Hearing held on bill to change state wildlands designations
Several hearings were held before the Economic Matters Committee including for HB1270, sponsored by Del. Jim Hinebaugh and cross filed with Sen. Mike McKay's SB0399.
The legislation aims to strip wildlands designation from Big Savage Mountain Wildland, Bear Pen Wildland and Dan's Mountain Wildland for NextEra Energy Transmission MidAtlantic to build new overhead transmission lines.
Hinebaugh said the electrical pylons would carry high-voltage current for roughly 105 miles over land from southwestern Pennsylvania to Virginia.
'More specifically of our interest, it'll run through Garrett and Allegany' counties, he said.
Hinebaugh said farm bureaus in Garrett and Allegany counties as well as the state endorse HB1270, but added he doesn't believe 'anybody wants to have a new power line going through their area.'
Construction of the transmission line is 'a pretty sensitive issue,' Hinebaugh said.
'I knew it was going to be very controversial and stir up a lot of emotions,' he said.
'I tried to look at the big picture and not just look at my district in particular,' Hinebaugh said of regional electrical demands. 'I'm convinced that this is absolutely necessary.'
Friday, Maryland Department of Natural Resources Media Relations Manager Gregg Bortz said the organization hasn't taken a stance on the bill.
'The department is monitoring this legislation and does not have a position at this point,' he said.
'Very gun-shy'Questions from the Economic Matters Committee included whether the proposed project in the wildlands would be illegal and/or jeopardize funding on a federal level.
A policy note on HB1270 from DNR 'advises that state wildlands are partially managed using federal grant monies received under the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act.'
According to DNR, 'the bill may jeopardize a portion of the funding it receives annually under the act because it would permit the installation of overhead transmission lines on land that is currently part of existing state wildlands.'
Del. Jesse Pippy said HB1270 has some support as well as opposition whereas 'everybody is unanimously against' plans for the Maryland Piedmont Reliability Project that proposes to construct a high-voltage electricity transmission line across roughly 70 miles of land in Baltimore, Carroll and Frederick counties.
'I'm very gun-shy about supporting any bill related to a transmission line at this point because the last nine months have been nightmarish in Frederick County dealing with this transmission business,' he said. 'But it was interesting to see that you do have support from elected officials ... that is in stark contrast to what we're dealing with.'
Route pushbackT. Lee Beeman, Allegany County's attorney, testified at the hearing on behalf of the county's three-member board of commissioners.
'At this point and time the commissioners aren't supportive of this exact route,' Beeman said. 'But they are supportive of the legislation that's necessary to have this route be considered and to ultimately voice their opinion through the (Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity) process where they believe it would be most appropriate.'
He said the commissioners support the bill because infrastructure to support data centers is necessary.
'It has to go somewhere,' he said.
Discussions with NextEra have included consideration of a new substation in Allegany County, Beeman said.
Violates COMARGarrett County resident and farm owner Steve Storck testified against the legislation.
'I've spent the last 40 years teaching people about stewardship of wild and natural places and providing data products to help inform policy and protect and preserve them,' he said. '(HB1270) is a direct affront to that work.'
Policy notes attached to the draft include 'all the things wrong with this bill,' Storck said, adding that the proposed law violates the resource protection statue in the Code of Maryland Regulations.
'The more I learn about this bill ... it's likely a concession or some other downstate interest,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
3 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Execution date set for Florida man who killed estranged wife's sister and parents, set fire to house
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) — A Florida man who fatally stabbed his estranged wife's sister and parents and then set fire to their house is scheduled for execution in Florida under a death warrant signed by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis. David Pittman, 63, is set to die Sept. 17 in the record-extending 12th execution scheduled for this year. DeSantis signed the warrant Friday, as two other men, Kayle Bates and Curtis Windom, await execution later this month. The highest previous annual total of recent Florida executions is eight in 2014, since the death penalty was restored in 1976 by the U.S. Supreme Court. Florida has already executed nine people this year, more than any other state, while Texas and South Carolina are tied for second place with four each. A total of 28 people have been executed so far this year in the U.S., exceeding the 25 executions carried out last year. It ties 2015, when 28 people were also put to death. Pittman was convicted and sentenced to death in 1991 on three counts of first-degree murder, according to court records. Jurors also found him guilty of arson and grand theft. Pittman and his wife, Marie, were going through a divorce in May 1990, when Pittman went to the Polk County home of her parents, Clarence and Barbara Knowles, officials said. Pittman fatally stabbed the couple, as well as their younger daughter, Bonnie. He then set fire to the house and stole Bonnie Knowles' car, which he also set on fire, investigators said.
