logo
Top jockey stood down as disturbing video of Noel Callow racially abusing Indigenous man emerges

Top jockey stood down as disturbing video of Noel Callow racially abusing Indigenous man emerges

News.com.au4 days ago
WARNING: This article contains offensive language
Group 1-winning jockey Noel Callow has been charged by racing stewards and stood down from riding after a disturbing video emerged of him ridiculing an Indigenous man.
On Friday, the Queensland Racing Integrity Commission charged the controversial jockey with two charges of conduct prejudicial to the image of racing, after a video of the 50-year-old, recorded in Darwin last year, surfaced online in which he filmed himself racially abusing Indigenous people.
The video shows Callow striking up a conversation with an Aboriginal man he passed on the street, offering him some pizza, before the seemingly friendly conversation turned offensive.
'What's doing, crackers?' Callow says, before asking, 'Have you showered? F*** you stink like f***.'
You can watch the video in the player above
The man says back, 'Nah, I haven't got a job (inaudible).'
'You stink like f***. Have some pizza. Take the pizza. Eat. Eat the pizza,' Callow continues.
'I don't want to eat,' the man responded.
'Have a shower then, do me a favour. Have a shower. You stink like f***,' Callow said.
The chat continues.
Man: '(inaudible) I sleep on the street.'
Callow: 'So you don't want a pizza … what do you want?'
Man: 'I want a beer.'
Callow: 'You want a beer … if you have a shower, I'll buy you a beer.'
Man: '(inaudible) I don't have a shower. There's no shower in the friggin area.'
Callow: 'Well, jump in the f---ing creek … for f--- sake man.'
And acting swiftly on Friday evening, the Queensland Racing Integrity Commission (QRIC) stood the veteran hoop down effective immediately.
'The Queensland Racing Integrity Commission (QRIC) has today convened a Stewards' Inquiry and issued two charges under Australian Rule of Racing AR 228(a) against licensed jockey Mr Noel Callow,' a QRIC statement reads.
'The charges relate to conduct alleged to have occurred approximately one year ago while Mr Callow was not riding at, or attending, a race meeting and was not at any racecourse.
'It is alleged Mr Callow engaged in conduct prejudicial to the image of racing.
'Acting under AR 23(a), the Stewards have suspended Mr Callow's jockey licence in full, pending the outcome of the inquiry. Mr Callow has been informed of his right of appeal in respect of this decision.
'QRIC takes matters concerning conduct, welfare, and integrity seriously and will continue to ensure all participants are held to the highest professional and behavioural standards.'
Callow – with five Group 1s to his name in Australia – had only just returned to riding after being banned for a physical altercation with fellow Group 1 winning jockey Kyle Wilson-Taylor in the jockeys' room during a race meeting in the Queensland winter carnival.
After more than two months out of the saddle, Callow made a winning return to racing this week when riding Stormfront to victory in Darwin for Gold Coast trainer Peter Robl.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NSW Labor government unsuccesful in condemnation of independent MP Mark Latham
NSW Labor government unsuccesful in condemnation of independent MP Mark Latham

