&w=3840&q=100)
Taiwan detects 4 Chinese aircraft, 10 naval vessels near its territory
In a post on X, the MND stated that four out of four sorties crossed the median line and entered Taiwan's southwestern Air Defence Identification Zone (ADIZ).
"4 sorties of PLA aircraft and 10 PLAN vessels operating around Taiwan were detected up until 6 a.m. (UTC+8) today. 4 out of 4 sorties crossed the median line and entered Taiwan's southwestern ADIZ. We have monitored the situation and responded accordingly," MND stated.
Earlier on Saturday, the Taiwanese MND detected 17 sorties of PLA aircraft and detected seven PLAN vessels operating around its territory.
As per the MND, eight out of 17 sorties crossed the median line and entered Taiwan's southwestern ADIZ.
"17 sorties of PLA aircraft and 7 PLAN vessels operating around Taiwan were detected up until 6 a.m. (UTC+8) today. 8 out of 17 sorties crossed the median line and entered Taiwan's southwestern ADIZ. We have monitored the situation and responded accordingly," MND stated on X.
The frequent incursions and maritime operations reflect rising tensions between Taiwan and China, a relationship long fraught with geopolitical strain. Taiwan, officially known as the Republic of China (ROC), governs itself independently with its own distinct political and economic systems.
However, China continues to claim Taiwan as part of its territory under the "One China" principle, insisting there is only one China with its capital in Beijing.
The dispute's roots trace back to the end of the Chinese Civil War in 1949, when the ROC government fled to Taiwan after the Communist Party, led by Mao Zedong, took control of mainland China.
Since then, Beijing has maintained its goal of reunification, using military, diplomatic, and economic means to apply pressure on Taiwan and diminish its international space.
Despite these efforts, Taiwan maintains its de facto independence, backed by strong public support, and continues to assert its sovereignty amid ongoing external pressures. The MND regularly monitors and publicly reports such military movements to ensure transparency and national security awareness.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
4 hours ago
- The Print
Rudra, Bhairav commandos, Shaktiman to drone platoons—how Army is transforming for future wars
While I welcome the changes announced by the COAS, my grouse is the slow pace of progress. It has taken seven years for the Army to begin executing the transformation of its World War II-era structures and organisations, first conceived in 2018. Most modern armies have already switched to combined arms brigades as the basic fighting formation. The People's Liberation Army (PLA) commenced its reforms in 2015, and by 2020, it had completed the restructuring of divisions into combined arms brigades operating directly under the group army—China's equivalent of a corps. He also announced the raising of Bhairav Light Commando Battalions— reminiscent of the German Stormtroopers of World War I; Unarmed Aerial Vehicle (UAV)/ counter UAV (C-UAV) based Shaktiman artillery regiments; a composite UAC/C-UAV battery for each standard artillery regiment; and drone platoons for each infantry battalion. These changes are part of the overall restructuring and reorganisation of the Army that began in 2018 . Chief of the Army Staff, General Upendra Dwivedi, announced the transformative restructuring of the Indian Army on 26 July, during Kargil Vijay Diwas commemoration. Rudra brigades will replace the ' division ', which has been the default combined arms fighting formation for over two centuries . Rudra brigades Emphasising the Indian Army's transformation as a modern, future-ready force, the COAS said, 'New all-arms brigades named 'Rudra' are being formed, and I approved it yesterday. This will have fighting components like infantry, mechanised infantry, armoured units, artillery, special forces, and unmanned aerial systems, supported by tailored logistics and combat support.' Rudra is the new 'fearsome' name for the all-arms Integrated Battle Group (IBG), which has been a work in progress since 2018. However, as per media reports, so far, only two experimental IBGs have been raised. The COAS had highlighted in January that the proposal was pending government approval due to financial implications. Now that he has publicly announced it, albeit with a new name, one can presume that the restructuring has finally been approved by the government. Details of the new structures and organisations, and progress of implementation, are not yet in the public domain. There seems to be some ambiguity with respect to the reconnaissance and air defence components, which are normally part of combined arms brigades. It is not clear whether the UAS component to support the brigade will be under a separate unit or under the reorganised artillery units. Since the IBGs will be tailor-made based on terrain and operational role, the organisations need to be kept flexible to absorb or shed resources. There is also a strong case for composite units of armour, mechanised infantry, and regular infantry, a system already in practice with the PLA. There is also a long-pending need to provide protected mobility to regular infantry in the plains—particularly in offensive formations—in the form of a basic wheeled armoured personnel carrier (APC). Bhairav Light Commando Battalions To enhance rapid response along the borders, 30 Bhairav Light Commando Battalions of 250 personnel each are being raised. These units will be the first movers in both offensive and defensive tactical operations. In the offensive role, they will infiltrate behind enemy lines to capture or secure key terrain or even launch surprise attacks on defended localities along the Line of Control or Line of Actual Control. In defensive operations, they can preempt incursions or force their recoil by infiltrating and attacking from the rear. These super or specially-trained and equipped infantry units will be kept free of traditional infantry tasks of defending or capturing ground as part of deliberate operations and will be used as a force multiplier. Historically, this concept was adopted when deliberate operations became too predictable or both armies got entrenched in strong defences. Their necessity arises due to the limited availability of Special Forces, which will now focus only on strategic/operational level tasks. 