Hearing held on bill to change state wildlands designations
ANNAPOLIS — Distrust and lack of transparency were repeatedly mentioned as one bill after another in the Maryland House Thursday addressed land protections threatened by power companies.
Several hearings were held before the Economic Matters Committee including for HB1270, sponsored by Del. Jim Hinebaugh and cross filed with Sen. Mike McKay's SB0399.
The legislation aims to strip wildlands designation from Big Savage Mountain Wildland, Bear Pen Wildland and Dan's Mountain Wildland for NextEra Energy Transmission MidAtlantic to build new overhead transmission lines.
Hinebaugh said the electrical pylons would carry high-voltage current for roughly 105 miles over land from southwestern Pennsylvania to Virginia.
'More specifically of our interest, it'll run through Garrett and Allegany' counties, he said.
Hinebaugh said farm bureaus in Garrett and Allegany counties as well as the state endorse HB1270, but added he doesn't believe 'anybody wants to have a new power line going through their area.'
Construction of the transmission line is 'a pretty sensitive issue,' Hinebaugh said.
'I knew it was going to be very controversial and stir up a lot of emotions,' he said.
'I tried to look at the big picture and not just look at my district in particular,' Hinebaugh said of regional electrical demands. 'I'm convinced that this is absolutely necessary.'
Friday, Maryland Department of Natural Resources Media Relations Manager Gregg Bortz said the organization hasn't taken a stance on the bill.
'The department is monitoring this legislation and does not have a position at this point,' he said.
'Very gun-shy'Questions from the Economic Matters Committee included whether the proposed project in the wildlands would be illegal and/or jeopardize funding on a federal level.
A policy note on HB1270 from DNR 'advises that state wildlands are partially managed using federal grant monies received under the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act.'
According to DNR, 'the bill may jeopardize a portion of the funding it receives annually under the act because it would permit the installation of overhead transmission lines on land that is currently part of existing state wildlands.'
Del. Jesse Pippy said HB1270 has some support as well as opposition whereas 'everybody is unanimously against' plans for the Maryland Piedmont Reliability Project that proposes to construct a high-voltage electricity transmission line across roughly 70 miles of land in Baltimore, Carroll and Frederick counties.
'I'm very gun-shy about supporting any bill related to a transmission line at this point because the last nine months have been nightmarish in Frederick County dealing with this transmission business,' he said. 'But it was interesting to see that you do have support from elected officials ... that is in stark contrast to what we're dealing with.'
Route pushbackT. Lee Beeman, Allegany County's attorney, testified at the hearing on behalf of the county's three-member board of commissioners.
'At this point and time the commissioners aren't supportive of this exact route,' Beeman said. 'But they are supportive of the legislation that's necessary to have this route be considered and to ultimately voice their opinion through the (Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity) process where they believe it would be most appropriate.'
He said the commissioners support the bill because infrastructure to support data centers is necessary.
'It has to go somewhere,' he said.
Discussions with NextEra have included consideration of a new substation in Allegany County, Beeman said.
Violates COMARGarrett County resident and farm owner Steve Storck testified against the legislation.
'I've spent the last 40 years teaching people about stewardship of wild and natural places and providing data products to help inform policy and protect and preserve them,' he said. '(HB1270) is a direct affront to that work.'
Policy notes attached to the draft include 'all the things wrong with this bill,' Storck said, adding that the proposed law violates the resource protection statue in the Code of Maryland Regulations.
