Tampa Bay tree-planting programs lose federal funding in DEI purge
TAMPA, Fla. (WFLA) — Efforts to plant trees using federal dollars in Tampa Bay could be at a standstill. The Trump Administration is looking to eliminate environmental justice programs under the premise of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI).
There were 183 trees planted in Childs Park in St. Petersburg. And $19,000 from the federal government's U.S. Forest Service was used to accomplish it.
Hurricane-damaged hotel in St. Pete Beach receives $34K internet/cable bill
The same government agency cancelled the funding for a nationwide tree planting program because it no longer aligns with the agency priorities regarding DEI.
'It's hard to believe that trees have anything to do with diversity, equity, and inclusion. I mean we need trees everywhere,' said Pat Fling, the co-chair of the Sierra Club political committee. They advocate for a clean environment and say trees contribute to it.
Fling said not having this funding can hurt some areas.
'It'll be hard for those residents who can't afford to plant trees on their own. Lower income neighborhoods might be closer to commercial businesses which are generating pollution, so trees can help mitigate some of that,' Fling said.
This has been a focal point for Jabaar Edmond. He is the former president of the Childs Park Neighborhood Association.
'The tree planting is an investment for the future more so than an investment right now,' Edmond said. 'We're still battling air quality emissions from factories in our industrial corridor.'
He said it's going to be up to the city and state to fill gaps left by the federal government.
'The reality is sometimes we have to be the ones to issue the grant and not be the ones receiving it,' Edmond said.
The nonprofit Take MAR (More Action for Regeneration) plants trees across Tampa Bay. They say on average, planting one tree can cost between $1,000 to $2,000.
'Trees are expensive, not just for the planting, but also to maintain, and they require labor cost of trees, mulching, fertilizing, etc. So with cities that have more affluent neighborhoods, they have more funding for certain things, so we are also looking at the importance of planting and underserved communities,' said Michelle Ellena, the Co-Founder of Take MAR. 'Looking at communities that trees might not be their first priority but are very necessary in order to, yeah, help with storm protection, flood mitigation air and water quality, and urban heat reduction.'
The Sierra Club mentioned how their organization and others are still counting the number of tree's lost during Hurricanes Helene and Milton. These groups hope people realize the need for newly planted trees and are willing to pay for it.
'It almost feels like a defeat sometimes, but at the same time, trees are resilient, so we're going to be resilient,' Ellena said.
It's unclear where Governor Ron DeSantis stands on federal funding being cut for programs to plant trees. But the governor has been vocal about assessing state spending and bringing in government efficiency.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Sierra Club: EPA plan to repeal emission standards would ‘put Americans at risk'
The Trump administration's EPA seeks to repeal all greenhouse gas emission standards on the power sector. (Photo by Robert Zullo/States Newsroom) Estimates from the Sierra Club found Iowa utilities would be allowed to release 26 million tons of carbon emissions annually, if the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency finalized a proposal to repeal carbon pollution standards. In its explanation for the proposal, EPA claims greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel-fired plants 'do not contribute significantly' to dangerous air pollution and that removing pollution standards set by the agency under previous administrations would save $19 billion in regulatory costs over two decades. The Sierra Club, which is an environmental organization with chapters across the country, said the power sector is the largest stationary source of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. and that exposure to these air pollutants are linked to a higher risk of heart disease, respiratory diseases, pregnancy complications and cancer. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX 'The Trump Administration continues to put the American people at risk by stripping away environmental safeguards proven to clean up the air we breathe and improve public health,' Pam Mackey Taylor, director of the Iowa Chapter of the Sierra Club, said in a statement. The proposal would repeal regulations put in place in 2015 and in 2024 that put emission guidelines and standards on coal-fired power plants, via Section 111 of the Clean Air Act. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin's proposal argues the Clean Air Act requires the agency to determine, before it issues regulations, that pollutants emitted by fossil fuel-fired power plants 'causes, or contributes significantly to, air pollution' that is 'anticipated to endanger public health or welfare.' The current administration argues EPA in the past created regulation standards without this determination. EPA data shows that 25% of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions in 2022 came from the power sector, which was just slightly less than the transportation sector which accounted for 28% of domestic greenhouse gas emissions. In an EPA presentation explaining the rules which were finalized in July 2024, the agency estimated the additional carbon pollution standards would have cut 617 million metric tons of carbon dioxide and other 'harmful air pollutants that are known to endanger public health.' Sierra Club charted the impacts these regulations would have had, state-by-state based on operating coal-powered plants and their estimated closure dates. EPA regulations around carbon pollution standards for the power sector have been challenged in the past, most recently with a 2022 U.S. Supreme Court case that repealed part of the 2015 Clean Power Plan emission guidelines. The proposal to repeal the most recent rules alleges Biden-era EPA leadership did not change course following the Supreme Court ruling, but created similar, rules with expanded regulations. Acting under a handful of executive orders from President Donald Trump, and Zeldin's 'Powering the Great American Comeback' initiative, the agency seeks to repeal 'all' greenhouse gas emission standards on the power sector, or alternatively, just the 'most burdensome set of requirements.' The notice said this will 'ensure affordable and reliable energy supplies and drive down the costs of transportation, heating, utilities, farming, and manufacturing while boosting our national security.' The proposal will have a public hearing 15 days after it is published in the Federal Register, where EPA will also accept public comments on the proposed rules 45 days after it is published. Those interested can search for the docket in the federal register with Docket ID number: EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0124. 