logo
Joe Soucheray: Was politics a factor in Mary Moriarty's charity to Tesla vandal?

Joe Soucheray: Was politics a factor in Mary Moriarty's charity to Tesla vandal?

Yahoo26-04-2025
Having never driven a Tesla, but having sat in one in order to pretend to a friend that I thought the dominating computer screen was fascinating, I sensed no revulsion or any particular distaste for the car. Everybody dances to a different beat and if you want an electric car, a Tesla, then have at it, even if the front of a Tesla looks like the underbelly of a dolphin.
And the Tesla truck is perhaps the ugliest machine ever manufactured. Some cars are so ugly that they become cool. You'd a pay a pretty penny these days for an Edsel, not in spite of its horse collar grill, but probably because of it. The Tesla truck looks like an industrial toaster or a hastily slapped together prop for a 1952 invasion-from-Mars movie. What were you thinking, Elon?
There is no accounting for taste and the vehicle's novelty cannot be denied. Besides, the way we're going, cars will end up looking like hot dog buns and the Tesla truck will someday be as revered as a Ferrari.
A fellow doesn't mean to pile on – Teslas have been getting keyed – but we have learned some lessons. Apparently, many of you who bought Teslas really, deep down, didn't care about saving the Earth. You cared about making a statement that you cared about saving the Earth. Otherwise, so many of you wouldn't now be plastering your cars with stickers that say, 'Don't blame me, I bought mine before Musk got to Washington.'
But then Musk joined President Donald Trump and because the two of them are ideologically evil, it is now acceptable to insist that you find Musk dastardly, even though when you bought the car, you thought Musk was ideologically a genius. I guess the stickers promote a wish to have the cake and eat it, too.
What changed? Well, Trump.
Our governor hasn't helped. It would be a stretch to say that Tim Walz incited the destruction of property, but a couple of weeks back, on that whatever that tour of his is, he took great glee in Tesla's falling stock price. It is now believed that the governor didn't realize that his own State Board of Investment had 1.6 million shares of Tesla stock in its retirement fund or that Tesla owns a manufacturing plant in Brooklyn Park.
In a riotous display of first-world angst, Teslas have been shot at, keyed and kicked. Tesla dealerships have been vandalized.
And locally we have the astonishing case of Dylan Bryan Adams, a financial analyst in the Minnesota Department of Human Services. Adams was arrested recently in Minneapolis for allegedly keying at least six Tesla cars to the tune of more than $20,000 in damages. Allegedly seems redundant. Teslas are virtually rolling film studios. The cars filmed Adams in the act.
It is unlikely Adams will be fired or even have a note placed in his file. He's been with the state since 2018 and nobody in the Walz administration has ever suffered any consequences for their incompetent handling of a $250 million food fraud. $20,000 is peanuts.
In fact, Mary Moriarty, the Hennepin County attorney, has decided not to press felony charges against Adams. Instead, Adams was offered 'diversion,' meaning restitution and some community service work. It almost sounds like Moriarty said, 'Oh, what the hell, he was only keying Teslas.'
It'd hard to know if Moriarty's charity to Adams reflected her politics. You have to wonder if she thought about it at all.
My question will go unanswered. Adams was out walking his dog when he struck. Why wasn't he at work?
Joe Soucheray can be reached at jsoucheray@pioneerpress.com. Soucheray's 'Garage Logic' podcast can be heard at garagelogic.com.
Jim Gelbmann: Our partisan endorsement process is unrepresentative, polarizing and self-serving
Ed Lotterman: What if the Fed set a trap for Trump?
Skywatch: A crow, a cup and a water snake
Real World Economics: Powell hits first; Trump hits back
Working Strategies: Random thoughts: Stretching job titles and happy places
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wall Street's Wild Rally: Why No One Cares About Tariffs Anymore
Wall Street's Wild Rally: Why No One Cares About Tariffs Anymore

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Wall Street's Wild Rally: Why No One Cares About Tariffs Anymore

