Autopilot saves the day after Lufthansa first officer passes out alone in the cockpit
The first officer on a flight operated by German airline Lufthansa lost consciousness for about 10 minutes while the captain was away from the flight deck, leaving the plane to fly itself.
The incident occurred on Feb. 17, 2024, on a flight operating from Frankfurt to Seville, Spain.
According to Spanish authorities, there were 199 passengers and 6 crewmembers aboard the Airbus A321.
The official incident report said the captain had left the cockpit for "physiological reasons" and the first officer fainted soon after. The plane's autopilot system kept the aircraft in stable flight throughout the incident, although the unconscious first officer did make some inputs to the controls.
The captain was unable to reenter the cockpit using normal procedures and attempted to use emergency procedures for access. The first officer ultimately regained consciousness and was able to admit the captain.
According to the report, Lufthansa had recently removed a policy that required a second crewmember to enter the cockpit whenever one of the pilots left, and authorities urged airlines to reconsider such changes.
The copilot received medical attention from a doctor onboard, and the flight diverted to Madrid, where he received further treatment at a hospital.
The copilot apparently had a previously undetected neurological condition, which caused the episode.
Lufthansa acknowledged the incident in a statement to USA TODAY.
"We are aware of the report issued by the Spanish authorities. Lufthansa has provided intensive and comprehensive support to the authorities in their work. In addition, Lufthansa's flight safety department has conducted its own extensive investigation," the statement said. "We ask for your understanding that we cannot comment further on the report at this time."
Zach Wichter is a travel reporter and writes the Cruising Altitude column for USA TODAY. He is based in New York and you can reach him at zwichter@usatoday.com.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: This Lufthansa flight went 10 minutes without a pilot
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Doritos, Mountain Dew could get warning labels in this state
Doritos, Mountain Dew could get warning labels in this state Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has yet to indicate if he plans to sign the bill into law. Show Caption Hide Caption FDA redefines what foods can be labeled as 'healthy' Foods will be required to contain certain ingredients and be under specific limits for added sugar, saturated fat and sodium to be marketed as "healthy." Scripps News A bipartisan bill out of Texas, awaiting Gov. Greg Abbott's signature, could change food and drink packaging as we know it nationwide. Texas Senate Bill 25 passed unanimously in the state senate before being forwarded to Abbott's desk on June 1, where it is under review. Among provisions for education on nutrition and health, one set of proposed regulations would require that packaging for food or drink items contain warnings about ingredients "not recommended for human consumption." The commonly used ingredients listed in the bill are legal to use in the U.S., but most are subject to some sort of ban or more stringent regulation in other countries State lawmaker Rep. Lacey Hull told Bloomberg that Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. called her to voice his support for the bill, which aligns with initiatives in his "Make America Healthy Again" movement. HHS press secretary Emily G. Hilliard told USA TODAY in an email that, "Secretary Kennedy encourages states to promote healthy practices and enhance consumer transparency in food labeling. Americans deserve to know what's in their food so they can make informed choices for themselves and their families." While the bill managed to reach across a contentious political aisle, it is not universally popular. John Hewitt, Senior Vice President of State Affairs for the Consumer Brands Association, urged the governor not to sign it in a statement shared with USA TODAY, saying, "The ingredients used in the U.S. food supply are safe and have been rigorously studied following an objective science and risk-based evaluation process. The labeling requirements of SB 25 mandate inaccurate warning language, create legal risks for brands and drive consumer confusion and higher costs." Gov. Abbott has yet to indicate if he plans to sign the bill into law. In a statement to USA TODAY on Tuesday, June 3, press secretary Andrew Mahaleris said, 'Governor Abbott will continue to work with the legislature to ensure Texans have access to healthy foods to care for themselves and their families and will thoughtfully review any legislation they send to his desk.' What's in Texas Senate Bill 25 about food labels? Texas Senate Bill 25 would