logo
Deachman: Once, Canada Post was vital. Now people tell me it's irrelevant

Deachman: Once, Canada Post was vital. Now people tell me it's irrelevant

Yahoo4 hours ago

Joanne Bateman recently received a letter in the mail from her insurance company in Winnipeg. It was postmarked 19 days earlier.
According to Google Maps, it takes 19 days to walk from Winnipeg to Ottawa. One wonders if that is how the letter actually made it to this city.
Perhaps it's not a surprise, then, that the 79-year-old Bateman says the ongoing labour strife between the Crown corporation and its workers won't affect her: 'Not one bit.' Canada Post, she says, is simply not important to her anymore.
Tha's the problem the post office faces as management and the union CUPW grapple over a new contract for 55,000 employees. The jousting has been going on since November, 2023, and led to a 32-day strike over the 2024 Christmas period.
'I don't get much mail beyond flyers, and I only check my mailbox about once a week. I use my computer for a lot of my interactions,' said Bateman. 'I don't send cards; I send Happy Birthday emails. I don't send letters to friends; I just call or FaceTime them.'
Bateman's experience isn't universal, but judging from the quick straw poll I conducted outside the the Canada Post outlet at Fairlawn Mall on Friday, it's an increasingly common one. Reliance on the post office is following the path of the dodo.
Remember how upset we got when Canada Post announced in 2013 that it intended to drop home delivery in many areas in favour of community mailboxes? Nowadays, some residents are suggesting that home delivery be almost abandoned altogether.
'The federal government should still have a hand in this — every country in the world has a postal service — but they could cut it down to once-a-week delivery,' said Blake McIntyre, a Gatineau resident who noted he only receives about two letters a month in the mail, mostly from government departments. If he were slightly more advanced with his computer equipment, he could get that number even lower.
McIntyre's not in favour of full-on privatization of the post office, but said there might be a solution that leans in that direction. 'Maybe the government could contract it out but still be in control of it. But the federal government can't walk away from it, not yet.'
He's doubtful, though, that the corporation's stated wish to use more part-time employees at the cost of full-time ones will ever happen. 'You think those full-time union guys are going to walk back and let the part-timers take over? I don't think so.'
Melanie Stanton agrees that mail delivery could drop to one or two days a week without ruffling many feathers.
'I've always used the post office, but they need to cut things to make it work,' she said. 'We don't need delivery five days a week. We just don't.
'I think there's a place for the post office, but not the way it is right now.'
By contrast, Peaches Nicholas, 78, calls herself 'a Canada Post girl.'
'I can't live without it,' she told me. 'I like to communicate by mail: birthday cards, Christmas cards, anniversaries and letters. It's because I'm ancient; I'm not 21 or 22. I love opening my mail. I want Canada Post to keep on keeping on.'
She relies on Canada Post, in addition to other electronic means, to keep in touch with family members in Port of Spain, in Trinidad and Tobago. But that's a costly proposition; on Friday, she sent an ordinary letter to her sister Elizabeth in Port of Spain, which cost $10. 'If I was to send it express, it would be $60.' She says it's cheaper than talking at length on the phone, and when I suggested she try What'sApp, she sighed. 'I know. But I like communicating by writing — it's warm.'
Warm, but, at least in terms of cards and letters, on life support. And I suspect there are many people who are recently and uncomfortably realizing that apart from the Canadian Tire flyer that arrives in their mailbox on Mondays, say, they no longer have much of a relationship with Canada Post.
'I feel kind of guilty saying it, but I could live without Canada Post,' lamented Lorraine Walton.
'Young people don't know any different, and let's face it, out generation is going to be gone in 20 years.'
Don't remind us. We know. But do Canada Post and its workers?
bdeachman@postmedia.com
Our website is your destination for up-to-the-minute news, so make sure to bookmark our homepage and sign up for our newsletters so we can keep you informed.
Postal workers protest 'final offer' from Canada Post
Today's letters: Canada Post workers must be realistic about the future

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nova Scotia's ambitious 'Wind West' offshore energy plan wins support with conditions
Nova Scotia's ambitious 'Wind West' offshore energy plan wins support with conditions

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Nova Scotia's ambitious 'Wind West' offshore energy plan wins support with conditions

