‘A joy yet a threat': How Portland Fire and Rescue is preparing to save swimmers in distress this summer
KOIN 6 took a plunge in the water with the supervision of Portland Fire and Rescue to show how to stay safe this summer. That includes demonstrating how rescuers save people from drowning and sharing tips on how to prevent unnecessary deaths.
Fred Meyer employee stole $60K for gambling
'This waterway is a – is a joy yet a threat,' said PF&R Public Information Office Rick Graves.
Every year, an average of 40 Oregonians die from drowning in natural water like the Willamette River. Boating, fishing and swimming are all great activities to do on Oregon's waters over the summer but they can become deadly.
'We get marine calls so frequently. You know, we will respond to what is perceived to be somebody in the water, will respond to people who might be on the edge of the bridge, appearing as if they're going to jump so our response, submarine response, is very, very frequent,' said Graves.
Rick Graves, a Portland Fire and Rescue spokesperson, explains the importance of water safety during the summer season. May 7, 2025 (KOIN).
Drowning is the leading cause of death of children four and younger, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The City of Portland said two-thirds of those deaths happen between May and August.
'There's an emotional component to our job, right? Like we see things that most of the public don't see,' Graves said.
Last year in Oregon, 19 people died boating, according to the Oregon State Marine Board. They said it is likely that 16 of the victims would have survived their incidents had they worn a life jacket.
Driver arrested after Hwy 26 motorcyclist hit-run
'Accidents can happen at any time, and we want people to be wearing their life jackets at all times so we don't have to encounter these, these traumatic situations in the water,' Graves explained.
The Portland Fire and Rescue teams are out on these waters saving people all year long. To be prepared, they train.
KOIN 6 News Reporter Ariel Salk slid into the cold, 60-degree Willamette River, taking a moment to catch her breath, then distanced herself from the PF&R team before it was time for them to demonstrate their practice by pulling her back onto the boat.
KOIN 6 News Reporter Ariel Salk took a plunge in the water to help firefighters demonstrate how they do water rescues. May 7, 2025 (KOIN).
KOIN 6 News Reporter Ariel Salk took a plunge in the water to help firefighters demonstrate how they do water rescues. May 7, 2025 (KOIN).
KOIN 6 News Reporter Ariel Salk took a plunge in the water to help firefighters demonstrate how they do water rescues. May 7, 2025 (KOIN).
Portland Fire's advice is that if you are in the water without a life jacket and can't make it to shore, don't panic while you wait to be rescued. That's exactly what Ariel Salk tried, lying still in the water as the rescuers brought her back onto the boat.
'If you take a large breath in and hold your breath and just hang, you can even hang with your face in the water and just relax. You're not active. You'll actually maintain buoyancy,' said Graves.
So when you're out having fun, don't forget to wear a life jacket, don't turn your back on the water and keep an eye on children.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to KOIN.com.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indianapolis Star
a day ago
- Indianapolis Star
Indiana school's recording ban is an assault on parents' rights
It's back-to-school season, and parents and kids around the country are prepping for the inevitable transition from summer fun to the fall grind. For one Indiana mom, the stakes are higher than normal. Nicole Graves has sued her school district, Whitley County Consolidated Schools in Columbia City, Indiana, in federal court with help from the Arizona-based Goldwater Institute. She alleges that her First and 14th Amendment rights were violated in a series of interactions with school administrators. All four of Graves' children still attend district schools, and she's rightly concerned – given how she's been treated – about potential retaliation from the administration. Here's what happened: According to the Goldwater Institute, in April 2024, Graves' seventh-grade daughter 'filmed her school bus driver walking up and down the aisle, smacking his belt against his hand with his pants falling and his underwear visible.' After that incident on her daughter's school bus, Graves set up a meeting with the school principal. She recorded the meeting because she wanted an accurate record of what transpired. When Graves wasn't satisfied with what the principal said, she posted the recording on social media. That angered school administrators, who contacted her via letter and told her she broke school policy by recording the meeting without permission. Even though Graves had been unaware of the policy, she was banned from school grounds and restricted in her communication with staff, unless she got written permission from the superintendent's office. While that absurd punishment has expired, the lawsuit seeks to overturn the ban on recording, which remains in place. 'This is not fun for me,' Graves told IndyStar. 