logo
An Eerily Familiar 20th-Century Hoax

An Eerily Familiar 20th-Century Hoax

Yahoo12-05-2025

When the influencer Katie Sorensen posted on Instagram about the less than 'clean cut' Latino couple who she said tried to kidnap her children outside a Bay Area Michaels in 2020, she credited her kids' safety to 'the absolute grace of God.' The video, viewed more than 4 million times, was eventually found to be a hoax: The accused couple had not interacted with Sorensen's children at all.
The Sorensen scandal seems, on the surface, to be a uniquely contemporary event—involving social media, child-trafficking panic, and even essential oils (Sorensen was an 'independent wellness advocate' who sold products through the multi-level marketing company doTERRA)—but a similar incident occurred almost 100 years earlier.
In May 1926, the world-famous evangelist Aimee Semple McPherson vanished; she was last seen ducking into the ocean near Santa Monica for a swim. Weeks later, she turned up in Mexico with a sordid tale of abduction. Like Sorensen, McPherson was a white woman living in California who'd built a career on her openness and accessibility. She also blamed the kidnapping on a Latino couple, in this case invented characters named Felipe and Mexicali Rose, who, along with a white man named Steve, she said kept her locked in a shack in Mexico for more than a month. After her return, McPherson claimed that the devil had arranged her kidnapping to thwart her good works, but God had intervened.
Sorensen's story ended tidily: She was given a short jail sentence for making a false report of a crime. But obscurity wasn't an option for McPherson. She was too famous—and too good at being famous—to fade.
Claire Hoffman begins Sister, Sinner, her new biography of McPherson, with a play-by-play description of the day the evangelist went missing. The hoax was probably the most significant event in McPherson's action-packed life, and the intricacies of the ensuing legal proceedings (a grand jury investigated the incident, and McPherson faced three charges, including conspiracy to 'pervert or obstruct justice') make up the bulk of Hoffman's fascinating, frustrating book.
More than the eerie parallels of their hoaxes kept me thinking about Sorensen as I read Sister, Sinner. In some ways, McPherson's whole life seemed to me like the tale of a proto-influencer: As a multihyphenate (mega-church founder, writer, radio star), she was keenly ambitious, technologically adventurous, aware of her brand but studiously authentic. She showed enough vulnerability to make her followers feel connected to her, to feel that with her guidance they might be able to shed illness, sinful habits, and psychic malaise. A better world was possible for those who liked and subscribed.
[Read: Beware the weepy influencers]
McPherson was born Aimee Elizabeth Kennedy in rural Ontario, Canada, in 1890 to a mother who was deeply involved in the fledgling Salvation Army, the temperance-focused British missionary movement that had recently arrived in North America. When she was 17, she married a Pentecostal missionary from Ireland named Robert Semple and traveled with him to evangelize in China, where they both contracted malaria. McPherson, who was at that point eight months pregnant, survived, but Semple died, leaving her a widow and new mother stranded halfway around the world from anyone she knew.
McPherson raised money preaching and used it to travel to New York, where her mother, by then separated from McPherson's father and working full-time for the Salvation Army, lived. While her mother stayed home with baby Roberta, McPherson rang the organization's brass bell in the lobbies of Broadway theaters, asking members of the crowds 'Are you saved?' One day, a man named Harold McPherson stopped to answer her, and not long after, the two married. As Hoffman writes, Harold believed that once they had a child together, McPherson would put the energy that once went to sidewalk preaching into domestic life. Their son, Rolf, was born in 1913. And Harold was wrong.
Experiencing what might today be diagnosed as postpartum depression, McPherson was hospitalized and given a hysterectomy. As she fought to regain strength, Hoffman writes that McPherson heard a divine voice telling her 'GO! Do the work of an evangelist: Preach the Word.' McPherson waited until Harold was out of the house one night, grabbed her children, and left. For the next five years, she toured the country as a tent revivalist, sharing the good news.
In McPherson's age, preaching—not unlike the work of an influencer today—was a way for people, especially women, to gain social power and financial success without working a conventional job. McPherson also had the smarts to control the means of production. For instance, while canvassing the American South in her 'Gospel Car,' she published and sold her sermons in her proprietary magazine rather than letting other companies print them. As Hoffman writes of the rise of the steam-powered printing press: 'The creation of a mass media opened up the public sphere—suddenly anyone could be famous.'
