What does 'designed in Canada' label even mean? 'It's insincere and an effort to mislead and manipulate,' expert says
As Canadian shoppers commit to boycotting U.S. products amid the ongoing tariff war, some are raising their eyebrows at some tactics companies are using to appear more Canadian than they actually are.
Reddit user MrIceCap (Canadian, much?!) posted a photo of a can of Campbell's soup on the popular "Loblaws Is Out of Control" group. The label states it is "designed in Canada," while just centimetres below, it states it is a "product of the U.S.A."
So, what gives? In an e-mail statement, a representative from Campbell's says 'Designed in Canada' describes a product that is created based on Canadian taste preferences, insights or recipes, and may contain Canadian ingredients, but is made elsewhere. They note that the label has been on their products since 2018.
While the company once had a manufacturing plant in Toronto, it shuttered in 2018. Campbell's does still have a Canadian office, located in the Greater Toronto Area.
Still, experts say this type of marketing in the current political climate is bound to be confusing.
'It doesn't mean anything really,' says Sylvain Charlebois, director of the Agri-Food Analytics Lab at Dalhousie University. 'The origin of the product comes from Canada.'
He notes that Habitant soup, a company that originated in Quebec also has 'Designed in Canada' labeling. It was acquired by Campbell's in 1989, but is now manufactured in the U.S.
Another good question. The 'Designed in Canada' label indicates that the product was developed in Canada but may now be manufactured in the U.S. Traditional Habitant soup is a good example. pic.twitter.com/WbSNy8NQyh
— The Food Professor (@FoodProfessor) February 6, 2025
'It means it was created in Canada but was manufactured in the U.S. or elsewhere using foreign ingredients as well,' he says.
Markus Giesler is a professor of marketing at York University. He says 'Designed in Canada' is the least regulated of all designations of product marketing, describing the tactic as 'reaching' and a 'poor attempt at making a product as Canadian when it's not.'
'It just means that a part of the product was designed in Canada,' he says. 'The design process, the engineering, the artistic design, the styling of either the product or the labeling. That is Canadian. The products and the ingredients came from other parts of the world.'
He says companies are using this type of marketing to capitalize on patriotism on products that aren't even Canadian.
'Maybe they had a Canadian graphic designer, or photographer, or software engineer that contributed to this product,' he says. 'It's not about the product. It's insincere and an effort to mislead and manipulate.'
It's not about the product. It's insincere and an effort to mislead and manipulate.
The label of 'Designed in Canada' isn't unheard of in the marketing of known Canadian clothing brands, like lululemon or Aritizia, despite being manufactured abroad, Giesler says. He adds that other brands like mattress company Endy, jewelry company Mejuri and clothing retailer Frank and Oak have recently been magnifying the fact that they're Canadian companies, as patriotism spikes, despite manufacturing their products outside of Canada.
On its website, the Competition Bureau says a product that is making 'Made in Canada' claims must have accurate and truthful identification of country of origin and accurately reflect the production or activity that took place in Canada on labelling or marketing claims. If the product doesn't meet the criteria, it must use more specific terms to describe the process that took place in Canada, like 'Assembled in Canada' or 'Designed in Canada.'
Between November 1, 2024 and March 31, 2025, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency received a total of 64 complaints related to country of origin claims on food labels or in advertisements, including some related to "Product of Canada."
