
Does Our $80,000 Lincoln Nautilus Have a Better Interior Than a $120K Navigator?
The wow factor on our yearlong review 2025 Lincoln Nautilus SUV is its panoramic screen, a marvelous and slick 48 inches of pixels and information spread across the width of the vehicle but placed low enough to not be a distraction. It made its debut on the Nautilus, and the two-row SUV held court for a while. But Lincoln has a new flagship Navigator, and you just knew the Nautilus was about to lose its unique status.
The 2025 Lincoln Nautilus arguably offers a superior interior, thanks to its 48-inch screen, better layout, and intuitive controls compared to the pricier Navigator. Despite its smaller size, the Nautilus provides a more tailored experience, appealing to tech-savvy buyers.
This summary was generated by AI using content from this MotorTrend article Read Next
As our long-term Nautilus' chaperone, I was keen to check the 2025 Lincoln Navigator out myself. Could the newer and more expensive vehicle do the big screen thing better? The answer is yes and no.
Both SUVs have the 48-inch panoramic screen and a separate 11.1-inch infotainment screen to control the expansive display. Both feature the intuitive Lincoln Digital Experience user interface to run Google programs, as well as Apple CarPlay or Android Auto phone mirroring. Being newer, the Navigator launched with a few more apps and goodies than our Nautilus has, such as a light mode for daytime viewing, which will eventually also be deployed on the Nautilus. Some of the other additional apps have already been added via over-the-air updates, such as a Quick Tips app that can be downloaded from the Google Play Store to help owners better use the system. Also new: a Sirius XM sports widget to show the score during a live game. Size Matters
Because the Navigator is a much larger—and more important, wider—vehicle, its screen doesn't extend fully from one side of the vehicle to the other. Lincoln's designers cleverly placed speakers on each end for aesthetics, but it means all the displays shift slightly versus where they are in our Nautilus. Instead of having the speedometer directly in front of the driver, it has moved a bit to the right. It is still easy to see in the Navigator, but the slight relocation bothered at least one editor. We recognize it would likely have been prohibitively expensive to develop a wider screen, and we are all for keeping costs down and vehicles more affordable, but at the same time Lincoln is asking $102,190 for a base Navigator. We get the rationale, but we award points to the smaller Nautilus for its more tailored look. Software Can Fix This, Right?
Perhaps Lincoln can rearrange the Navigator's graphics on the programmable digital space on the screen to make the speedometer more front and center and move some less vital information closer to the left pillar.
An over-the-air update should do the trick. This is how Lincoln will continue to add some of the features and apps now on the Navigator to the Nautilus, such as the Quick Tips app that has already made its way to the smaller SUV.
Another offshoot of the Navigator's sheer size: The control screen might feel a bit too low and out of reach because the vehicle is so big and the screen is integrated into the dashboard. The Nautilus is smaller, and the screen is mounted higher on the dash, making it easier to access. What About the Lincoln Aviator?
If you are wondering why we compared the Nautilus to the Navigator and skipped the middle man, the smaller three-row Aviator, that's because the 2025 Aviator did not get the splendid screen as part of its refresh. It has a 13.2-inch center touchscreen—an improvement over the outgoing model but a far cry from the 48-inch screen on the smaller and more affordable Nautilus, which struck us as odd. We were told the splashier screen went into the Nautilus because the two-row SUV attracts a younger, techier, more metropolitan buyers while the Aviator is more family-oriented. We still think families would have liked the bigger screen in their Aviator, but at least Lincoln recognized the flagship Navigator needed the wow factor of the panoramic screen.
The piano key gearshift is nicer in our Nautilus Black Label, a sparkling silver and integrated into the dash. The Navigator Black Label we drove had glossy black buttons incorporated into the center console, to the right of the ignition button, a location that puts the gearshift farther from the driver's reach. The ignition button is on the dash in the Nautilus, another location we prefer to the larger Navigator.
One placement improvement where the Navigator wins: The button to open the rear hatch is still left of the steering wheel, but it's higher up and easier to see and use. The Nautilus houses its button lower where it is harder to get at, alongside the button to release the fuel door—thankfully the Navigator does not require that.
The Navigator also has an angled wireless phone charging, but instead of being up at the front and angled toward you, it's now side by side with the cupholders.
We recognize the Nautilus and Navigator buyers are not the same and have different needs. But the fact that our Nautilus keeps up with and in some ways surpasses the flagship three-row is a testament to the high-end nature of our long-term vehicle. More on Our 2025 Lincoln Nautilus Long-Termer: 2025 Lincoln Nautilus Black Label Yearlong Arrival: A Worthy SUV of the Year?
2025 Lincoln Nautilus Interior Review: How Nice Is the Black Label Interior?
Experiencing a Moment of Zen From Our 2025 Lincoln Nautilus Black Label
Our 2025 Lincoln Nautilus Black Label Proved To Be a Winter Warrior
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


