logo
Lucy Letby was taught to write down darkest thoughts, friend claims in bombshell documentary

Lucy Letby was taught to write down darkest thoughts, friend claims in bombshell documentary

Independent2 days ago
A bombshell new documentary on child killer Lucy Letby will offer a new explanation behind a number of scribbled notes written by the nurse which were used as evidence to convict her.
Britain's most prolific child serial killer is currently serving 15 whole-life sentences for seven murders and seven attempted murders of babies while working at the Countess of Chester Hospital.
Notes such as 'I am evil, I did this' were scrawled on a scrappy notepad found in her house, which also read: 'I killed them on purpose because I am not good enough to care for them and I am a horrible evil person.'
'Hate' was also written in block capitals with heavy ink and circled, while the note is headed: 'Not good enough.' But the notes also included other phrases such as: "I haven't done anything wrong" and "we tried our best and it wasn't enough"
The NHS neonatal nurse is currently serving 15 whole life sentences for seven murders and seven attempted murders of babies while working at the Countess of Chester Hospital.
According to The Times, a new ITV documentary will put forward a new explanation for the notes, which were presented by the prosecution as amounting to a confession - despite some of the notes appearing to deny her guilt.
Dawn is a childhood friend of Letby with whom she studied her A-Levels at Aylestone School in Hereford. The 35-year-old, who did not want her last name to be published, said the pair were taught while in school to write down their most dark thoughts during 'peer-support training sessions'
Speaking to the Lucy Letby: Beyond Reasonable Doubt? documentary, she said: 'At all of those training sessions, it was recommended to us that, you know, if you're feeling overwhelmed, you write down everything that's going through your mind that is, you know, troubling you.
'So, all of the dark thoughts, all of those inner voices that you can't silence. You just write it all down on a piece of paper to get it off your mind.'
Letby has lost two attempts to challenge her convictions at the Court of Appeal so far, but questions are growing about the safety of Letby's convictions after multiple experts have cast doubts over some of the evidence used in the trial in August 2023.
The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) is reviewing an application by Letby's legal team, which includes a 300-page report from chemical engineer Helen Shannon and professor Geoff Chase, who refute claims made by the prosecution that Letby 'undoubtedly' poisoned two babies by spiking their feeding bags with insulin.
Ms Shannon and Prof Chase, who were given access to the babies' medical notes, say they could have been born with specific types of antibodies in their blood which can cause a high reading of insulin.
Speaking to the documentary, Ms Shannon said according to The Times: 'What was presented in court as this is smoking-gun evidence of poisoning actually looks pretty typical for a pre-term neonate.
'And we can't see any justification whatsoever for the prosecution statement that it could only be poisoning.'
Dawn also tells the documentary about the moment Letby was found guilty: 'I think I was at work when I heard that they were, sort of, returning the verdict, and sort of tuned in and I think I just sat there dumbfounded for a while, not really knowing how to process what I was hearing,' she said.
'I didn't think it was real. I immediately switched to thinking: 'Well, what's next, you know? What happens next? This can't be it. She can't just spend the rest of her life in prison'.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Moral outrage over Bonnie Blue's porn empire misses the point: this is hardcore economics
Moral outrage over Bonnie Blue's porn empire misses the point: this is hardcore economics

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Moral outrage over Bonnie Blue's porn empire misses the point: this is hardcore economics

