
EPBD asks govt to withdraw Tax Laws Ordinance
ISLAMABAD: Economic Policy and Business Development (EPBD) - a Think Tank has asked the government to immediately withdraw Tax Laws (Amendment) Ordinance 2025, as it would create cash flow disruptions for business community and undermines judicial safeguards that protect businesses during tax disputes.
According to an analysis of EPBD of the said Ordinance on Tuesday, it explained that the Tax Laws (Amendment) Ordinance 2025 (Ordinance No. IV of 2025), promulgated by the President on May 2, 2025, introduces three significant amendments that pose grave concerns for Pakistan's business community at a critical economic juncture.
Our analysis reveals serious issues with these amendments. First, changes to Sections 138(3A) and 140(6A) of the Income Tax Ordinance empower tax authorities to demand immediate payment when cases are decided by courts, effectively nullifying established legal timeframes and judicial stays. This creates potential for catastrophic cash flow disruptions and undermines judicial safeguards that protect businesses during disputes.
Second, the new Section 175C grants unprecedented authority to tax officials to maintain continuous presence at business premises for monitoring operations. This surveillance mechanism will disrupt business activities, compromise confidential information, and increase compliance costs for enterprises already struggling in challenging economic conditions.
Third, amendments to the Federal Excise Act dramatically broaden the government's seizure powers, allowing confiscation of goods based on technical non-compliance while extending enforcement authority beyond specialized tax officials to any government officer, creating heightened business uncertainty.
These measures appear particularly unjustified given the remarkable improvement in tax compliance despite challenging economic conditions. The cumulative impact of these amendments extends far beyond tax administration and threatens fundamental aspects of Pakistan's economic environment. The creation of an unpredictable tax regime with diminished procedural safeguards signals a disregard for legal due process that will inevitably damage Pakistan's international competitiveness and deter both domestic and foreign investment at a time when capital formation is critically needed.
The financial stability of businesses across sectors is placed at risk through the threat of unexpected tax demands that bypass normal judicial processes. Companies will be forced to maintain excessive cash reserves as protection against sudden tax liabilities, thereby reducing productive investment and economic growth potential. The diversion of management attention toward compliance with intrusive monitoring requirements will further impede business efficiency and innovation.
Of particular concern are the constitutional implications of these amendments. By effectively limiting the authority of the courts to grant meaningful relief through stays and appeals, these provisions challenge fundamental protections established under Article 199 of the Constitution. The undermining of judicial authority and the resulting threat to separation of powers represents a troubling precedent that extends beyond tax matters to broader questions of governance.
EPBD recommends that the government:
(i) Review and withdraw the Ordinance to allow for open parliamentary debate and comprehensive stakeholder consultations. This would ensure that revenue objectives can be balanced against economic stability and constitutional principles through a deliberative process.
(ii) Restore established legal timeframes for tax recovery and respect judicial stays and appeals as foundational elements of Pakistan's legal framework. A more balanced approach would implement targeted rather than blanket monitoring provisions and create robust safeguards against official overreach.
(iii) Establish a structured business-government dialogue to address legitimate revenue concerns through consensus rather than unilateral action. If the government is serious about sustainable revenue generation, it must focus more on rightsizing and rationalizing expenses rather than implementing measures that undermine business confidence and economic stability.
EPBD stands ready to facilitate constructive engagement to develop balanced policies that serve both fiscal needs and economic growth objectives. The goal is a prosperous, competitive, and economically stable Pakistan, and achieving this requires a predictable and fair tax regime that supports business growth rather than impedes it. The business community remains committed to contributing its fair share to national development, but this must occur within a framework that respects rule of law and economic sustainability.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Recorder
18 hours ago
- Business Recorder
PECA Act: Respondents asked to submit comments
ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) gave a deadline to the respondents to submit comments in the petitions challenging amendments in the PECA Act. A single bench of Justice Inaam Ameen Minhas on Wednesday heard the petitions of Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ), anchors association and Islamabad High Court Journalists Association (IHCJA). In the petition, counsel of the journalist body adopted the stance that the PECA (Amendment) Act is unconstitutional and illegal; hence, the court should conduct judicial review on it. The petition said the PECA (Amendment) 2025 increased the government control and restrictions on freedom of speech. It said the PECA law violated Article 19 and 19(A) of the Constitution as well. Therefore, it pleaded, the law should be suspended. PECA amendments challenged in SC During the hearing, Advocate Imran Shafiq and other lawyers appeared in the court on behalf of the petitioners. Advocate Shafiq said the federal government has filed its reply only through the Ministry of Interior and the Ministry of Information while the Ministry of Law and Justice, Parliamentary Affairs and the PTA have not submitted any response yet. He informed the bench that the federal government has raised a