logo
BURGESS Q&A: Building, Salford priorities and young prop duo

BURGESS Q&A: Building, Salford priorities and young prop duo

Yahoo7 hours ago
WHILE the hope is that Warrington Wolves will take advantage of Salford Red Devils' unfortunate plight in the same way their rivals have, Sam Burgess insists his side cannot go out with a mindset of recklessly chasing points.
Having picked up a crucial victory over Hull FC on Saturday, he is more interested in seeing his side take steps forward in terms of performance having looked 'a bit more like themselves' in Round 16.
Advertisement
Victory over Super League's financially stricken bottom club will take The Wire – temporarily at least – to within a point of the play-off spots, with nearest rivals Hull FC and Wakefield Trinity both playing on Saturday.
Their hosts are conceding an average of just under 44 points per game, leading many to see this as an opportunity for Burgess' side to get their attack firing and boost their points difference, which is vastly inferior to all of the sides above them.
However, he says closing that particular gap is absolutely not in his mind as he called on his players to pay their opponents the respect they are due.
Here is what Burgess said to the media during this week's pre-match press conference…
Advertisement
Q: Looking back at Saturday, was that more like the Warrington Wolves you know and expect?
SB: It certainly looked a bit more like us but we're still a long way from where we need to be.
Parts of our game were a little bit better – I think that was only the second time George, Sneyd and Duff have played together in the last 12 weeks, and Duff and George had only played together once in that time and that was Wembley.
Hopefully, we can keep those guys together and start getting a bit of consistency within our group.
It was a step forward, but we've got a way to go yet.
Q: Does it give you a platform now to kick on?
SB: I'm not getting carried away, and we're doubling down.
Advertisement
We've got a little block before a break in a few weeks, so we're going hard at it.
We'll try and nail a few little bits of our game and see where it takes us.
Saturday's win over Hull FC kept Wire's play-off hopes alive (Image: Richard Walker)
Q: It was an important win for a lot of reasons but with it being your last home game for six weeks, was making sure your home crowd left on a high note a factor?
SB: I didn't quite realise how long it would be, so it was nice to get the win there for that reason.
Our fans travel really well anyway but with there not being a home game for a while, I'm sure more will follow us around in the next few weeks.
Advertisement
We'll look forward to seeing them on the road, but it's always nice to get a win at the Halliwell Jones.
Q: People are going to throw this fixture at you and say 'finally, you get to play Salford' but is this one of those 'damned if you do, damned if you don't' fixtures for you?
SB: It's another chance for us to improve, regardless of who we're playing.
For us, we need to work on our game and we've got things we really need to tidy up that we're really working hard on.
It doesn't matter who we're playing this week, not a lot would have changed for us. That's the way it is.
Huddersfield were in the same boat as Salford a couple of weeks ago – they had only won one game.
Advertisement
We'll just worry about and focus on our own team and getting our best foot forward in the game.
We're not going to change our style of play just because it's Salford – we're going to play our style and try to solve different problems that come our way.
We'll probably see some unstructured things that we'll probably have to manage.
Q: They're obviously conceding a lot of points – other clubs have climbed in and pumped up their points difference. Is that a consideration?
SB: No.
We've got figure our game out and the outcome will be the outcome.
We're just chasing a performance whatever the outcome will be on the back of that, we'll wait and see.
Advertisement
Q: Luke Thomas has played the last couple of games for you – his first Super League minutes for the club in more than two years.
Have you been pleased with what he's brought and does he have a chance to nail down a spot in your 17 now?
SB: Everyone loves Thommo around the place – he's a lovely lad and tries his backside off to be the best version of himself.
He trains hard and is no trouble, so I like him around the club.
He offers a lot and he's only going to get better. He's done a decent job for us.
Luke Thomas has come off the bench in Warrington's last two matches (Image: Alex Whitehead/SWpix.com)
Advertisement
Q: You had Tom McKinney as your 18th man on Saturday – he's someone that's generating a lot of excitement within the club and he's a big body.
How close is he to making his debut?
SB: I don't know but we're trying to expose him to a little bit more.
He trained with us in pre-season for about six weeks, so he's comfortable around the guys and he's been showing a bit of promise in the reserves games.
We just wanted to expose him to the environment and see if we can push him through a bit quicker, but there's a bit of work between now and then for Tom.
There's a few things in his game that he needs to work on – there's no doubt he can do a job for us but when he comes in, we want him to be able to stay in.
Advertisement
Q: You've obviously got Sam Stone here on loan from Salford, while Dan Russell is over there on loan and both are able to play on Friday.
It's not uncommon in rugby league but it does create a weird dynamic – have you leant on Sam at all for any info?
SB: No, not at all.
We're looking more at ourselves and what we can improve on to get our performance a little bit better.
I'm not really used to these kinds of deals as they don't really happen in Australia so it is a bit of a funny situation.
Sam Stone will face parent club Salford for the first time since leaving on Friday (Image: Neil Ashurst/P&B Pictures)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Footballers close to going on strike over ‘nonsensical' playing calendar
Footballers close to going on strike over ‘nonsensical' playing calendar