HALIFAX — Two leading environmental groups are giving a thumbs up to Nova Scotia's ambitious plan to dramatically expand its fledgling offshore wind energy industry. But both groups were quick to add caveats. On Monday, Premier Tim Houston said the province's plan to license enough offshore wind farms to produce five megawatts of electricity would be increased eightfold to 40 megawatts, well beyond the 2.4 megawatts Nova Scotia needs. He called on Ottawa to help cover the costs of his new Wind West project, saying the excess electricity could be used to supply 27 per cent of Canada's total demand. "Nova Scotia is on the edge of a clean energy breakthrough," the Progressive Conservative premier said in an online video, adding the province is poised to become an "energy superpower." Gretchen Fitzgerald, executive director of Sierra Club Canada, said the premier's bold plan, which includes building transmission lines across the country, represents an exciting opportunity for the province. "It could be a game-changer for the region and for Canada," she said in an interview from Ottawa. "But it needs to be done correctly and with consultations." Fitzgerald said the Nova Scotia and Canadian governments must focus on securing long-term benefits from the nascent offshore wind industry because they did a poor job on that front when dealing with the offshore oil and gas sector. "We have to make sure that we are not selling out what is a massive resource for less benefit than communities should have," Fitzgerald said, adding that Nova Scotia continues to suffer from a high rate of energy poverty. In May of this year, utility affordability expert Roger Colton produced a report showing that 43 per cent of Nova Scotians were struggling to pay their energy bills — the highest proportion in Canada. While Fitzgerald applauded Houston's clean energy plan, she criticized what she described as the premier's populist penchant for taking decisive action before consulting with experts and the public. "Moving from a couple hundred turbines to thousands in the next decade needs to be done in a staged way so we learn how to do this right," she said, adding Houston appears to have adopted a "'move-fast-and-break-things mentality." "(That) can lead to unacceptable harm to sensitive ocean life," she said. "From a community benefits and acceptance point of view, breaking trust can be the biggest barrier to getting to good climate solutions." In October 2023, the Public Policy Forum released a study saying Sable Island Bank, an ocean area about 180 kilometres south of Nova Scotia, is among the world's best locations for wind energy generation. "It and several other similarly endowed areas off the coast of Atlantic Canada hold the potential to place the region among the leading global hubs of offshore wind-powered energy development," says the report from the independent non-profit think tank. It goes on to say that as the world shifts from a dependence on fossil fuels to forms of energy that do not emit climate-changing greenhouse gases, Atlantic Canada is facing "a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity ... to recover an economic vitality comparable to the Age of Sail — fittingly built again on the power of wind at sea." The report says the installation of 15 gigawatts of offshore wind generation would create about 30,000 direct jobs annually. Despite the hype, the industry must also earn acceptance from Nova Scotia's fishing industry, which in 2023 contributed $2.5 billion to the province's economy and employed 19,000 people. In Halifax, a spokesman for the Ecology Action Centre called on the provincial government to build public trust, especially with coastal communities. "There really needs to be a priority on stakeholder engagement for all ocean users," said senior energy co-ordinator Thomas Arnason McNeil. "We're going to need to prioritize ecological safeguards and preserve the existing livelihoods that we have. That includes the fishing industry. That's half the economy in Nova Scotia." Still, he said the province's big push for clean energy is on the right track, especially when it comes to building out its electricity grid to better connect with the rest of the country. If done right, the payoff would be enormous, Arnason McNeil said. "We're talking serious job creation here and a lot of revenue potentially," he said. "The bottom line is that you have to do this right. (But) the prize at the end of the road is monumental in terms of the benefits." A call for bids to build enough offshore turbines to generate five gigawatts of electricity is expected as early as this year. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 8, 2025. Michael MacDonald, The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Doug Ford's Bill 5 is now law in Ontario. Here's what happens next
Doug Ford's Bill 5 is now law in Ontario. Here's what happens next

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Doug Ford's Bill 5 is now law in Ontario. Here's what happens next

