Ministers ‘bending the knee' to private parking firms
The Government has published its plans for a legislation-backed code of practice for private parking companies, in a bid to make the system fairer for drivers.
Alex Norris, the local growth minister, pledged that the new rules, now out for consultation, will 'tackle misleading tactics and confusing processes'.
It comes after the previous government attempted to crack down on 'rogue' parking operators by introducing a bill to establish a code in 2019.
Draft legislation would have meant that by 2025, fines would have been capped at £50 in most areas outside London, apart from in the cases of more serious breaches.
But a successful legal challenge by private parking companies meant the government withdrew the legislation in the summer of 2022.
The new draft code of conduct maintains the £100 cap, and retains the debt recovery charge, which is currently capped at £70.
The AA called on drivers to get in touch with the Government with their concerns, so that ministers will 'do more to help innocent drivers'.
Jack Cousens, head of roads policy for the AA, said: 'This long-awaited consultation will not please drivers and suggests that the Government is bending the knee to the private parking industry.
'A higher cap of £100 compared to the original plans of £50, the retention of debt recovery fees, and the inclusion of a £20 so-called 'mitigation' charge does little to offer protection for drivers.'
Simon Williams, of the RAC, said drivers 'desperately need' a government-backed private parking code of practice, but it must have 'sufficient teeth to make a real difference'.
Analysis by the PA news agency found that drivers were handed a record 14.4 million parking tickets by private companies in the year ending March 2025.
It represented a 13 per cent increase from the 12.8 million during the previous 12 months, and more than double the 6.8 million in 2018-2019.
The new draft guidance will tighten up the appeals process, so that motorists who breached parking rules in emergency situations, such as breakdowns or sudden illness, are not fined.
It also aims to create stricter punishments for operators who are not up to industry standards.
Mr Norris said: 'At present, operators can avoid sanctions for poor practice, leaving motorists vulnerable to unfair or incorrect charges.
'The new compliance framework will ensure accountability. Under proposals, operators who breach the Code may lose access to DVLA data required to issue parking charges.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
How people in Epping reacted to closure of migrant hotel
Locals in Epping have welcomed an injunction to block asylum seekers from being housed at a nearby hotel, but raised concerns the decision would only 'kick the can down the road'. Epping Forest District Council was granted a temporary High Court injunction on Tuesday blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex. Several protests and counter-protests have been held in the town since Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, a then-resident at the hotel, was charged with trying to kiss a teenage girl, which he denies. Following the decision on Tuesday, a crowd of about a dozen people gathered outside the hotel brandishing flags, shouting 'We've won' and popping sparkling wine, while passing traffic honked their horns at them. A few police cars were parked nearby with officers standing outside the hotel, which is fenced in. Other residents gave a mixed reaction to the injunction, with some saying they were glad to 'see it gone'. But others cited concerns about where the asylum seekers currently housed inside the hotel would be moved to in light of the court's decision. Callum Barker, 21, a construction worker who lives next to the hotel, was handing out leaflets at the protest including the names of three men staying at the Bell Hotel who are alleged to have committed criminal offences. He said he was in favour of the injunction. Mr Barker told the PA news agency: 'Our community's in danger and we don't want these people here. 'I'm ecstatic; I haven't stopped smiling. For five years, this hotel's blighted us. Everyone's had their complaints and reservations about it and I'm really glad to see it gone. 'I think nationally there will be more protests; I hope so. We want people to get out into their communities, get rid of these hotels. 'It's not right they're here on taxpayers' dime while British people struggle. 'They get three meals a day and a roof over their head while kids go hungry in school and have to rely on free dinners and I think it's terrible. The asylum system is broken.' In the town centre, Charlotte, 33, a solicitor living in Epping, said: 'I think it's kicking the can down the road because where are they going to go? 'Personally, I have lived here for four years and I've never had an issue, never noticed any problems with any asylum seekers living in the hotel a mile away. 'With the injunction today, I don't know what the long-term solution is going to be because they have to be housed somewhere so what's the alternative? 'I don't partake in (the protests). I think people are allowed to have a right of free speech but what annoys me about them is I'm on community groups on Facebook and it seems if you're not speaking about it you're presumed to be completely for it when I think a lot of people are in the middle. 'There are extremists at these protests every week.' Michael Barnes, 61, a former carpenter from Epping, said he was happy about the High Court's decision. He said: 'The question is, where does it go from here? I don't love them on my doorstep but, in fairness, they've got to live somewhere. 'I don't think it's all of them, it's just the minority of them that get up to no good.' Gary Crump, 63, a self-employed lift consultant living just outside of Epping, said: 'I was quite pleased it's actually happened. 'I don't think they should be housed in the hotels like they are. 'We haven't got the infrastructure here. The doctors' surgery is filled up in the mornings with people from there with translators. Everything is pushing the limits. We're an island. We're full. 'I've got no reason to be against people coming into the UK but I do think that the reasons given are not true in a lot of cases.' Ryan Martin, 39, who runs a natural health business, said: 'It's a good thing. When people spend a lot of money to live in this area, they want to feel safe. 'Them shutting it down probably happened because of the noise that was made about it and the reaction they saw from people because there was a strong reaction. 'It was taking a while to happen but people finally got up to protest against them being here.'