New York Times

time35 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Footballers close to going on strike over ‘nonsensical' playing calendar

Professional Footballers' Association (PFA) chief executive Maheta Molango believes players are closer to going on strike over the 'nonsensical' playing calendar than ever before in his time in charge of the players' union. Speaking at the PFA's pre-season camp for out-of-contract players on Wednesday, Molango said players at the Club World Cup this summer 'will be struggling to know which season they are in' and suggested that the coming campaign could be the breaking-point in terms of fatigue, injuries and loss-of-form. Advertisement 'It's almost as if the lines are blurred between seasons — this is our problem,' said Molango, who became PFA boss in 2021. 'We're not trying to single out a specific competition. It's this feeling of accumulation of competitions that just do not talk to each other and create a calendar that's just nonsensical. 'We always said that this season would be one that would give us tangible examples. Because sometimes you can talk about stuff but when people are in the middle of it, then they really realise what it means. 'I think (Manchester City head coach) Pep Guardiola said the other day, and we agree, let's see what happens in October, November — that's when you're going to start seeing (the impact), because you pay the price.' Unlike North America's traditional 'Big Four' sports, European football has not experienced many industrial disputes. There were short strikes in Italy and Spain in 2011 but English players have not even threatened to strike since the PFA organised a successful campaign for the abolition of the maximum wage in 1961. Molango, however, pointed out that more and more players have been talking about the effect of too many games, too much travel, not enough rest and no breaks between seasons. He has also played a central role in launching two legal challenges against world football's governing body FIFA — one through the Belgian courts and one via the European Commission — for what global players' unions claim is a failure to consult on the calendar. And the Swiss-born Italian, who played professionally in England, Germany and Spain before becoming a leading sports lawyer, said the crowded international calendar is not just a problem for the world's best players, as the need to find room for more FIFA and UEFA club football has already seen FA Cup replays scrapped and now there is pressure on English football to drop its second cup competition and reduce the Premier League to 18 teams. He also pointed out that there is a finite amount of broadcast and commercial money out there and companies are reassessing where best to allocate it. 'The TV money pot is what it is — it's not getting any bigger,' he said. 'A new competition means a new guest trying to eat into that pie, so what goes to that competition may not go to another. Advertisement 'And people who come from the French market know this very tangibly. The broadcasters only have €500million (£430m) to spend. Do I spend on Champions League? Do I spend on the French League? 'They go for the premium competition or what they perceive as being premium. This is not speculation. This is what is happening right now, just across The Channel.' When asked specifically about the risk of a strike, he said: 'It comes to a stage when you expect the authorities to look after you, and they don't look after you, then you need to take your own measures to protect yourself. 'When you go to those pre-season meetings with other stakeholders, you can see the tension. I've been doing that now for four years and the tension has been escalating because people are saying 'this is my career and this may become shorter – that's my problem, not the problem of other people who put together these competitions'. 'It's very tangible that people are worried about that.' Molango also backed this week's calls from global players' union FIFPro to avoid playing any games at next summer's World Cup during the hottest parts of the day at many of the chosen venues in Mexico and the U.S.. 'We've reached a stage where it's no longer a question of what the players feel, it's damaging the actual product,' he said. 'I've been to games held at 4pm in Philadelphia — it was unbearable for me as a fan, let alone for people on the pitch, and the quality of what we saw was just not good. 'There's no way you can have a good game if you play at 4pm in Mexico. It's impossible, because the players say to you 'I need to manage my efforts', which means what you see on the pitch is not good (and) the audiences drop. 'It's as simple as that. It's not good for us as an industry. We're devaluating the product. 'And it's a shame, because if I'm a U.S. fan and that's my first exposure to soccer, that's not good. We need to be mindful that we're competing with other sports.' (Steven Paston/PA Images via Getty Images)