question on the jurisdiction of this court. He added that the federation has stated that after the 26th Constitutional Amendment, only the Constitutional Bench of the High Court can hear this case. The lawyer said the second objection was raised while giving a reference of a Quranic verse that before spreading the words, do research. The lawyer said the FIRs are being registered against people and the court should hear this case soon. The IHC bench asked whether there is no news going on? Is someone preventing news from being given or published? Riasat Ali Azad advocate prayed the court to issue a stay order that there will be no FIR or arrest against the journalist for reporting the news. He said that the parties are not submitting a response and are taking time from the court. Journalist Mazhar Abbas said that an atmosphere of harassment has been created in the media industry and the journalists are being summoned and harassed by the FIA. The petitioner's lawyer said the parties should be directed to file their replies and provide a copy of the replies to the petitioners in advance before the next hearing. Justice Inaam remarked that even if the response is not filed, the hearing will still be continued. He said that this case would take a long time and therefore, it will be scheduled after Eid. Later, the court deferred hearing of the case till the second week of July. The PFUJ said in the petition that the law infringed international human rights as well as digital rights in Pakistan. The petition read: '…a writ may be issued declaring that the Prevention of Electronic Crimes (Amendment) Act, 2025 is unconstitutional, being violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution, due process, fair trial, and the concept of regulatory independence, as well as the doctrines of fairness, proportionality, reasonableness, and constitutional limitations or restrictions, hence void, and liable to be struck down.' Therefore, the PFUJ prayed that the respondents may be restrained and prevented from employing the coercive powers under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes (Amendment) Act, 2025, in general, and against the journalist community, in particular till final disposal of the instant petition. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
IHC halts FBR tax recovery under Tax Laws Ord, 2025
ISLAMABAD: In a major development, Islamabad High Court (IHC) has stopped the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) from immediate tax recovery against taxpayers under the controversial Tax Laws (Amendment) Ordinance, 2025. In this regard, IHC has issued an order on Tuesday in favour of the private limited companies (petitioners). The National Assembly Standing Committee on Finance has also categorically conveyed to the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) that the government has bypassed Parliament for promulgating Tax Laws (Amendment) Ordinance, 2025, and urgently communicated ordinance to the FBR's field formations for recovery from taxpayers. Tax laws bill: NA panel defers Sec 114C until FBR system overhaul According to the order of the IHC, the court has issued notices to the FBR to submit comments and meanwhile, no coercive measure to be taken by the FBR against the petitioners. The petitioners have requested the IHC to declare that the Tax Laws (Amendment) Ordinance 2025, promulgated on May 2, 2025, as Ultra Vires of the Constitution and void ab initio. IHC should declare that sections 138 (3A), 140(6A), 175 C of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (as amended), and section 27 (4) of the Federal Excise Act, 2005 are inconsistent with Articles 4, 8, 10-A, 18, and 25 of the Constitution, hence void. IHC should suspend the operation of impugned Tax Laws (Amendment) Ordinance, 2025 dated 02.05.2025, till pendency of this Writ Petition and restrain the Respondents (FBR) from enforcing or taking any coercive action under the impugned provisions till pendency of this Writ Petition, petitioners added. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


Business Recorder
3 days ago
- Business Recorder
IHC tax bench's order: All SOE references be routed thru ADRC
ISLAMABAD: The special tax division bench of the Islamabad High Court has ordered that all tax references filed by state-owned enterprises shall be referred to the Alternate Dispute Resolution Committee under Section 134A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. The state-owned enterprises contended that those tax reference applications which were instituted prior to the enactment of the Tax Laws Amendment Act, 2024 ought to be adjudicated by the Court in accordance with the procedure applicable at the time of filing of the tax reference application. However, the counsel for the Commissioner, Osama Shahid (Advocate) placed reliance upon a recent judgment of the Supreme Court of Pakistan wherein a case filed in the year 2023 (i.e., prior to the enactment of the Tax Laws Amendment Act, 2024) was referred to the mandatory alternate dispute resolution committee under Section 134A of the Ordinance. In light of the Supreme Court's judgment, the Islamabad High Court referred to matters to alternate dispute resolution committee. Tax dispute: IHC grants conditional relief to SOE Earlier, the Islamabad Bench of the ATIR had referred several appeals filed by and against state-owned enterprises to the alternate dispute resolution committee. The Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals), Islamabad has also refused to adjudicate any appeal filed by a state-owned enterprise in light of the Supreme Court's judgment. It appears that the only recourse available to a state-owned enterprise in case of a tax dispute is the alternate dispute resolution mechanism provided under Section 134A of the Ordinance regardless of whether the dispute initiated prior to or after the enactment of the Tax Laws Amendment Act, 2024. It is pertinent to note that several state-owned enterprises have also assailed the vires of the Tax Laws Amendment Act, 2024 before the Islamabad High Court by filing writ petitions which are currently sub judice. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025