ABC News

time6 hours ago

  • ABC News

NSW Labor government unsuccesful in condemnation of independent MP Mark Latham

Mark Latham has escaped parliamentary condemnation after the former federal Labor leader was accused of sharing secret government information. The NSW Labor Party put forward a condemnation motion against Mr Latham after accusing him of "disclosing authorised information" under parliamentary privilege about a fellow MP. But the motion was adjourned after being blocked by the opposition until October 13. The condemnation was defeated 22 to 16 after a fiery debate. It is alleged Mr Latham referenced confidential information from a psychologist's report prepared for the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT) in proceedings brought by independent MP Alex Greenwich, a claim Mr Latham denied. On Tuesday night, he told the chamber that the remarks were based on publicly available information, including several affidavits signed by Mr Greenwich. "This is not a state secret," he said of the information. He said when he viewed the information, it was only under a non-publication order, not formally under parliamentary privilege. During the debate, Mr Latham went on to further criticise Mr Greenwich and journalists present at the NCAT hearing. He said if he had the chance, he would share the information again. Penny Sharpe, leader of the government in the upper house, moved the motion to condemn the independent MP. Ms Sharpe said that revealing deeply personal medical records about a fellow member meant the house should take a stand over Mr Latham's use of parliamentary privilege. "If you don't draw this line, I don't know what line you are going to draw," Ms Sharpe said, calling on her parliamentary colleagues to support the condemnation. However, Mr Latham again insisted he had not broken standing orders in parliament. Despite the failure of the condemnation motion, Mr Latham was later successfully referred to the Privileges Committee over the alleged sharing of information in a privileged report by the NSW Police Force in a separate incident. On the prospects of a parliamentary committee investigation into his actions on that matter, which relates to former police commissioner Karen Webb, Mr Latham said: "Bring it on." "I'm happy for these things to go to privilege … I wouldn't mind if this matter went to the High Court," Mr Latham said. Last month, it was revealed Mr Latham's former partner, Nathalie Matthews, had sought an apprehended violence order against him in a NSW court, with media reports that she accused him of a "sustained pattern" of abuse and pressuring her into "degrading" sex acts. The independent MP has vowed to defend himself in court, and labelled Ms Matthews's claims as "comically false and ridiculous". Police are not investigating the matter. In the wake of the application being made public, it also emerged that Mr Latham had sent disparaging photos and comments about some female MPs to Ms Matthews, which he said was part of an "in-joke" taken out of context. He has apologised to the MPs at the centre of the photos, describing them as "ill-advised". Mr Latham released a lengthy public statement last month, addressing allegations of inappropriate behaviour in state parliament.

Former WA Police officer Gary Edward Fitzgerald has charges of improper sexual relationship dropped
Former WA Police officer Gary Edward Fitzgerald has charges of improper sexual relationship dropped

ABC News

time6 hours ago

  • ABC News

Former WA Police officer Gary Edward Fitzgerald has charges of improper sexual relationship dropped

A former WA Police officer accused of having an improper relationship with a 16-year-old girl has had the case against him dropped during his trial. Gary Edward Fitzgerald was a serving officer when he started a sexual relationship with the girl about 25 years ago, after meeting her during his policing duties. The prosecution alleged the girl, who was over 16, could not give consent to sex because she was under his authority. Mr Fitzgerald was charged with five counts of sexual penetration of a child over 16, under their care, supervision, or authority. But the prosecution has been discontinued in the District Court. Prosecutor Danya Borkowski said there had been legal discussions regarding the element of "care, supervision, or authority". "We concluded that we were unable to establish that element to the standard of beyond a reasonable doubt," she told the court. Judge Michael Bowden told the jury the discontinuance had been accepted by the court. "This is a court of law, not of morality," he told the jurors. He said it would only have been an offence if the sexual relationship was with a girl aged over 16 who was under care, supervision, or authority. The court heard from the complainant on Monday, who had described sexual encounters in detail, including threesomes, and sex in the interview room of Fremantle Police Station. The defence lawyer had put it to her that the sex in the police station did not happen, to which she responded: "That's completely incorrect." She told the court the sex they had was consensual and there was a "mutual attraction" from the time they first met, which led to flirtatious phone messages, including sexual innuendo. The pair first met when Mr Fitzgerald attended the teenager's home on duty, when her housemate was reported to have run away. The complainant said the sexual relationship stopped when she was about 17, and "definitely" was not continuing when she was 18. But she admitted that Mr Fitzgerald never presented himself as her "personal on-call police officer", and the sex had nothing to do with any ongoing investigation.

Roxanne Tickle says Sall Grover must pay damages for misgendering her in 50 media interviews
Roxanne Tickle says Sall Grover must pay damages for misgendering her in 50 media interviews

The Australian

time7 hours ago

  • The Australian

Roxanne Tickle says Sall Grover must pay damages for misgendering her in 50 media interviews