Bonnie Blue has sex with men on camera for money. Lots of men one after the other, to be precise, for lots and lots of money: the commercial niche she invented to distinguish herself from countless other amateur porn stars jostling desperately for attention on OnlyFans was inviting 'barely legal' ordinary teenage boys (which in porn means 18-plus) to have sex with her on film, and flogging the results to paying subscribers for a fortune. Unusually, her model involves a woman making millions out of men generating content for free, which makes it slightly harder than usual to work out exactly who is exploiting whom if she turns up (as she did in Nottingham) at a university freshers' week with a sign saying 'bonk me and let me film it'. But debating whether getting rich this way makes Bonnie personally 'empowered' seems tired and pointless. It was with this old pseudo-feminist chestnut that Channel 4 justified last week's ratings-chasing documentary on her attempt to sleep with 1,000 men in 12 hours, a film that finally brought her into the cultural mainstream. There's more to this story than sex, gender politics or Bonnie herself, and whatever is driving her (which she swears isn't past trauma, 'daddy issues' over a biological father she never knew, or anything else you're thinking: though she does say maybe her brain works differently from other people's, given her curious ability to switch off her emotions). It's at heart a story about money, the merging of the oldest trade in the world with a newer attention economy inexorably geared towards rewarding extremes, and what that does to the society that unwittingly produced it. As her now-estranged husband explained admiringly to camera, though OnlyFans performers often invite a man to imagine he's doing whatever he wants to them, that's an illusion: really they're out of reach. But Bonnie (real name Tia Billinger) isn't. She actively encourages her fans to come and do it to her for real. She is the parasocial relationship – that strange confusion created when you think you know someone because you've seen so much of their life unfold on your phone screen, though in reality they're a stranger – taken to its fantasy conclusion: a stalker's dream made flesh. Like what you see? Then just reach through the screen and grab it. Bonnie/Tia comes across essentially as a female Andrew Tate, telling teenage or otherwise vulnerable audiences that they have a right to sex – in one video urging men not to feel guilty about taking part in her stunts, she says it's only what they were 'owed', the language of the incel forum – and that it's hot to be slapped around or degraded; but, unlike Tate, with the apparent authority of actually being a woman herself. Channel 4 filmed the men queueing up to join her 1,000-men stunt mostly as a line of mute, anonymous shuffling feet. But we already know that watching near-ubiquitous porn online has changed the way younger generations have sex. What does being invited into the picture do? No wonder Ofcom is taking an interest, while the children's commissioner for England, Rachel de Souza, warns against TV normalising things that – as she put it – teenagers find 'frightening, confusing and damaging to their relationships'. Ironically, the biggest short-term beneficiary of such a storm may be Bonnie/Tia herself, already a dab hand at posting rage-bait videos expertly calibrated to provoke women who already can't stand her (and are willing to explain why at length to their own followers on their own social media channels). Being hated is great for business, she explains chirpily: the more women publicly denounce her, the more their sons and husbands will Google her. Her real skill is in monetising both lust and rage, crossing the internet's two most powerful streams to capture its most lucrative currency: attention. 'She's a marketing genius,' her female publicist tells Channel 4, laughing as the team discuss how best to commercially exploit footage of an appalled mother trying to retrieve her son from one of Bonnie/Tia's filmed orgies. OnlyFans performers can't advertise as a normal business would, so they promote themselves by seeding clips across social media, ideally of them doing something wild enough to go viral: since people get bored easily, the pressure is always on to keep getting wilder and wilder, pushing way past whatever you thought were your limits. That has long been the trajectory of porn stars' careers, of course. But it's also recognisably now true of so much contemporary culture, from fully clothed influencers to reality TV shows forced to introduce ever more cruel plot twists to stop the formula getting stale (this year's Love Island has noticeably morphed from dating show into a kind of brutal sexual Hunger Games), and arguably even broadcasters such as Channel 4 fighting desperately for audience share in a world of almost infinite competition for eyeballs. When I finish watching 1000 Men and Me: The Bonnie Blue Story on catchup, the channel's algorithm perkily suggests an episode of Sex Actually with Alice Levine. Like the sexy stuff? Want more? Please don't leave me for YouTube! As with Tate, if Bonnie was somehow shut down there would be another one along soon enough. She's a feature, not a bug, the inevitable product of an economy relentlessly geared to giving an audience what it most reliably pays for – to feel angry or horny, or both at once – and then endlessly pushing its luck. But society does still have some limits to impose on what is in the end just another business model. Her current nemesis is Visa, which processes OnlyFans payments and which she says declined to be associated with her 1,000-man marathon, leading to her being banned from uploading it and cashing in. (Legislators have long regarded mainstream financial services companies on whom porn sites rely to rake in their profits as the crack in their armour, more susceptible to public opinion and regulatory pressure.) Meanwhile, a new taskforce on pornography headed by the Tory peer Gabby Bertin, who formerly worked for David Cameron in Downing Street, is arguing for a ban on content likely to encourage child sexual abuse – which Bertin argues could encompass 'barely legal' material or (as Bonnie has also experimented with doing, as her options narrowed) casting grown porn actors as schoolgirls. Like Labour's battle against Page 3 girls in the 1990s, which in retrospect seems an astonishingly innocent era, if ministers want to pick this fight with porn it will be brutal. But doing nothing might, in the end, be more so. Gaby Hinsliff is a Guardian columnist Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.

Oasis gig death: Witness saw similar incident and asks 'were lessons learned'?
Oasis gig death: Witness saw similar incident and asks 'were lessons learned'?

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

Oasis gig death: Witness saw similar incident and asks 'were lessons learned'?

A woman who saw a man falling from an upper tier at Wembley Stadium says a similar incident at an Oasis concert over the weekend in which a fan died makes her wonder whether lessons have been learned. Stephanie Good, 39, said a man fell during a Euro 2020 match between England and Croatia at Wembley in June 2021. He landed "right next to where we were" on the "stairwell between rows of seats", she said. Named as Jon, he reportedly survived but suffered two broken ankles, a fractured femur and fractured pelvis just before kick-off. Ms Good said she tried to give feedback but was unable to and felt the "emergency response was really lacking". Oasis, meanwhile, said they were "shocked and saddened to hear of the tragic death of a fan" at their Wembley concert on Saturday. The man reportedly fell from the stadium's upper tier. In his 40s, he was found with "injuries consistent with a fall" and pronounced dead at the scene, the Met Police said. Ms Good, an NHS manager from east London, said what happened at the Oasis gig was "so similar" to what she witnessed that it made her wonder "were lessons learned"? During that incident, among stadium staff "nobody seemed to know what to do", she told the Press Association. She thinks the man may have been trying to attach a flag to the front of a stand and "somehow managed to fall straight over". She said: "They (staff) didn't seem well-trained in terms of how to respond to a really big emergency. "Their stewards were kind of paralysed a little bit by fear, or they just weren't well trained and didn't know how to call for paramedics. "It was us who were sort of shouting at them that they needed to get some paramedics. "The first person on the scene wasn't a stadium paramedic or St John Ambulance. It was an off-duty firefighter who had seen the guy fall and ran down to just try and offer some help." Regarding the follow-up, Ms Good said staff moved spectators to other seats but did not ask for witness statements. She added: "They didn't seek any input from people who'd seen the incident or the aftermath of it. They didn't seem interested in speaking to anybody about it. "I was a bit concerned, because I felt that the emergency response was really lacking." She then tried to get in touch to give feedback, but was unable to do so and did not receive a response to a message on social media, she said. A Wembley spokesperson said: "Wembley Stadium operates to a very high health and safety standard, fully meeting legal requirements for the safety of spectators and staff, and is certified to and compliant with the ISO 45001 standard. "We work very closely and collaboratively with all relevant event delivery stakeholders - including event owners, local authorities, the Sports Grounds Safety Authority and the police - to deliver events to high standards of safety, security and service for everyone attending or working in the venue."

