logo
Lured by Thailand perks, China's EV makers face reality check

Lured by Thailand perks, China's EV makers face reality check

Business Times02-05-2025

IT'S HARD to miss the aggressiveness of Chinese automakers in the Thai market on the drive from Suvarnabhumi Airport into Bangkok: huge billboards featuring BYD, Changan Auto, GAC, Great Wall Motor, SAIC MG and many other Chinese brands line the highways and roads.
And on the streets of the capital, Chinese car dealerships are often located steps away from the long-established showrooms of Japanese brands like Toyota and Honda.
Thai consumers now have more choices than ever and at attractive prices. This phenomenon followed a deluge of Chinese brands in the Thai market over the past three years, with at least nine automakers currently in the fray.
The influx has been driven by the Thai government's offer of generous industrial subsidies for electric vehicle (EV) purchases and production. This coincided with Chinese firms looking for new markets overseas amid intensifying competition at home, and the perception that Thailand was a prospective steppingstone for their global ambitions.
But the story has a caveat: The subsidy policies require Chinese carmakers to produce at least the same number of cars locally as they import, leading to a build-up of supply made at a relatively higher cost for a small market.
As a result, the local auto market has now become a reflection of its larger counterpart on the Chinese mainland – saturated with competing brands and dogged by fierce price competition. At the same time, the Thai market is experiencing a downturn, with consumers hobbled by high levels of household debt.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Thailand's auto market sold 572,675 new cars in 2024 – down more than 25 per cent year-on-year – while pure EV sales accounted for fewer than 67,000 of that, according to Federation of Thai Industries (FTI) data.
'The current state of the Thai market has become a 'deep red ocean,'' said Shi Qingke, president of Great Wall Motor International.
Unseating the Japanese
For decades, the kingdom has been the undisputed playground of Japanese automakers. But Chinese rivals have been catching up fast with new models, and even getting creative to gain market share.
At the Bangkok International Motor Show in April, Great Wall Motor placed a smashed-up vehicle front and centre in its booth to show its cabin remained intact after the driver wrapped the car around a utility pole at high speed.
Another Chinese brand displayed its latest model clad in a bright pink cartoon design alongside a giant teddy bear to attract young consumers.
The result of these tactics: Almost every car displayed at the booths of Chinese brands – including Great Wall Motor, SAIC MG and Changan's Deepal – was surrounded by people. In contrast, the booths of Japanese and South Korean automakers like Mazda and Kia had few visitors, with numerous salespeople waiting idly with brochures.
On the list of top 10 brands by order volume at the show, Chinese brands occupied half the spots. BYD secured the top position with five-digit orders, decisively outselling Japan's Toyota Motor, a titan that had cultivated the market for generations.
Auto industry experts believe this was more than just a minor upset: it was a declaration that a new era has dawned.
The shift didn't happen overnight, but it accelerated over the past few years. Spurred by Thailand's generous new-energy vehicle (NEV) subsidy policies implemented from 2022, Chinese automakers like BYD and Neta Auto were early movers.
They were quickly followed by state-owned giants including Guangzhou Automobile Group and Chongqing Changan Automobile and Chery Automobile. At least 16 Chinese marques are now vying for a share of the local market, turning Bangkok's streets into a showcase of China's automotive ambitions.
Their primary weapon in this offensive is a combination of advanced technology and aggressive pricing. Chinese entrants flooded the market with EVs boasting features previously reserved for luxury segments – full LCD dashboards, smart infotainment systems, sleek designs and rapid charging capabilities.
Coupled with deep discounts, like BYD slashing nearly 40 per cent off its Dolphin model's initial launch price over the past two years, the value proposition became hard for Thai consumers to ignore.
The impact on the incumbents has been palpable. Japanese automaker Honda Motor, once a comfortable third in show orders, found itself eclipsed not only by BYD but also GAC and Changan. A total of 41 car manufacturers from around the world participated in the show.
Industry insiders noted a stark difference, with some suggesting Japanese models often feel 'two generations behind' in terms of standard features compared with their Chinese rivals, forcing a long-overdue reckoning for the established players in this crucial Southeast Asian battleground.
Toyota, despite retaining an overall market share as high as 38.5 per cent, saw its sales slide 17.1 per cent year-on-year in 2024 to 220,000 vehicles.
To counter the competition, Toyota in December announced a major investment plan, injecting 55 billion baht (S$2.15 billion) to expand hybrid vehicle production capacity, aiming to further consolidate its leadership position in the market.
Meanwhile, in late 2023, Honda became the first Japanese automaker to produce NEVs in the country when it began making pure electric cars at its factory in Prachinburi province in eastern Thailand.
However, due to sluggish local sales, Japanese firms have been forced to cut local production capacity. In July last year, Honda announced it would cease car production at its factory in Ayutthaya province by 2025, consolidating capacity at the Prachinburi site. Prior to this, Japanese automakers Suzuki and Subaru also announced the closure of their Thai factories.
Spoiled for choice
For Thai consumers, the flood of Chinese firms has also created a shift in local preference for NEVs, and within just a few years, the NEV market has become a veritable Chinese buffet.
Chinese EV brands have aggressively targeted the market with feature-rich EVs at price points that challenge the status quo.
Consumers previously choosing a mid-range Japanese sedan are now finding they can afford an EV boasting large touchscreens, sophisticated driver-assistance systems, and eye-catching designs, further enhanced by significant discounts and government subsidies that make the switch even more tempting.
