Private doctors join call for grace period, clarity over mandatory drug price display rule kicking in today
KUCHING, May 1 — The Federation of Private Medical Practitioners' Associations Malaysia (FPMPAM) has urged the government to issue a formal written directive for a reasonable implementation window for the mandatory medicine price display regulation.
Its president Dr Shanmuganathan TV Ganeson said the government should instruct enforcement officers to adopt a non-punitive, educational approach during the initial period of implementation.
'The government should also engage GP (general practitioners) associations immediately to co-develop fair and workable compliance guidelines,' he said in a statement today.
The statement was issued in response to the unexpected gazettement of the mandatory medicine price display regulation under the Price Control and Anti-Profiteering Act 2011 (Act 723), which is scheduled to come into effect on May 1.
Dr Shanmuganathan said no grace period was provided under the gazetted regulation and this means that enforcement officers, particularly from the Ministry of Domestic Trade and Cost of Living, may initiate action against clinics immediately, based on their own interpretations of compliance.
He said the absence of an official implementation window or transitional directive had created a dangerous legal grey area.
'Frontline GP and specialist clinics, many of which serve B40 and M40 communities, are now legally exposed, despite making good faith efforts to adapt.
'Without time to restructure billing, train staff or engage patients, doctors face the risk of being wrongly penalised or accused of profiteering, simply for struggling to interpret and apply a complex new requirement,' he explained.
According to Dr Shanmuganathan, this regulation compels clinics to unbundle every aspect of care including consultation (per illness or complaint), medications (individually priced) as well as consumables, procedures, documentation and operational overheads.
He said this will result in longer and more itemised bills, which may be misinterpreted by patients as fee inflation, when in fact, the bundled subsidies clinics used to provide are no longer permitted.
As such, he advised all private clinics to begin itemising fees for consultation, medicine and services to the best of their ability and display medicine pricing in good faith, even partially, with clear explanations to patients.
He said they should keep records of all compliance efforts such as price lists, staff briefings and system changes and document any enforcement visits including names of officers, instructions given, and basis of alleged non-compliance.
He added that they should also report incidents to FPMPAM and state societies promptly for legal tracking and support.
Dr Shanmuganathan stressed that clinics should continue to act professionally, ethically and defensively, protecting both patients and staff while adapting under pressure.
'Doctors are not the cause of inflation, we are the first responders of Malaysia's health system,' he said.
He pledged that FPMPAM will continue to protect ethical practice, legal clarity and patient access in the face of regulatory overreach, adding: 'These are challenging times for GPs, especially. The struggle should be continued.' — The Borneo Post
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
2 days ago
- New Straits Times
GPs: Outdated fees make practice a hard pill to swallow
KUALA LUMPUR: Outdated consultation fees and rising operational costs are squeezing general practitioners (GPs), forcing them to see more patients daily just to stay afloat. Consultation fees are regulated under Schedule 7 of the Private Healthcare Facilities and Services Regulations. The fees were last revised in 1992, before construction of the Petronas Twin Towers, and are fixed between RM10 and RM35. The government is currently studying a possible increase. Federation of Private Medical Practitioners' Associations Malaysia president Dr Shanmuganathan T.V. Ganesan said a typical clinic needed at least RM40,000 a month to operate. This covers rent, wages, utilities, maintenance, medical supplies and statutory contributions, excluding the GP owner's or doctors' salaries and loan repayments. Dr Shanmuganathan said based on a flat RM30 consultation fee per patient, and excluding revenue from medicine or additional services, a GP would need to see about 53 