But just because anyone could be famous didn't mean anyone would be. McPherson distinguished herself by creating her own feminine, even romantic, brand of proselytizing. 'Her tone was often girlish and innocent,' Hoffman writes about McPherson's magazine, The Bridal Call. 'Her prose was amorous, adjective-laden, and woozily swooning.' McPherson 'emphasized her fallibility, always—she was prideful and prone to make foolish mistakes, but all of this made her more adorable and magnetic.' As a mother, she was relatable to many women, and her habitual white nurse's costume conveyed both a purity and a medical training that she did not possess. Over the top yet self-aware, giddy, and relatable, McPherson was what today's TikTok user might call a 'Gospel Girly.'
As McPherson's fame grew, she eventually decided to settle down in a city that she could tell was on the rise: Los Angeles. Although McPherson often encouraged a return to a simpler, more traditional way of life—she spoke in her sermons about her wholesome upbringing on a farm—she wanted to be in the middle of the cultural and technological revolution sweeping Southern California. In L.A., McPherson became one of the first women to hold a radio license in the United States. Using giant radio towers perched above the Angelus Temple, the megachurch she founded, she gave sermons, administered faith healing over the air, and invited powerful political figures to join her in bemoaning the degeneracy of modern life. Broadcasting content about how good things used to be on a thoroughly modern communication platform represents a paradox readers might find familiar—consider the rise of the social-media tradwife.
[Read: MomTok is the apotheosis of 21st-century womanhood]
The centerpiece of Hoffman's book is the kidnapping scandal itself, and the frenzied grand-jury hearing that resulted. As holes appeared in McPherson's story, the prosecution discovered her close relationship with her married audio engineer, and found witnesses who reported seeing them in a secluded beachside cabin. Hoffman's recounting of the hearing is meticulous, but the deeper the book delved into the proceedings, the more I noticed something surprising about her approach—a notable reluctance to offer an opinion of McPherson's conduct or character. Despite the plethora of detail, the book has a curious and, to me, unnerving lack of perspective.
A certain amount of empathy for one's subject might be of value in a biographer, and Hoffman conveys a sense of the difficulties that McPherson faced leading up to her disappearance. Her revival services were attended by enormous crowds, all hungry for her personal touch. She would stay onstage for hours, exhausting herself to minister to all. At times, Hoffman blames the pressures McPherson experienced on the uniquely difficult position of being a woman in the public eye—the book has, with good reason, a certain 'Leave Aimee Alone' energy—but it refuses to pass any judgment on her actions.
McPherson's stunt, whatever its motives, had real human costs. During the search for her body in the Pacific, a diver died of hypothermia; another woman, a disciple of McPherson's, drowned in the ocean, hoping to meet her spiritual leader in death. McPherson also weaponized anti-Latino racism, calling to mind the actions of Katie Sorensen and Sherri Papini, another Californian who claimed in 2016 to have been kidnapped by two Latina women while actually visiting an ex-boyfriend. (Papini pleaded guilty to mail fraud and making false statements, and was sentenced to 18 months in prison.)
After she returned to Los Angeles, McPherson gave an interview to the Los Angeles Times, in which she described the way she had been treated by the press with regard to the hoax: 'Either I am a good woman, or I am the most terrible, unspeakable person in the whole world. There is no half-way ground in a situation like that.' The idea that famous women tend to be either lionized or vilified certainly hasn't grown less accurate over the past century. But because Hoffman refuses to condemn McPherson, her book sometimes implies, whether intentionally or not, that she is too fragile to withstand scrutiny. There is indeed a halfway ground in a situation like this, and I wish Hoffman had pushed harder to find it.
The charges against McPherson were ultimately dropped. In the years following the scandal, McPherson continued to preach, while also building a career as a celebrity who appeared at events and on the radio. She tried to work in the movie business but had to settle for something closer to being a reality star. In an interview with Mockingbird magazine, Hoffman said that she 'thought a lot about grace' while writing her book. Grace, in contemporary internet parlance, often means forgiveness. Influencers ask to be 'given grace' when they screw up in the ways that are perhaps inevitable when you are sharing your emotions around the clock for money. But in Christian theology, grace isn't something you receive as a result of your contrition or your sincerity. It is free and undeserved, impossible to earn. Grace can't be given by people online, or by authors to the people they write about. It is God's job alone. The rest of us can stand to be more opinionated.
Article originally published at The Atlantic