Consumers are encouraged to report any products believed to be mislabelled to the CFIA through their food complaint or concern web page.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Reddit brands Anthropic as 'anything but' a white knight, heating up AI scraping wars
A clash between established online content providers and artificial intelligence upstarts is heating up again as AI-driven large language models gobble information in a race to dominate the web's frontier. The latest of the AI scraping wars is between Reddit (RDDT) and AI startup Anthropic ( a company backed by tech giants Amazon (AMZN) and Google (GOOG, GOOGL) that created the AI language model Claude. Reddit is claiming in a new lawsuit that Anthropic intentionally scraped Reddit users' personal data without their consent and then put their data to work training Claude. Reddit said in its complaint that Anthropic "bills itself as the white knight of the AI industry" and argues that "it is anything but." Anthropic said last year that it had blocked its bots from Reddit's website, according to the complaint. But Reddit said Anthropic 'continued to hit Reddit's servers over one hundred thousand times.' An Anthropic spokesperson said, "We disagree with Reddit's claims and will defend ourselves vigorously." Anthropic is also defending itself against a separate suit from music publishers, including Universal Music Group (0VD.F), ABKCO, and Concord, alleging that Anthropic infringed on copyrights for Beyoncé, the Rolling Stones, and other artists as it trained Claude on lyrics to more than 500 songs. The confrontation between Reddit and Anthropic adds to a growing number of high-profile cases where copyright holders have tried to guard their works from the reach of technology firms. A question at the heart of all these lawsuits: Can artificial intelligence companies use copyrighted material to train generative AI models without asking the owner of that data for permission? Courts haven't settled on the answer. However, last February, the US District Court for Delaware handed copyright holder Thompson Reuters a win in a case that could impact what data training models can legally collect. The court granted Thompson Reuters' request for summary judgment, saying that its competitor, Ross, infringed on its copyrights by using lawsuit summaries to train its AI model. The court rejected Ross's argument that it could use the summaries under the concept of fair use, which allows copyrights to be used for news reporting, teaching, research, criticism, and commentary. One big name featuring prominently in some of these clashes is OpenAI ( the creator of chatbot ChatGPT that is run by Sam Altman and backed by Microsoft (MSFT). Comedian Sarah Silverman has accused the companies in a lawsuit of copying material from her book and 7 million pirated works in order to train its AI systems. Parenting website Mumsnet has also accused OpenAI of scraping its six billion-word database without consent. But perhaps the most prominent case targeting OpenAI is from The New York Times (NYT), which in 2023 filed a lawsuit accusing OpenAI and Microsoft of illegally using millions of the news outlet's published stories to train OpenAI's language models. The newspaper has said that ChatGPT, which trained on millions of its articles, at times generates query answers that closely mirror its original publications. Last week, OpenAI called the lawsuit "baseless" and appealed a judge's recent order in that case requiring the AI developer to preserve 'output data' generated by ChatGPT. OpenAI and Microsoft are using a defense similar to those raised in other AI training copyright disputes: that the Times' publicly available content falls under the fair use doctrine and, therefore, can be used to train its models. Getty Images is trying to chip away at that same argument in lawsuits in the US and United Kingdom filed in 2023 against AI image generation startup Stability. The UK case went to trial on Monday. Stability argues that fair use (or "fair dealing" as it's known in the UK) justified training its technology, Stable Diffusion, on copyrighted Getty material. That same defense has hallmarks of justification that Google has been asserting for the past two decades to fight lawsuits claiming it violated copyright laws when pulling information into results for users' search queries. In 2005, the Authors Guild sued Google over millions of books that the tech giant scanned and made available in 'snippets' to online searchers. Google didn't pay for the copyrighted information but did provide word-for-word pieces of the copyrighted works in search results. The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reasoned in a decision that Google's scanning project tested the limits of fair use but was 'transformative' and therefore protected under fair use law. In 2016, Getty Images sued Google over similar claims, alleging that Google violated its copyrights and antitrust law by displaying Getty's high-resolution images in Google search results. The practice, Getty argued, promoted piracy, and kept its prospective customers from visiting its site and from paying for their content. Google and Getty settled before trial. In an agreement, Google agreed to display copyright holders' information more prominently, as well as enter into a licensing partnership with Getty and remove a 'view image' button from Google Search that made it more difficult to download high-quality images. Google could be drawn into the new AI scraping wars as part of a landmark antitrust case against Google's Search monopoly that was won last year by the US Justice Department. The DOJ has argued to a judge considering remedies to rectify Google's monopoly that the search giant could further entrench its dominance by training its AI model, Gemini, on its vast index of internet content. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
As U.S. Uncertainty Sparks Travel Boom in Canada, RVezy Urges Canadian RV Owners to Cash In on Soaring Demand