require that specific warning labels be placed on products intended for human consumption if they use certain ingredients like bleached flour, food dyes, sweeteners, oils and preservatives. Because manufacturers generally aim for uniformity and efficiency, as reported by Bloomberg, they will often expand practices employed to comply with state laws nationwide, meaning this change could impact the packaged food industry on a larger scale. The bill would require that manufacturers display the warning label prominently if their product contains one of 44 listed ingredients, most of which have some form of ban, warning or regulation in other Western countries despite being legal in the U.S. The proposed label reads as follows: "WARNING: This product contains an ingredient that is not recommended for human consumption by the appropriate authority in Australia, Canada, the European Union, or the United Kingdom." Manufacturers, and in some cases retailers, would also be required to post a similar statement on websites on which applicable products are offered for sale. This requirement would not apply to products not intended for human consumption; food prepared, served, or sold in restaurants or retail locations; drugs or dietary supplements; or agricultural products on which pesticides or other such chemicals were used in their production, storage or transportation. Regulations set by federal agencies like the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or Surgeon General would supersede these state-level rules, meaning products already overseen or required to utilize certain labels by these agencies would not need an additional warning. The FDA deeming ingredients safe or setting new guidelines for their use would also exempt them from labeling. Which ingredients are listed in the bill? acetylated esters of mono- and diglycerides (acetic acid ester) anisole azodicarbonamide (ADA) butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) bleached flour blue 1 (CAS 3844-45-9) blue 2 (CAS 860-22-0) bromated flour calcium bromate canthaxanthin certified food colors by the United States Food and Drug Administration citrus red 2 (CAS 6358-53-8) diacetyl diacetyl tartaric and fatty acid esters of mono- and diglycerides (DATEM) dimethylamylamine (DMAA) dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate (DSS) ficin green 3 (CAS 2353-45-9) interesterified palm oil interesterified soybean oil lactylated fatty acid esters of glycerol and propylene glycol lye morpholine olestra partially hydrogenated oil (PHO) potassium aluminum sulfate potassium bromate potassium iodate propylene oxide propylparaben red 3 (CAS 16423-68-0) red 4 (CAS 4548-53-2) red 40 (CAS 25956-17-6) sodium aluminum sulfate sodium lauryl sulfate sodium stearyl fumarate stearyl tartrate synthetic trans fatty acid thiodipropionic acid titanium dioxide toluene yellow 5 (CAS 1934-21-0) yellow 6 (CAS 2783-94-0) Which foods could be impacted? Packaged and processed foods of all kinds could be impacted by the bill. If it passes, consumers will begin seeing the warning on labels developed and copyrighted beginning in 2027. Chips, candy and snack products like Doritos, Ruffles, Lay's flavored chips, microwaved popcorn, M&Ms, Sour Patch Kids and Skittles would need to be labeled, along with cereals like Froot Loops and Cap'n Crunch. Sweets like Twinkies or Hostess snack cakes and packaged cookies like Oreos and Chips Ahoy! contain the offending ingredients, along with frozen dinners, instant noodles, some breads and even processed meats like sausages and hot dogs. Drinks like Mountain Dew, Gatorade, Capri Sun, Hawaiian Punch and Juicy Juice would also be affected. RFK Jr.'s push for ingredient reviews, tighter regulations In April, the FDA and RFK announced plans to "phase out" petroleum-based synthetic dyes previously allowed under FDA regulations from the U.S. food and drug supply by the end of 2026. No formal agreement or legislation was passed officially banning the substances. Instead, HHS and the FDA have a "mutual understanding" with the food industry that the dyes will be progressively removed, according to Kennedy. Are food dyes getting banned in the US?: What know to about 8 dyes being phased out During an April 22 press conference, FDA Commissioner Marty Makary said the agency intended to revoke the approval of some dyes and work with industry leaders to substitute petrochemical dyes with "natural" ones. A press statement released by the FDA also said it plans to establish a "national standard and timeline for the transition from petrochemical-based dyes to natural alternatives." The FDA will authorize four new natural color additives and expedite the approval of more, according to its statement. The agency will also partner with the National Institutes of Health to research the effect food additives have on children's health and development.
