logo
Fox Valley residents show concerns over the local economy over the next year

Fox Valley residents show concerns over the local economy over the next year

Yahoo22-05-2025

Consumers in the Fox Valley weighed in on the local economic outlook recently, with nearly three-quarters expecting local economic conditions to worsen in the year ahead.
The Appleton Post-Crescent surveyed readers to capture the consumer sentiment in the Fox Valley in mid-April. Forty-seven respondents completed the questionnaire, responding on local economic conditions to personal finances between April 17 and April 30, amid far-reaching trade policy changes with national implications.
Their responses show a deep concern about rising prices of goods and services, a tight job market, and restrained household spending. Some respondents said local issues, like egg prices, the housing market, and layoffs, and federal economic policies, especially tariffs, are shaping their recent financial outlook.
This fits national trends of a prevailing economic uncertainty across the country, as shown by the recent data from the University of Michigan's Consumer Sentiment Index, which collects data monthly on consumers' views about their personal finances, business conditions, and purchasing decisions across the country.
The index of consumer sentiment dropped to 50.8 out of 100, down from 52.2 in April, in a preliminary reading for May. It marks the second-lowest level on the record since June 2022.
"Tariffs were spontaneously mentioned by nearly three-quarters of consumers, up from almost 60% in April; uncertainty over trade policy continues to dominate consumers' thinking about the economy," said Joanne Hsu, director of the Surveys of Consumers, in the release.
Despite this gloom, most respondents in the Fox Valley say they are prepared for a financial emergency, demonstrating resilience in the region.
Here is a breakdown of what the Fox Valley respondents said:
Most respondents rate the current local economy as 'good' (51%) or 'fair' (27.7%), while only 4.3% say the economic outlook is 'excellent' and 17% call it 'poor.'
However, 72.3% of respondents expect the local economy to deteriorate over the next year, and only 23.4% expect improvement. It shows strong pessimism about the near future, even among those who view the current situation positively.
The majority of respondents say there are 'plentiful' or 'adequate' job opportunities in the Fox Valley, but over a quarter (27.7%) see them as 'limited' and 6.4% as 'very few'.
Respondents feel the labor market will be in decline. Only 19.2% expect more job opportunities in the next six months, and an equal share of 19.2% see the 'same level', while 62% expect fewer opportunities.
Only 12.8% of respondents say it's a good time for a major purchase, including a home, car, or appliances, while a majority of 61.7% say 'no,' and a quarter are unsure.
Just over 46% of respondents plan to decrease spending in the next six months and 27.7% will keep the spending at the same level, with another 27.7% saying they are expecting an increase.
The majority of respondents fear inflation: 78.7% expect prices to increase, with 53.2% saying 'significantly' and 25.5% saying 'moderately.' By contrast, 14.9% see prices falling.
Meanwhile, 59.6% of respondents are 'very concerned' about inflation and believe it impacts their purchasing decisions, while 8.5% are 'not at all' concerned.
Just over 6% of respondents say their ability to save has improved over the past year, while 38.3% responded it has declined over the same time, and 55.3% say it's unchanged.
Despite challenges, 70.2% say they could handle an unexpected $1,000 expense, while 19.1% say they could not, and 10.6% are unsure.
Zhen Wang is a business reporter for The Post-Crescent. Reach her with story tips and feedback at zwang@gannett.com or 920-993-7117.
This article originally appeared on Appleton Post-Crescent: Fox Valley survey shows economic concerns amid financial resilience

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

TAP Q1 Earnings Call: Molson Coors Addresses Macroeconomic Pressures and Strategic Adjustments
TAP Q1 Earnings Call: Molson Coors Addresses Macroeconomic Pressures and Strategic Adjustments

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

TAP Q1 Earnings Call: Molson Coors Addresses Macroeconomic Pressures and Strategic Adjustments

