logo
‘Equivalent to book burning.' CDC gag order eases, but crucial data remain unavailable

‘Equivalent to book burning.' CDC gag order eases, but crucial data remain unavailable

Boston Globe07-02-2025

Massachusetts and New Hampshire public health officials noted that state health agencies continue to communicate with each other about emerging health threats and have other sources for insight into the health of the nation.
But the precedent of freezing communication is troubling, Massachusetts officials said.
Advertisement
The CDC is still providing information on emerging health concerns through other channels, Massachusetts DPH officials said. The federal agency shared information about an
The CDC on Thursday released its
Advertisement
'Not being able to talk about ongoing health emergencies is a level of stifling that will imperil our communities,' said Jennifer Nuzzo, director of the Pandemic Center at the Brown University School of Public Health.
The latest issue of the weekly report included articles about the health impacts of wildfires and firefighting chemicals. Nuzzo and others, though, had expected new information about H5N1. A variant of the bird flu spreading among cows has raised concerns about the virus' capacity to adapt to spread easily among humans. The CDC is posting updated numbers tallying bird flu infections among animals and people, but that's not sufficient, Nuzzo said.
'Just knowing a count and what state it occurs in doesn't tell us if this virus has mutated to trigger another pandemic,' she said.
The CDC did not respond to a Globe question about the timing of future bird flu articles but told the Associated Press they
It's been a week since the CDC removed material that included vital information about the health of groups including young people, Black and Latino populations and LGBTQ+ Americans.
Advertisement
'What's happening to the federal data that's being taken off web sites is equivalent to book burning,' said Carlene Pavlos, executive director of the Massachusetts Public Health Alliance and a former official with the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. 'It's real world facts that are being prevented from seeing the light of day.'
Scientists and health officials emphasized that failing to track health impacts based on race and gender will only succeed in blinding experts to emerging health threats.
'If people exist, simply declaring by fiat that they don't exist doesn't work,' said Nancy Krieger, a professor of social epidemiology at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. 'They still have health needs.'
One of the paused datasets is the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System, which several scientists described as the country's best source of information about physical and mental health among American adolescents. By Friday, some of the links to the data had been restored, but not all.
The database anchors a trove of research and policymaking, said Dr. Steven Woolf, director emeritus and senior advisor at the Virginia Commonwealth University Center on Society and Health. His work on social justice and health disparities relies on the data, which includes information dating back to the 1980s about factors such as smoking, exercise, drug use, and suicidal behavior. He believes the database was removed because it includes a question on sexual and gender identity.
'Clinical trials have been forced to grind to a halt,' Woolf said. 'This delay in the scientific process and interference with the independence of science is only going to harm the health of Americans.'
Clinicians also use that dataset to keep abreast of trends in illnesses they treat, said Dr. Kenneth H. Mayer, medical research director at Fenway Health and co-director of The Fenway Institute.
Advertisement
'It's helpful to know what are the emerging issues around sexually transmitted infections,' Mayer said. The CDC did not respond to questions about missing data, saying only that some communications were not subject to the pause, though a spokesperson did not say what communications were exempt. He also said the federal Department of Health and Human Services had provided guidance on how to 'seek approval for any other type of mass communication.' HHS spokespeople did not respond to questions about that guidance.
Some CDC web sites say they are 'being modified to comply with President Trump's Executive Orders.'
Researchers across the country are now trying to piece together the missing databases by sharing copies they've made. Some material, though, isn't available to download, Krieger said. And even researchers who have copies of the missing data aren't able to publish, since peer review requires that the data underpinning their work be available for fact checking.
'This is unprecedented, to my knowledge,' Krieger said. 'To lose that information, it's a crime against humanity, as far as I'm concerned, and against this planet.'
Jason Laughlin can be reached at

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

RFK Jr. guts ACIP. What happens next?
RFK Jr. guts ACIP. What happens next?

Politico

time42 minutes ago

  • Politico

RFK Jr. guts ACIP. What happens next?

