logo
The childcare subsidy gives parents 'choice', but the government must ensure good choices are available

The childcare subsidy gives parents 'choice', but the government must ensure good choices are available

This week's horrifying allegations against a Melbourne childcare worker have provoked shock, grief and reckoning.
For those who spend their lives thinking about how to improve the systems and policies our society relies on, moments like this can also provoke change.
We expect our governments to be improving our institutions all the time, not just when there is a horror story — and they often do, in ways that do not make headlines — but policy advocates understand the power of a "burning platform" to make reforms stick.
This week, childcare advocate Georgie Dent of The Parenthood said leaders needed to go beyond steps already underway to improve screening and surveillance of staff and redesign the sector entirely.
Dent's two priorities are an independent national regulator with the power to effectively force the closure of centres that do not meet minimum standards, and a new funding model where child care is provided directly like public schools, rather than subsidised.
It is obvious how a national regulator relates to the failures exposed by this week's allegations — in fact, it may surprise many to learn that shutting down substandard childcare centres isn't already standard practice, and the federal government has work underway to change that.
The relevance of funding may not be so obvious. But the financial model of Australian child care — where the federal government gives money to parents rather than operating centres itself — has long put it at arm's length from ensuring quality and safety.
That is a challenge for the Albanese government, which has long aspired to make those subsidies universal but has limited oversight of what exactly it is subsidising.
Our childcare system is built with "choice" at its centre. Rather than the government providing childcare services directly, it pays a subsidy to eligible parents, who choose from a range of providers, including for-profit and not-for-profit organisations.
The logic is that high-quality services will naturally follow if parents are "empowered" to give their money to a good provider instead of a bad one.
It's a hybrid system: demand is public, with the government paying for at least a portion of the cost of care, but supply is private, with providers competing with one another in a market for customers, and regulations often light-touch.
Similar systems are today used for a range of services that were once directly provided by government, including aged care and vocational education, and for disability care through the NDIS.
In-home aged care recipients have "packages", NDIS participants have "budgets" and trainees have "fee-free TAFE", all different names for subsidies allowing them to choose their preferred providers.
But this choice "revolution", which has taken place in the last few decades, has its critics. Mark Considine, a politics professor at the University of Melbourne, calls it evidence of a "careless state".
Though motivated by a desire to improve on often stale government service providers, Considine argues it became an excuse for governments to outsource quality assurance to those who use the services, who may lack the information to make informed choices.
Sometimes there may not be much choice at all, like in Australia's childcare "deserts" where only a smattering of providers are available.
But even where options are plenty, it is an open question whether those who rely on these services, who are often vulnerable and confronting complicated systems, are really equipped to sort good from bad.
That is why Dent advocates the school model — schools being one of a few remaining services directly provided by (state and territory) governments, with hospitals another.
"The way schools are funded is directly. Parents are not subsidised to send their children to schools," she said on Wednesday.
"There is no accountability for the childcare subsidy … where taxpayers and the [federal] government are able to say that receiving this money is dependent on you meeting these minimum standards …
"When we've got services that have almost got a business model around employing the fewest number of staff with the lowest number of qualifications, that creates extraordinary risk."
The federal government has not indicated it intends to abolish the subsidy system, but it is considering how to improve regulatory oversight, with Education Minister Jason Clare vowing to deny subsidies to substandard providers in forthcoming legislation, something in train before the events of this week.
The government is also considering how to improve training, pay and retention in the childcare workforce, and address childcare deserts.
That trio of reforms was suggested by the Productivity Commission, which recommended retaining the subsidy system but also called for a national commission to better regulate quality, similar to Dent's other recommendation.
It would be a similar approach to what has unfolded over the last few years in aged care, another sector where stories of neglect and abuse kickstarted a process of change.
An Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission was set up in 2019 and has been accompanied by a star rating system to inform choices.
A new "rights-based" framework for the system was also legislated last year but recently had its implementation delayed.
The jury is out on these changes, and the ABC reported last year that five-star ratings were being handed out to aged care homes found not to be compliant with government standards.
Direct provision of government services is no perfect guarantee of quality either, as we often see with schools and hospitals.
But there is growing recognition, including from the government itself, that giving people "choice" in the services they access cannot come at the expense of strong oversight to give parents the confidence, no doubt shaken this week, that those choices are safe.
If the government does press ahead with universal child care, which will require more providers and more workers, safeguarding quality will be essential.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Guard llama' Larry killed in dog attack at hobby farm near Geraldton
'Guard llama' Larry killed in dog attack at hobby farm near Geraldton