Investors are in full-on risk modeand they're not waiting around to see how the Trump tariffs play out. From small caps to crypto, riskier corners of the market are lighting up as bets on a Federal Reserve rate cut heat up. The S&P 500 (SPY) is up nearly 30% from its April lows, with Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) and other megacap techs carrying most of the load. According to Deutsche Bank, just a handful of tech giants were responsible for 90% of the index's Q2 earnings growth. The Russell 2000 is climbing for the fourth straight month, emerging-market stocks are catching bids, and even speculative European bank bonds are finding buyers. The fear? Gone. Volatility measures like the VIX and MOVE indexes are plumbing their lowest levels in months. Traders are now pricing in a nearly 90% chance the Fed cuts rates in September, with some even betting on a 50-basis-point move. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent added fuel to that fire, saying rates should probably be 150 to 175 basis points lower. The market has latched onto that narrative. Even currency volatility has dropped to its lowest in a year. All the while, the economic backdrop remains soft: labor market data isn't running hot, inflation came in as expected, and for now, that's enough. The mood is surprisingly bullishit's almost like what tariffs, who cares?' said Neil Birrell, CIO at Premier Miton. That detachment from reality? It's workingat least for now. But not everyone's ready to join the parade. It's very expensive right now to be bearish, said UBS O'Connor's Bernard Ahkong, who still sees plenty of risks lurking in the background. Bloomberg's Mark Cudmore warned that rising long-end yields or another Trump curveball could snap the rally. Still, Wall Street strategistssome of whom had slashed targets back in Aprilare now raising their outlooks. Citigroup's Scott Chronert even bumped up his year-end S&P 500 target, betting that potential tax cuts could outweigh tariff impacts. For now, the market's not trading fearit's trading FOMO. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOGE Has Continued to Waste Billions While Saving Almost Nothing: Reports
DOGE Has Continued to Waste Billions While Saving Almost Nothing: Reports

Gizmodo

time10 minutes ago

  • Gizmodo

DOGE Has Continued to Waste Billions While Saving Almost Nothing: Reports

The Trump Administration's Department of Government Efficiency has been a project largely defined by ever-diminishing expectations. At the outset of DOGE's journey, its chief operator, Elon Musk, famously claimed, in a bout of wild optimism, that he hoped to cut 'at least' $2 trillion out of the federal budget. Not long after the election, Musk reduced his ambitions to $1 trillion. Throughout the first few months of Trump's second term, DOGE claimed to be saving Americans billions, but analyses repeatedly showed the organization was wildly inflating its savings and often making rudimentary math mistakes. In May, the billionaire claimed that DOGE had saved Americans $160 billion, but admitted that his org was 'not as effective' as he'd hoped. At the time, the New York Times reported that DOGE had only publicly accounted for $58 billion of the savings Musk alleged and that even those purported savings had been 'significantly inflated, by including outright errors and guesses about the future.' Now, yet another fact-checking effort aimed at Musk's initiative has resulted in greatly reduced facts and figures. An analysis by Politico claims that, of some $52.8 billion that DOGE purports to have saved Americans by cancelling various government contracts, only a fraction appears to have been realized. The report states that, of the savings bragged about on DOGE's 'Wall of Receipts' website, only '$32.7 billion in actual claimed contract savings' could be verified. On top of that, the news outlet found that 'DOGE's savings over that period were closer to $1.4 billion.' Politico further notes that none of those savings will lower the federal deficit unless Congress steps in. Instead, the money went back to the respective agencies to which it had been allotted. In other words, DOGE basically did nothing. The apparent blunder was achieved through a poor grasp of timetables, the report claims: DOGE's savings calculations are based on faulty math. The group uses the maximum spending possible under each contract as its baseline — meaning all money an agency could spend in future fiscal years. That amount can far exceed what the government has actually committed to pay out. Counting this 'ceiling value' gives a false picture of savings for taxpayers. 'That's the equivalent of basically taking out a credit card with a $20,000 credit limit, canceling it and then saying, 'I've just saved $20,000,'' said Jessica Tillipman, associate dean for government procurement law studies at George Washington University Law School. 'Anything that's been said publicly about [DOGE's] savings is meaningless.' Also relevant is another recent report that claims DOGE spent substantially more money attempting to downsize government than it saved by destroying public programs. Authored by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, the analysis claims that DOGE blew through some $21.7 billion in taxpayer money as it attempted to downsize the federal workforce. Between January and July, DOGE spent some $14.8 billion through its Deferred Resignation Program, which paid public employees 'not to work for up to eight months.' DOGE allegedly spent another $6 billion on '100,000 employees who have been involuntarily separated from federal service or who remain on prolonged periods of administrative leave pending separation, many of whom were paid to not do their jobs for weeks or months.' The organization spent hundreds of millions more on various inefficient and wasteful policies. The Senate committee notes that the amount that DOGE spent in this fashion is more than double the amount that DOGE has definitively culled from the government ($9 billion, via cuts to NPR, PBS, and foreign aid) through the rescission package voted for by Republicans this summer. Meanwhile, as DOGE has continued on with its questionable antics, its own staff have continued to suck taxpayer money out of the government. In March, NPR reported that $40 million in public funds had been apportioned for DOGE's activities, but much about the cost of the initiative remains unclear. That same month, Wired noted that some DOGE staffers were making six-figure government salaries for their slash-and-burn work. The money often appeared to be coming from the very agencies that DOGE was butchering, the outlet noted. If both the recent studies are accurate, they reveal the very ironic contours of DOGE and its activities—an organization that claims to be rooting out governmental waste and fraud, but whose operations appear wasteful and whose public statements are frequently, according to many journalistic analyses, fraudulent. At this point, it's unclear what the heck DOGE is even doing. The organization isn't dead, but with the loss of its Supreme Leader (Musk), its mandate has become increasingly unclear, and its activities are now shrouded in mystery. Like a computer virus, the organization continues to worm its way through the bureaucracy's guts, servicing nebulous projects, like the creation of a national citizenship database that has alarmed privacy activists. Some of DOGE's former members continue to prove useful to the administration in other ways. Last week, the 19-year-old former DOGE-ling known as 'Big Balls' (real name Edward Coristine) managed to get punched in the face by a group of juveniles while out for a stroll in the nation's capital, according to Washington D.C. police. The spectacle of Coristine's bloodied visage was shared widely on Musk's X platform and other social media sites, and the incident has since served as a justification for Trump's authoritarian-style federalization of local police forces in D.C. The episode shows that, while DOGE has been an utter trainwreck from a governance and policy standpoint, it continues to serve certain functions deemed critical to the success of the current regime: namely, those of the public relations (i.e., propaganda) department.