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Virginia radio host Brandon Stokes arrested for allegedly trying to drunkenly enter crime scene
Virginia radio host Brandon Stokes arrested for allegedly trying to drunkenly enter crime scene

New York Post

time42 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Virginia radio host Brandon Stokes arrested for allegedly trying to drunkenly enter crime scene

A beloved Virginia radio personality was accused of attempting to drive drunkenly through a crime scene where law enforcement was investigating an officer-involved shooting. Brandon Stokes, known by his stage name as 'Shaggy' on Virginia Beach's Z104, allegedly showed signs of intoxication as he tried to enter a closed-off area surrounded by law enforcement in Virginia Beach on Wednesday around 9:30 a.m., 13 News Now reported. At the time, the Virginia Beach Police Department blocked off the area when they were investigating an unrelated officer-involved shooting that happened the same morning. 5 Brandon Stokes was arrested on Wednesday and charged with DUI and obstruction of justice. Virginia Beach Sheriff's Office Officers reportedly fired at a suspect — identified as 18-year-old Shaun Marlar — who was holding a replica gun outside of a self-storage business, according to 10 WAVY. Marlar was allegedly attempting to break into a car at a daycare facility near the storage business when police confronted him. Authorities shot Marlar when the teen pointed the replica firearm. The 43-year-old radio personality, who owns a roller skating rink just feet away from where the shooting happened, said he had property nearby and insisted that he was 'allowed to drive through,' according to court records reviewed by the outlet. Officers repeatedly told Stokes that he could not enter, but the disc jockey would not take no for an answer. Stokes reportedly became 'belligerent' and slurred his words while cussing at the law enforcement officers on scene. 5 Stokes reportedly was trying to drive up to his business, a roller skating rink, near the crime scene. WTKR 3 One officer noticed a strong smell of booze on his breath and Stokes agreed to take a preliminary breath test. The results showed a reported blood alcohol concentration of 0.18, which is more than twice the legal limit in Virginia. Stokes was taken into custody. 5 Stokes is a morning show host for Z104. Courtesy 5 Stokes invited inmates to perform their work live in the studio nearly one year ago. Facebook/Virginia Beach Sheriff's Office He's since bonded out and the on-air personality was back in the studio to host his morning show the following day. 'THURSDAY – RUMOR IS IT'S GONNA RAIN TODAY,' the host captioned on an Instagram story posted Thursday. The video on his Instagram showed a quick look inside the studio. He later assured his fans that everything was okay in a short post on his DJ Facebook page. 'Promise you all is well.. I'm good. – happy Thursday,' the post read. 5 The DJ partnered with local law enforcement to promote a program that helped inmates create music last June. Facebook/Virginia Beach Sheriff's Office The Post reached out to Stokes and his radio station for comment. The DJ's arrest came nearly one year after he teamed up with the Virginia Beach Sheriff's Office to feature a program that allowed inmates to create original music. Marlar is in critical, but stable condition after the shooting. He was charged with two counts of assault on a law enforcement officer and three counts of brandishing. 'I don't know. My heart is broken. I don't know what to say about that. You know, I'm terrified for the people that he had an effect on, and I'm terribly sorry for what they've gone through, but super glad that nobody got hurt,' Marlar's dad told the outlet. 'He's got to know the consequences for what he has done and get some help. He is not a bad or mean person. He just struggles.'

Authorities investigating a new social media post by a New Orleans jail escapee on the run

timean hour ago

Authorities investigating a new social media post by a New Orleans jail escapee on the run

NEW ORLEANS -- Authorities announced Thursday they are investigating another social media post, the second in a week, showing a man who identifies himself as Antoine Massey, a fugitive still on the lam after escaping more than two weeks ago from a New Orleans jail. The latest Instagram post, which appears to have been published Wednesday, shows a man standing in front of a blue car who says he is '#AntoineMassey' and has the same distinctive facial tattoos. Authorities are not sure when or where the photo reportedly showing Massey was taken. But they 'are treating the post as if it's real,' a senior law enforcement official said. The official spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because the official was not authorized to publicly discuss the ongoing investigation into the May 16 escape by 10 inmates. The group yanked up a faulty cell door, crawled through a hole in a wall behind a toilet where steel bars had been cut and then scaled a barbed wire fence using blankets for protection. It was one of the largest jailbreaks in recent U.S. history. State and local officials have heaped criticism on the management of Orleans Parish Sheriff Susan Hutson, who has largely blamed the jailbreak on poor infrastructure and the inability to make needed improvements at the 10-year-old $150 million facility. Eight of the escaped men have been apprehended, while Massey and another fugitive, convicted murderer Derrick Groves, remain on the run. In the Instagram post, the person claiming to be Massey states he is 'innocent.' Massey, 32, faces charges of kidnapping, rape, domestic battery involving strangulation and motor vehicle theft. 'We would encourage Mr. Massey to turn himself in and go through proper legal channels for his day in court,' said Deputy U.S. Marshal Brian Fair in an emailed statement. He added it was 'unknown at this time' if Massey posted the photo or when it was taken. Earlier this week, other videos made by Massey surfaced on social media, leading authorities to raid a New Orleans home a little over two miles (three kilometers) from the jail, where they believed the videos were produced. But they said they only found some of the clothing they believed he wore in the videos. Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry urged Massey and Groves on Tuesday to 'quit the hide-and-seek game' and turn themselves in.