'Dronisation' of the Army The most heartening feature of the transformative reforms announced by the COAS is the organisational adoption of drone warfare. Until now, at the tactical level, UAVs have been exploited in an ad hoc manner by dual-tasking personnel within existing units. This approach works well with low-end drones used as an additional weapon by frontline small subunits for combat. However, high-technology drones require specialised training and dedicated organisations. To this end, Shaktiman artillery units are being created, equipped with UAS, C-UAS, and loitering ammunition. This implies that employment of tactical drones at the Corps level and below will now fall under the artillery. Additionally, each standard artillery unit will also have a Divyastra composite UAS/C-UAS battery to provide close UAV support at the IBG level. The COAS also announced the creation of drone platoons for each infantry battalion. This will be in addition to the combat drones used at the section or platoon level as an add-on weapon. The main difference between the two lies in the range and capability of the drones and the skills of the operators. Five months ago, I had written my wish list for drone organisations in the Army: 'There is no other option for the Indian Army, but to create a similar combat support arm at the tactical and operational level as part of Integrated Battle Groups and Corps. This would require a subunit at IBG and a unit at the corps level. These subunits/units will be responsible for the coordination and control of all drone and anti-drone operations. In addition, the fighting arms—arms and infantry—and combat support arms will require their own subunits for drone and anti-drone operations. Close combat drones will have to be handled by frontline soldiers as add-on weapons. Composite counter-drone systems will have to be authorised for all logistics units and headquarters for point protection. Area protection will be ensured by IBG and corps subunits/units.' There are still some voids between my wish list based on the Ukraine-Russia war and what the COAS has announced. I have no doubts that the Army will pragmatically fill the void in the near future. Also read: China is world leader in drones, Pakistan a peer. India must prioritise UAS to keep up Need for a holistic approach I sincerely hope the ongoing restructuring or reorganisations are part of a holistic plan. Apart from restructuring the divisions into IBGs, there is a need to re-examine the organisations of units across all arms and services— most of which have remained unchanged since World War II. Our units are 25-30 per cent larger than their counterparts in modern armies. Indian Army's 40 divisions will have to be reorganised into 80-90 IBGs. Mountains will require infantry-predominant IBGs. High-altitude valleys and plateaus will require a balanced mix of mechanised forces and infantry equipped with protected high mobility vehicles or APCs. In the plains, IBGs will need to be either mechanised forces predominant or APC-borne infantry predominant, depending on the role. Similarly, amphibious and air-transportable IBGs will be tailor-made for their roles. Additional resources in terms of mechanised forces and manpower for this restructuring will have to be found in-house through optimisation and reorganisation. There is a strong case for reducing the Infantry Battalion from four companies to three, at least in the plains – a practice followed by most armies. This will result in saving 120 soldiers from each of approximately 250 infantry battalions operating in the plains. An armoured regiment can be downsized to 31 tanks, with each squadron having three troops of three tanks each and one each for the squadron commander and the commanding officer. This adjustment will free up 980 tanks or make up an additional 31-tank regiments from the current 70 regiments available for the IBGs. Similarly, the 50 Mechanised Infantry Battalions can shed 9 Infantry Combat Vehicles (ICV) each by operating with three ICVs per platoon instead of four, sparing 450 ICVs—sufficient to raise 10 more Mechanised Infantry Battalions. This lean and agile organisational pattern is followed by many armies. A similar bold exercise across other arms and services would help generate the necessary resources for IBGs and also lead to an overall saving in manpower. Infusion of technology Infusing state-of-the-art technology is an even bigger challenge than the restructuring or reorganisation. One of the biggest lessons from 21st-century conflicts is the conspicuous absence of close combat—attacking and defending forces are now being neutralised from standoff ranges using UAVs and Precision Guided Munitions (PGMs) delivered in various modes. Without cutting-edge technology, the IBG will be toothless. More than fearsome names like Rudra, Bhairav, Shaktiman, and Divyastra, it is advanced technology and superior training that will instil fear in the enemy. Transformation through restructuring, optimising, reorganising, and infusion of state-of-the-art technology should be the mantra for the Army. Lt Gen H S Panag PVSM, AVSM (R) served in the Indian Army for 40 years. He was GOC in C Northern Command and Central Command. Post retirement, he was Member of Armed Forces Tribunal. Views are personal. (Edited by Ratan Priya)
