
Kirsten Gillibrand apologizes to Zohran Mamdani over ‘jihad' claim
'Gillibrand apologized for mischaracterizing Mamdani's record and for her tone on the call,' according to a readout of a phone call between Gillibrand and Mamdani that was obtained by Politico.
The apology comes after an interview the Democratic senator gave to the Brian Lehrer radio show last week in which Gillibrand was asked if she would hold Mamdani accountable for 'glorifying' Hamas.
That was prompted by an ongoing controversy over Mamdani – who would become New York City's first Muslim mayor if he wins the election – declining to condemn the phrase 'globalize the intifada' while also emphasizing that he plans, if elected, to be a mayor 'that protects Jewish New Yorkers'.
Gillibrand said in the interview that Jewish New Yorkers were alarmed by Mamdani's statements. While there is no evidence that Mamdani supports the Palestinian militant group, the city has been host to scores of pro-Palestinian protests. Some critics have called them antisemitic.
Reacting to a listener's call-in question, Gillibrand said she would like to talk through the issues with Mamdani and that he should denounce the phrase 'globalize the intifada'.
Gillibrand said that her constituents in upstate New York were 'alarmed' by Mamdani's past public statements, 'particularly references to global jihad. This is a very serious issue because people that glorify the slaughter of Jews create fear in our communities.'
Mamdani argues that the phrase 'globalize the intifada' has been deliberately misinterpreted to smear him and others who stand up for Palestinian rights.
He also said in an MSNBC interview that comments like Gillibrand's represented 'a language of darkness and a language of exclusion'.
Mamdani supporters have protested outside Gillibrand's office and called for her resignation.
'I find it disgusting that someone who is one of the most powerful people in this country would repeat rightwing talking points to diminish' Mamdani, said the New York state representative Emily Gallagher.
Gillibrand's comments also appeared to be rebuked by New York's governor, Kathy Hochul, who said, 'no one should be subjected to any comments that slur their ethnicity, their religious beliefs, and we condemn that anywhere it rears its head in the state of New York.'
Gillibrand had earlier backed away from her comment, releasing a statement on Friday saying she 'misspoke'.
In Gillibrand's call with Mamdani, they 'discussed the need to bring down the temperature around the issue' of the war between Israel and Hamas, and that she 'regretted not separating her own views from the radio show caller's more clearly'.
'Gillibrand said she believes Mr Mamdani is sincere when he says he wants to protect all New Yorkers and combat antisemitism,' the readout continued. 'She said the GOP attacks on him are outrageous and unacceptable.'
Those attacks continued on Tuesday when Donald Trump reasserted an earlier statement branding Mamdani as a communist, which Mamdani denies, and threatened to cut off federal funds to New York City if Mamdani becomes mayor and 'doesn't behave himself'.
'We don't need a communist in this country, but if we have one, I'm going to be watching over him very carefully on behalf of the nation. We send him money, we send him all the things that he needs to run a government,' Trump said.
Trump also made a baseless allegation that Mamdani, 33, who was born in Uganda to ethnic Indian parents and became a US citizen in 2018, obtained his citizenship 'illegally'.
The Trump administration is engaged in an aggressive effort to deport foreign-born citizens convicted of certain offenses, and Mamdani has pledged to maintain New York City as a 'sanctuary' city that resists federal deportation efforts.
Eric Adams, the incumbent mayor who is running as an independent in November's election, has said the city would not stand in the way of immigration authorities. 'The federal government is in charge of immigration enforcement, but we are not gonna collaborate with civil enforcement, and we're gonna encourage people to not live in fear and go on with their lives,' he said last month.
According to a Bloomberg report this week, more than 1,900 people have been arrested in New York City by federal immigration authorities since Trump's inauguration, a 31% increase from the same period last year, according to figures obtained by the Deportation Data Project, which is so far a smaller percentage rise than in Los Angeles (112%), Chicago (97%) and Miami (238%).
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
22 minutes ago
- Metro
What is Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' and what does it mean for Americans?
President Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' has cleared multiple hurdles and passed in Congress and is on its way to his desk to be signed into law. The House passed Trump's signature domestic policy bill 218-214 on Thursday, with Representatives Brian Fitzpatrick and Thomas Massie being the only Republicans who joined Democrats in opposing it. Trump set a July 4 deadline for the bill to reach his desk and his Republican allies delivered, with House Speaker Mike Johnson in particular succeeding in flipping dozens of members who hand planned to vote against it. The president is set to sign his bill at 5pm on Friday while celebrating the Fourth of July at the White House. Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' is a massive spending and tax bill with his signature policies. It will extend his 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was set to expire at the end of 2025. It will make many tax cuts permanent and boost funding for defense, border security and producing energy. To offset those costs the bill makes cuts to programs like Medicaid health insurance for low-income and disabled Americans, and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) food aid. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the bill would add $3.4trillion to the federal deficit and leave nearly 12million Americans without health coverage over the next decade. But the Trump administration has contested that and claim that it would decrease the deficit by more than $5trillion. Immigrants including refugees, asylees and victims of sex trafficking and domestic violence may no longer qualify for federal benefits like Medicaid and food stamps. Additionally, immigrants would have to pay more for programs like work authorization and Temporary Protected Status. The bill puts aside $45billion to detain undocumented people taken into custody by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). It provides $46.5billion for border wall construction, making up the amount that Trump was not able to secure for the project during his first term. The passage of the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' represents Trump's first major legislative win in his second term, and he touted it as 'the biggest bill of its kind ever signed' in the US. Speaking to reporters at Joint Base Andrews late afternoon Thursday, Trump confirmed that he will be signing the bill surrounded by lawmakers including Johnson and that military aircraft will be flying over the White House as part of a July 4 celebration. 'It's going to be a great day,' he said. 'So we'll be signing with those beautiful planes flying right over our heads.' Elon Musk, who served as Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) chief, has been criticising the bill ever since his departure from the White House, and that caused a big feud to happen between the two billionaires. More Trending The Tesla CEO has denied Trump's claim that he is upset because the bill eliminates federal tax credits for purchasing electric vehicles, and said he is against it because it 'pork-filled' and will drive up the deficit. On Wednesday, Musk appeared to take a break from firing shots at Trump and gave him 'credit where credit is due' on his work to try to resolve conflicts and wars around the world. Hours after the bill cleared Congress, Musk remained silent on the bill on his X platform. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Convenience store worker dies after 'manager sat on and suffocated her' MORE: Hundreds of blueberry boxes recalled over 'severe' listeria warning in the US MORE: Fact check: Is the US using planes for deportations to throw people into the ocean?