Many Chinese brands' value-for-money models – priced at around 600,000 to 700,000 baht – now come standard with full LCD instrument panels and smart systems, not just high-end models, according to a source at SAIC MG. In contrast, Japanese cars priced over 1 million Thai baht often still feature small control screens and all-plastic interiors, the source added.
Beyond the initial sticker price and flashy tech, EVs also appeal to consumers for being cheaper to run. Liming, a Chinese national and long-term resident of Thailand, said charging his electric car at home costs roughly 80 per cent less per kilometer than fueling a comparable gasoline vehicle.
'Although gasoline prices in Thailand are slightly lower than in China, the cost per kilometer for a gasoline car is about 0.8 to 1 yuan (S$0.14 to S$0.18). My electric car costs about 0.8 yuan per kilowatt-hour to charge, which works out to less than 0.2 yuan per kilometer,' Liming said.
Wang Haoyong, head of GAC International South-east Asia, said that EVs also have annual maintenance costs that are over 50 per cent lower due to the absence of requirements like engine oil and transmission fluid replacements. In Thailand, where temperatures are always hot, EVs also don't suffer from range issues caused by low temperatures reducing the efficiency of lithium-ion batteries.
This combination of factors is resonating. The market share for pure EVs continued to climb last year, reaching nearly 12 per cent overall and significantly higher within the passenger car segment.
Chinese brands commanded an overwhelming 80 per cent slice of that pie and they are actively building momentum in this shift to electric. GAC International, for example, plans to build an intercity charging network centred around Bangkok, constructing 25 new charging stations this year.
Perils of subsidised growth
The current state of Thailand's auto industry is largely the result of a bold ambition harbored by the government: to transform itself into the EV production hub of South-east Asia. To kickstart this vision, Bangkok rolled out subsidy packages, starting with 'EV3.0' in June 2022 and its successor 'EV3.5', offering purchase incentives, consumption tax cuts and reduced import tariffs.
Perks under 'EV3.0' include reducing the NEV consumption tax from 8 per cent to 2 per cent, providing subsidies of up to 150,000 Thai baht per vehicle for pure electric cars priced below 2 million baht, and reducing import tariffs on pre-built vehicles by up to 40 percentage points.
This attracted a wave of investment, predominantly from Chinese automakers eager to establish a foothold and capitalise on the incentives.
However, this government generosity came with a significant string attached – a mandatory local production requirement.
Automakers benefiting from the subsidies, particularly under EV3.0, had to commit to producing EVs in Thailand equivalent to, or even exceeding, the number of vehicles they imported under the scheme. This seemingly logical policy, designed to build domestic capacity, appears to have moved faster than the market and set the stage for a potential crisis of oversupply.
The numbers paint a stark picture. Collectively, the major Chinese players like BYD, Changan, Chery, GAC, Great Wall Motor, Neta and SAIC-CP Motor (a joint venture between SAIC Motor and Thailand's Charoen Pokphand Group), are building or operating factories with a combined potential annual capacity exceeding 550,000 vehicles.
Yet, new car sales in Thailand totaled just 572,000 units in 2024, a 26.2 per cent drop year-on-year, FTI data show.
As the Electric Vehicle Association of Thailand's president Yossapong Laoonual noted, capacity already 'far exceeds local market demand'.
Facing the obligation to produce locally into a shrinking, saturated market, intense price wars have erupted. Automakers are under pressure to clear inventory built to meet production quotas, often at thinning margins.
They are also grappling with the reality that manufacturing in Thailand is more expensive than in China. The struggle is exemplified by firms such as EV startup Neta, which is facing financial headwinds domestically while under pressure to meet Thai production targets or risk facing hefty penalties.
Newer Chinese automotive entrants – such as XPeng and Zhejiang Geely Holding's EV brand Zeekr – have opted for exporting fully built vehicles to minimise high upfront local investment.
A Zeekr representative in Thailand said that while local production could make the brand more competitive, the company is sticking with vehicle exports in the short term to maintain flexibility.
Stepping stone doubts
But for many of the Chinese automakers that flooded into Thailand, the strategy extended beyond simply capturing local market share.
The country, with its established automotive infrastructure and strategic location, was envisioned by many as a springboard – a potential manufacturing and export hub to penetrate the wider South-east Asian region and potentially hedge against trade barriers in Western markets. Great Wall Motor has already begun exporting Thai-made vehicles to neighboring countries like Vietnam and Indonesia.
The rationale seems compelling on the surface. Establishing production bases in South-east Asia could offer preferential access to member markets, provide a diversification strategy away from US or European Union tariffs on China-made goods, and offer a release valve for the intense overcapacity plaguing the Chinese domestic market.
However, the dream of Thailand as a seamless stepping stone into South-east Asia appears increasingly challenging, hindered by local supply-side issues, while bumping against regional complexities.
Most fundamental is cost competitiveness: manufacturing EVs in Thailand is around 20 per cent more expensive than in China, the head of a Chinese automaker's Thai factory told Caixin, eroding a key advantage.
'For Japanese automakers, producing in Thailand is much cheaper than producing in Japan, so they can naturally use Thailand as a production base,' said a source at SAIC MG.
But as one auto industry insider lamented: 'Frankly speaking, nowhere in the world is cheaper or more efficient than manufacturing in China.'
Moreover, regional giants like Indonesia, South-east Asia's largest auto market, are aggressively pursuing their own EV industrial policies, directly competing for investment from the very same Chinese companies.
Indonesia's local rules and tax incentives also favor domestic production, potentially fragmenting rather than consolidating regional manufacturing strategies. CAIXIN GLOBAL

