Schools need more time to decide on AI's future in academia
[email protected] or filling in
this Google form . Submissions should not exceed 400 words, and must include your full name and address, plus a phone number for verification
Advertisement
As a university student, I am caught in the crossfire over
artificial intelligence (AI). Almost every day, I can go from a class taught by a professor who is against AI use to another taught by a lecturer who, when asked whether ChatGPT can be used, invariably says, 'Go for it'. Their perspectives have given me food for thought on AI's role in higher education.
Universities have the right to prohibit AI in science-related courses or any courses involving theoretical knowledge. Having studied linguistics, I have experienced the problems of using AI first-hand.
AI does not appear well-suited to help students write about language acquisition theory or speech mechanisms in phonetics. These theories involve concepts and specialised terminology which must be explained in-depth. I've found that popular chatbots are unable to include direct quotes from research papers to support arguments, while often quoting from non-academic sources or even fabricating quotes.
Regardless, many university students may learn foreign languages more efficiently with the help of AI. I've heard French teachers speak of the shock students experience when learning a new language – the initial loss of ability to articulate their ideas.
Advertisement
Acquiring a language often relies on students' knowledge of their native or second languages. While exposure to texts in a foreign language is vital, looking up a multitude of unfamiliar words in a dictionary can be tedious. Chatbots can help students by providing what seems like authentic French-English translation, for example. Synonyms can also be found in seconds with the help of AI.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AllAfrica
a day ago
- AllAfrica
US-China race for air supremacy at sea hits critical phase
As China readies its first catapult carrier and the US scrambles to revive its sixth-generation carrier-based fighter program, the battle for air dominance at sea is entering a crucial new phase. This month, The War Zone (TWZ) reported that China's People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) is nearing a pivotal milestone with its first catapult-equipped aircraft carrier, known as Fujian, as newly released state media imagery suggests imminent or ongoing fixed-wing flight operations. The undated visuals—timed with the PLA's 98th anniversary—show Shenyang J-15T fighters positioned for catapult launches, afterburners ignited and shadows of jets flying low over the deck, though no confirmed launch or recovery footage has surfaced. Since May 2024, Fujian has undergone intensive sea trials, including an eighth round completed in May 2025. The carrier employs an Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS), bypassing steam catapults entirely, bringing China in line with US, French and Indian naval advancements. Operational readiness is underscored by support assets such as Harbin Z-9 helicopters and crew performing Foreign Object Debris (FOD) walks. The PLAN's modernization, driven by ambitions for Taiwan contingencies and blue-water power projection, includes stealthy J-35s, KJ-600 airborne early warning (AEW) aircraft and a new JL-10-based carrier trainer. Beyond Fujian, China is developing a nuclear-powered Type 004 CATOBAR carrier, which could enable sustained operations farther afield. The broader naval buildup also features amphibious platforms like the EMALS-equipped Type 076 Sichuan, highlighting China's growing capacity to integrate sea-based airpower across multiple hull types. This acceleration reflects more than technical upgrades—it signals doctrinal transformation. Asia Times has previously reported that Fujian is on track to conduct 'Alpha strike' tactics—mass saturation air assaults designed to overwhelm adversary defenses and seize early initiative. Once the exclusive domain of the US Navy, these tactics are now within China's grasp thanks to EMALS-enabled sortie rates that eclipse those of its older ski-jump carriers, Liaoning and Shandong. Such capability enhances China's ability to support amphibious operations and conduct standoff strikes beyond the First Island Chain. Yet significant structural constraints remain. Fujian's conventional propulsion system limits its operational endurance compared to nuclear-powered US carriers. It also lacks overseas basing infrastructure, reducing its forward persistence. Its EMALS has not yet matched US performance benchmarks, and China still faces a shortfall of carrier-qualified pilots. The PLAN's capital ships also remain highly vulnerable to long-range precision strikes, while China's space-based intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) architecture—essential for targeting and coordination—remains fragile. While China surges ahead in carrier aviation and doctrine, the US is working to preserve its edge by rebooting long-delayed initiatives. Last month, TWZ reported that the US Senate Appropriations Committee approved $1.4 billion in its draft FY2026 defense spending bill to revive the Navy's F/A-XX sixth-generation carrier-based fighter program. This move defies the Department of Defense's (DoD) previous decision to halt the program and echoes the Navy's Unfunded Priority List, revealing an internal split between naval leadership and defense officials. TWZ also notes that Admiral Daryl Caudle, Chief of Naval Operations, has warned that without the F/A-XX, the Navy risks ceding air superiority and depending on aging fourth-generation platforms. According to TWZ, Boeing and Northrop Grumman remain contenders for the contract, while Lockheed Martin has reportedly been eliminated. The House has proposed $972 million, with final funding dependent on reconciliation and presidential approval. In a July 2025 article for The National Security Journal, Brent Sadler underscores the urgency. He argues that the US Navy's current air wing—dominated by the F/A-18 and stealth-optimized F-35C—is increasingly mismatched to the realities of a Pacific conflict. Sadler writes that the F/A-18, first deployed in 1983, is outdated and vulnerable to long-range threats, while the F-35C's limited internal weapons bays constrain its capacity to carry extended-range ordnance. He notes that China's PL-17 air-to-air missile and DF-21D anti-ship ballistic missile can reach 400 and 1,600 kilometers, respectively—distances that far outstrip the range envelopes of US carrier aircraft. Without a fast, long-range and heavily armed platform like the F/A-XX, Sadler warns, American carriers may be forced to operate within lethal threat rings, jeopardizing both survivability and mission effectiveness. The