'The more I learn about this bill ... it's likely a concession or some other downstate interest,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Cyber charter reform that could save public schools $616M advances with unclear future in Pennsylvania Senate
Spotlight PA is an independent, nonpartisan, and nonprofit newsroom producing investigative and public-service journalism that holds power to account and drives positive change in Pennsylvania. Sign up for our free newsletters. HARRISBURG — Public school districts in Pennsylvania could save more than $600 million annually under a bill that the state House passed Wednesday to cap the tuition they pay to cyber charters. The bill is part of a several-year effort to boost oversight and cut spending on cyber charter schools. At least some of its concepts have support in both chambers, but the issue has always been complicated by the commonwealth's tricky education politics. Democrats, who control the state House, have championed increased spending for poor public schools, while Republicans, who control the state Senate, favor funding alternatives including charter schools, though the issue doesn't break neatly down party lines. Senate Majority Leader Joe Pittman (R, Indiana) reflected that dynamic in a statement Wednesday, saying 'certain aspects' of the bill advanced by the state House 'could be beneficial.' That includes the measure's requirements that cyber schools do wellness checks on students and that public districts get proof of residency for students for whom they pay tuition. But, Pittman added, there needs to be recognition that the proposal would save school districts money, which he believes should count as the legislature giving public schools increased support as required by a 2022 court ruling. Democrats, meanwhile, are casting this issue as an administrative necessity. 'This bill is the result of repeated and urgent calls to update our commonwealth's outdated charter school law,' state Rep. Mary Isaacson (D., Philadelphia), the bill sponsor, said on the House floor Wednesday. 'This proposal is about fiscal responsibilities and aligning tuition to the actual cost.' The measure made it through the lower chamber 104-98, with two moderate Republicans voting in favor. It now goes to the state Senate Education Committee. Its chair, Sen. Lynda Schlegel Culver (R., Columbia), said in a statement, 'We will thoroughly review the legislation as we do for all bills given to the committee.' Pennsylvania school districts must pay tuition for any students who live within their borders and opt to attend a charter school. These tuition rates are calculated based on the district's per-student spending using a formula that has changed little over the past several decades. Currently, the state uses nearly the same formula to fund online-only cyber charter schools as it does for brick-and-mortar charters, despite the former's relatively lower overhead costs. That would change under this bill. It would instead set a base tuition rate of $8,000 per student. That rate would be increased for students who have extra needs, such as disabilities. This mirrors a proposal that Gov. Josh Shapiro has made in his last two budgets, and of which Democrats have long been supportive. The measure would also make several other changes. A number focus on transparency, such as the wellness checks and residency requirements Pittman cited. Other provisions include requirements that cyber charters post annual performance assessments online and inform students if they are found to be low-performing, as well as an enrollment cap on cyber charters found to be low-performing. Cyber charters would also be required to disclose any 'entities' helping to finance their capital projects. Along with the flat tuition rate, there are also other financial components. By the end of this year, cyber charters would have to pay back a significant portion of their unspent surplus dollars from the 2024-25 fiscal year to the state. That money would go into a state fund for public schools' facility improvement projects, and would newly make charter schools eligible for those funds. The bill would additionally bar cyber charters from accumulating large surpluses in the future. Starting at the end of the next fiscal year — June 2026 — any surplus dollars in excess of 12% of the school's total expenditures that aren't earmarked would have to be sent back to public districts. Plus, it would require that any revenue cyber charters generate via property be paid back to the school districts they receive money from. According to the bill's fiscal note, lower cyber charter tuition payments would save districts an aggregate of $616 million, half of what they currently spend. Each district's specific savings would vary based on how many students they have enrolled in cyber charters. The shaky bipartisan agreement that Pennsylvania's cyber charter law needs to be updated didn't come out of nowhere. Cyber charter enrollment has risen significantly in recent years — by nearly 57% across the state since 2020, when the pandemic began pushing more families to explore the option. Nearly 60,000 Pennsylvania students now attend cyber charters, which means a growing number of school districts and lawmakers are affected. A review earlier this year from Republican Auditor General Tim DeFoor solidified members' opinion that something had to change. DeFoor audited five of the commonwealth's 14 cyber charters and found that the revenue they were taking in nearly doubled from 2020 to 2023, from $473 million to $898 million, and also that the schools' financial reserves had increased by nearly 150% in that period. In addition, he found cyber charters had been spending funds on 'unusual' things like gift cards and vehicle payments. Still, division remains. During the floor debate Wednesday, several Republicans slammed the bill as unfair to cyber charter schools. 