'This is not something I ever thought I would have to fight for. But I am more than happy to stand up and fight and talk to who I need to talk to to get things to change because I think it's important for all the families in this school district.' Opinion: School choice wars miss the point. Data can't dictate our values. The complaint argues that the school's recording policy and the no-trespass and communication orders violate the First Amendment, 'which protects the right to record government officials in the performance of their duties.' Adam Shelton, the Goldwater staff attorney working with Graves, says these kinds of recordings fall squarely under the First Amendment. 'The First Amendment protects more than just speech, it also protects conduct that is inherently expressive and conduct that cannot be divorced from the speech creation process, like recording,' Shelton observed on X. 'This is especially true in situations involving parents and school officials.' While Democrats and teachers unions may think they know what's best for children, that's simply false. Parents do. This lawsuit also alleges that the school district violated Graves' constitutional right to direct her children's education. 'The orders also violate the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause, which protects the fundamental rights of parents to control and direct the education and upbringing of their children,' the complaint states. 'This right is the oldest right that the Supreme Court has recognized as one of the 'liberties' protected by the due process clause.' Hicks: Indiana's college crisis has nothing to do with woke campuses or high costs Graves' case reminded me of one I've written about before, regarding another Midwest mom who was shunned by her child's school district. Sandra Hernden of Michigan sued her school district in 2022 for violating her constitutional rights. She had complained to the school board about its COVID-19 policies in 2020, and board members responded by contacting her employer and then reporting her to the Biden administration's U.S. Department of Justice (remember how the DOJ went after parents as 'domestic terrorists'?). Hernden's case is ongoing. Steve Delie, an attorney with the Mackinac Center Legal Foundation that is representing Hernden, made oral arguments in June before the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. 'Even if we assume there was no monetarily compensable injury, you're still talking about government officials taking advantage of their elected positions of power to silence opposition,' Delie told the court. 'That can't be the way society functions.' No, it can't. Kudos to these moms for their bravery and for standing up for parental rights everywhere.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
‘Human crisis': Oregon joins lawsuit against Trump administration over $15M crime victim cuts
OREGON CITY, Ore. (KOIN) — The State of Oregon joined a lawsuit challenging the Trump Administration's slashing of funds for the Attorney General Dan Rayfield announced the lawsuit on Monday. 'Betrayed': Gov. Kotek reacts to projected loss of $15B in federal funding A press conference took place on Monday afternoon with Rayfield and Clackamas County District Attorney John Wentworth, plus others. It can be viewed in the video player above. 'The Federal Administration is trying to use victims of crimes as a political tool to carry out an incredibly unpopular political agenda, and they are doing it in an unprecedented way,' Rayfield said. 'This lawsuit is about keeping shelters open for survivors of domestic violence, who need a safe space to sleep at night.' Oregon advocates warn of cuts to vital services for domestic, sexual abuse survivors The loss of the federal funding has thrown more than 100 agencies and organizations in the state into chaos. These organizations help victims of domestic violence, child abuse and sex trafficking. 'This is yet another attempt to place unlawful conditions on federal funds coming into Oregon to advance the President's unpopular agenda, this time at the expense of crime victims and survivors,' said Rayfield. 'These grants support services like the counselor who picks up the phone at 2 a.m., the shelter bed that keeps a mom and her kids safe tonight, or the advocate who walks a victim through the court process.' Clackamas County District Attorney said the victim cuts bring a 'human crisis' to the area. 'This is a fact. We are standing on the edge of a catastrophic failure of our duty to protect the most vulnerable in our community,' he said. 'If we don't act, we will pay the price.' 'It breaks my heart to experience the destruction of our system of safety and care,' added Melissa Erlbaum, the executive director of Clackamas Women's Services. Established more than 40 years ago, the Oregon AG's office says that more than 140 victim service providers rely on Victims of Crime Act (or VOCA) grants to provide critical services from shelters to camps for kids, victim advocates, and more. The AG's office says those organizations stand to lose more than $15 million under the new federal cuts next year. 'This is the money that keeps the lights on at domestic violence shelters,' Clackamas County District Attorney John Wentworth said. 'It pays for the specially trained advocates at child children's advocacy centers to provide a safe space for abused children to describe the unspeakable.' The attorney general's office said the federal government is KOIN 6 News will have more details as soon as possible. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
USA Today
3 days ago
- USA Today
Indiana school banned a mom for trying to protect her child. She's right to sue.