The Hill
5 hours ago
- The Hill
Bill Clinton reveals why Secret Service gave him an M&M's box
Former President Clinton says the Secret Service helped him mark a fitness milestone when he was at the White House with a candy-coated memento that he's held onto. 'I went running every morning for years,' the ex-commander in chief said in an interview with USA Today published Monday, while promoting the political thriller he co-authored with James Patterson, 'The First Gentleman.' 'I still have the M&M's box that I was given by the head of my security detail on my 100th run when I was president,' Clinton said. 'I loved it,' he told the newspaper. 'Once M&M's get 20 years old, you don't eat them anymore,' Patterson quipped. Retired Secret Service agent Nick Trotta recalled in a 2012 interview how Clinton's security detail developed a system that would give them a heads-up when the 42nd president was ready to go for a jog. 'One of the valets would leak President Clinton's attire — running clothes or suit — to the nearest agent. That's how we knew he wanted to run,' Trotta said. While Clinton said he's cherished the box of M&M's since exiting the White House in 2001, the milk chocolate candies are unlikely to conform to his dietary lifestyle in recent years. Seventy-eight-year-old Clinton has credited a vegan diet with preserving his health. '[It] changed my life,' he said in 2016.
USA Today
5 hours ago
- USA Today
A 7-year-old boy died crossing the street. His parents are being charged.
A 7-year-old boy died crossing the street. His parents are being charged. The accused parents remain in the custody of the Gaston County Jail with $1.5 million bonds, according to inmate records. Show Caption Hide Caption Car safety systems may lead to distracted driving, AAA study finds Multiple systems that are designed to make driving safer and easier may be placing drivers in danger, according to a new AAA study. USA TODAY Parents in North Carolina were arrested after allegedly leaving their 7-year-old son unsupervised when he was fatally struck by a car while trying to cross the street, police said. Gastonia police said on May 29 that Jessica Ivey and Samuele Jenkins have been charged with felony involuntary manslaughter, felony child neglect, and misdemeanor child neglect. The incident involving the parents' young son occurred around 5:55 p.m. on Tuesday, May 27, according to the department. Officers responded to the scene after receiving a report about a traffic collision, and upon their arrival, they found that a Jeep Cherokee had hit the 7-year-old boy, police said. The 76-year-old driver of the vehicle was traveling east when she struck the child, the department added. The police's preliminary investigation determined that the child was attempting to cross the street outside of a crosswalk with another young boy, age 10, when he entered the roadway and was hit, the department said. The boy was taken to a medical center with life-threatening injuries and later transferred to Levine Children's Hospital in Charlotte, where he succumbed to his injuries and was pronounced dead around 10:00 p.m., according to police. More news: A mom has been charged with her son's death. She says God told her to 'exorcise demons'. 'Adults must be held accountable for their responsibilities' As Gastonia police offered "its deepest sympathies to the family for the heartbreaking loss of their child," the department said its investigation revealed that the boy was unsupervised at the time he stepped into traffic. "In such cases, adults must be held accountable for their responsibilities to ensure a safe environment for their children," police said. No charges have been filed against the driver of the Jeep Cherokee after no evidence of speeding or wrongdoing on her part was found, police said, adding that the woman continues to be cooperative. The incident remains under active investigation, according to the department. Both Ivey and Jenkins remain in the custody of the Gaston County Jail with $1.5 million bonds, according to inmate records. Anyone who witnessed the deadly crash or may have relevant information can contact Corporal Carpenter with the Gastonia Police Department at 704-866-6702. Jonathan Limehouse covers breaking and trending news for USA TODAY. Reach him at JLimehouse@