'During the public comment period, we will continue to fight for clean air and protect our communities being harmed by Trump's shortsighted actions,' Mackey Taylor said. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
The gaslighting of Alex Padilla is already in full swing on the right
Lunging men are perceived as dangerous. In an America that has long weaponized descriptions of how men of color look and move to justify use of force, that is especially true of dark men lunging at white women. So when Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said after Sen. Alex Padilla interrupted her news conference Thursday that 'people need to identify themselves before they start lunging' — it's hard to believe it wasn't meant to be an intentionally loaded word, with loaded results. For those of you who don't watch Fox and other right-wing media, I'll fill you in on how Noem's description played out. Padilla, the Trumpian version of the story now goes, got what he deserved: He busted into a press conference uninvited, they say, pushed his way toward the stage and failed to identify himself. Just ask my inbox. 'Here is what your article should have said,' wrote one fan of my column about the incident. ''DEI appointee Senator Alex Padilla, dressed like a truck driver and acting like a potential attacker or mental case, burst into a press conference being conducted by a high ranking member of the Cabinet and started shouting and interrupting her.'' Another reader put that dog-whistle racism more succinctly. 'No Juan above the law,' the reader quipped. We'll get to whether Padilla lunged or not and just how dangerous a lunge really is. But the larger issue is the alternate reality the Trump administration is building to cultivate fear and build support for a military crackdown. The ask isn't that we believe Padilla was a threat, but that we believe that America has devolved into a immigrant-induced chaos that only the military can quell, and that Trump needs the powers of a king to lead the military to our salvation. So the question isn't really whether Padilla lunged or not — since, as the video shows, it's clear he was nowhere close to Noem and had no intent to harm — but rather why Noem chose to call it a lunge. 'It was very disingenuous of Kristi Noem to make the claim that he lunged at her,' Joan Donovan told me. She's an expert on disinformation and an assistant professor of journalism at Boston University. 'The Trump administration is salivating over a major contestation that would allow them to roll the military out into any old town,' she said. 'They are making it seem as if without this kind of major intervention and excessive force, that these people are ungovernable.' Padilla, the son of Mexican immigrants, is known to be a level-headed guy. My colleague Gustavo Arellano describes him as a 'goody-two-shoes.' But these aren't level-headed days. Padilla said that he was in the federal building on Thursday for a briefing with a general, because for weeks he's been trying unsuccessfully to get answers about how deportations are being handled. That briefing was delayed by Noem's news conference, and so — escorted by federal authorities who knew exactly who they were escorting, Padilla said — he went to listen to Noem in the hopes of getting some information. Padilla said he got fed up listening to her remarks about criminals and invasions and tried to ask a question, while moving forward past the wall of television cameras. In the videos I've watched, multiple federal agents — seemingly some from Homeland Security and the FBI — block his way then begin pushing him back. Padilla seems to continue to push forward, but is overpowered and forced into the hallway. It's here where he's taken to the ground and cuffed. It's hard to see a lunge in there. And if there was one, it was from at least a good 10 feet away from Noem, at a minimum. Use-of-force expert Ed Obayashi told me that in situations such as this, law enforcement officers are expected to use their judgment on what is a danger. 'They were trying to keep him from approaching,' Obayashi said, pointing out it was the officers' job to protect Noem. 'They were trying to do what they could under the circumstances to prevent him from getting closer.' But, he added, from what we can see in the videos, it doesn't look like Padilla showed 'intent' to cause harm and he was really far away. Distance makes a difference when judging whether a lunge is a threat. 'It doesn't seem like he was going to rush up,' Obayashi said. So, to be fair to officers who may or may not have at first realized they were manhandling a U.S. senator, they had a job to do and were doing it, even if a bit zealously. But Noem knows better. It's hard to imagine she didn't recognize Padilla, who served on her confirmation committee and is the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship and Border Safety. And if she didn't, her confidant and close advisor Corey Lewandowski certainly did. Padilla told the New York Times that he was being detained in the hallway 'when of all people, Corey Lewandowski ... comes running down the hall and he starts yelling, 'Let him go! Let him go!'' And of course, Padilla was yelling that he was a senator, and forcefully denies any lunge. 