AI Company Tensor Debuts a Robocar You Can Own
AI Company Tensor Debuts a Robocar You Can Own

CNET

time40 minutes ago

  • CNET

AI Company Tensor Debuts a Robocar You Can Own

Table of Contents AI Company Tensor Debuts a Robocar You Can Own Robotaxis are expanding into a growing number of cities, but an AI company called Tensor unveiled a self-driving vehicle on Wednesday designed specifically for personal ownership. The Tensor Robocar looks somewhat like a mashup of Waymo's Jaguar I-Pace vehicles and Tesla's Model Y, with sleek, futuristic contours and a silver finish, as seen in a promotional video. In a statement, the company said the vehicle has "over 100 seamlessly integrated sensors," as well as 37 cameras, five lidars, 11 radars, 22 microphones and 10 ultrasonic sensors. Tensor says the vehicle is Level 4-autonomous, meaning it can fully drive itself within a specified area and under certain weather conditions (robotaxis like Waymo are also Level 4). "The Tensor Robocar is the first volume-produced, consumer-ready autonomous vehicle -- designed from the ground up for private ownership at scale," the company said in a statement. "While today's autonomous vehicles are primarily built as RoboTaxis -- heavily maintained, depot-dependent fleets -- Tensor represents a radical departure: a truly independent personal Robocar engineered to serve its owner, not its operator." Tensor says its Robocar will be available "in select global markets" in the US, Europe and the United Arab Emirates, and deliveries will begin in the second half of 2026. The company notes this new vehicle is "designed to meet the world's most stringent automotive standards." That includes the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, which is designed to ensure vehicles and components like brakes, tires and airbags meet necessary safety requirements. The Robocar is designed to serve as an agentic vehicle. You can state commands whether you're inside the car or nearby, Tensor says. The promotional vehicle shows a woman using her phone to say "Pick me up" and "Come now" while specifying the pickup point on a map, adding "Turn on the AC" while walking to meet the vehicle. After exiting, she states commands like "Open truck" and "Go find a parking spot." What's perhaps most interesting is that users can still drive the vehicle if they choose to do so. The video shows the woman climbing into the driver's seat and tapping a button that makes a dashboard touchscreen slide away and reveal a steering wheel. Watch this: This Robotaxi Looks and Drives Like No Car You've Ever Seen Before 11:09 Tensor says personal information including a user's location, preferences and records is "processed and stored locally on the vehicle, ensuring security." Users can access their data through an end-to-end encrypted smartphone app or the onboard interface, the company adds. And if all the cameras and microphones make you uneasy, Tensor says there are physical camera covers and microphone off switches for more privacy. A vehicle like the Tensor Robocar may be appealing to someone who still wants to own a personal vehicle while tapping into autonomous driving technology. Elon Musk has a similar plan for Tesla's Robotaxi, which he said people can personally own while also having them operate as part of a ride hailing service. That vehicle, which was unveiled last year, is slated to go into production "before 2027," according to Musk. Other companies big and small are getting in on self-driving vehicles. Waymo, which is owned by Google's parent company Alphabet, is undoubtedly the leader, with a robotaxi presence in a handful of US cities and more to come -- some via a partnership with Uber. Other companies like May Mobility and Nuro are also teaming up with Uber to make their services available to more people. Lyft similarly has a batch of ridehailing partnerships. And Zoox, owned by Amazon, is gearing up to launch commercially later this year.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store