Microsoft is getting tougher on employees, and this 'ban' is proof
Microsoft
has implemented a new two-year rehire ban for employees forced out due to performance issues, signaling a significant shift in the company's approach to workforce management. According to internal documents viewed by Business Insider, the tech giant is also categorizing these departures as "
good attrition
,"essentially labeling certain employee exits as beneficial for the company.
This policy shift indicates Microsoft is deliberately tightening its internal standards, implementing formal mechanisms to prevent the return of employees whose performance didn't meet expectations, something the company had historically approached with more flexibility.
"Good attrition" metric tracks desirable employee departures
The newly introduced "good attrition" metric, similar to Amazon's controversial "unregretted attrition" approach, allows Microsoft to track and even celebrate the departure of employees it's happy to see leave. Business Insider reports that while specific targets for this metric haven't been established, it's already being reviewed at the executive level.
This approach signals Microsoft's intent to more aggressively manage out underperformers while preventing their return to the company—a strategy that aligns with Meta's practice of maintaining internal "do not rehire" lists.
Microsoft revamps performance management system
Microsoft is fundamentally restructuring its approach to performance management. Earlier this year, the company terminated 2,000 employees deemed underperformers without severance and implemented a new performance improvement plan (PIP) with what internal documents describe as "globally consistent" standards featuring "clear expectations and a timeline for improvement."
According to Business Insider's reporting, Microsoft employees facing performance issues now face a stark choice: enter the company's PIP program or accept a "Global Voluntary Separation Agreement" that includes a payout equal to 16 weeks of salary.
These changes mark a significant departure from Microsoft's previous management philosophy under CEO
Satya Nadella
, suggesting the company is moving away from its more employee-friendly reputation as it intensifies focus on efficiency and high performance metrics, similar to its industry peers, like Amazon and Meta.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Microsoft staff protests spark arrests amid review of Israel military ties
Worker-led protests erupted at Microsoft headquarters this week as the tech company promises an urgent review of the Israeli military's use of its technology during the ongoing war in Gaza. A second day of protests at the Microsoft campus on Wednesday called for the tech giant to immediately cut its business ties with Israel. The police department began making arrests after Microsoft said the protesters were trespassing. We said, Please leave or you will be arrested,' and they chose not to leave so they were detained, said police spokesperson Jill Green. Microsoft late last week said it was tapping a law firm to investigate allegations reported by British newspaper The Guardian that the Israeli Defense Forces used Microsoft's Azure cloud computing platform to store phone call data obtained through the mass surveillance of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank. Microsoft's standard terms of service prohibit this type of usage," the company said in a statement posted Friday, adding that the report raises precise allegations that merit a full and urgent review. The company said it will share the findings after law firm Covington & Burling completes its review. The promised review was insufficient for the employee-led No Azure for Apartheid group, which for months has protested Microsoft's supplying the Israeli military with technology used for its war against Hamas in Gaza. In February, The Associated Press revealed previously unreported details about the American tech giant's close partnership with the Israeli Ministry of Defence, with military use of commercial AI products skyrocketing by nearly 200 times after the deadly Oct 7, 2023, Hamas attack. The AP reported that the Israeli military uses Azure to transcribe, translate and process intelligence gathered through mass surveillance, which can then be cross-checked with Israel's in-house AI-enabled targeting systems. Following The AP's report, Microsoft acknowledged the military applications but said a review it commissioned found no evidence that its Azure platform and artificial intelligence technologies were used to target or harm people in Gaza. Microsoft did not share a copy of that review or say who conducted it. Microsoft in May fired an employee who interrupted a speech by CEO Satya Nadella to protest the contracts, and in April, fired two others who interrupted the company's 50th anniversary celebration.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
33 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Best of BS Opinion: Rolling the dice on gaming bans, AI rules, and growth