Roma eyeing Genoa midfielder Morten Frendrup
Roma eyeing Genoa midfielder Morten Frendrup

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Roma eyeing Genoa midfielder Morten Frendrup

Roma's midfield is waiting to be strengthened in view of next season. Despite the restrictions imposed by the FFP, in fact, the Giallorossi will still be able to count on an important budget for the summer transfer market session. Advertisement Part of this amount, according to French portal FootMercato, could be used to sign Morten Frendrup. The Danish midfielder of Genoa, who made 37 appearances last season, is valued at around 20 million euros by the rossoblu club. Frendrup seems ready to make the leap to a big club and is also being monitored by other clubs, including Inter. Having arrived in Italy in January 2022, he has already made 122 appearances, demonstrating reliability and consistency of performance.

For the first time in 148 years, Wimbledon has no line judges. Some say that ‘takes away the humanity' from the tournament
For the first time in 148 years, Wimbledon has no line judges. Some say that ‘takes away the humanity' from the tournament

CNN

time42 minutes ago

  • CNN

For the first time in 148 years, Wimbledon has no line judges. Some say that ‘takes away the humanity' from the tournament

Pauline Eyre still remembers the 'extraordinary feeling' of making her first appearance at Wimbledon aged 21, taking in the noise and the crowds as she marched onto the pristine grass courts, neat and pillowy under her feet. Eyre, however, had no intentions of hitting a serve or swiping at a forehand, nor dreamed of lifting a trophy in two weeks' time. She even calls herself 'a pretty bad junior player' who regularly lost in the first round of local tournaments. But under the looming shadow of Centre Court, she had reached the pinnacle of her vocation as a line judge. That moment, Eyre tells CNN Sports, was 'a great feeling of pride … going out as that team of people so visibly different.' Line judges have long been an iconic and instantly-recognizable facet of Wimbledon, decked out in Ralph Lauren uniforms and often considered the sporting world's best-dressed officials. But as of this year, that tradition has come to an end. Organizers announced in October that an electronic calling system would be introduced at future tournaments, doing away with human line judges. For someone like Eyre, who called the lines at Wimbledon on 16 occasions, the decision marks a sad chapter in the tournament's near 148-year-old history. 'At the end of the day, a tennis match is sport, and sport is about people,' says Eyre. 'And I don't think technology necessarily makes everything better. I don't think it's improving the quality of the line calling because line calling was always excellent. 'It takes away that bit for the players where they need to deal with adversity. If they don't like a call, they can't argue with the technology. … It's about the player who does the best in adversity. You take away the humanity from tennis, you're taking away a lot of what it is: human beings striving against each other and competition.' Line judges, Eyre adds, were 'part of the furniture of the court' at Wimbledon, their uniforms 'so striking and so different to any uniform anywhere else in the world.' But the tournament's shift to electronic line calling (ELC) is in step with the rest of the tennis world. The ATP and WTA Tours have adopted the system, as have the Australian and US Opens. Roland-Garros remains the only grand slam competition using human line judges for 'out' and 'fault' calls. For Wimbledon to follow this trend might not seem like a particularly radical move, but the grass-court grand slam, brimming with history and old-school values, is often viewed as a separate entity to other tournaments, a world unto itself. The decision, according to All England Lawn Tennis Club (AELTC) chief executive Sally Bolton, was made to ensure 'maximum accuracy in our officiating' and to give players 'the same conditions' as for most other events on tour. '(It) was probably inevitable,' Andrew Jarrett, the tournament referee at Wimbledon between 2006 and 2019, tells CNN Sports. 'It is almost certainly correct to go down this route. Why? Well, provided it is set up correctly – and that's crucial – then you get a very good result, and it's proven to be better than human eyesight, so therefore it's seen as being an improvement. 