logo
Wes Streeting: ‘I won't shrink away from opening NHS to private sector'

Wes Streeting: ‘I won't shrink away from opening NHS to private sector'

Telegraph16 hours ago

Wes Streeting has said he will not rule out leaning more heavily on the private sector to cut NHS backlogs.
The Health Secretary said he 'refused to be bound by outdated ideological battles', saying using independent hospitals to provide taxpayer-funded care did not contradict the principles of the health service.
Writing for The Telegraph, below, he said he would fight for the future of the NHS, warning of a 'national emergency' facing the country.
He made the comments as new figures showed that almost 1.4 million people have had private care on the NHS since Labour won the election.
They include more than 500,000 patients – more than the population of Liverpool – who have received such treatment since an agreement to 'turbocharge' such efforts was published in January.
The deal with the independent sector, announced by Sir Keir Starmer, offers vacant private care appointments to NHS patients while keeping treatment free at the point of use.
Officials have pushed the services particularly in parts of the country that have some of the longest waits and lowest levels of private healthcare uptake.
The biggest surge in the use of the private sector by the NHS came in the North East and Yorkshire, followed by the South East and North West.
Mr Streeting, a survivor of kidney cancer, said the NHS saved his life and he is now fighting to make sure it is there for others.
He said: 'Millions are waiting in limbo for treatment that could transform their lives.
'Behind the staggering six million people on waiting lists are real human stories. Parents missing work to care for children in pain. Grandparents unable to play with grandchildren. People forced to take sick days that threaten their livelihoods. This isn't just a statistic – it's a national emergency.
'That's why I refuse to be bound by outdated ideological battles when confronting this crisis. My priority is simple. And in my effort to get there, I won't shrink away from using the independent sector to get NHS patients seen faster.'
On Wednesday, the NHS was declared 'the big winner' from the Government's spending review, with a record cash injection of £29 billion a year.
Mr Streeting stressed: 'Money alone won't fix this. We need reform too.'
The Government is expected to go further in its use of the private sector, as it prepares to draw up a 10-year plan for the NHS, which promises three major shifts – from hospital to community, from analogue to digital and from treating sickness to prevention.
Mr Streeting said it was 'nonsense' to suggest that using the private sector was at odds with NHS principles.
'What contradicts NHS principles is letting people suffer unnecessarily when capacity exists to treat them. The treatment remains free at the point of use – that's what matters,' he said.
The Health Secretary said it was 'ambitious but essential' that the NHS meets its target of ensuring that 92 per cent of patients wait no longer than 18 weeks from referral to treatment. It has not been achieved since 2015.
The independent sector agreement, launched in January this year, is part of an NHS Elective Reform Plan to clear waiting backlogs, especially in the most challenged specialities.
'Going further than New Labour'
Before the election, Mr Streeting said a new Labour government would 'go further than New Labour ever did' in use of the private sector for NHS patients.
'If you want to understand my appetite for reform, think New Labour on steroids,' he said in a speech in May 2024.
Tony Blair's New Labour government funded a network of 30 private clinics carrying out operations and tests for NHS patients between 2003 and 2010.
It also introduced patient choice, allowing patients to opt for care in a private hospital.
However, the drive divided the Labour party and lost momentum.
Polling from YouGov shows strong support for the Independent Sector agreement, with 70 per cent of the public showing strong support for the NHS using the private sector to clear the backlog.
The most common procedures delivered through the independent sector are ophthalmology (23.8 per cent of all treatments), trauma and orthopaedics (20.9 per cent) and dermatology (14.9 per cent).
Mark Cubbon, the director of elective care, cancer and diagnostics at NHS England, said: 'Independent sector providers play an important role in supporting NHS efforts to get patients the care they need quicker, with the latest figures showing record numbers of treatments are being carried out.
'NHS use of the private sector has risen significantly since 2021, and our new partnership agreement will help us go even further to widen access to treatment for thousands of patients.'
'Pivotal role in NHS's recovery'
David Hare, the chief executive of the Independent Healthcare Providers Network said: 'These figures demonstrate that independent providers are playing a pivotal role in the NHS's elective recovery, helping ensure patients can get the treatment they need – all free at the point of use and paid for at NHS prices.
'But with so much more still to do to once again meet the NHS's 18-week target by March 2029, it's vital that local NHS areas build on this progress and ensure that they make full use of existing and potential capacity in the sector to give patients greater choice and access to the care they need.'
Rachel Power, the chief executive of the Patients Association, welcomed the announcement. She said: 'Patients waiting for treatment tell us they feel like their lives are on hold, while facing real hardship, uncertainty and pain.'
Analysis from the Independent Health Providers Network has shown that 96 per cent of people in England live within 30 minutes' driving distance of an independent provider that delivers NHS treatment.
Using private help contradicts NHS principles? What nonsense
By Wes Streeting
I know what it's like to sit in a doctor's office and hear the word 'cancer'. The gut punch. The fear. The questions about what happens next – and crucially, how quickly.
Yet millions are waiting in limbo for treatment that could transform their lives. Behind the staggering six million people on waiting lists are real human stories. Parents missing work to care for children in pain. Grandparents unable to play with grandchildren. People forced to take sick days that threaten their livelihoods.
This isn't just a statistic – it's a national emergency.
That's why I refuse to be bound by outdated ideological battles when confronting this crisis. My priority is simple. And in my effort to get there, I won't shrink away from using the independent sector to get NHS patients seen faster.
Between January and April alone, over 500,000 people received vital treatments through our partnership with independent healthcare providers – the equivalent of treating the entire population of Liverpool in just four months. These aren't abstract numbers. They're people getting life-changing hip replacements, knee surgeries and cancer treatments.
Some ask whether using private capacity contradicts NHS principles. Nonsense. What contradicts NHS principles is letting people suffer unnecessarily when capacity exists to treat them. The treatment remains free at the point of use – that's what matters.
The independent healthcare sector won't affect this principle, and so it would be foolish to turn it away when we so desperately need it in certain specialities. But at the same time, we must see it for what it is.
The spending review has delivered proper investment in our NHS with nearly £29 billion in additional funding. But money alone won't fix this. We need reform too.
The results of our Plan for Change are already showing. Waiting lists have fallen to their lowest level in two years, marking the first April drop since 2008. We're finally heading in the right direction to creating an NHS Fit for Future.
Our Plan for Change sets out the clear milestone: meeting the NHS standard where 92 per cent of patients wait no longer than 18 weeks from referral to treatment. It's ambitious but essential.
Cancer taught me that time is precious. When you're waiting for treatment, every day matters. That's why I won't waste a single day, or a single available appointment slot, in our mission to give patients the care they deserve.
The NHS saved my life. Now I'm fighting to ensure it's there – on time – to save yours.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No concessions on benefits reform, Starmer tells rebels
No concessions on benefits reform, Starmer tells rebels