In the Mahabharata, Chausar was not mere entertainment but a test of foresight, nerve, and destiny. Dice in hand, pieces moving, fortunes shifting, the game carried the weight of unpredictability and choice. Each roll of dice carried the possibility of triumph or ruin, every move shaping the course of kingdoms. What made the game enduring was its blend of chance and calculation, a reminder that even the strongest warriors could falter when strategy met uncertainty. Modern policymaking and economic choices carry the same weight. Laws, frameworks, and reforms resemble moves on a vast board where ambition, caution, and risk constantly collide. Let's dive in. The Union government's Online Gaming Bill, 2025 embodies this duality. It seeks to ban online money games, citing addiction, fraud, and financial losses, while simultaneously creating a regulatory framework to promote e-sports and casual play. The industry warns of job losses, underground markets, and declining investor confidence if prohibition prevails, notes our first editorial. With over Rs 25,000 crore in FDI and Rs 2 trillion in valuations at stake, the decision resembles a risky throw. Like a hasty roll of dice, Parliament must decide whether prohibition secures or destabilises the board. The Reserve Bank's FREE-AI report, too, is a masterclass in anticipating moves, highlights our second editorial. With its seven guiding 'sutras,' it seeks to balance the promise of AI with the perils of bias and opacity. By proposing common AI infrastructure, sandboxes, and indigenous models, the RBI wants India to play not as a follower but as a designer of the game. Execution, however, will decide whether AI becomes a trusted ally or a loaded dice. Meanwhile, Naushad Forbes urges India to respond to Donald Trump's tariff threats not with defensive swagger but transformative ambition, much like Japan transformed humiliation into industrial resurgence. To become a developed nation by 2047, India must reform education, agriculture, taxation, and manufacturing, aiming for sustained growth above 9 per cent. The choice is whether to play defensively or pursue the bold moves that can transform the board. Amit Kapoor cautions that India's cities risk losing vitality if migration slows. Migrants power both formal and informal economies, yet fear-driven governance has weakened their sense of belonging. With urban investment needs of $840 billion over 15 years, cities must remain open and trusting, or else the pieces on the board may stop moving altogether. And finally, as Ambi Parameswaran notes in his review of Sandeep Das's Why Your Strategy Sucks, strategy itself is the master move. Das distinguishes true strategy from mere plans, offering frameworks for both corporate goals and personal careers. Even if richer case studies might have added depth, its core lesson stands, that strategy is not about playing every piece but choosing the few moves that can redefine the entire game. Stay tuned!
Hans India
33 minutes ago
- Hans India
IT hiring in small cities may hit slow lane amid AI adoption, Trump tariffs
Bengaluru: Top Indian IT services firms are likely to go slow in headcount addition in tier-II cities owing to the ongoing business uncertainties. Industry observers are of the opinion that given the pressing issues at hand like AI-led disruption and tariffs imposed by Donald Trump-led US government, expanding in small centres is expected to lose focus in the coming quarters. Against this backdrop, though many top IT firms have committed to set up new centres or expanding their existing ones in tier-II cities, they are unlikely to follow up in the near future. 'Indian IT companies are facing AI-led disruption and second-order impact of US tariffs on its trading partners. So, they are likely to be more focussed on core business concerns at this point of time. So, it is likely that expanding in tier-II cities may not remain a priority as of now,' Pareekh Jain, an IT outsourcing advisor & Founder of Pareekh Consulting, told The Hans India. In the last one year, cities like Udaipur, Visakhapatnam, Warangal, Lucknow, Bhubaneswar and Indore among others have emerged as sound job creators in the technology industry. According to a Teamlease report, tier-II and tier-III cities have seen a more than 50 per cent increase in hirings for technology roles during the January-June period. In contrast, the tier-I cities, which include Bengaluru and the National Capital Region, posted 12–15 per cent growth. While Coimbatore, Nagpur and Nasik are growing around 20–25 per cent year-on-year, Indore and Jaipur are recording 30–40 per cent growth in IT hiring, the report noted. This spectacular growth has been seen in the post pandemic period as remote working has gained momentum. IT firms have expanded their small centres or set up new centres in their bids to improve operating margin as the wage cost in these centres are relatively low with low attrition levels. All big companies including TCS, Infosys, Cognizant, & others have announced plans to set up new centres in recent years. For instance, Cognizant in June this year has said that it will set up a new centre in Vizag, which will lead to employment of 8,000 people in phases. Similarly, many other companies have announced expansion of their centres in small cities. 'When AI is making deep inroads, hiring numbers are not likely to be at a similar level as it used to be. In this perspective, adding employee count seems difficult in small cities,' said an industry source. Sources in the know said that these big campuses may be turned into real estate investment with a part of it leased out to other companies.