Dominion Post
30-07-2025
- Dominion Post
'It's a no-brainer': Mon Commission opposes passthrough power lines
MORGANTOWN — 'It solves a problem, but somebody else's problem … And to be forced to accept this project without any benefit to our citizens while extremely impacting our citizens isn't something that this commission can stand for.' And with that, the Monongalia County Commission voted Wednesday to take a public position against the 105-mile MidAtlantic Resiliency Link power transmission project looking at parts of West Virginia as a path for 500-kilovolt power lines running from Greene County, Pa. to Frederick County, Va. Five counties – Monongalia, Preston, Hampshire, Jefferson and Mineral – have been identified by NextEra Energy Transmission MidAtlantic as part of the potential route With Wednesday's resolution, all five county commissions have now said, 'No, thank you.' Commissioner Sean Sikora, who offered the remarks that opened this report, explained further. 'When we had the work session with NextEra, everything that they're saying in regards to electricity needs is true. We just don't see a benefit to them running this line across our state – across our beautiful county – and not providing us any benefit.' In regard to this project, one of the major sticking points raised by both residents and elected officials is that West Virginia – a next exporter of energy as the country's fifth-highest producer – is little more than countryside to be cleared in service to power-hungry data centers in northern Virginia. Even so, it's believed the cost of the infrastructure will ultimately be paid through increased rates for all customers across the 13-state power grid operated by PJM Interconnection. 'To me, it's pretty simple. They want to shove these things down our throats and say, 'Oh, by the way, you also get to pay for it, and by the way, you don't get any benefit from it,'' Commission President Jeff Arnett said. 'It's a no-brainer.' Arnett went on to say there was consensus across the political spectrum in terms of the numerous individuals who kept pressure on the commission to get involved. One of those individuals was Delegate David McCormick, R-82nd District. 'This is a bipartisan issue. It's about property values and increased rates for ratepayers. I don't see West Virginia and West Virginians benefiting from this; it being just a vehicle to get more power to Virginia to help their economic development efforts with data centers. I'd rather see them come here, frankly,' McCormick said. 'Virginia doesn't have enough power? Well, maybe they shouldn't have closed all the power plants and they wouldn't have this problem.' In addition to the resolution opposing MARL within Monongalia County, the commission also pledged to honor a recent request from the Hampshire County Commission to coordinate the efforts of the various counties leading up to and including participation in the West Virginia Public Service Commission's review of the final project route presented by NextEra.
Yahoo
12-07-2025
- Yahoo
Sheboygan letter-writers on Enbridge Line 5, Democratic Party's 4th of July parade display
Here are this week's letters to the editor of the Sheboygan Press. See our letters policy below for details about how to share your views. Last fall, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources determined — after more than four years of review and nearly a thousand pages of environmental assessments — that the Enbridge Line 5 relocation project in Bayfield, Ashland and Iron counties could be built within the boundaries of our state's strict environmental laws. The DNR included more than 200 stipulations in their permits — including independent observers — to ensure the construction of this pipeline project followed state laws. This would seem like a reasonable conclusion and requirement for reasonable people. But opponents of this project have long put reason aside. They have now moved on to the courts. Not only are they going after the DNR's decision through the administrative court process, but they have also filed a lawsuit against the decision. The DNR performed a comprehensive review of the Line 5 relocation. They spent years compiling data and coming to a justifiable conclusion. Sadly, opponents of the project have put their radical views ahead of the science the DNR used in issuing the permits. Line 5 is an integral part of our energy supply and the relocation needs to move forward. These legal games need to stop, and we need to trust the DNR's decision. Ted Keneklis Sheboygan I just returned from watching the Sheboygan Fourth of July parade, which was excellent. Of all of the groups in the parade, only one was disappointing: the Sheboygan County Democratic Party. All other groups and people set aside their differences for today and came together to celebrate the greatness and uniqueness of America. Whatever religion, color or ethnicity they were, they gave their respect to our flag and country. The Black-American group, the Hmong, the different churches and branches of government proudly showed their uniqueness with their costumes and customs. Yet, they were there for one purpose: to celebrate being Americans in the best country in the world. Unfortunately, the Sheboygan County Democratic Party showed up with anti-American, anti-president and unpatriotic messages and signs. Shame on you. This was not the time and place for protesting. I was not the only person in the crowd who was shocked to see signs like 'No Kings' and 'The Big Beautiful Bill is Bad.' I heard verbal gasps and remarks like 'Really?' and 'That's terrible.' People were shaking their heads. Judi Pool Sheboygan Letters to the editor are published in the order in which they are received and letter-writers are limited to having one letter published per month. Letters can be emailed to news@ and Editor Brandon Reid at breid@ Letters must meet specific guidelines, including being no more than 250 words and be from local authors or on topics of local interest. All submissions must include the name of the person who wrote the letter, their city of residence and a contact phone number. Letters are edited as needed for style, grammar, length, fairness, accuracy and libel. This article originally appeared on Sheboygan Press: Sheboygan letters to the editor on Enbridge Line 5, 4th of July parade