'We still have some more work to do for our school districts complaining about equal funding. All they ask is to be treated the same, and I'm here to advocate for them,' said state Rep. Craig Williams (R., Chester). 'House Bill 1500 doesn't do that. House Bill 1500 puts us on a path to end cyber charters.' Cyber charter administrators and advocates are also uniformly against the measure. Marcus Hite, who heads the Pennsylvania Association of Public Cyber Charter Schools, called the $8,000 tuition cap 'arbitrary and unrealistic,' saying in a news release it 'doesn't reflect the real cost of educating students, especially those with disabilities or unique learning needs.' 'Cyber charters are already subject to some of the highest levels of oversight in the education system — audits, performance reviews, and public transparency,' he added. 'HB 1500 piles on duplicative and punitive rules.' In a joint statement, a group of administrators from five cyber charter schools said the bill would lead to closures. Jon Marsh of Philadelphia's Esperanza Cyber Charter School called it 'an attack on some of the most chronically disenfranchised and disadvantaged students in our Commonwealth.' Public education advocates support the measure. Susan Spicka of Education Voters of PA said it 'will save hundreds of millions of tax dollars annually and bring long-overdue accountability and transparency to Pennsylvania's billion dollar cyber charter industry.' The issue is heavily lobbied. Last year alone, Commonwealth Charter Academy, the state's biggest cyber charter, spent $202,500 on education-related lobbying. Other cyber charters typically spend at least tens of thousands of dollars annually. That doesn't touch the significant dollars that traditional brick-and-mortar charters and their advocates spend on lobbying. Public schools have their own lobbying presence, too. The Pennsylvania State Education Association, the union that represents teachers, spent nearly $178,000 on lobbying last year. If you learned something from this article, pay it forward and contribute to Spotlight PA at Spotlight PA is funded by foundations and readers like you who are committed to accountability journalism that gets results. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Man runs from drug deal, jumps into GA pond to escape deputies, officials say
Georgia officials said a man went to great lengths to avoid an arrest. [DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks] On Sunday, Cpl. Johnny Robinette and Game Warden Aaron Powell were called to help Cook County deputies and Adel police. According to the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, officers were chasing a suspect who ran away from a drug deal. The DNR said the suspect stole a bike to help in his escape, and then jumped into a pond and swam to a nearby island to avoid being arrested. TRENDING STORIES: Man installed recording device in metro Atlanta Burlington Coat Factory, police say Nearly 2 dozen arrested for stealing thousands from Mall of Georgia Hall Co. escaped inmate steals motorcycle, leads deputies on multi-state chase, officials say When game wardens arrived, they launched a boat to access the island. They later found the suspect and took him into custody. The suspect, whose age and identity were not released, was turned over to local agencies and charged with multiple drug-related offenses. [SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Shapiro, Senate Republicans clash over mass transit spending as budget deadline looms
(WHTM) — June may be the busiest month at the State Capitol, with the budget deadline approaching and a lot of lobbying going on. Governor Josh Shapiro is also pushing hard for his priorities, along with a spending number that Republicans insist is not possible. 'It is critically important that we invest in mass transit,' said Shapiro, touting his spending wish list, all worthy causes. But June is as much about finding funds as making fixes. 'Great politics is to be all things to all people, and that's what the Governor's budget proposal was,' said Senate Majority Leader Joe Pittman (R). 'It was all things to all people.' Senate Republicans are skeptical of the Governor's demands and are growing wary of the proposed budget's burden on the Pennsylvania taxpayer. 'At the end of the day, the taxpayer cannot bear the expenses that he has proposed in his budget,' said Pittman. 'We can't afford it all.' Democrats counter that Pennsylvania can't afford not to. 'We must continue to make those investments that we know pay us dividends, and that's the budget that we're looking forward to getting to the Governor's desk on June 30,' said Appropriations Chairman Jordan Harris (D). Will they make it? Shapiro is generally optimistic. 'We've had some good conversations that have been ongoing,' said Shapiro. Pittman disagrees. 'We have miles to go, I think, in terms of getting a budget in place,' said Pittman. 'There's a wide gulf, frankly, in our revenues and our expenditures.' Shapiro has mastered press conferences. How about budget negotiating? 'I would like to see him a little more engaged,' Pittman said. 'My response is that the Governor's Office is on the second floor of this building,' said Harris. 'I see him all the time.' There's also some concern in the building that Senate Republicans don't want to give Governor Shapiro a win in the budget because he's running for re-election in 2026, and maybe higher office in future years. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