patients a day to break even — nearly three times the actual average. "Unfortunately, consultation fees are no longer sufficient to sustain clinic operations. "Rising costs in wages, medical consumables, digital systems and regulatory compliance, especially with new price display mandates, have compounded the financial burden," he told the New Straits Times. The Malaysian Medical Association has called for a minimum RM60 consultation fee. On Thursday, the association urged the government to expedite cabinet approval for the revised rates, warning that continued delays could threaten the survival of private clinics nationwide. On May 3, Health Minister Datuk Seri Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad indicated that revisions would be finalised within a month. Dr Shanmuganathan said many patients required time-consuming consultations, counselling and emergency care, services that are often uncompensated. Clinics are also required to stock life-saving medications, many of which have short shelf lives and go unused. Former Johor assemblyman and practising GP Dr Boo Cheng Hau said a sustainable clinic needed to see at least 15 patients a day, five to six days a week, charging RM70 to RM100 per visit, including medication. He said the public must be educated on what constitutes a fair consultation fee. "For instance, for uncomplicated cough and cold cases, the market price in my area is about RM70 to RM80, inclusive of consultation and medication." he said. "Often, doctors have to lower their consultation fees to meet market demand, as medication costs exceed the consultation fee itself." PROFITS FROM MEDICINES Dr Shanmuganathan said many clinics were not operating on conventional "profits", as current consultation fees alone cannot sustain operations. To stay afloat, clinics often rely on modest profits from medicine sales. "This is not profiteering, but a pragmatic workaround in a system that restricts doctors from transparently charging for other professional services, such as nursing care, regulatory compliance, equipment use or consumables," he said. He estimated that a clinic spending RM12,000 per month on medicine stock might generate RM15,000 to RM17,000 in revenue, leaving a slim profit margin of RM3,000 to RM5,000. Additional revenue comes from procedural fees, health screenings and medical report preparation, but these are irregular and often underpriced due to market pressure. Dr Shanmuganathan said the recent implementation of medicine price display mandates had worsened matters. The Galen Centre for Health and Social Policy previously warned that the rule could lead more consumers to request prescriptions and buy medicines at lower prices from pharmacies. Its chief executive, Azrul Mohd Khalib, said while patients had every right to do so, this trend could undermine clinics' sustainability, as consultation fees remained low. "GPs hesitate to itemise every charge — nursing, registration, equipment use — for fear of alienating patients or appearing to overcharge," he said. AN ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION Both Dr Shanmuganathan and Dr Boo said Malaysia should adopt a national health scheme to address the crisis. In the United Kingdom, the National Health Service is funded primarily through general taxation, supported by National Insurance contributions. These fund services such as GP visits, hospital care and prescriptions. In November 2023, then health minister Datuk Seri Dr Zaliha Mustafa said Malaysia was exploring a national health insurance scheme involving contributions from employees, employers and the government. However, it has yet to materialise. Dr Boo said insurance policies must also cover outpatient management and GP visits, not just hospitalisation. He urged the government to raise its health spending from four per cent of the gross domestic product to between five and 10 per cent, in line with advanced nations. Dr Shanmuganathan added that such a scheme was necessary to strengthen healthcare financing and service delivery. He also proposed revising the GP consultation fee range to between RM50 and RM100, depending on case complexity. "It is important to recognise that these fees represent payment for the doctor's professional services and should not be subject to arbitrary discrimination," he said. "Doctors with the same qualifications should be paid fairly and equitably for the same scope of work."