proposed F/A-XX aims to restore that edge. In a July 2025 article for Proceedings, Josh Hano writes that the aircraft would prioritize long-range strike and heavy payloads, allowing it to complement F-35s assigned to fleet air defense. He adds that the envisioned F/A-XX—also referred to as the A-XX—would trade traditional fighter agility for the ability to deliver antiship missiles, smart bombs and naval mines, while also serving as a platform for electronic warfare, ISR and aerial refueling. Though the F-35's range limitations are well-known, TWZ mentions in a June 2025 article that the upcoming Block 4 upgrade package may evaluate integration of drop tanks or conformal fuel tanks, though technical details remain sparse. Hano notes that this new strike aircraft would recall Cold War-era platforms designed to deliver specialized ordnance at long range, thereby restoring the carrier's ability to project power from outside contested zones—a capability that is becoming vital as adversary missile systems improve. Framing these developments in broader strategic terms, Thomas Mahnken writes in a February 2022 Proceedings article that the US Navy's evolving maritime posture against China revolves around a dual-force concept: 'inside forces' that operate within China's missile envelope, and 'outside forces' that remain beyond it. Mahnken explains that inside forces—submarines and land-based units stationed in allied territory—would impose costs and deny adversary objectives through presence and rapid reaction. Outside forces, like carrier strike groups, would operate from standoff distances, leveraging long-range strike capabilities to hold targets at risk and reinforce deterrence. But the US may not have enough carriers to make this strategy work. Asia Times reported in July 2025 that delays in the delivery of USS John F Kennedy (CVN-79) will soon reduce the US Navy's operational carrier fleet below the congressionally mandated 11-ship minimum, exposing a readiness shortfall at a time of global tension. Delays in the Ford-class carrier program—exacerbated by technical faults, industrial bottlenecks and persistent cost overruns—are undermining the Navy's ability to maintain forward-deployed strike groups in multiple theaters. As China intensifies naval activity near Taiwan and the Luzon Strait, while crises simmer in the Middle East and Europe, the US risks strategic overextension. Building carrier power is one challenge. But sustaining it across contested maritime space is the actual test—one both nations are now racing to master in a contest that could redefine naval dominance in the Indo-Pacific.
South China Morning Post
4 days ago
- South China Morning Post
Microsoft nears OpenAI agreement for ongoing tech access
Microsoft is in advanced talks to land a deal that could give it ongoing access to critical OpenAI technology, an agreement that would remove a major obstacle to the start-up's efforts to become a for-profit enterprise. The companies have discussed new terms that would let Microsoft use OpenAI's latest models and other technology even if the start-up decides it has reached its goal of building a more powerful form of AI known as artificial general intelligence (AGI), according to two people familiar with the negotiations. Under the current contract, OpenAI attaining AGI is seen as a major milestone at which point Microsoft would lose some rights to OpenAI technology. Negotiators have been meeting regularly, and an agreement could come together in a matter of weeks, according to three people with knowledge of the situation, who requested anonymity to discuss a private matter. OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman and Satya Nadella, his Microsoft counterpart, discussed the restructuring at the Allen & Co conference in Sun Valley, Idaho, earlier this month, two of the people said. While the tone of the talks has been positive, some of the people cautioned that the deal is not finalised and could hit new roadblocks. Moreover, OpenAI's restructuring plans face other complications, including regulatory scrutiny and a lawsuit filed by Elon Musk, an early backer who split with the company and accused the start-up of defrauding investors about its commitment to its charitable mission. (OpenAI has pushed back at Musk's claims and said the billionaire is trying to slow down the company.) Microsoft signage at its corporate office in Mountain View, California, July 29, 2025. Photo: EPA Negotiations over OpenAI's future as a profit-company have dragged on for months. Microsoft, which backed OpenAI with some US$13.75 billion and has the right to use its intellectual property, is the biggest holdout among the ChatGPT maker's investors, Bloomberg previously reported. At issue is the size of Microsoft's stake in the newly configured company. The talks have since broadened into a renegotiation of their relationship, with the software maker seeking to avoid suddenly losing access to the start-up's technology before the end of the current deal, which expires in 2030.
South China Morning Post
25-07-2025
- South China Morning Post
Shanghai conference sets stage for US-China face-off in heated race for AI supremacy
Shanghai will host its eighth annual flagship artificial intelligence (AI) conference this weekend as China ramps up competition against the US for supremacy in the fast-developing technology. The three-day World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC), with the theme of 'Global Solidarity in the AI Era', will kick off on Saturday with an opening keynote from Premier Li Qiang, who also headlined last year's event. A high-level meeting on global AI governance will be held in tandem with the conference. The main forum, taking place at the Shanghai World Expo Centre, will feature a line-up of renowned international scientists and business leaders. Nobel laureate and 'AI godfather' Geoffrey Hinton, Harry Shum, council chairman at Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, and Turing Award winner Andrew Yao are among the participants. Prominent business leaders who will speak include former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, MiniMax founder Yan Junjie and SenseTime CEO Xu Li, along with senior executives from Siemens and Schneider Electric. The SenseTime booth at last year's WAIC in Shanghai. Photo: NurPhoto via Getty Images The conference represents an opportunity for China to showcase to the global AI community its latest advancements amid a heated race between the world's two largest economies. On Wednesday, the White House released a 28-page AI Action Plan designed to further strengthen exports of American AI technology to China and limit the spread of Chinese AI models, as part of the Trump administration's sweeping plan to shape the rules governing the fast-moving technology.