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China says it may speed up rare earths application approvals from EU
China says it may speed up rare earths application approvals from EU

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

China says it may speed up rare earths application approvals from EU

A mining machine is seen at a mine containing rare earth minerals in Inner Mongolia, China. PHOTO: REUTERS China says it may speed up rare earths application approvals from EU SHANGHAI – China is willing to accelerate the examination and approval of rare earth exports to European Union firms and will also deliver a verdict on its trade investigation of EU brandy imports by July 5, its Commerce Ministry said on June 7. Price commitment consultations between China and the EU on Chinese-made electric vehicles exported to the EU have also entered a final stage, but efforts from both sides are still needed, according to a statement on the ministry's website. The issues were discussed between Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao and EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic in Paris on June 3, according to the statement. The comments mark progress on matters that have vexed China's relationship with the EU over the past year. Most recently, China's decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of rare earths and related magnets has upended the supply chains central to automakers, aerospace manufacturers, semiconductor companies and military contractors around the world. The Commerce Ministry said China attached great importance to the EU's concerns and 'was willing to establish a green channel for qualified applications to speed up the approval process'. Mr Wang during the meeting 'expressed the hope that the EU will meet us halfway and take effective measures to facilitate, safeguard and promote compliant trade in high-tech products to China', according to the statement. Chinese anti-dumping measures that applied duties of up to 39 per cent on imports of European brandy – with French cognac bearing the brunt – have also strained relations between Paris and Beijing. The brandy duties were enforced days after the EU took action against Chinese-made electric vehicle imports to shield its local industry, prompting France's President Emmanuel Macron to accuse Beijing of 'pure retaliation'. The Chinese duties have dented sales of brands, including LVMH's Hennessy, Pernod Ricard's Martell and Remy Cointreau. Beijing was initially meant to make a final decision on the brandy duties by January, but extended the deadline to April and then again to July 5. China's Commerce Ministry said on June 7 French companies and relevant associations have proactively submitted applications on price commitments for brandy to China, and that Chinese investigators have reached an agreement with them on the core terms. The Chinese authorities were now reviewing the complete text on those commitments and would issue a final announcement before July 5, it said. In April, the European Commission said the EU and China also agreed to look into setting minimum prices of Chinese-made electric vehicles instead of tariffs imposed by the EU last year. China's Commerce Ministry said the EU also proposed exploring 'new technical paths' relating to EVs, which the Chinese side was now evaluating. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Over 300 workers retrenched without pay as CCIC Singapore enters liquidation after US sanctions
Over 300 workers retrenched without pay as CCIC Singapore enters liquidation after US sanctions