ABC News

time5 minutes ago

  • ABC News

'Guard llama' Larry killed in dog attack at hobby farm near Geraldton

After spending more than 20 years loyally guarding a flock of about 150 sheep, Larry the llama met a gruesome end in the jaws of one or more roaming dogs. WARNING: This article contains an image that some readers might find distressing. On the day Larry was mauled to death, his owner, Laura Elson, found four dogs running amok on her hobby farm, east of Geraldton. But the dogs were not wild — they were domestic pets, and at least three had registered owners. On the day of the attack last month, Ms Elson first realised something was wrong when she caught a pair of border collies on her farm. She called City of Greater Geraldton rangers and, accompanied by one, went to check on her flock. Shortly after the rangers left with the border collies, Ms Elson went back to the paddock for a more thorough check, which is when she found a third dog. "I loaded that one up, then I located a fourth dog … loaded that one up, and then I called the rangers back again to come and collect the other two dogs," she said. It was then that she noticed one had blood on its fur. The ranger accompanied her to Larry's paddock, where they found him deceased. A devastated Ms Elson said llamas only lived to between 15 and 20 years, but Larry "was a bit of a record breaker". Initially bought in a pair, her beloved pet had outlived his paddock mate, who died of old age. Three of the dogs were returned by rangers to their owners, while one has not been claimed. The owners who could be identified were issued with fines for not containing their pets or failing to ensure they had collars, with the penalties averaging about $500 for each owner. Ms Elson is angry that no one has been held responsible for the attack on Larry or her livestock. "Unfortunately, the rangers said that they can't prosecute," Ms Elson said. "It would be passed out in court as beyond reasonable doubt because I didn't visually see the dogs attacking him." Ms Elson said rangers should have more power to declare dogs as dangerous. "I think it's ridiculous," she said. City of Greater Geraldton ranger coordinator Mark Lambert said they still considered the case to be "open". However, prosecution was difficult in situations such as these because court cases had to meet criminal standards of proof, he said. "We work within the legislation of the Dog Act of 1976," he said. "That puts us into a criminal framework and any potential prosecutions, in a Magistrate's Court. "We have to operate under evidence rules, and that evidence that we have to provide needs to prove things beyond a reasonable doubt." Mr Lambert said such attacks were upsetting for his team, particularly when they could not resolve a case. "They do get very distressed when they cannot provide the level of service that they want to provide and cannot bring a positive resolution to an incident, particularly with the dog attacks when we've got stock that are being killed or badly injured." Mr Lambert said the city averaged about 15 reports a month of attacks on people, pets or livestock, most of which could be prevented. "It really is a big call-out to our community to please check your fencing, make sure that it's good, that it can contain your dog appropriately," he said. "Keep keep your gates closed. Make sure you know where your dog is. Make sure it's contained, and we can really make a big impact on these dog attack figures."

Teen charged with manslaughter after woman, 59, killed in ‘high-powered' e-motorbike crash at Perth park
Teen charged with manslaughter after woman, 59, killed in ‘high-powered' e-motorbike crash at Perth park

News.com.au

time5 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Teen charged with manslaughter after woman, 59, killed in ‘high-powered' e-motorbike crash at Perth park

A 17-year-old boy has been charged with manslaughter after a woman was killed by an out-of-control 'high-powered' e-motorbike in Perth's north. On Saturday about 2.30pm, air police were conducting patrols across Perth when they found an unregistered off-road electric motorbike allegedly driving recklessly through Woodvale in the city's north. A short time later, the motorbike struck a 59-year-old woman near Edgewater Drive in Edgewater. Emergency services treated the 59-year-old woman for critical injuries. She was transported to Joondalup Health Campus where she later died. A 17-year-old was arrested and has since been charged with one count of manslaughter, one count of no authority to drive (never held) and one count of use of unlicensed vehicle on road. He was refused bail and appeared at Perth Children's Court on Sunday. WA Police Detective Sergeant Ollie Edwards said the fatal collision with the 'high-powered' vehicle was a 'tragic incident'. 'Another innocent life has been lost through the reckless, dangerous acts of another person,' he alleged on Sunday. He said the teenager was not being actively pursued by police but confirmed officers 'activated their lights and tried doing an intercept', which the teen allegedly 'evaded'. He alleged the teenager was driving in excess of 100km/h in a 50km/h zone. Sergeant Edwards urged riders to be more cautious when driving electric vehicles, such as e-bikes and e-scooters. 'People riding e-rideables have got to exercise heightened caution when riding them, particularly the scooters with the smaller wheels,' he said. 'The speeds that some of these vehicles can go is not safe, and people need to exercise more caution when using them.' Anyone who witnessed the fatal crash or has information is urged to contact Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000.

French man arrested after disturbing airport find
French man arrested after disturbing airport find

News.com.au

time35 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

French man arrested after disturbing airport find

Australian Border Force (ABF) officers at Sydney International Airport have made a shocking discovery after sifting through the luggage of a young man as he attempted to enter the country. A 20-year-old French man was arrested by officers after they uncovered a 22kg stash of crystal methamphetamine inside his bags. After locating 22 vacuum-sealed bags of the substance, which are estimated to have a street value of more than $20m, the ABF handed over the investigation to the Australian Federal Police (AFP). The AFP charged the man with a pair of drug-trafficking-related offences, which individually carry maximum sentences of life in prison if convicted. The man has already appeared at the Downing Centre and will face court again on September 16. AFP Detective Superintendent Morgen Blunden said the AFP were 'working closely' with overseas partners to disrupt drug supply chains. 'This is not a victimless crime. These drugs individuals carry fuel violence, addiction and organised crime in our communities,' he said. 'Every kilogram seized is a blow to the networks that profit from harm and a reminder that Australia is not an easy target.' AFP Superindendent Elke West said ABF officers were 'the first line of defence' when it cames to tackling drug smuggling. 'Working alongside our partner agencies, we are at the ready 24/7 to disrupt this criminal behaviour at the border, protecting our members of the community one detection at a time,' Superintendent West said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store