The Independent
35 minutes ago
- The Independent
How the ‘Big, Beautiful Bill' will affect grad student loans
The House of Representatives is advancing the GOP's 'Big Beautiful Bill', which is set to significantly alter how graduate students finance their higher education. The bill proposes eliminating the federal Grad PLUS loan program starting July 2026, replacing it with increased but potentially insufficient limits on federal Stafford loans. Graduate students would face annual borrowing limits of $20,500 and a lifetime cap $100,000, while professional students could borrow up to $50,000 annually $200,000 lifetime maximum. Critics warn the changes could force students into private loans, deter them from pursuing advanced degrees, and exacerbate shortages in high-demand sectors like rural healthcare. While Republicans argue the limits will help control college costs, President Donald Trump is scheduled to sign the bill, which will also affect borrowers on the Biden-era SAVE plan from next summer.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Former CBS anchor slams Paramount settlement with Trump: ‘It was a sellout'
A former CBS News anchor and 60 minutes correspondent, Dan Rather, has blasted the $16m settlement between Paramount, the parent company of CBS News, and Donald Trump, calling it a 'sad day for journalism'. 'It's a sad day for 60 Minutes and CBS News,' Rather, a veteran journalist who was a CBS News anchor for over 20 years, told Variety in an interview published on Wednesday. 'I hope people will read the details of this and understand what it was. It was distortion by the president and a kneeling down and saying, 'yes, sir,' by billionaire corporate owners.' Last November, Trump sued CBS News, claiming that the network's interview with the Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris, had been doctored to portray her in a favorable light – which he alleged amounted to 'election interference'. Many legal experts had widely dismissed the lawsuit as 'meritless' and unlikely to hold up under the first amendment, but on Wednesday Paramount announced that it had agreed to pay Trump $16m to settle the case over the interview that was broadcast on the CBS News program 60 Minutes. The settlement comes as Paramount is preparing for a $8bn merger with Skydance Media, which requires approval from the US Federal Communications Commission. Paramount has said that the lawsuit is separate from the company's merger. A spokesperson for Trump's legal team said in a statement to the Guardian that 'With this record settlement, President Donald J. Trump delivers another win for the American people as he, once again, holds the Fake News media accountable for their wrongdoing and deceit. 'CBS and Paramount Global realized the strength of this historic case and had no choice but to settle,' the spokesperson added. According to Wednesday's announcement, the settlement funds will not be paid to Trump directly, but instead would be allocated to Trump's future presidential library. The settlement did not include an apology. Rather told Variety on Wednesday that in his opinion 'you settle a lawsuit when you've done something wrong' and '60 minutes did nothing wrong, it followed accepted journalistic practices'. 'Lawyers almost unanimously said the case wouldn't stand up in court,' he said. Ultimately though, Rather said he was disappointed but not surprised by the settlement. 'Big billionaire businesspeople make decisions about money,' he said. 'We could always hope that they will make an exception when it comes to freedom of the press, but it wasn't to be. 'Trump knew if he put the pressure on and threatened and just held that they would fold, because there's too much money on the table,' Rather said. 'Trump is now forcing a whole news organization to pay millions of dollars for doing something protected by the constitution – which is, of course, free and independent reporting. Now, you take today's sellout. And that's what it was: It was a sellout to extortion by the president. Who can now say where all this ends?' He continued: 'It has to do with not just journalism, but more importantly, with the country as a whole. What kind of country we're going to have, what kind of country we're going to be. If major news organizations continue to kneel before power and stop trying to hold the powerful accountable, then we all lose.' In his more than 60 years in journalism, Rather told Variety he had never seen the profession face the kind of challenges as those it faces today. 'Journalism has had its trials and tribulations before, and it takes courage to just soldier on,' Rather said. 'Keep trying, keep fighting. It takes guts to do that. And I know the people at CBS News, and particularly those at 60 Minutes, they'll do their dead level best under these circumstances. But the question is what [is] this development and the message it sends to us. And that's what I'm trying to concentrate on.'