Online Citizen​

timean hour ago

  • Online Citizen​

Over 300 workers retrenched without pay as CCIC Singapore enters liquidation after US sanctions

Over 300 employees of CCIC Singapore, a subsidiary of a Chinese state-owned enterprise, China Certification and Inspection Group (CCIC), have been retrenched without receiving their May 2025 salaries, following the company's abrupt move into liquidation after being blacklisted by the United States. The sanctions, announced on 13 May 2025, targeted 15 companies, including CCIC Singapore, which the US Treasury Department accused of helping obscure the origin of Iranian oil shipped to China. The firm reportedly provided inspection services during ship-to-ship transfers of sanctioned oil cargo, including one involving 2 million barrels of Iranian oil. CCIC Singapore, founded in 1989 and located at Singapore Science Park, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of China Certification & Inspection Group (CCIC), a Chinese state-owned firm under China's State-Owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission. Affected employees were formally notified of their retrenchment on 30 May, with terminations effective the next day. According to three employees who spoke to CNA, most of CCIC Singapore's workforce—estimated to number over 300 in Singapore alone—is now jobless. Employees said they were informed that the firm's liquidation process was underway, and retrenchment benefits would only be fully paid by 30 June 2026. In the meantime, workers remain unpaid for May and received only two weeks' salary for every year of service completed. Surveyors and operations staff expressed frustration over the severance arrangement, noting that many relied on overtime and allowances to supplement basic pay. Junior surveyors earn less than S$1,000 monthly in base salary, with senior surveyors earning up to S$1,500. Speaking anonymously, employees expressed anger over the handling of the retrenchments. They described communication from management as inconsistent, citing internal emails that promised job continuity and transfers to a new entity—only to be contradicted within a day. On 14 May, an email from human resources assured employees of legal support and plans to establish a new company, backed by the Beijing headquarters. Staff were told they would be transferred without disruption. However, the following day, a second email urged recipients to disregard the earlier message. Subsequent internal communication revealed the company was downsizing and unable to pay retrenchment benefits due to frozen bank accounts. The firm's managing director later travelled to Beijing for discussions, though staff were not informed of any resolutions before receiving their termination notices. In an email sent to media on 6 June by a staff representative, employees highlighted several grievances: non-payment of wages, inadequate severance packages, lack of transparency, and absence of support for job placement. The letter described the situation as a breach of Singapore's Employment Act. 'Over 300 individuals and their families face immediate financial distress,' the letter read. 'This situation causes significant anxiety and hardship.' The letter further alleged that the offered severance—two weeks per year of service—fell well below Singapore's prevailing retrenchment standards, which can range from one to three months' pay per year of service. Employees also criticised the firm's leadership for failing to provide any apology or assurance, and questioned why CCIC's parent company had not intervened to ensure obligations to Singapore staff were met. 'This is a foreign company. They act like high and mighty, but they leave us in the lurch,' one employee told CNA. 'The top man doesn't even see us, talk to us.' As of now, the Ministry of Manpower, the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC), and the Tripartite Alliance for Dispute Management (TADM) have been approached by affected staff for assistance. CNA has also reached out to CCIC Singapore, its parent company CCIC in China, and relevant authorities for comment. No responses have been published as of the date of this report. The sanctions imposed by the US include a freeze on all US-linked assets of sanctioned entities and block any business engagement involving the US financial system. The US Treasury claims that Iran's illicit oil trade supports weapons development and terrorism, and CCIC Singapore was directly involved in enabling these operations by providing falsified documentation and inspection services. With Singapore-based assets unfrozen, affected employees have also questioned why local resources cannot be used to cover immediate financial obligations, such as salary arrears.

Kia Carnival Hybrid review: Hybrid power and modern updates for a spacious family MPV, Lifestyle News
Kia Carnival Hybrid review: Hybrid power and modern updates for a spacious family MPV, Lifestyle News

AsiaOne

time3 hours ago

  • AsiaOne

Kia Carnival Hybrid review: Hybrid power and modern updates for a spacious family MPV, Lifestyle News