With 300% increase in U.S. travelers to Canada, RV rental platform RVezy calls on Canada's 2 million RV owners to list their vehicles and earn thousands this summer OTTAWA, ON, June 10, 2025 /CNW/ - Political instability south of the border is fueling a surge in Canadian travel—and RV owners have a golden opportunity to cash in. RVezy, Canada's leading peer-to-peer, RV rental platform, is reporting a 300% year-over-year spike in bookings from American travelers, along with a major increase in interest from overseas visitors. As international and domestic demand hits record levels ahead of the summer season, the company is issuing a national call to action: RV owners, list your RV now and earn thousands this summer. "With over 2 million RVs sitting idle across Canada and demand hitting all-time highs, we need more RV owners to list—today," said Michael McNaught, CEO of RVezy. "This isn't just about travel—it's about helping Canadians earn meaningful income while supporting our national and local tourism economy." Big Earnings, Big Impact: Renting Pays Off RV owners on RVezy earn an average of over $10,000 per year, with many earning significantly more during the peak summer months. Yet most RVs sit unused for 11 months of the year. With rising prices and economic pressures affecting households across the country, renting out an RV is an easy, practical way to generate additional income. And because travelers spend on average $300 per day in local communities, every RV trip fuels spending at local shops, restaurants, campgrounds, and small tourism operators. "We're seeing this incredible wave of interest in Canada—not just from Americans, but from international visitors looking for safe, scenic, flexible travel," added McNaught. "Every RV rental helps support Canadian families—on both sides of the keys." No Worries, Full Protection: RVezy's All-Inclusive Approach For RV owners concerned about liability or damage, RVezy provides full insurance coverage that protects the entire value of the RV. Every rental includes 24/7 roadside assistance and is backed by a dedicated Host Experience team to guide owners through every step of the process. RVezy is a proudly Canadian company—founded by Canadians, operated by Canadians, and located in Canada, RVezy is committed to building a stronger local travel economy. Call to Action: List Your RV Before Peak Season Hits With unprecedented traveler demand and limited vehicle availability, RVezy urges RV owners across the country to list now—especially in popular gateway regions like British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, Quebec and the Maritimes. Whether you're an occasional camper or a seasoned RV enthusiast, listing your RV this summer could make a serious difference. To learn more or list your RV, visit SOURCE View original content to download multimedia: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Boston Globe
3 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Canada commits billions in military spending to meet NATO target
But even if Canada is able to finally hit the 2 percent threshold, that is not likely to be enough to satisfy the United States or other NATO allies. Mark Rutte, NATO's secretary general, speaking in London on Monday, called on the alliance's members to make a 'quantum leap in our collective defense' by committing to significantly higher spending targets. Rutte wants members to commit to spending 5 percent of their gross domestic products on military and defense-related activities. Trump has called for a similar spending target. Advertisement Proposals for increased spending are likely to dominate the NATO summit meeting in The Hague this month, though Rutte has not set a timeline for his increased spending plan. Carney, speaking in Toronto, said that new geopolitical threats, advances in technology, and the fraying of Canada's alliance with the United States demanded an accelerated spending schedule. 'We stood shoulder to shoulder with the Americans throughout the Cold War and in the decades that followed, as the United States played a dominant role on the world stage,' he said. 'Today, that dominance is a thing of the past.' Advertisement 'It is time for Canada to chart its own path,' he added, 'and to assert itself on the international stage.' While Carney promised to increase spending by billions of Canadian dollars, he did not specify where the funds would come from. Government officials spoke mostly in broad terms about how the money would be used. Canada's economy is heavily dependent on exports to the United States, and Trump's tariffs have targeted key industries, including autos and steel. Some economists have warned that Canada could face a recession if the tariffs persist. Carney also said the country would no longer rely as extensively on American defense contractors to supply its armed forces, underscoring Canada's strained relations with the United States and focus on shifting away from its neighbor. The Canadian government said it would immediately add 9.3 billion Canadian dollars (about $6.8 billion) to its defense budget. That will raise total defense-related spending this year to CA$62.7 billion, slightly higher than the 2 percent NATO target. To get there, the government included CA$2.5 billion in spending related to 'defense and security' for other departments, including the Canadian coast guard, an unarmed civilian agency which is under the department of fisheries. Carney's spending pledge was welcomed by defense analysts. 'This is a long-overdue announcement,' said Margaret McCuaig-Johnston, a senior fellow at the Graduate School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Ottawa. 'This significant commitment is remarkable given how quickly they're going to have to move to make 2 percent by the end of the fiscal year.' But, she added, Carney will have to add further budget increases to fund all of the programs he is promising. Advertisement Carney laid out a long shopping list for the military, including 'new submarines, aircraft, ships, armed vehicles, and artillery.' He also said the military would add drones and sensors to monitor the seafloor in the Arctic, a vast region of the country that is becoming a source of competition among global powers such as Russia and China. But Canadian officials said that this year most of the spending would go toward things like increasing the pay and the benefits of armed forces members to help ease a severe recruitment crisis, and repairing broken equipment. Carney also said that money would be directed toward much-needed improvements, noting that three of the Royal Canadian Navy's four diesel submarines were not seaworthy. 'We will repair and maintain our ships, our aircraft, and infrastructure that for too long we allowed to rust and deteriorate,' the prime minister said. Other spending will focus on artificial intelligence and computer systems, as well as ammunition production within the country. Carney also said that Canada would look to buy more goods domestically or from allies other than the United States to equip its military. 'We should no longer send three-quarters of our defense capital spending to America,' he said. Carney said Monday that details about how the country's military needs would be financed would be revealed when a budget was released in the fall. 'Our fundamental goal in all of this is to protect Canadians,' he told reporters, 'not to satisfy NATO accountants.' This article originally appeared in