Presented by Driving the day ACIP FIRINGS ROCK WASHINGTON — HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. abruptly removed 17 vaccine experts from the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices on Monday — and Washington is already reeling. 'The committee has been plagued with persistent conflicts of interest and has become little more than a rubber stamp for any vaccine,' Kennedy wrote in an opinion piece published in The Wall Street Journal. He wrote that the decision is meant to restore faith in vaccines. Public health experts and Democrats immediately condemned the action — which POLITICO reported was under consideration in February. 'This is absolutely unprecedented. RFK Jr. has many levers at his disposal to influence vaccine policy in the U.S., each with varying degrees of impact. But this move is a red-alert, level 4 alarm,' said Katelyn Jetelina, an epidemiologist who's consulted for the CDC. The biopharmaceutical industry also raised concerns. 'A wholesale change of this manner will negatively affect the Committee's ability to deliberate and make well-informed recommendations, putting American lives at risk,' Biotechnology Innovation Organization CEO John Crowley said in a statement. 'We agree that transparency is key to restoring trust in immunizations; however, the actions taken today upend a time-tested system that has protected American public health.' The removal of the experts also appears to buck the commitment Kennedy made to Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Chair Bill Cassidy (R-La.) to 'maintain' the committee 'without changes.' But Cassidy told reporters at the U.S. Capitol that he spoke with Kennedy twice Monday and that the assurance he'd won from the now-secretary concerned ACIP's structure rather than membership. 'Of course, now the fear is that the ACIP will be filled up with people who know nothing about vaccines except suspicion,' Cassidy posted on X after the announcement. That fear was echoed by Democrats — who slammed the decision as a dangerous action that puts the health of Americans at risk. 'Secretary Kennedy is firing the 17 medical experts that advise our nation on immunization practices so he can stack the panel with a bunch of anti-vaccine wackos,' House Energy and Commerce ranking member Frank Pallone (D-N.J.) said in a statement. Remember: FDA Commissioner Marty Makary slammed ACIP as a 'kangaroo court' earlier this month on CBS' 'Face the Nation.' What's next: HHS said ACIP will still meet June 25-27, but with new membership. IT'S TUESDAY. WELCOME BACK TO PRESCRIPTION PULSE. Do you know how the decision to fire ACIP members went down? Send your tips to David Lim (dlim@ @davidalim or davidalim.49 on Signal) and Lauren Gardner (lgardner@ @Gardner_LM or gardnerlm.01 on Signal). Eye on the FDA DECISION TIME ON RSV — Two drug products targeting respiratory syncytial virus — a common bug that can cause severe illness in young babies and older adults — are on deck FDA decisions this week. Another antibody: The agency approved Merck's preventive monoclonal antibody Monday — a day ahead of schedule — for infants' first RSV season, injecting more competition into the RSV market. The company has designed the drug, dubbed Enflonsia, to be the same single dose administered to babies of any weight — a departure from Sanofi's Beyfortus, which is made in different dosage amounts depending on a baby or toddler's age and weight. Dr. Octavio Ramilo of St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, who worked as an investigator for Merck's trials for the drug, said its 'dosing convenience' and strong evidence showing reductions in disease and hospitalization make Enflonsia 'a promising new intervention to help protect infants from RSV.' Merck said it expects the CDC's external vaccine panel to make recommendations for the antibody's use at its next meeting in late June. The company statement came out just before HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s op-ed on the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices was published. Another vaccine? Moderna is slated to get a decision on its mRNA vaccine for RSV in high-risk adults under 60 by Thursday. The FDA approved mResvia last year for adults 60 and older, and the company has said the shot met its study goals in the younger population. But Kennedy's suspicion of mRNA technology has prompted the federal government to pull funding from Moderna's bird flu vaccine program and to condition future Covid vaccine approvals for healthy people on more data, making the FDA's decision this week worth watching. Moderna stopped working on a version of the vaccine for children last year after receiving reports of severe lower respiratory tract infections in immunized trial participants. In Congress IN THE HOT SEAT — President Donald Trump's cuts to ideologically disfavored research have left the National Institutes of Health with unspent funds. Director Jay Bhattacharya, under pressure from critics on Capitol Hill and in the research community, is pledging to change that. But Democrats will get a chance to ask Bhattacharya for more details when he testifies before a Senate Appropriations subcommittee this morning. Pharma Moves Dr. Jennifer Peña is joining women's telehealth company Wisp as chief medical officer. She previously worked in similar roles at Oscar Health and Nurx and served as a White House physician under Barack Obama and Donald Trump. Document Drawer The FDA is publicizing a voluntary recall by Church & Dwight Co. of its Zicam nasal swabs and Orajel baby teething swabs due to potential fungi microbial contamination in the cotton swab components. No serious adverse events have been reported to date. The White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs is reviewing a 340B rebate guidance from the Health Resources and Services Administration. WHAT WE'RE READING STAT's Helen Branswell examines efforts by philanthropic leaders to maintain a network of labs that conduct surveillance of measles and rubella around the world following cuts by the Trump administration to global aid dollars. A bipartisan bill that tackles tools Medicare Advantage plans use to get higher payments from the federal government could be included in Senate Republicans' megabill, but a key Democrat doesn't want it in the package, POLITICO's Robert King and Meredith Lee Hill report. Nearly 50 food industry groups and companies are being invited by the White House to discuss a recent report on its Make America Healthy Again goals, POLITICO's Grace Yarrow reports.

