IAEA chief condemns Ukraine strikes on Zaporozhye power plant
His remark came shortly after Russian authorities in the eponymous region reported multiple drone strikes on the ZNPP, blaming the Ukrainian military. Moscow has repeatedly accused Kiev of targeting the facility in the past.
The power plant was brought under Russian control in March 2022, shortly after which the region's residents voted in a referendum to join Russia, which Ukraine has dismissed as a sham. Around the same time, the IAEA deployed a monitoring mission to the ZNPP, which has remained in-situ to date.
Speaking to reporters at Khrabrovo Airport in Russia's Kaliningrad Region on Friday, Grossi insisted that 'any attack on any nuclear power plant, in particular [the] Zaporozhye [NPP], is absolutely unacceptable.'
He stopped short of apportioning the blame for such incidents to either Ukraine or Russia, noting that the IAEA's mandate is purely technical in nature.
Grossi argued, however, that the fact that the international watchdog is monitoring the situation and recording any attacks, is meant to act as a deterrent.
He was in Kaliningrad for a meeting with the CEO of Russia's state-run nuclear corporation, Rosatom, Aleksey Likhachev, who described the talks as the 'most multifaceted and meaningful' to date, during a press conference on Friday.
He emphasized the importance of IAEA's mission at the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant, noting how it provides an 'information window for the whole world into the real state of affairs.' This helps fight 'provocations [and] fakes.'
In a statement on Thursday, the IAEA chief reported that the watchdog's team stationed at the facility had 'heard repeated rounds of gunfire that appeared to be aimed at drones reportedly attacking the site's training center, followed by the sound of multiple explosions.'
Grossi stressed that 'it was the fourth time this year that the training center, located just outside the site perimeter, was reportedly targeted by unmanned aerial vehicles.'
Drone attacks on the ZNPP 'must stop immediately,' he insisted, warning of 'potentially serious consequences.'
Also on Thursday, a statement appeared on the ZNPP's Telegram channel, claiming the Ukrainian military had conducted multiple drone attacks on the training center located on the facility's grounds, with no casualties or significant damage reported.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
7 minutes ago
- Russia Today
Ukraine hits residential district in Russian city ahead of summit (PHOTOS)
Ukraine shelled several apartment blocks in the Russian city of Donetsk, killing at least one person and injuring three, local officials have reported. The attack came just hours before the summit between Russian President Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart, Donald Trump, in Alaska. Denis Pushilin, the head of the Donetsk People's Republic, said on Telegram that a woman had been killed and three other civilians wounded in a long-range strike that damaged two residential buildings and a school. Rodion Miroshnik, the Russian Foreign Ministry's ambassador-at-large, earlier stated that rescue workers had retrieved one person from under the rubble in the wake of a 'strike on a multi-story residential building' in Donetsk. Russia's RIA Novosti previously claimed that an 18-year-old woman had been trapped underneath the collapsed structure. On Thursday, Russian officials reported a series of Ukrainian drone strikes on residential buildings in the border city of Belgorod and the southern Russian city of Rostov-on-Don, which killed and wounded multiple civilians. The strikes came just days after Russia's Defense Ministry alleged that the Ukrainian leadership was preparing to stage a high-profile provocation intended to derail the summit between Trump and Putin. According to the statement, Kiev was hoping to frame Russian forces as responsible, while having Western journalists on hand to provide damaging media coverage. Last month, Ukrainian forces also launched a major UAV raid on Moscow and surrounding areas, just hours after Vladimir Zelensky proposed a third round of talks with Russia in Istanbul. In early June, the Russian Defense Ministry said that Ukrainian drones had targeted military airfields in five Russian regions, just a day before the two belligerents were to hold negotiations in Türkiye. Moscow and Kiev resumed direct talks after a three-year hiatus in light of the latter's decision to unilaterally walk away from the peace process in the spring of 2022. Commenting on the escalating Ukrainian drone attacks on Russian territory in late May, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov stated that Kiev's actions were 'clearly at odds with the pursuit of the peace process.' Around the same time, Russia's Foreign Ministry accused Ukraine of staging 'barbaric terrorist attacks' in an attempt to 'thwart the direct Russia-Ukraine talks facilitated by the US administration.'
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
WATCH Putin land in Anchorage for historic US visit
Russian President Vladimir Putin's aircraft has landed at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage ahead of the summit with his US counterpart, Donald Trump. The meeting between the two leaders could last between six and seven hours, according to Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov. The summit will involve a meeting between Putin and Trump that will include aides followed by talks and lunch with the US and Russian delegations and a joint conference of the two presidents afterwards. The two leaders are widely expected to discuss the settlement of the Ukraine conflict at the summit. Moscow has repeatedly stated that sustainable settlement of the Ukraine conflict can only be achieved if Kiev agrees never to join NATO and recognize the reality on the ground, including the status of new Russian regions that voted to join the country in referendums in 2014 and 2022. The event's agenda still goes far beyond that includes bilateral Russia-US relations, possible joint economic projects, and other regional and international issues, according to addition to Putin, the Russian delegation includes Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, Defense Minister Andrey Belousov, Finance Minister Anton Siluanov, Kremlin aide Yury Ushakov, and presidential economic envoy Kirill Dmitriev, who has been a key figure in the Ukraine settlement process. The sides are expected to discuss the restoration of bilateral relations as a whole, Dmitriev told journalists before the event, adding that he was in 'high spirits' ahead of the talks.