We've seen all manner of large MPVs go on sale in Singapore recently. Many of these are Chinese in origin, come filled with lots of fancy tech and luxury features, and feature some form of electrification, being either full electric vehicles (EVs), or plug-in hybrids. But what if you wanted something a bit more traditional and old-school? Well, there are a handful of MPVs that stick to the classic internal combustion route and one of them is the updated Kia Carnival tested here. What's new in the latest Kia Carnival? The updated Kia Carnival has received a mid-life facelift, and it gets some pretty substantial changes externally, internally and under the hood. On the outside, it gets a larger front grille that's flanked by vertical LED headlights on either side. The overall effect gives the car a more imposing look that gives it lots of presence, especially in the test car's black colour. The rear has also been slightly redesigned, with the taillights now extending downwards at both ends from the horizontal light bar. It's a small but significant change, and gives the Kia Carnival a futuristic look that wouldn't look out of place in a sci-fi movie. The changes to the interior are somewhat more subtle, however. The most visible update is the driver instrument panel, which is now a fully digital item with a 12.3-inch display, instead of the previous analogue gauges. The controls on the dashboard have also been redesigned and refreshed, and features Kia's new switchable LCD display that can toggle between the controls for the air conditioning or media system. The biggest change to the Kia Carnival though, is under the bonnet, with the large MPV now swapping its previous 2.2-litre diesel engine for a 1.6-litre hybrid powerplant. Despite the downsized engine, it actually has more power than before. The new hybrid drivetrain now produces 241hp, an increase of 43hp over the diesel's 198hp. However, torque has been reduced to 366Nm, down from 440Nm previously. The car's gearbox also now has six speeds instead of its previous eight, and Kia says that hybrid drivetrain's power delivery reduces the need for more gears, as compared to the diesel powerplant which required more shifts. So how does the updated Kia Carnival Hybrid drive? The primary reason for the switch to hybrid power from diesel is down to the fact that Singapore has banned the registration of new diesel passenger cars from January 2025. [[nid:694420]] But while diesel enthusiasts may lament the loss of the plentiful torque of the old powerplant, the new hybrid drivetrain does bring about its own characteristics and benefits. For starters, it's no less responsive than the diesel, with the electric motor of the hybrid delivering an instant boost on acceleration with no lag. The transition from electric motor to petrol engine feels seamless as well, and the switch is virtually imperceptible. Smoothness is a pervasive theme with this car, and the Carnival impresses with its well-damped ride quality and excellent refinement. On smooth highways, the Kia Carnival glides along in great comfort and silence, while on rougher roads the suspension works well to ease out the bumps without feeling too ruffled. Of course, given the Carnival's stature as a large family MPV, one should not expect much in terms of nimbleness or agility. The steering is appropriately heavy, and while it's not exactly cumbersome to steer around corners, its size and weight is clearly evident to the driver. In terms of fuel efficiency, the Kia Carnival Hybrid delivers a claimed average fuel consumption figure of 6.5 litres per 100km, which is actually not that far off from the diesel's figure of 6.8 litres per 100km. But of course, the fact that the hybrid allows for the ability to drive on electric power means that, on the whole, it is still considered greener and more efficient than the diesel-powered model. How does the Kia Carnival Hybrid fare as an MPV then? Given its size, it's no surprise that the Kia Carnival Hybrid is extremely spacious inside. After all, this is meant to be a car that can ferry seven people in comfort over long distances. The best seats in the house are arguably in the second row, with its pair of 'VIP lounge seats' (as Kia calls them) that can recline fully, and come with heating and ventilation functions as well. But even if you're confined to the third row, there's still plenty of room to accommodate full-sized adults without needing to contort yourself to get comfortable. As a nice touch, there are also comfort features like cupholders and sunshades, so that those in the back don't feel like second-class citizens. Probably the most impressive bit about the Kia Carnival though is its generous boot space. With all the seats up, there is a massive 627 litres available, which is enough to fit two full-sized luggage bags, and then some. If you fold the third row seats down, there is an absolutely colossal 2,827 litres of space. With that kind of capacity, you could throw in a couple of bicycles and an entire selection of Ikea flat-packed furniture and still have room to spare. Is the Kia Carnival Hybrid a worthy buy then? While the Kia Carnival Hybrid is incredibly spacious and comfortable, even by large MPV standards, it doesn't exactly come cheap. The 7-seater version as tested here retails for $287,999 with COE (as of June 2025). You can save a little bit if you opt for the 8-seater version, which goes for $281,999 with COE, but you lose the ultra-comfortable 'VIP lounge seats' in the second row in favour of a standard three-seater bench. That said, it does have its appeal. The new hybrid powertrain is smooth and efficient, and the updates certainly give the Carnival a renewed sense of modernity. If you're looking for a large family MPV of the old-school, non-electric variety, the Kia Carnival Hybrid is a choice that's hard to ignore. [[nid:714096]] No part of this article can be reproduced without permission from AsiaOne.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store