Quadruple Rise in Uncommon Cancer Seen in Older Millennials
Quadruple Rise in Uncommon Cancer Seen in Older Millennials

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Quadruple Rise in Uncommon Cancer Seen in Older Millennials

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A new study has found a striking increase in appendix cancer in Americans born after 1945, with older millennials experiencing the most dramatic rise. Appendix cancer, according to the National Cancer Institute, is fortunately very rare, affecting only about 1–2 people in every million annually. However, the study led by researchers at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, Tennessee, found that appendiceal adenocarcinoma (AA) diagnoses have more than tripled in those born around 1980 and quadrupled in those born around 1985. While older millennials were those with the highest number of diagnoses, researchers believe that as higher-risk birth cohorts continue to age, it is likely that AA incidence rates will increase in the future. The study was based on data from the National Cancer Institute SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) Program, with the researchers analyzing the incidence of AA in people aged 20 or older from 1975 to 2019. In total, they examined 4,858 confirmed cases. A stock image shows a doctor pressing on a young woman's appendix. A stock image shows a doctor pressing on a young woman's appendix. getty images According to the Cleveland Clinic, sex and age are risk factors for appendix cancer; women are more likely to develop AA, are are those aged 50 and over. Other factors include smoking, a family history of cancer and health conditions such as atrophic gastritis (where the stomach lining becomes chronically inflamed), pernicious anemia (an autoimmune condition which affects the red blood cells) and Zollinger–Ellison syndrome (in which tumors cause ulcers in the stomach and upper small intestine), which have all been linked to a higher risk. Symptoms of appendix cancer vary from person to person—and sometimes can be asymptomatic. When present, symptoms usually include appendicitis, bloating, fluid buildup in the abdomen, increase in waist size, pain in the abdomen or pelvis, changes in bowel habits, nausea, vomiting and a tendency to feel full. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), risk factors for cancer in general include alcohol usage, HPV and obesity, which is associated with a higher risk of 13 types of cancer. These include adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, breast, colon/rectum, uterus, gallbladder, upper stomach, kidneys, liver, ovaries, pancreas, thyroid, meningioma, and multiple myeloma. Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about appendiceal adenocarcinoma? Let us know via science@ Reference Holowatyj, A. N., Washington, M. K., Goldberg, R. M., & Murphy, C. C. (2025). Birth cohort effects in appendiceal adenocarcinoma incidence across the United States. Annals of Internal Medicine, 178(7).

CDC Publishes Female Body Hair Guidelines
CDC Publishes Female Body Hair Guidelines

The Onion

timean hour ago

  • The Onion

CDC Publishes Female Body Hair Guidelines

ATLANTA—Stressing that the rules were formulated for the safety of all Americans, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released new guidelines Thursday governing female body hair. 'Effective immediately, women nationwide are advised to remove all hair from arms, legs, underarms, and genital areas or suffer the legal consequences,' said CDC spokesperson Jamie Reardon, stressing that failure to comply with the newly issued weekly waxing schedule for women 18 and over would result in a $50 fine for every hair spotted that was over a millimeter long. 'Even so much as a thin landing strip or faint peach fuzz on the cheeks should be reported to authorities. That is, unless the woman in question has written approval from a male family member. But why would they do that? It's true that body hair doesn't cause diseases, per se. But it does look very gross.' This reportedly represents the first significant revisions to U.S. female body hair guidelines since 1977, when CDC director David Sencer urged all women to grow a full and unapologetic bush.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store