Report: Britain's prisons 'on the brink of collapse' while Sunak was PM
Report: Britain's prisons 'on the brink of collapse' while Sunak was PM

Daily Mail​

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Report: Britain's prisons 'on the brink of collapse' while Sunak was PM

Britain's prison system was on the brink of collapse on three occasions while Rishi Sunak was prime minister, according to a damning report. Dame Ann Owers, a former chief inspector of prisons, found the criminal justice system had been 'in crisis' for more than 18 months under the Tory government. In her review, commissioned by Labour 's Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood, Dame Ann revealed that senior officials even feared riots if jails ran out of space. She also disclosed that top civil servants 'were so concerned' about a breakdown that they kept 'an audit' of all decision-making and documents in case of a future inquiry. Following Labour's general election victory in July 2024, Ms Mahmood implemented a new early release scheme in order to tackle prison overcrowding. This saw her cut the proportion of a sentence that inmates must serve behind bars from 50 per cent to 40 per cent. But prisons in England and Wales are still around 98 per cent full. HM Prison and Probation Service says it cannot run the estate efficiently at over 95 per cent capacity. In her report, published today, Dame Ann described an 18-month 'permacrisis' in the criminal justice system while Mr Sunak was in Downing Street. Dame Ann criticized the previous Tory government for only doing 'just enough to avert breakdown and buy time until the next predictable cliff edge was reached'. She revealed how, in May 2024 following the announcement of the general election, senior officials discussed 'contingency plans in case the criminal justice system collapsed during the election campaign because prisons were unable to take in any more prisoners'. 'This could involve invoking emergency powers under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 to release prisoners early, in order to avert the risk of public disorder,' she added. 'The risk was real: at one point there were fewer than 100 places in adult male prisons. 'However, the system had in fact been in crisis for over eighteen months. From 2023 onwards, prisons were running very close to the edge of capacity. 'On three occasions, this was only pulled back at the last minute by the use of early release schemes, gradually decreasing the amount of time many prisoners spent in custody, using powers designed to allow release on compassionate grounds. 'Senior officials were so concerned about a potential breakdown in the criminal justice system that an audit was kept of all decision making and documents, in case there was a public or parliamentary inquiry.' In a further criticism of the previous government's handling of the crisis, Dame Ann continued: 'Although departmental ministers were convinced by mid-2023 that some form of early release was both necessary and urgent, this required Prime Ministerial agreement, which was not forthcoming until the system was within three days of potential collapse, and only in incremental stages.' She also said that, while conducting her review, many of those she spoke to 'expressed frustration and sometimes anger at the reluctance to accept and then act on the well-documented and imminent crisis, or to agree any coherent plan to avert it'. 'Many believed that the default position was to do as little as possible as late as possible, with the consequence that the system repeatedly reached the brink of collapse, rather than accepting the inevitable and getting ahead of the crisis,' Dame Ann added. In October 2023, then justice secretary Alex Chalk announced some 'less serious offenders' could be freed from prison up to 18 days before their automatic release date. This was then increased to 60 days in March 2024 and then to 70 days in May 2024. Ms Mahmood said: 'This report lays bare the disgraceful way the last Conservative government ran our prisons. 'They added less than 500 cells to the prison estate over 14 years, released over 10,000 prisoners early under a veil of secrecy, and brought our jails close to total collapse on countless occasions.' Andrew Neilson, the director of campaigns at the Howard League for Penal Reform, said: 'This review into prison capacity spells out in forensic detail how the Government has found itself facing the prospect of running out of cells. 'It is a crisis, or more accurately a series of crises, that has been brewing over several decades and across successive governments.' A Conservative Party spokesman said: 'In office, the Conservatives rightly listened to the public demand to see criminals punished with proper sentences, and to tackle the capacity issues we had plans to use prisons abroad. 'Labour scrapped those plans and instead chose to release violent criminals back on our streets. 'Labour aren't serious about tackling these issues. They blocked our deportation bill that would have mandated the deportation of all foreign criminals. 'Whilst Labour and Reform want shorter sentences, the Conservatives will make no apology for ensuring that heinous criminals are kept off our streets and behind bars.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store