Beer company Molson Coors (NYSE:TAP) fell short of the market's revenue expectations in Q1 CY2025, with sales falling 11.3% year on year to $2.3 billion. Its non-GAAP EPS of $0.50 per share was 37.2% below analysts' consensus estimates. Is now the time to buy TAP? Find out in our full research report (it's free). Revenue: $2.3 billion (11.3% year-on-year decline) Adjusted EPS: $0.50 vs analyst expectations of $0.80 (37.2% miss) Operating Margin: 8.1%, down from 12.1% in the same quarter last year Sales Volumes fell 15.6% year on year (5.7% in the same quarter last year) Market Capitalization: $10.68 billion Molson Coors' latest quarter was defined by pronounced declines in sales volumes and operating margins amid a challenging macroeconomic environment. Management attributed the year-on-year drop in financial results to softer consumer demand, ongoing macro volatility, and expected headwinds such as the end of contract brewing agreements and one-time integration costs related to the Fever-Tree partnership. CEO Gavin Hattersley highlighted that the U.S. beer market, in particular, faced larger-than-anticipated declines in consumer confidence, which weighed heavily on consumption trends. While operational disruptions like last year's Fort Worth brewery strike and changes in shipment timing also played a role, Hattersley emphasized, "The magnitude of the impacts of the macroeconomic environment and industry has been much greater so far this year than we had expected." Looking ahead, Molson Coors is adjusting its strategy to navigate ongoing uncertainty in consumer demand and external pressures. Management now expects a low single-digit decline in revenue for the year and is taking steps to reduce capital expenditures and discretionary costs. CFO Tracey Joubert explained that the company's updated outlook is shaped by industry softness and continued macro challenges but is supported by ongoing premiumization initiatives, new product launches, and incremental contributions from partnerships like Fever-Tree and ZOA. Hattersley noted, "These are uncertain times, but we believe we have the right strategy and a healthy balance sheet and strong cash generation to continue to execute it, while continuing to return cash to shareholders." Management cited macroeconomic headwinds, planned operational changes, and a focus on premiumization as primary factors influencing the quarter's results and near-term outlook. Macroeconomic pressures dominate: Management repeatedly referenced the impact of volatile consumer confidence and global economic uncertainty, which led to weaker-than-expected demand across key markets. Hattersley noted that the U.S. beer market experienced a larger decline than anticipated, with the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index dropping sharply during the period. Contract brewing exits weigh on volume: The conclusion of contract brewing agreements with Pabst in the U.S. and Labatt in Canada resulted in a temporary volume headwind that pressured reported sales, though management expects mix and margin benefits in subsequent quarters as the portfolio shifts away from lower-margin contract production. Premiumization and brand investment: Molson Coors continued investing in its core "power brands" (Coors Light, Miller Lite, Coors Banquet) and highlighted growth in above-premium offerings, including the expansion of Peroni and the Blue Moon non-alcoholic line. The company stressed ongoing efforts to capture value from premiumization, aiming for more favorable brand and product mix. Fever-Tree integration and non-alcoholic expansion: The company's recent acquisition of U.S. rights to Fever-Tree and increased stake in ZOA energy drinks were described as strategic moves to expand the non-alcoholic business. Fever-Tree's addition was called 'immediately incremental' to Molson Coors' U.S. business, with management citing significant distribution upside. Disciplined cost management: Facing lower volumes and profitability, management prioritized cost savings by curtailing non-critical discretionary spending and reducing planned capital expenditures by $100 million, postponing projects not directly tied to cost savings or critical growth initiatives. Molson Coors' outlook for the coming quarters centers on cautious revenue expectations, a continued push for premiumization, and disciplined capital allocation in a volatile environment. Consumer demand uncertainty: Management expects near-term demand to remain pressured by macroeconomic factors but is not forecasting the steep declines seen in Q1 to persist throughout the year. Hattersley indicated that improvement is anticipated in the back half of the year, provided economic conditions stabilize. Premiumization and innovation focus: The company is prioritizing further premiumization of its portfolio in North America, EMEA, and APAC, with special attention on the rollout of Peroni, Blue Moon innovations, and the continued momentum of non-alcoholic offerings. Management views these initiatives as vital for margin recovery and long-term growth. Cost control and capital discipline: Molson Coors is tightening control over discretionary expenses and reducing capital expenditures, focusing investment on projects linked to productivity, cost savings, and critical brand support. The company reiterated its commitment to maintaining healthy free cash flow and returning capital to shareholders. In the coming quarters, our analysts will monitor (1) volume trends and consumer demand stabilization in North America and Europe; (2) the pace and effectiveness of premiumization strategies, especially for brands like Peroni, Blue Moon, and Fever-Tree; and (3) the execution of cost control measures and capital allocation discipline. Leadership transition progress and the impact of new product launches will also be key areas to watch. Molson Coors currently trades at a forward P/E ratio of 8.2×. In the wake of earnings, is it a buy or sell? Find out in our full research report (it's free). The market surged in 2024 and reached record highs after Donald Trump's presidential victory in November, but questions about new economic policies are adding much uncertainty for 2025. While the crowd speculates what might happen next, we're homing in on the companies that can succeed regardless of the political or macroeconomic environment. Put yourself in the driver's seat and build a durable portfolio by checking out our Top 5 Growth Stocks for this month. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 183% over the last five years (as of March 31st 2025). Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-micro-cap company Kadant (+351% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Former UC president Santa Ono, who left Michigan post in May, rejected for Florida job
Former UC president Santa Ono, who left Michigan post in May, rejected for Florida job

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Former UC president Santa Ono, who left Michigan post in May, rejected for Florida job