News18
5 hours ago
- News18
Trump considers imposing 100% tariffs on imported chips: CNA, Taiwan
Taipei [Taiwan], August 8 (ANI): U.S. President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that the United States will impose a 100 per cent tariff on imported semiconductor chips. Focus Taiwan reported that the announcement, delivered from the Oval Office, came just hours before the country-specific tariffs were scheduled to take effect. 'We'll be putting a tariff of approximately 100 per cent on chips and semiconductors," Trump said. 'But if you're building in the United States of America, there's no charge." A tariff of this magnitude could sharply raise costs for American companies reliant on Taiwanese chips and force difficult decisions for Taiwanese manufacturers trying to stay competitive in the U.S. market. Taiwan, home to the world's largest contract chipmaker, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC), plays a pivotal role in the global supply chain. Its advanced chip technologies are indispensable to everything from iPhones to fighter jets. Earlier, a government-affiliated think tank, as per a separate report by Focus Taiwan, had said, 'The United States should prioritise strengthening semiconductor cooperation with Taiwan instead of threatening tariffs on Taiwanese chips,". While the long-term fallout of 100 per cent tariff remains uncertain, Taiwan's top chipmaker has already begun hedging its bets. In March, TSMC pledged an additional USD 100 billion to expand its manufacturing footprint in the United States. Last month, Focus Taiwan reported that the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) is fast-tracking the construction of its second and third semiconductor fabrication plants in Arizona, with plans to establish a large-scale 'gigafab" cluster in the state. Speaking at an investor conference, TSMC Chairman CC Wei highlighted the strategic importance of Arizona in the company's global footprint. He said the state is poised to become a key centre for TSMC's most advanced production technologies. TSMC reported a second-quarter net profit of NT dollar 398.27 billion (USD 10.11 billion), marking a 60.7 per cent increase year-on-year and a 10.2 per cent rise from the previous quarter. Even with such moves, the broader Taiwanese tech industry is bracing for impact. The new tariff raises urgent questions about how smaller firms in the semiconductor ecosystem, those without the scale or capital to set up shop in the U.S., will survive in a reshaped market. (ANI) view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
6 hours ago
- Business Standard
Chipmaker TSMC 'exempt' from Donald Trump's 100% tariff, says Taiwan
Taiwanese chipmaking firm TSMC "is exempt" from US President Donald Trump's 100 per cent tariff on semiconductor chips, Taipei said Thursday, according to a report by news agency AFP. National Development Council chief Liu Chin-ching briefed his country's legislature that because TSMC has factories in the US, TSMC is exempt from the tariffs. On Wednesday, US President Donald Trump announced that Washington would introduce a 100 per cent tariff on computer chip imports. He stated that companies manufacturing chips within the US would be exempt from the import duty. Trump highlighted that the new tariff rate would apply to 'all chips and semiconductors coming into the United States", except for firms that had already committed to manufacturing in the US or were in the process of establishing production facilities. Trump stated, 'If, for some reason, you say you're building and you don't build, then we go back and we add it up, it accumulates, and we charge you at a later date, you have to pay, and that's a guarantee.' Global demand for computer chips has been increasing steadily, with sales rising by 19.6 per cent in the year ending in June, according to the World Semiconductor Trade Statistics organisation. 'Much of semiconductor sector to be exempt' Martin Chorzempa, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, stated that much of the sector would be exempt as there has been significant investment in chip manufacturing within the US. Chorzempa added that, since chips produced in China would not be exempt, those made by SMIC or Huawei would also fall under the tariffs, as such chips typically entered the US market embedded in devices assembled in China. He also underlined that the impact of the tariffs might be minimal if they were not accompanied by a component tariff. Under Joe Biden, the Commerce Department in 2024 secured commitments from all five leading-edge semiconductor companies to set up chip factories in the US as part of a national initiative. Brian Jacobsen, chief economist at investment advisory firm Annex Wealth Management, said that large and cash-rich companies with the capacity to build in the US stood to gain the most from the current environment, describing it as a case of "survival of the biggest". The proposed tariffs are expected to be primarily directed at China, with trade negotiations between Washington and Beijing still ongoing. South Korea's chief trade envoy, Yeo Han-koo, stated on Thursday that Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix would not be subject to the 100 per cent US tariffs on said South Korea would receive the most favourable US tariff treatment on semiconductors under the trade agreement between Seoul and Washington.
