logo
Ukraine's drone strike is a warning—for the US

Ukraine's drone strike is a warning—for the US

Mint2 days ago

By now Americans know about Ukraine's remarkable drone strike on Sunday that damaged as many as 40 aircraft deep inside Russia as strategic bombers sat like ducks in a row on military bases. One urgent lesson beyond that conflict is that the U.S. homeland is far more vulnerable than most Americans realize.
The details about Ukraine's daring operation are few, but Kyiv managed to sneak cheap drones across the border and use them to destroy costly Russian military assets. The bang for Ukraine's buck was considerable. You don't have to be a fan of thrillers to imagine a similar scenario in the United States.
'Could those have been B-2s at the hands of Iranian drones flying out of containers, let alone Chinese?" military analyst Fred Kagan asked this week. The U.S. strategic bomber fleet is small (about one-third the size it was in the Cold War) and concentrated at a handful of bases. See the aerial photo flying across social media of B-52 bombers lined up at Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana. The story is similar for fighters and capital assets like aircraft carriers.
One lesson is that President Trump's planned Golden Dome missile-defense shield isn't the boondoggle it's portrayed to be in the press. The headlines are preoccupied with space-based interceptors. But the U.S. is exposed to many threats besides ballistic missiles—from drones and spy blimps to cruise missiles launched off submarines.
The bipartisan Strategic Posture Commission warned in 2023 that the U.S. needs better integrated air and missile defenses against 'coercive attacks" from Russia and China, and such an attack could come from conventional weapons. In a crisis over the Taiwan Strait, Xi Jinping might threaten the Commander in Chief: Stay out of the Western Pacific or you never know what might happen to your pricey F-22s in Alaska.
That's one reason the U.S. needs a layered missile shield that exploits new technology and existing systems like the Patriot. Israel's recent success shooting down drones with lasers shows that innovative and affluent societies can meet new threats. President Trump deserves credit for elevating missile defense as a presidential priority.
But the U.S. has lost some basic muscle memory since the Cold War on living in a dangerous world. A prescient report this year from Thomas Shugart and Timothy Walton at the Hudson Institute warned about highly vulnerable U.S. airfields, especially in the Western Pacific.
For the new B-21 bomber, the Air Force is looking at shelters 'akin to sunshades," Messrs. Shugart and Walton write, that could leave the aircraft 'exposed to threats, including lethal" unmanned aerial vehicles. 'Not building approximately $30 million" hardened aircraft shelters 'for over-$600 million B-21 bombers is an unwise decision that could endanger the US's ability to strike globally," they write.
Such shelters always end up being a low budget priority compared with airplanes and missiles, and the message here is that defense spending can't stay at 3% of the economy and provide the security Americans expect. The bill moving through Congress puts up $25 billion for Golden Dome. But a national air defense won't be built by a one-time cash infusion, and the Administration is ducking a sustained defense buildup to mollify its fiscal hawks.
Americans are accustomed to wars fought far from home by a force of volunteers, but everyone in the U.S. will be on the front lines of the next conflict. Political leaders could be doing much more to educate the country about this vulnerability, rather than boasting that the U.S. military is the best it has ever been. It isn't.
Ukraine did the U.S. a favor by destroying bombers of a U.S. adversary—and sending America a wake up call about its own complacency.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New normal amid a new cold war
New normal amid a new cold war

New Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • New Indian Express

New normal amid a new cold war

The effect of Donald Trump's return to the White House is being felt in capitals all over the world. At the recently-concluded Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, the spectre of a new cold war rose once again to dominate discussions. In his ASEAN chairman's statement, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim categorically asserted the return of a cold war to systemic interstate relations. The reference does not augur well for the ASEAN, which has been trying to build resilience within while maintaining a degree of balance between the US and China. The second important aspect of this year's dialogue has been the tough stand India has placed on its recent military stand-off with Pakistan following the devastating terror attack at Pahalgam. The subsequent Indian political and military action against Pakistan has highlighted what the political leadership is calling the 'new normal', signalling that tolerance has its limits. Both these indicated a changed environment at the Shangri-La Dialogue, especially as they implied certain defining shifts. First, the very definition of the term 'cold war' and how this period will be different from the earlier cold war. Second, the Trump administration's impact on the wider Indo-Pacific and what it expects from the region vis-á-vis the US-China rivalry. Third, the choices for ASEAN states, particularly in light of the extending US-China rivalry. And finally, how this affects the role India plays within multilateral forums and how India's definition of the new normal affects the region. First, the reference to a new cold war is not new. Even during the first Trump term, a National Security Strategy paper released by the administration in November 2017 clearly reiterated that the foremost threats to American interests and leadership in the global order were from China and Russia, articulating the tensions at systemic levels.