Russia Today
9 hours ago
- Russia Today
Why Putin and Trump had to talk in person
The meeting between the presidents of Russia and the United States in Alaska is not an end point, but the beginning of a long journey. It will not resolve the turbulence that has gripped humanity – but it matters to everyone. In international politics, there have been few moments when meetings between the leaders of major powers have decided questions of universal importance. This is partly because situations requiring attention at such a level are rare. We are living through one now: since the start of Russia's military operation against Ukraine, Washington has declared its aim to be the 'strategic defeat' of Russia, while Moscow has challenged the West's monopoly over world affairs. Another reason is practical. Leaders of the world's most powerful states do not waste time on problems that can be solved by subordinates. And history shows that even when top-level meetings do occur, they rarely change the overall course of international politics. It is no surprise, then, that the Alaska meeting has been compared to famous encounters from the past – notably the 1807 meeting between the Russian and French emperors on a raft in the Neman River. That summit did not prevent Napoleon from attacking Russia five years later – an act that ultimately brought about his own downfall. Later, at the 1815 Congress of Vienna, Russia was the only power represented by its ruler on a regular basis. Tsar Alexander I insisted on presenting his personal vision for Europe's political structure. It failed to win over the other great powers, who, as Henry Kissinger once noted, preferred to discuss interests rather than ideals. History is full of high-level talks that preceded war rather than preventing it. European monarchs would meet, fail to agree, and then march their armies. Once the fighting ended, their envoys would sit down to negotiate. Everyone understood that 'eternal peace' was usually just a pause before the next conflict. The 2021 Geneva summit between Russia and the US may well be remembered in this way – as a meeting that took place on the eve of confrontation. Both sides left convinced their disputes could not be resolved at the time. In its aftermath, Kiev was armed, sanctions were readied, and Moscow accelerated military-technical preparations. Russia's own history offers parallels. The most famous 'summit' of ancient Rus was the 971 meeting between Prince Svyatoslav and Byzantine Emperor John Tzimiskes, following a peace treaty. According to historian Nikolay Karamzin, they 'parted as friends' – but that did not stop the Byzantines from unleashing the Pechenegs against Svyatoslav on his journey home. In Asia, traditions were different. The status of Chinese and Japanese emperors did not permit meetings with equals; such encounters were legally and culturally impossible. When the modern European 'world order' was created – most famously in the 1648 Peace of Westphalia – it was not through grand encounters of rulers but through years of negotiations among hundreds of envoys. By then, after 30 years of war, all sides were too exhausted to continue fighting. That exhaustion made it possible to agree on a comprehensive set of rules for relations between states. Seen in this historical light, top-level summits are exceedingly rare, and those that produce fundamental change are rarer still. The tradition of two leaders speaking on behalf of the entire global system is a product of the Cold War, when Moscow and Washington alone had the ability to destroy or save the world. Even if Roman and Chinese emperors had met in the third century, it would not have transformed the fate of the world. The great empires of antiquity could not conquer the planet in a single war with each other. Russia – as the USSR before it – and the United States can. In the last three years, they have often stood on the brink of a path from which there would be no return. This is why Alaska matters, even if it does not yield a breakthrough. Summits of this kind are a creation of the nuclear age. They cannot be treated as just another bilateral meeting between important states. The very fact of direct negotiations is a measure of how close or far we are from catastrophe. The United States will arrive at the summit as the leader of a Western bloc whose members – even nuclear powers such as Britain and France – defer to Washington on strategic questions. Russia, for its part, will be watched closely by what is often called the 'global majority': dozens of states across Asia, Africa, and Latin America that resent Western dominance but cannot overturn it alone. These countries know that US mediation in local conflicts will not change the fact that the structure of that dominance remains unjust. Could Alaska lay the foundation for a new international order? Probably not. The very concept of a fixed 'order' is fading. Any order requires an enforcing power – and none exists today. The world is moving toward greater fluidity, to the frustration of those who crave neat arrangements and predictable futures. Even if a new balance of power emerges, it will not come from one meeting. The wartime summits of Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin are not a fair comparison. Those were preceded by the most destructive battles in human history. Fortunately, we are not in that situation now. The likely outcome in Alaska is the start of a long and difficult process, rather than an immediate settlement. But it is still of fundamental importance. In today's world, only two states possess vast nuclear arsenals capable of ending human civilization. This alone means that the leaders of Russia and the United States have no more important duty than to speak directly to one another – especially when they are, for now, the only invincible powers at the edge of the article was first published by Vzglyad newspaper and was translated and edited by the RT team.