Miles Hudson found guilty on 2 counts of reckless driving in Seattle
Miles Hudson found guilty on 2 counts of reckless driving in Seattle

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Miles Hudson found guilty on 2 counts of reckless driving in Seattle

The Brief A jury found Miles Hudson, notoriously known as the "Belltown Hellcat," guilty of reckless driving and reckless driving racing in Seattle between December 1, 2023, and February 24, 2024. On the stand, Hudson claimed the viral street racing video was a staged and edited Need for Speed–style skit for his Instagram audience, asserting the car never actually reached 107 mph as shown in the Instagram video he posted. Despite Hudson's claim of video editing and performance art, jurors were swayed by police testimony and video evidence allegedly showing real-life dangerous driving through Seattle's public streets. SEATTLE - The Seattle Municipal Court jury has reached a verdict in the highly publicized case of Miles Hudson, finding the 22-year-old social media personality, guilty on both counts of reckless driving and reckless driving racing. The incidents in question took place between December 1, 2023, and February 24, 2024, on the streets of downtown Seattle and the Belltown neighborhood. Hudson, known to his hundreds of thousands of online followers as the "Belltown Hellcat," was charged after multiple videos surfaced showing his uniquely painted black and beige Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat — alleged to be driven by Hudson — speeding, weaving through traffic, and appearing to engage in street racing. Prosecutors argued that the conduct posed a serious public safety threat and was glamorized online for social media content. What we know The city presented three witnesses — two Seattle Police Department officers and a detective — who testified about the danger and illegality of the high-speed maneuvers depicted in Hudson's online videos. Footage showed cars revving engines, performing maneuvers in downtown intersections and reaching speeds upwards of 100 mph. One critical piece of evidence was a video clip allegedly showing a speedometer reading of 107 mph. The prosecution argued this was proof of street racing and reckless endangerment in a busy urban area. Hudson took the stand in his own defense Tuesday, denying that he ever raced or reached those speeds. Instead, he characterized the videos as "skits," designed as content for his Instagram page, SRT Miles. "It's like a movie. You saw the final result of me and the homies," Hudson testified. "We staged some Need for Speed stuff … it's entertainment." Miles Hudson Hudson claimed that what appeared to be speeding was achieved through video editing, using tools like Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve. He explained that a "dynamic mask" was used to overlay the speedometer, fabricating the 107 mph readout. He also said the sound effects were added in post-production. The defense emphasized that many of the scenes were scripted and rehearsed, and that props like Nerf guns and ski masks were used to enhance the illusion of intensity. However, the jury was not persuaded. What they're saying After a brief deliberation, the jury returned with a guilty verdict on both counts. Judge Melanie Tratnik, who presided over the trial following a last-minute reassignment from Judge Andrew Simons, set a sentencing date of July 7. Although Hudson's attorney asked the court to lift his home monitoring requirement, the judge declined to change the terms of his release. Hudson will remain on electronic home monitoring, and restrictions on his social media use will also stay in effect until his sentencing on July 7. What we don't know It is unknown if Hudson's attorney, Sheley Anderson, will appeal the verdict. City Prosecutor, Christopher Karr, led the case for the city of Seattle. Hudson's sentencing is expected on Monday, July 7. He could face fines, license suspension, mandatory driving courses or even jail time, depending on the judge's decision. This case has sparked broader conversations about Seattle's new reckless driving law and social media's influence on risky behavior, especially among young car enthusiasts. The Source Information in this story came from the Seattle Municipal Court and FOX 13 Seattle original reporting. Bodies of 3 missing Wenatchee, WA girls found, father wanted for murder 'I am in a lot of pain': Lakewood, WA mass shooting survivors being released from hospitals Alaska Airlines announces nonstop flight from Seattle to Rome WATCH: TikTok video of woman digging for geoduck in WA goes viral Carnation fed up with traffic from Remlinger Farms concerts To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily FOX Seattle Newsletter. Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national news.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store