Elon Musk's Trump clash backfires; Tesla CEO's net worth takes massive hit, federal contracts under risk
Elon Musk's Trump clash backfires; Tesla CEO's net worth takes massive hit, federal contracts under risk

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Elon Musk's Trump clash backfires; Tesla CEO's net worth takes massive hit, federal contracts under risk

Elon Musk's clash with President Donald Trump appears to have backfired on him. The 53-year-old, who accused the president of being ungrateful, lost $15 billion on Thursday, and his company Tesla's shares tumbled as much as 9% during trading hours. According to Forbes' real-time billionaires list, Musk is worth $399.5 billion, down 3.63%. Tesla slumped 8.9% amid Musk's criticism of Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill'. This comes after the president lashed out at his former ally on Thursday, saying he was 'disappointed' by the billionaire's opposition to the sweeping tax-cut and spending bill that is at the heart of his administration's agenda. 'Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore. He said the most beautiful things about me, and he hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that'll be next. But I'm, I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot,' he said. Meanwhile, Musk unleashed a series of responses on X, platform formerly known as Twitter. Read More: 'Such ingratitude': Elon Musk claims Trump would've lost election without him "Without me, Trump would have lost the election," he wrote. 'Such ingratitude.' The Tesla CEO also used the president's own words against him. He retweeted the 78-year-old's part criticisms about raising the debt ceiling. In a 2013 tweet, Trump wrote, " I cannot believe the Republicans are extending the debt ceiling—I am a Republican & I am embarrassed!" "Wise words," Musk commented on the post. Read More: 'Disgusting': Why Elon Musk attacked Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful' bill In his latest attack on Musk, Trump said that he is terminating the tech billionaire's subsidies and contracts. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' the president wrote on Truth Social. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' he added.

Trump ally Laura Loomer says Republican law makers wondering if they should side with President Trump or Elon Musk; Tesla CEO responds: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I ...
Trump ally Laura Loomer says Republican law makers wondering if they should side with President Trump or Elon Musk; Tesla CEO responds: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I ...

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Trump ally Laura Loomer says Republican law makers wondering if they should side with President Trump or Elon Musk; Tesla CEO responds: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I ...

The escalating feud between President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk has reached a critical juncture, with Republican lawmakers now questioning their loyalties as the two most powerful figures in conservative politics engage in an unprecedented public battle over Trump's signature domestic policy bill. Trump ally Laura Loomer reported Thursday that GOP legislators are actively debating whether to support the president or the Tesla CEO. "I know lawmakers who are asking if they should side with President Trump or Elon," Loomer posted on social media. "I've been on the hill all day and it's all anyone is talking about. The most powerful man in the world vs the richest man in the world." Musk's response was characteristically provocative, telling Loomer: "One thing's for sure, it ain't boring!" He then delivered what appears to be a veiled threat to Republican politicians weighing their options: "Oh and some food for thought as they ponder this question: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years." Musk claims credit for Trump's Presidential election victory The public rupture intensified Thursday when Musk explicitly took credit for Trump's 2024 election victory after the president expressed disappointment in his former adviser. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate," Musk wrote on X. "Such ingratitude." Trump had earlier told reporters during a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz that he was "very disappointed in Elon" and that he had "helped Elon a lot." The president accused Musk of opposing the legislation only after Republicans removed electric vehicle subsidies that would benefit Tesla. "He had no problem with it. All of a sudden, he had a problem. And he only developed the problem when he found out that we're going to have to cut the EV mandate because that's billions and billions of dollars," Trump said. Battle over 'Big Beautiful Bill' escalates The conflict centers on Trump's massive domestic policy bill, which Musk has repeatedly attacked as a "disgusting abomination" that will increase the federal deficit. Musk has urged Americans to "KILL THE BILL," arguing it doesn't cut government spending deeply enough despite projections it will remove health coverage from millions. Trump disputed Musk's claim that he wasn't consulted on the legislation, stating: "Elon knew the inner workings of this bill, better than almost anybody sitting here." Musk fired back on X: "False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!" The president also mocked Musk's appearance, referencing the billionaire's recent black eye and suggesting he might be developing "Trump Derangement Syndrome." Trump compared Musk to other former advisers who "become hostile" after leaving his administration, noting that "some of them actually become hostile" when "the glamour's gone." AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store