'From a technology point of view, if it exists and if it improves, why wouldn't you use it as the line that's been taken across the world?' Jarret, however, acknowledges the 'cost to the human side' of the sport, as well as disincentivizing young officials who can no longer aspire to call lines at Wimbledon. Eyre makes the same point. 'You have to be a bit of a saint to want to spend your weekends umpiring children's tennis matches at the local club without the carrot of Wimbledon at the end of it,' she says. 'Why would a 15-year-old who's a club tennis player or a county tennis player want to go into line judging when there's nothing really in it for them?' As for the players, the reaction has been mixed. Women's top seed Aryna Sabalenka said that she is '50/50' but 'probably leaning towards the electronic system' because it removes the question of challenging a line judge's call. But defending women's champion Barbora Krejčíková said that she 'like(s) the old traditional style,' while American star Frances Tiafoe enjoyed the 'fanfare' of being able to challenge a line judge. There have been occasional teething issues with electronic calling, too. During Wednesday's second-round match between Madison Keys and Olga Danilović, the automated system made an unprompted 'out' call between points, causing brief confusion and a ripple of laughter from the crowd. And after her first-round match on Court 8, located in one of the busiest parts of the grounds, China's Yuan Yue said that the automated calls were sometimes too quiet to hear. From observing other tournaments, Eyre also thinks that electronic calls aren't always loud enough. Line judges, by contrast, are instructed to shout their calls clearly. 'We had to sell the call: out, definitely, it's out, in one very short, sharp syllable,' says Eyre. 'It did feel a bit odd when they were super calm – it changed the environment, changed the atmosphere.' CNN Sports has contacted Wimbledon organizers for comment on the volume of the electronic line calls. According to Reuters, the tournament's pool of around 300 line judges has been reduced to 80 at this year's event, with those remaining deployed as 'match assistants' who step in should the ELC system fail. Wimbledon first used Hawk-Eye cameras to provide electronic officiating in 2007, and since then players have been able to 'challenge' the calls made by human line judges, potentially overturning a decision against them. Jarrett was serving as the tournament referee when Hawk-Eye was introduced, but says that scrapping line umpires 'was not on the agenda' during his time in office, which ended six years ago. 'There was no real suggestion for the replacement of line umpires,' he says. 'I think we all knew right from the outset that we were starting a journey that would possibly lead to this one day, but that was not on the immediate horizon.' As for Eyre, she felt that the threat of her old job being extinguished 'was always there' once HawkEye was introduced, even though she thought it simply proved that line judges were 'almost always' correct during player challenges. 'After a while, I think it made us more confident that we knew that we were doing it right, and that was really good,' she says. But even that wasn't enough to save the jobs of line judges, who are now destined to be talked about with a nostalgic appeal by the sport's traditionalists. Like many things in life, the charm of a Wimbledon line judge is perhaps only being appreciated once they've been taken away. That might feel ironic to someone like Eyre, who these days is a stand-up comedian using her line-judging days as a source for material. She never saw herself as a popular figure among players at Wimbledon, once being stared down by John McEnroe – the most famous protestor of a line call – and on another occasion getting booed by the crowd for foot-faulting home favorite Greg Rusedski. Line judges, she thinks, had a reputation as failed players and hangers-on, 'terribly officious people who wanted to exert some power.' But the true reason they devote so much time to the cause, Eyre believes, runs much deeper: 'We just wanted to be part of something we loved.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store