Now that Ontario's controversial Bill 5 is law, all eyes are on what Premier Doug Ford does with the new powers it gives his government. Bill 5, also called the Protecting Ontario by Unleashing Our Economy Act, empowers the government (among other things) to create special economic zones, where cabinet can exempt companies or projects from having to comply with any provincial law, provincial regulation or municipal bylaw. Ford pitches Bill 5 as a way of shoring up Ontario's economy in the face of Donald Trump's tariffs by speeding up major infrastructure and resource projects. Ford's officials insist the government won't exempt any company in a special economic zone from Ontario's minimum wage rules or other labour laws. But the wide-open way the legislation is written would allow cabinet to hand out exemptions from any law, whether labour, environmental or operational. Asked this week which laws he's considering overriding with Bill 5 — and whether any laws are off the table for such exemptions — Ford offered no specifics. WATCH | Your quick guide to Bill 5: "I just want to speed up the process," he said during a news conference on Thursday, moments after Bill 5 received Royal Assent, making it law. Ford then talked of how long it takes for a mine to get into production, an issue that is actually tackled in a different part of Bill 5: revisions to the Mining Act designed to shorten Ontario's approval process to two years from the current four years. Pressed again on which laws he would exempt companies from in the special economic zones, Ford said every situation is different. Ford wants to move 'as quickly as possible' "Let's see what companies come to the table, and depending on how quickly we can get opportunities and jobs, we'll reveal them," Ford said. Ford wants Ontario's first special economic zone to be the Ring of Fire mineral deposit, some 500 kilometres northeast of Thunder Bay, in the heart of Treaty 9 territory. The area is said to be full of so-called critical minerals, such as cobalt, lithium and nickel, in high demand for the tech industry. The premier said on Thursday that he wants to make the Ring of Fire a special economic zone "as quickly as possible" but has also said he won't do so without consulting with First Nations Energy and Mines Minister Stephen Lecce says the province is already "consulting meaningfully" with First Nations and will continue to do so over the coming months. "We're all going to be part of this endeavour to really listen to those voices and help build a common vision for responsible resource development that unlocks the bounty of the resource, to change the lives of northerners and to ensure Indigenous share in that bounty," Lecce said alongside Ford at Thursday's news conference inside Queen's Park. The skepticism from many First Nations leaders is palpable. The Chiefs of Ontario invited Ford to attend their annual assembly June 17 to 19 and sent Ford a message that his attendance would mark the start of consultations on Bill 5. "This legislation, introduced without prior consultation with First Nations rights holders, raises serious concerns due to its far-reaching implications on inherent Treaty rights and community obligations to the land, waters, and wildlife," says the invitation letter from Ontario Regional Chief Abram Benedict. The Chiefs of Ontario, the umbrella group representing more than 130 First Nations across the province, are warning of "resistance, on the ground, and in the courts" against Bill 5. WATCH | What the 'duty to consult' First Nations means for governments: One thing to watch for in the months to come is whether the provincial government's push to fast-track the Ring of Fire is replicated by the federal government. Ford put the Ring of Fire at the top of his list presented to Prime Minister Mark Carney for consideration as a potential nation-building project. Ford calls Carney 'Santa Claus' Carney asked all the premiers to come to last Monday's First Ministers Meeting in Saskatoon with their ideas of projects that would be "in the national interest," either by helping to diversify the Canadian economy or to reach new export markets. It's now up to Carney to decide which projects merit federal backing, whether through fast-track approvals or funding. Ford described Carney as Santa Claus for this approach. But to make the metaphor accurate, it means Ford and his fellow premiers have merely written their letters to Santa Claus, and they now have to wait until Christmas comes to find out whether Santa brings them what they asked for. The other items on Ford's list are also projects that could be designated special economic zones: new nuclear power plants, a new deep-sea port on James Bay, Ford's vision of a tunnel under Highway 401 through Toronto, and an expansion of the GO Transit network. If Carney endorses any of these, you can expect the Ford government will use its Bill 5 powers to speed up the process of moving that project from endorsement to reality. On Friday, Carney's Liberals tabled a bill in the House of Commons called the One Canadian Economy Act, designed in part to speed up the approval process of major infrastructure projects, a goal similar to Ontario's Bill 5. One line in the text of Bill 5 says its purpose is making Ontario "the best place in the G7 to invest, create jobs and do business." Economic Development, Job Creation and Trade Minister Vic Fedeli, whose chief role is attracting companies to the province, says investors around the world are hoarding capital in hopes of some economic certainty. Will Bill 5 attract investment? "That capital that's building up needs to unleash, and we want them to know that when they come to Ontario, it can be unleashed very quickly here," Fedeli said at the news conference alongside Ford and Lecce. Having Bill 5 powers on the books means Ontario could try to entice investors to set up shop in a special economic zone, but officials won't say whether that incentive is now being dangled at any particular companies. More questions remain on how exactly the government will use other powers it obtained through Bill 5, such as the power to ignore the independent scientific committee that determines whether a species is endangered or threatened in Ontario. You can expect a backlash from conservation groups whenever the government uses that power, for instance by scrapping measures that would protect the habitat of a species at risk. What's unknown is when, where and with what species the government will take such a step. Another 'watch this space' related to Bill 5: what happens with the expansion of a landfill on the edge of the southwestern Ontario town of Dresden, which the legislation exempts from having to go through a comprehensive environmental assessment. Local residents say they're not giving up their efforts to halt the project, while the company behind is welcoming the opportunity of "moving forward with our plan."