Focus Malaysia
3 days ago
- Focus Malaysia
Delay on GP fee review: 'Face realities on the ground,' NACCOL told
A DOCTORS' group has expressed disappointment over the government's failure to to revise private general practitioners' (GP) consultation fees as promised. 'We note with deep disappointment that the Health Minister's promise to finalise the long-overdue review of private GP consultation fees within a month has now passed without action,' said Federation of Private Medical Practitioners' Associations, Malaysia (FPMPAM) president Dr Shanmuganthan TV Ganeson. 'Private GPs have been self-funding the essential primary care system for decades. Yet we remain shackled by consultation fees that have not changed in 33 years, while regulations and compliance costs continue to rise.' Recall that Health Minister Datuk Seri Dzulkefly Ahmad told reporters on May 3 that the issue about GP consultation fees would be resolved 'within one month at the latest', adding that he had already prepared a Cabinet memorandum and circular. During Dzulkefly's May 3 press conference, the Health Minister claimed that the National Action Committee on the Cost of Living (NACCOL) had already agreed to a review of GP consultation fees. 'The Malaysian Medical Association and other GP bodies have presented a clear, evidence-based case for a fee update that ensures the sustainability of primary care clinics and the quality of care for our patients,' Dr Shanmuganathan said. 'We understand that NACCOL has raised concerns about the impact of the fee update. We want to remind NACCOL that these concerns are misplaced. 'Patients who visit GPs choose to do so for immediate, quality care—often to avoid hospital queues and costly specialist visits. They are willing to pay a fair fee for this timely service. 'Past analyses by NACCOL itself showed no significant impact on the Consumer Price Index, even with proposed fee updates as far back as 2019.' Moreover, Dr Shanmuganathan noted that third-party administrators have for too long suppressed GP consultation fees for corporate profit, while the Pharmaceutical Services Division, certain pharmacy groups, and even Pharma Corporations have lobbied to undermine the integrated GP clinic model that has served Malaysians well for over 60 years. 'The government must not hide behind a narrative that keeping GP fees artificially low somehow serves the public good,' he stressed. 'In reality, it threatens the survival of primary care—the most cost-effective part of our healthcare system—and shifts costs to patients in other ways. 'NACCOL must face these realities. It must not deny GPs the means to sustain their practices and continue serving communities effectively. 'We call on the Health Minister to honour his promise and on NACCOL to remove its obstacles and allow this long-overdue correction. Anything less is a disservice to GPs and the communities we care for daily.' ‒ June 6, 2025 Main image: The Straits Times
New Straits Times
27-05-2025
- New Straits Times
MMA calls for clear legal framework on medicine pricing
KUALA LUMPUR: The Malaysian Medical Association (MMA) has urged the government to act swiftly on issues affecting private general practitioners (GPs), stressing the need for clear legal frameworks and fair consultation fees to ensure the sustainability of Malaysia's primary healthcare system. MMA president Datuk Dr Kalwinder Singh Khaira said the association looks forward to the government's firm decisions following its joint memorandum submitted to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim earlier this month. He said among the top concerns were the appropriate regulation of medicine price display policies and the long-overdue revision of GP consultation fees. He welcomed Health Minister Datuk Seri Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad commitment to place the medicine price display policy under the Private Healthcare Facilities and Services Act 1998, a move the MMA has long advocated, rather than the Price Control and Anti-Profiteering Act 2011, which was never designed to regulate professional healthcare services. "To avoid disputes and legal ambiguities that may arise from overlapping legislation, the government must immediately de-gazette clinics from the Price Control and Anti-Profiteering Act 2011 (Act 723) once the decision is made to place the medicine price display policy under the Private Healthcare Facilities and Services Act 1998 (Act 586). "Keeping clinics under the Price Control and Anti-Profiteering Act after the policy shift would only create unnecessary legal ambiguity," he said in a statement. He said the government must act swiftly to ensure regulatory clarity and prevent jurisdictional overlap by formally de-gazetting clinics from Anti-Profiteering Act 2011 once the other Act comes into effect. "While doctors fully support price transparency, we strongly maintain that all healthcare-related policies must be implemented and enforced under the purview of the Health Ministry (MOH). "While we respect the Domestic Trade and Cost of Living Ministry's role in regulating the retail sector, it is important to recognise that healthcare is not retail." He said clinics provide essential, expert-driven services built on trust and ethical duty, not commercial transactions. Applying retail-based policies to medical practice risks compromising the quality and integrity of care Malaysians deserve, he said. Dr Kalwinder also called on the government to address the longstanding issue of stagnant consultation fees for private GPs. He said fees under the 7th Schedule of Act 586 have remained unchanged for over 33 years, despite significant increases in operating costs. "GP clinics are the front line of Malaysia's primary healthcare system. "For them to remain viable and continue delivering quality care, consultation fees must be reviewed and adjusted to reflect current realities," he said. He said the MMA has submitted a detailed proposal justifying the fee revision and hopes for a fair outcome that supports the long-term sustainability of private clinics. "These issues must not be delayed.