Giggle app founder Sall Grover should have to pay hefty damages to trans woman Roxanne Tickle because she 'misgendered her' in media interviews, Ms Tickle's legal team has pleaded in a ­bombshell submission to the Federal Court. In a submission which, if ­accepted, would have far-reaching implications for free speech, Ms Tickle's lawyers argued that Ms Grover's description of Ms Tickle as a man in at least 50 interviews should make her liable for 'significant' aggravated damages. Ms Grover is appealing a decision by judge Robert Bromwich that she indirectly discriminated against Ms Tickle by rejecting her from the Giggle for Girls female-only networking app because she appeared to be a man. Justice Bromwich had awarded $10,000 damages because Ms Grover had laughed in court at a satirical piece of merchandise – a scented candle – which appeared to mock Ms Tickle. Ms Tickle is also appealing parts of Justice Bromwich's decision, asking for a finding of direct rather than indirect discrimination and that the damages be increased to at least $40,000. Ms Tickle had sought $200,000 in damages at the previous trial. The Giggle v Tickle appeal has gained global attention, with author and prominent women's rights activist J.K. Rowling expressing support for Ms Grover in an overnight post on social media platform X. Rowling retweeted a post by Ms Grover of The Australian's story revealing a submission by the Sex Discrimination Commissioner that trans women 'should have legal protections available to pregnant or potentially women'. Ms Grover had captioned the post: 'This is how insane gender ideology is.' Rowling also sent her support to Ms Grover. 'Good luck, Sall. May the best woman (haha) win x,' she wrote in a post on X. On Tuesday, counsel for Ms Tickle, Briana Goding, said the $10,000 damages award was insufficient, in part because the beliefs Ms Grover held privately were also being made publicly and expressed in dozens of media interviews. 'There was evidence that Ms Grover had participated in some 50 interviews in relation to this case, and in each of those she used the male pronouns for Ms Tickle, and that on at least 10 occasions she referred to being scared or threatened or harassed by Ms Tickle,' Ms Goding said. Ms Grover's conduct 'has at the very least been seriously ­aggravating and has caused Ms Tickle injured feelings', Ms Goding said. 'The aggravation and ­injured feelings have mounted up, blow by blow.' Ms Goding said Justice Bromwich had found the satirical candle to be so offensive that he didn't repeat the content in his written judgment. 'However, it's our submission that His Honour ought to have gone beyond that single act of laughing in court and awarded ­aggravated damages for much broader conduct in the ­proceedings. Those matters included the statement that Ms Tickle was a man, but should also include the fact that in her opening submissions Ms Grover and Giggle stated they 'do not know, and cannot admit, whether the applicant is a natural person capable of being sued in the name of Roxanne Tickle'. 'This is not just a delegitimising of gender, but a delegitimising of humanity,' Ms Goding said. 'There's further, the overall conduct of crowd funding for the case using the demeaning ­material, the promoting of others to purchase material from the Etsy store as well as the laughing in court,' Ms Goding said. Ms Grover has previously stated that she did not have any role in producing or selling the candle merchandise. Ms Goding asked the appeal court to reject Justice Bromwich's finding that Ms Grover's views were genuinely held and bona fide because of the 'continued public misgendering and denial of gender identity of Ms Tickle'. 'This is not a case of asking anyone to change their opinions, it is not policing the opinions that someone can hold,' Ms Goding argued. Given the purpose of the Sex Discrimination Act in eliminating gender identity discrimination, the 'continued misgendering of Ms Tickle' could not be considered bona fide, proper or justifiable, she said. Earlier in the hearing, Ms Tickle's legal team had contested Ms Grover's claim that her rejection of Ms Tickle from the app was on the basis of her perceived sex – that she appeared to be a man – not because she was transgender. 'It was proved that not only did Giggle have a policy of excluding transgender women, they did ­exclude transgender women, and not only Ms Tickle,' said Georgina Costello KC, also ­appearing for Ms Tickle. 'Ms Grover has a policy that is not a secret. In fact, it's spoken about with some confidence and pride,' she said. 'Ms Tickle provided a selfie to the Giggle app in which she had a low-cut T-shirt on and a female haircut. She used the name Roxy, and that's important because they now say that they didn't know she was a transgender woman. We say that you shouldn't accept that evidence. 'The fact that (Ms Grover and Giggle) deny that they knew that Ms Tickle was a transgender woman when they excluded her from the app is not a defence to ­direct discrimination.' Counsel for Ms Grover, Noel Hutley SC, noted in relation to the demand for additional damages that the trial judge had found that although the denial of her gender identity had upset Ms Tickle, he was unable to attribute responsibility to Ms Grover for her ­'finding this exhausting and draining'. 'Ms Tickle's evidence as to loss or damage is slight, if not minimal, and does not rise higher than a modest degree of hurt,' Justice Bromwich found. Politics Treasurer's marathon consultation with Australia's business elite faces being relegated to a talkfest as government backs away from major economic reforms. Politics Jim Chalmers has abandoned major tax reform for his economic roundtable, instead focusing on deregulation and housing productivity amid rising business sector anxiety.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store