'I wasn't lunging at her or anybody, and yes, I identified myself,' he said on CNN. Noem, of course, could have said something in the moment to defuse the situation. She could have asked Padilla back into the room to answer his question. Padilla said the two met after the news conference and spoke for about 15 minutes, which means Noem knew his intentions when she later accused him of 'lunging.' So what could have been handled as an unfortunate encounter was instead purposely upgraded for propaganda purposes. Shortly after Noem's statement, the White House press secretary posted on X that Padilla 'recklessly lunged toward the podium,' cementing that narrative into right-wing conscientiousness. For weeks, the Trump administration has been ramping up its war on dissent. Weeks before Padilla was handcuffed, U.S. Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) was indicted by a grand jury for 'forcibly impeding and interfering' with federal law enforcement after a scuffle outside of a New Jersey ICE detention center. Newark Mayor Ras Baraka was arrested during the same incident, but charges were later dropped. In April, Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan was arrested inside her own courthouse after being accused of helping an immigrant appearing in her court to evade ICE officers by allowing him to exit through a public door. And just before the Padilla incident, Noem claimed that federal agents would remain in Los Angeles despite protests, where hundreds have been cited or arrested. By Friday, Marines had been deployed in Los Angeles, with little clarity on whether their guns contained live rounds and under what circumstances they were authorized to fire. 'We are staying here to liberate the city from the socialists and the burdensome leadership that this governor and that this mayor have placed on this country and what they have tried to insert into the city,' Noem said, right before Padilla interrupted. Liberate an American city. With troops. Quash dissent. With fear. A survey last fall by PRRI found that 26% of Republicans say that 'it is necessary for the progress of this country that the president has the power to limit the influence of opposing parties and groups.' It also found that there is a 'strong overlap among Americans who hold Christian nationalist and authoritarian views.' 'If it is the case that Trump and Kristi Noem and Pete Hegseth are going to continue arresting Democratic representatives, then that is authoritarianism,' Donovan said. 'Those are the people whose job it is to represent the common man, and if they can't do that because they're so bogged down with false charges or trumped-up charges, then we don't live in a democracy.' Padilla may have lost his trademark cool during that press conference, but Noem did not. She knew exactly what she was saying, and why. A Padilla asking questions is a threat to Trump. A Padilla lunging becomes a threat to society, one that only Trump can stop.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
National Portrait Gallery director resigns after Trump tried firing her
National Portrait Gallery Director Kim Sajet is resigning from her post two weeks after President Trump tried to fire her and accused her of being 'highly partisan' and supportive of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) efforts. 'We are grateful to Kim for leading the National Portrait Gallery with passion and creativity for 12 years. Throughout her tenure, she has reimagined and reshaped the impact and storytelling of portraiture,' Smithsonian Secretary Lonnie G. Bunch III said Friday morning in an internal memo, which was obtained by The Hill. Bunch said Sajet, an Australian native and the first woman to helm the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery, made 'lasting contributions to the Institution, including the expansion of the national collection with key acquisitions—such as the earliest known daguerreotype of First Lady Dolley Madison, dating back to 1846.' The internal memo included statements from Sajet, who is also a citizen of the Netherlands, expressing that it has been 'the honor of a lifetime' to head the gallery. 'This was not an easy decision, but I believe it is the right one. From the very beginning, my guiding principle has been to put the museum first. Today, I believe that stepping aside is the best way to serve the institution I hold so deeply in my heart,' Sajet said. 'The role of a museum director has never been about one individual—it is a shared mission, driven by the passion, creativity, and dedication of an extraordinary team.' Sajet's resignation came two weeks after Trump said he was terminating the National Portrait Gallery director, arguing she is a partisan actor and a 'strong supporter' of DEI initiatives, 'which is totally inappropriate for her position.' The White House has pointed to Sajet's political contributions to Democratic lawmakers and party groups. Sajet has dished out donations to former President Biden, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, EMILY's List — a PAC that works on electing female Democratic candidates — the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and others, according to Federal Election Commission filings. On Monday, the Smithsonian said it holds authority over personnel decisions. 'The board is entrusted with the governance and independence of the Institution, and the board appoints a Secretary to manage the Institution,' it said in a statement. 'All personnel decisions are made by and subject to the direction of the Secretary, with oversight by the Board. Lonnie G. Bunch, the Secretary, has the support of the Board of Regents in his authority and management of the Smithsonian.' Bunch wrote in the memo that Kevin Gover, the under secretary for museums and culture, will work as the next acting director. 'On day one, President Trump made clear that there is no place for dangerous anti-American ideology in our government and institutions. In align with this objective, he ordered the termination of Kim Sajet,' White House spokesperson David Ingle told The Hill in an emailed statement Friday. 'The Trump Administration is committed to restoring American greatness and celebrating our nation's proud history,' Ingle added. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