Deachman: Once, Canada Post was vital. Now people tell me it's irrelevant
Deachman: Once, Canada Post was vital. Now people tell me it's irrelevant

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Deachman: Once, Canada Post was vital. Now people tell me it's irrelevant

Joanne Bateman recently received a letter in the mail from her insurance company in Winnipeg. It was postmarked 19 days earlier. According to Google Maps, it takes 19 days to walk from Winnipeg to Ottawa. One wonders if that is how the letter actually made it to this city. Perhaps it's not a surprise, then, that the 79-year-old Bateman says the ongoing labour strife between the Crown corporation and its workers won't affect her: 'Not one bit.' Canada Post, she says, is simply not important to her anymore. Tha's the problem the post office faces as management and the union CUPW grapple over a new contract for 55,000 employees. The jousting has been going on since November, 2023, and led to a 32-day strike over the 2024 Christmas period. 'I don't get much mail beyond flyers, and I only check my mailbox about once a week. I use my computer for a lot of my interactions,' said Bateman. 'I don't send cards; I send Happy Birthday emails. I don't send letters to friends; I just call or FaceTime them.' Bateman's experience isn't universal, but judging from the quick straw poll I conducted outside the the Canada Post outlet at Fairlawn Mall on Friday, it's an increasingly common one. Reliance on the post office is following the path of the dodo. Remember how upset we got when Canada Post announced in 2013 that it intended to drop home delivery in many areas in favour of community mailboxes? Nowadays, some residents are suggesting that home delivery be almost abandoned altogether. 'The federal government should still have a hand in this — every country in the world has a postal service — but they could cut it down to once-a-week delivery,' said Blake McIntyre, a Gatineau resident who noted he only receives about two letters a month in the mail, mostly from government departments. If he were slightly more advanced with his computer equipment, he could get that number even lower. McIntyre's not in favour of full-on privatization of the post office, but said there might be a solution that leans in that direction. 'Maybe the government could contract it out but still be in control of it. But the federal government can't walk away from it, not yet.' He's doubtful, though, that the corporation's stated wish to use more part-time employees at the cost of full-time ones will ever happen. 'You think those full-time union guys are going to walk back and let the part-timers take over? I don't think so.' Melanie Stanton agrees that mail delivery could drop to one or two days a week without ruffling many feathers. 'I've always used the post office, but they need to cut things to make it work,' she said. 'We don't need delivery five days a week. We just don't. 'I think there's a place for the post office, but not the way it is right now.' By contrast, Peaches Nicholas, 78, calls herself 'a Canada Post girl.' 'I can't live without it,' she told me. 'I like to communicate by mail: birthday cards, Christmas cards, anniversaries and letters. It's because I'm ancient; I'm not 21 or 22. I love opening my mail. I want Canada Post to keep on keeping on.' She relies on Canada Post, in addition to other electronic means, to keep in touch with family members in Port of Spain, in Trinidad and Tobago. But that's a costly proposition; on Friday, she sent an ordinary letter to her sister Elizabeth in Port of Spain, which cost $10. 'If I was to send it express, it would be $60.' She says it's cheaper than talking at length on the phone, and when I suggested she try What'sApp, she sighed. 'I know. But I like communicating by writing — it's warm.' Warm, but, at least in terms of cards and letters, on life support. And I suspect there are many people who are recently and uncomfortably realizing that apart from the Canadian Tire flyer that arrives in their mailbox on Mondays, say, they no longer have much of a relationship with Canada Post. 'I feel kind of guilty saying it, but I could live without Canada Post,' lamented Lorraine Walton. 'Young people don't know any different, and let's face it, out generation is going to be gone in 20 years.' Don't remind us. We know. But do Canada Post and its workers? bdeachman@ Our website is your destination for up-to-the-minute news, so make sure to bookmark our homepage and sign up for our newsletters so we can keep you informed. Postal workers protest 'final offer' from Canada Post Today's letters: Canada Post workers must be realistic about the future

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store