Times

time22 minutes ago

  • Times

No concessions on benefits reform, Starmer tells rebels

Sir Keir Starmer has warned Labour rebels there will be no concessions on cuts to disability benefits as he vows to press ahead with reforming a welfare system he says is 'not working for taxpayers'. The prime minister said he has 'got to get the reforms through' as ministers prepare to publish legislation this week that is likely to prompt Starmer's biggest backbench rebellion yet. While ministers insist they are confident of avoiding defeat, there is nervousness in government after 170 Labour MPs raised concerns about reforms which will make it harder to claim personal independent payments (PIP), the main disability benefit. But Starmer insisted that even critics agreed that 'we've got to reform the welfare system', saying: 'The principles remain the same: those who can work should work; those who need support into work should have that support into work, which I don't think they are getting at the moment; those who are never going to be able to work should be properly supported and protected, and that includes not being reassessed and reassessed.' Speaking on his way to the G7 summit in Canada, Starmer said: 'We need reform and we will be getting on with that reform when the bill comes.' About 800,000 people will lose thousands of pounds a year under the reforms and MPs are alarmed by official estimates that a quarter of a million people will be pushed into poverty as a result. • Thanks to the PIP benefit I could work. So why remove it? Last week ministers offered rebels a £500 million 'olive branch', promising that those who lost PIP would have 13 weeks before their payments stopped, and that the same three-month transition period would also apply to 150,000 people who stand to lose a carer's allowance linked to a cancelled PIP claim. Ministers say this is longer than any other transition payment and will mean that no one loses out before 2027. They say there can be no change to the main thrust of the reforms, which will make it harder to qualify for help with everyday tasks such as washing and dressing. They are alarmed by the soaring cost of sickness benefits, which have risen by £20 billion since the pandemic and which will rise by another £18 billion by the end of the parliament. This is despite reforms that will save £5 billion. Asked if there would be any softening of the bill before a vote expected at the end of the month, Starmer said: 'We've got to get the reforms through. I've been clear about that from start to finish — the system is not working. It's not working for those that need support. It's not working for taxpayers. Everybody agrees it needs reform. We've got to reform it and that's what we intend to do with the bill.' • A quarter of Britons now disabled Leading rebels have dismissed last week's attempts at reassurance, saying they want a fuller impact assessment and an immediate review of PIP criteria. A wider review promised by ministers is not expected to be completed until after tougher rules come into effect in November 2026. Neil Duncan-Jordan, a leading backbench critic of the bill, agreed with ministers last week that the extra transition periods were 'not a concession', and confirmed he would vote against it. He said MPs should recognise the cuts 'will make disabled people poorer. No amount of warm words mask the reality — cuts don't create jobs, they create austerity'. Brian Leishman, another backbench leftwinger, attacked the reforms as 'a complete insult to disabled people and against everything a Labour government should ever do to people that need help'. Ministers believe that less hardline critics will be persuaded to fall into line by evidence that the government is listening to concerns. A suggestion by Kemi Badenoch, the Tory leader, that her party would vote against the bill is also seen as helpful by party managers who say Labour MPs will not want to walk through lobbies alongside Conservative MPs. An extension of free school meals to all pupils on universal credit has also helped as ministers have pointed out that this will lift 100,000 children out of poverty, twice the number pushed into poverty by welfare cuts.