TechCrunch
19 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Court filings reveal OpenAI and io's early work on an AI device
Legal filings submitted earlier this month from lawyers representing OpenAI and Jony Ive's io reveal new details about the companies' efforts to build a mass-market AI hardware device. The filings are part of a trademark dispute lawsuit filed this month by iyO, a Google-backed hardware startup developing custom-molded earpieces that connect to other devices. Over the weekend, OpenAI pulled promotional materials related to its $6.5 billion acquisition of Jony Ive's io startup in order to comply with a court order involved in the suit. OpenAI says it's fighting iyO's allegations of trademark infringement. For the last year, OpenAI executives and former Apple leaders now working at io have vigorously researched in-ear hardware devices, according to filings submitted in iyO's lawsuit. In a June 12 filing, lawyers representing OpenAI and io said the companies purchased at least 30 headphone sets from various companies to explore what's on the market today. In recent months, OpenAI and io executives also met with iyO's leadership, and demoed their in-ear technology, according to emails revealed in the case. That said, OpenAI's first device in collaboration with io may not be a pair of headphones at all. Tang Tan, a longtime Apple executive that co-founded io and serves as the startup's chief hardware officer, claims in a declaration to the court that the prototype OpenAI CEO Sam Altman mentioned in io's launch video 'is not an in-ear device, nor a wearable device.' Tan notes that the design of said prototype in not yet finalized, and that the product is at least a year away from being advertised or offered for sale. The form factor of OpenAI and io's first hardware device has largely remained a mystery. Altman merely stated in io's launch video that the startup was working to create a 'family' of AI devices with various capabilities, and Ive said io's first prototype 'completely captured' his imagination. Altman had previously told OpenAI's employees at a meeting that the company's prototype, when finished, would able to fit in a pocket or sit on a desk, according to the Wall Street Journal. The OpenAI CEO reportedly said the device would be fully aware of a user's surroundings, and that it would be a 'third device' for consumers to use alongside their smartphone and laptop. Techcrunch event Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Boston, MA | REGISTER NOW 'Our intent with this collaboration was, and is, to create products that go beyond traditional products and interfaces,' said Altman in a declaration to the court submitted on June 12. Lawyers representing OpenAI also said in a filing that the company has explored a wide range of devices, including ones that were 'desktop-based and mobile, wireless and wired, wearable and portable.' While smart glasses have emerged as the front-runner for AI-enabled devices, with companies like Meta and Google racing to develop the first broadly adopted pair, several companies are also exploring AI-enabled headphones. Apple is reportedly working on a pair of AirPods with cameras, which would help power AI features by gathering information about the surrounding environment. In recent months, OpenAI and io executives have done considerable research into in-ear products. On May 1, OpenAI's VP of Product, Peter Welinder, and Tan met with iyO's CEO, Jason Rugolo, to learn more about iyO's in-ear product, according to an emailed invitation revealed in the case. The meeting took place at io's office in Jackson Square, the San Francisco neighborhood where Ive has bought several buildings to work on LoveFrom and io. At the meeting, Welinder and Tan tested out iyO's custom-fit earpiece, but were disappointed when the product failed repeatedly during demonstrations, according to follow-up emails revealed in the case. Tan claims in his declaration that he met with Rugolo as a courtesy to his mentor, longtime Apple executive Steve Zadesky, who recommended he take the meeting. Tan also claims he took several precautions to avoid learning too much about iyO's IP, such as suggesting that his lawyers review materials before he does. However, it seemed that OpenAI and io employees thought they could learn something from one of iyO's partners. To customize its in-ear headsets, iyO sent a specialist from an ear-scanning company, The Ear Project, to someone's home or office to get a detailed map of someone's ear. In one email revealed in the case, Marwan Rammah, a former Apple engineer that's now working at io, told Tan that purchasing a large database of three-dimensional scans from The Ear Project could give the company a 'helpful starting point on ergonomics.' It's unclear if any such deal took place. Rugolo tried repeatedly to forge a deeper relationship between iyO, io, and OpenAI — but largely failed, according to the emails. He pitched OpenAI on launching iyO's device as an early 'developer kit' for its final AI device. He pitched OpenAI on investing in iyO and, at one point, even offered to sell his entire company for $200 million, the filing say. However, Tan said in his declaration that he declined these offers. Evans Hankey, former Apple executive turned io co-founder and chief product officer, said in a declaration to the court that io is not working on a 'custom-molded earpiece product.' The ChatGPT-maker seems to be more than a year out from selling its first hardware device, which may not be an in-ear product whatsoever. Gven what the company said in this lawsuit, it appears it is also exploring other form factors.


Geek Wire
21 minutes ago
- Geek Wire
UW's CoMotion Labs names six startups for inaugural climate and green tech incubator
Sustainability: News about the rapidly growing climate tech sector and other areas of innovation to protect our planet. SEE MORE The reception desk at the Seattle Climate Innovation Hub. (SCIH Photo) The University of Washington's CoMotion Labs has named the six startups participating in its inaugural Climate Tech Incubator. More than 30 companies applied to the eight-month program, which is part of the recently launched Seattle Climate Innovation Hub. The broader effort is a collaboration between CoMotion, the Seattle Office of Economic Development, the climate co-working group 9Zero, and the funding nonprofit VertueLab. The downtown-based incubator begins in July and includes access to UW facilities; mentoring, networking and entrepreneurial training; and preparation for raising capital from investors. 'These innovators are not only tackling the climate crisis head-on, they're laying the foundation for a resilient green economy. By supporting these startups, we're building a future where Washington leads in climate innovation, creates high-quality green jobs, and drives inclusive economic development across the region,' said Ashlee Esteban, director of CoMotion Labs, in a statement. The incubator companies are:


The Verge
38 minutes ago
- The Verge
A small System Shock 2 delay for consoles.
Posted Jun 23, 2025 at 11:23 PM UTC A small System Shock 2 delay for consoles. The 25th Anniversary Remaster is still launching on PC on June 26th, but on Xbox, Switch, and PlayStation, Nightdive Studios is now targeting a release for 'the first two weeks of July.' The studio vaguely says that it has 'encountered issues' preventing the June 26th launch on consoles.