An Indiana mother's lawsuit against her children's school district raises important questions about parents' First and 14th Amendment rights. It's back-to-school season, and parents and kids around the country are prepping for the inevitable transition from summer fun to the fall grind. For one Indiana mom, the stakes are higher than normal. Nicole Graves has sued her school district, Whitley County Consolidated Schools in Columbia City, Indiana, in federal court with help from the Arizona-based Goldwater Institute. She alleges that her First and 14th Amendment rights were violated in a series of interactions with school administrators. All four of Graves' children still attend district schools, and she's rightly concerned – given how she's been treated – about potential retaliation from the administration. Here's what happened: According to the Goldwater Institute, in April 2024, Graves' seventh-grade daughter 'filmed her school bus driver walking up and down the aisle, smacking his belt against his hand with his pants falling and his underwear visible.' After that incident on her daughter's school bus, Graves set up a meeting with the school principal. She recorded the meeting because she wanted an accurate record of what transpired. When Graves wasn't satisfied with what the principal said, she posted the recording on social media. That angered school administrators, who contacted her via letter and told her she broke school policy by recording the meeting without permission. Even though Graves had been unaware of the policy, she was banned from school grounds and restricted in her communication with staff, unless she got written permission from the superintendent's office. Trump is right about homeless camps: Make them 'move out, IMMEDIATELY' | Opinion 1st Amendment protections go beyond speech alone, lawsuit says While that absurd punishment has expired, the lawsuit seeks to overturn the ban on recording, which remains in place. 'This is not fun for me,' Graves told the Indianapolis Star. 'This is not something I ever thought I would have to fight for. But I am more than happy to stand up and fight and talk to who I need to talk to to get things to change because I think it's important for all the families in this school district.' The complaint argues that the school's recording policy and the no-trespass and communication orders violate the First Amendment, 'which protects the right to record government officials in the performance of their duties.' Adam Shelton, the Goldwater staff attorney working with Graves, says these kinds of recordings fall squarely under the First Amendment. 'The First Amendment protects more than just speech, it also protects conduct that is inherently expressive and conduct that cannot be divorced from the speech creation process, like recording,' Shelton observed on X. 'This is especially true in situations involving parents and school officials.' Opinion: Sydney Sweeney's jeans ad triggers liberals. She looks good. They don't. Parental rights around the country are at stake While Democrats and teachers unions may think they know what's best for children, that's simply false. Parents do. This lawsuit also alleges that the school district violated Graves' constitutional right to direct her children's education. 'The orders also violate the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause, which protects the fundamental rights of parents to control and direct the education and upbringing of their children,' the complaint states. 'This right is the oldest right that the Supreme Court has recognized as one of the 'liberties' protected by the due process clause.' Parents, not progressives, know their kids best. They should control education. | Opinion Graves' case reminded me of one I've written about before, regarding another Midwest mom who was shunned by her child's school district. Sandra Hernden of Michigan sued her school district in 2022 for violating her constitutional rights. She had complained to the school board about its COVID-19 policies in 2020, and board members responded by contacting her employer and then reporting her to the Biden administration's U.S. Department of Justice (remember how the DOJ went after parents as 'domestic terrorists'?). Hernden's case is ongoing. Steve Delie, an attorney with the Mackinac Center Legal Foundation that is representing Hernden, made oral arguments in June before the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. 'Even if we assume there was no monetarily compensable injury, you're still talking about government officials taking advantage of their elected positions of power to silence opposition,' Delie told the court. 'That can't be the way society functions.' No, it can't. Kudos to these moms for their bravery and for standing up for parental rights everywhere. Ingrid Jacques is a columnist at USA TODAY. Contact her at ijacques@ or on X: @Ingrid_Jacques