Keir Starmer: I'll face down rebels on benefit cuts
Keir Starmer: I'll face down rebels on benefit cuts

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Keir Starmer: I'll face down rebels on benefit cuts

Sir Keir Starmer has faced down Labour rebels on his welfare cuts package, insisting the reforms must be pushed through. The Prime Minister said the welfare system was not 'working for taxpayers' and gave no indication he was prepared to offer new concessions to angry backbenchers. A package of £5 billion in annual savings from the disability and sickness benefits bill was unveiled earlier this year, including cuts to the personal independence payment (PIP). Legislation unveiling the specifics of the changes is expected to be published this week before a crunch vote at some point before Parliament breaks for summer recess next month. More than 150 Labour MPs have signed a private letter indicating opposition to the welfare cuts, in what has become the biggest rebellion of Sir Keir's premiership to date. Downing Street advisers have identified the vote on the measures as the most politically challenging issue facing the Government in the coming weeks. The Prime Minister was asked, during a trip to Canada for the G7 summit, whether he was confident the disability benefit cuts would pass Parliament. Sir Keir replied: 'We've got to reform the welfare system. Everybody agrees with that proposition. So we've got to do that basic reform. It doesn't work for those that need support and help into work and it doesn't work for the taxpayer. 'So it's got to be reformed. The principles remain the same, those who can work should work. Those who need support in to work should have that support in to work which I don't think they are getting at the moment. 'Those who are never going to be able to work should be properly supported and protected. And that includes not being reassessed and reassessed. So they are the principles, we need to do reform and we will be getting on with that reform when the Bill comes.' The Prime Minister also offered up little chance on late changes to the package when asked if more concessions were to be expected. Sir Keir said: 'Well we have got to get the reforms through and I have been clear about that from start to finish. The system is not working, it's not working for those that need support, it's not working for taxpayers. Everybody agrees it needs reform, we have got to reform it and that is what we intend to do.' The Treasury will be loath to lose the £5 billion savings from the package, which were announced to help Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, restore her fiscal headroom in the spring statement in March. Critics on the Right insisted the reforms did not go far enough, given the sickness benefit bill is expected to continue ballooning by billions of pounds in the years ahead. But the reforms have ignited a fierce backlash from on the Left, with Labour backbenchers putting their names to a private letter to the Chief Whip voicing private opposition. The letter reportedly has signatures of more than 150 Labour MPs. Whether all of those potential rebels end up voting against the measures remains to be seen. The ability of Number 10 and Number 11 to hold the line has been challenged by the decision to reverse winter fuel payment cuts, an about-turn which cost £1.25 billion.

Staff at financial regulator revolt over female-only lavatories
Staff at financial regulator revolt over female-only lavatories

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Staff at financial regulator revolt over female-only lavatories

Staff at the financial regulator have revolted over a decision to make lavatories single-sex in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling on gender. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is changing several office spaces after judges ruled in April that the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the 2010 Equality Act 'refer to a biological woman and biological sex'. The ruling prompted new guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission. Under new internal FCA guidance, lavatories and showers should only be used by colleagues of that 'biological sex'. However, transgender men and women will still be able to use 'accessible toilets' under the changes. Disgruntled staff have now chosen not to represent the FCA at Pride events and attend individually instead. An FCA source said some employees feel 'uncomfortable' about the decision. They concluded: 'We will be attending as individuals, united in our support of the transgender community.' 'Sideline and ignore them' Helen Joyce, director of advocacy at human rights organisation Sex Matters, said: 'No doubt some activists, both inside and outside the FCA, will now noisily oppose the new policy. 'Senior managers should sideline and ignore them, just as they would with any other group advocating for breaking the law.' A FCA spokesman said it understood colleagues had been 'impacted' by the 'sensitive issue'. He added: 'In light of the Supreme Court ruling, the EHRC interim update and existing facilities in all offices, we concluded we needed to change our approach. 'We did this promptly to give clarity to colleagues on which facilities to use, which in itself offers individuals confidence, privacy and dignity when using our facilities.' Ther spokesman said that the FCA 'respects the decision some colleagues have taken not to represent the FCA at Pride'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store