Former University of Cincinnati President Santa Ono was rejected in his bid to be the next president of the University of Florida. That school's Board of Governors voted down his nomination Tuesday, June 3, after Ono had come under withering criticism from conservatives in Florida and elsewhere who were troubled by his tenure at the University of Michigan, including his previous support of diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives. Ono resigned his U-M job last month after being named the sole finalist for the top job at Florida. The Free Press was unable to reach Ono for comment. The Free Press also left a message seeking comment from U-M. Several of the school's regents declined to comment. Ono served as UC president for four years, from 2012 to 2016. He left to become the 15th president and vice-chancellor of the University of British Columbia in Vancouver. The rejection marked a stunning fall from grace for Ono, who had received unanimous support a week earlier from the Board of Trustees at the university's flagship school in Gainsville. That support included a contract that could have paid him up to $15 million over five years. The Board of Governors that voted him down oversees the entire University of Florida system, which has 12 public universities, including the Gainesville campus. Ono had tried to navigate the changing political winds higher education now faces in the second Trump administration. At times, he was criticized for appearing to capitulate to Trump's demands. In February, the Trump administration threatened to withhold federal funds from universities that consider race in their admission practices. In March, Ono announced that U-M would close its expansive Office of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion and redirect the funds to more student-focused efforts, such as the expansion of the Go Blue Guarantee, which provides free tuition to students from Michigan who meet income guidelines. Also in March, the U.S. Department of Education threatened to withhold funding to 60 universities across the country, including U-M, for what the Trump administration considered the schools' insufficient efforts to combat antisemitism. That charge came after U-M had long faced criticism of its treatment of pro-Palestinian demonstrators on campus, including the removal of a protest encampment on the U-M Diag. The school's treatment of those protesters prompted lawsuits against U-M, but in the eyes of some people in Florida, Ono was too soft on the encampment. On June 2, Florida Republican Sen. Rick Scott blasted Ono's nomination in a post on X ahead of the vote. 'Clearly, Ono has a concerning record from his time at the University of Michigan, where he allowed an illegal, pro-terrorist encampment to take over the campus for nearly a month, putting Jewish students in danger and failing to uphold even the most basic standards of leadership,' Scott wrote. 'He also has a record of embracing divisive and radical DEI policies, showing he is willing to appease and prioritize far-left activists over ensuring students are protected and receive a quality education.' Alan Festo of the Gainesville Sun contributed to this report. Contact John Wisely: jwisely@ On X: @jwisely This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Santa Ono, ex-UC president, rejected for University of Florida job

University of Florida board rejects hiring Michigan's president after he changed DEI policy to appease Trump
University of Florida board rejects hiring Michigan's president after he changed DEI policy to appease Trump

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

University of Florida board rejects hiring Michigan's president after he changed DEI policy to appease Trump

The board that oversees Florida's state university system voted against hiring Dr. Santa Ono, the former president of the University of Michigan, after he seemingly switched his stance on diversity, equity, and inclusion to appease President Donald Trump. The State University System Board of Governors' 6-10 vote against Ono came after hours of contentious debate and grilling of the academic over his previous position on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Ono, who received unanimous approval from the University of Florida Board of Trustees, was mainly questioned Tuesday about his recently changed stance on DEI, and how he would uphold Florida's agenda against DEI. The longtime academic's proposed contract included ideological requirements. In the role, he would be forced to cooperate with Gov. Ron DeSantis' Office of Government Efficiency and appoint other university officials who are 'firmly aligned' with Florida's approach. Ono was the sole finalist for the job, which would have paid him a $3 million annual package that included a $1.5 million base salary, the Florida Phoenix reported. However, on Tuesday, members of the board of governors were fixated on Ono's suddenly different stance on DEI, with some calling into question whether he switched sides to appease Trump or simply to get the gig. 'It's insidious that it feels like pushing a rope uphill when we establish these policies, if a president doesn't really believe in those policies,' Board of Governors Vice Chair Alan Levine said during the meeting in Orlando. 'And it's a powerful position — you can be an inhibitor, or you can help advance. And so I guess so much of your record reflects your deeply held beliefs, that you have been an advocate of DEI up until recently.' Ono had supported DEI initiatives at the University of Michigan until shuttering some of its programs earlier this year — a move some thought had to do with Trump's stripping of federal funding from universities. 'It looks to me like you got rid of the program because you needed to do what you had to do with the president's orders and the funding issues. But you didn't really push to get rid of DEI,' Levine said. Ono repeatedly told the board that he began looking at DEI when he took office at Michigan, instead of after Trump's executive order against it. He claimed he developed a new stance in the last year and a half after talking with students, and said that before, he was not an expert on the subject. Even still, his record left many conservative politicians unimpressed, including Republican U.S. Sen. Rick Scott of Florida, who wrote on X that it seemed Ono 'is willing to appease and prioritize far-left activists over ensuring students are protected and receive a quality education.' Other members of the GOP raising objections to Ono's hiring included Donald Trump Jr., Florida Republican U.S. Reps. Byron Donalds, Greg Steube and Jimmy Patronis. Ono was also questioned Tuesday by former Republican state House speakers Paul Renner and Jose Oliva, who wondered whether Ono changed his stance just to secure the Florida job. 'Now we are told to believe you are now abandoning an entire ideological architecture,' Oliva said. 'We are asking someone to lead our flagship university. I don't understand how it becomes unfair.' The intense degree of questioning from governors was not standard procedure, and it was the first time they had rejected a president, the Orlando Sentinel reported. Ono previously defended his change of heart in Inside Higher Ed, writing that he supported DEI at first because he thought the aim was 'equal opportunity and fairness for every student.' 'But over time, I saw how DEI became something else – more about ideology, division and bureaucracy, not student success,' Ono wrote. 'I believe in Florida's vision for higher education.' Now, the months-long search will have to restart. The University of Florida remains without a permanent president, with former UF President Kent Fuchs holding the role in the interim. With reporting from the Associated Press

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store