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Comedian hits out at London's E-bike licensing creating ‘Checkpoint Charlies'
Conflicting council decisions on electric bike licensing have created a "Checkpoint Charlie" situation near London bridges, according to comedian Dara O Briain. The Irish stand-up highlighted the issue of e-bikes "stacking up" at river crossings between the boroughs of Hounslow and Richmond in west London. Hounslow has granted permission for Forest and Voi's e-bikes to operate within its boundaries, while Richmond has licensed rival company Lime. This disparity means riders face a "patchwork of boundaries", preventing seamless travel across boroughs. Lime, one of the rental companies, has urged councils to collaborate to resolve the issue. The latter said it has agreed to a request by Hounslow for its bikes' electric motors to cut out if riders enter the borough. This causes the bikes to become heavy to ride, resulting in many users ending their trips. The PA news agency saw about 30 bikes near the southern entrance to Chiswick Bridge on Monday night. Some were parked appropriately to the side of pavements, but others had been thrown in bushes or tipped over. O Briain, 53, likened the issue to the Checkpoint Charlie border crossing point between East and West Berlin during the Cold War. In a post on social media platform X, he wrote: 'Hounslow Council have banned Lime bikes, and licensed Forest and Voi; neighbouring Richmond has licensed Lime and banned the others. 'So every bridge is Checkpoint Charlie, with loads of Lime bikes parked on one side and loads of Forest and Voi on the other. Top work everyone!' Richard Dilks, chief executive of shared transport charity CoMoUK, said: 'This rather bizarre set of circumstances is an unfortunate outcome of the current situation in London, where regulation of bike sharing schemes is decided at borough level.' He said the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill going through Parliament could make Transport for London the capital's licensing authority for rental e-bikes, enabling a 'more coherent pan-London approach' to be designed. A spokesperson for Lime said the existing scenario is 'frustrating for riders'. She said: 'We've already been contacted by many of them who are disappointed at the new rules. 'They should not have to experience London as a patchwork of boundaries. 'We want to see councils work together so that residents can travel seamlessly across boroughs, without having to stop at borders.' Alex Berwin, head of policy at Forest, said the issue is 'exactly why we have been calling for a pan-London approach to regulation'. He went on: 'We need a single regulatory framework, one enforcement model and one operational rulebook across the capital, whilst ensuring services support the local needs of each borough.' A Voi spokesperson said its users are 'free to cycle across borough boundaries, but parking must be in designated bays within participating areas'. He added: 'We're working with local leaders and TfL towards a London-wide scheme to make cross-borough journeys simpler.' Rental e-bike companies say they encourage people to switch from cars to a more sustainable form of travel, but there have been long-standing concerns about users blocking pavements with the bikes after they finish their rides. A spokesperson for Hounslow Council said: 'The issue of neighbouring boroughs having different e-bike operators is not unique to Hounslow. This is an issue at many boundaries wherever there is a change in operator. E-bike service areas are dynamic, with boroughs deciding to review operators at different points. 'We recognise that a borough-by-borough approach can be confusing for users and we continue to work closely with Transport for London and neighbouring boroughs to make the case to the Department for Transport for a pan-London approach. In the meantime, we are bringing in new measures to ensure e-bikes are better managed when left at the end of a journey.'
BBC News
25 minutes ago
- BBC News
Open road crashes lead to Manx Grand Prix qualifying delay
Two crashes on open roads ahead of the latest Manx Grand Prix qualifying session led to the course's closure being delayed by 30 minutes, police have around the 37.7-mile (61km) Mountain Course had been due to shut at 18:00 BST. The delay led to organisers issuing a revised Isle of Man Constabulary earlier said the road between the Bungalow and the Creg Ny Baa would not reopen before the session after a crash at Keppel latest delay follows the first evening of qualifying for the 2025 grand prix being disrupted by a crash on the opening lap. That session was abandoned after Andy McAllister crashed at the Black Dub on the opening lap, requiring the road to be Northern Irishman was taken to hospital with arm injuries. Tuesday's revised schedule 18:50 - Senior / Supersport MGP19:25 - Junior / Supertwin MGP Roads around the course are set to reopen no later than 21: 2025 Manx Grand Prix and Classic TT is scheduled to run until 29 August. Read more stories from the Isle of Man on the BBC, watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer and follow BBC Isle of Man on Facebook and X.
