King's Birthday weekend: What you need to know
By Nik Dirga of RNZ
Explainer - King Charles' birthday is commemorated with a public holiday on Monday - what's open, how do those royal honours get chosen and should we still celebrate it, anyway?
Here's everything you need to know about the holiday. What's open on Monday? Do I have to work?
It is a public holiday, but some people may still have to work depending on their employer.
Employees are paid time and a-half and entitled to a paid day off if a public holiday falls on a normal working day for them.
However, if you are a contractor or working for yourself, you don't get those benefits.
You can read more about public holiday rules for employers here.
Trading restrictions don't apply on Monday as they do for Easter holidays, the morning of Anzac Day or Christmas.
Shops, restaurants and cafes can be open as usual but it pays to check opening hours beforehand. I'm gonna want a latte, do I have to pay a surcharge?
Because businesses have to pay employees more on a public holiday, it raises their costs. So some businesses choose to add a surcharge to their prices on holidays.
The typical surcharge is 15 percent.
However, businesses must be clear about announcing those charges to customers via signage, verbally or other methods.
Customers can also complain to the Commerce Commission if they feel misled or a charge was excessive. King's Birthday is also about celebrating NZers' achievements
Dozens of New Zealanders will be given royal honours which will be announced on Monday for excellence in their fields.
It's the second time each year honours are given out - they're also announced on New Year's Eve. Cool, can I get an honour? Who decides who gets them?
Literally anyone can nominate someone living who they think deserves a Royal Honour. (Unless you try to nominate yourself, which is not allowed and also kind of weird.)
The Honours Unit at the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet processes between 800 to 1000 nominations a year, Blair Teesdale-Moore, senior communications advisor with the department, said.
"The unit prepares a draft citation for each one based on the information in the nomination and letters of support," she said.
The Cabinet Appointments and Honours Committee then considers every nomination individually in a series of confidential meetings over several weeks.
"As chair of the APH committee and the King's primary advisor on honours matters, the prime minister advises the King on the final honours lists," Teesdale-Moore said.
"By long-standing constitutional convention the King of New Zealand acts on the advice of the prime minister - this includes the formal approval of New Zealand Royal honours."
Once the draft list is set, it is then given informal approval by the governor-general, run by potential recipients first - "a small number decline," Teesdale-Moore said - and then it's off to the King, who is the head of our honours system. Hang on, the King was born in November. Why are we celebrating in June?
King Charles III turns 77 on 14 November. So why are we wishing him a happy birthday now?
Blame the weather. The tradition of celebrating the monarch's birthday in the northern summer dates back hundreds of years, and is tied in with the Trooping the Colour ceremonial event held every June in London.
The ceremony of Trooping the Colour is believed to have been first performed during the reign of King Charles II from 1660 to 1685, the British Army says.
In 1748, during the reign of King George II, the sovereign's birthday first became a celebrated holiday. Trooping the Colour became tied in to celebrate the monarch, no matter when their actual birthday was.
Ever since then, the king or queen has basically had two birthdays - the real one, and the big old fancy military parade one.
Trooping the Colour will be held in the UK on 14 June this year. Is the King's Birthday really something NZ should be marking in 2025?
That's a matter of opinion and it all depends on who you ask.
As part of the Commonwealth, King Charles is New Zealand's head of state. Of course, there have been calls to change that, which ramped up after the death of Queen Elizabeth II following her 70-year reign in 2022.
Monarchy New Zealand organisation did not respond to requests for comment from RNZ by deadline, but on its website calls the monarchy "something all Kiwis can be proud of".
"It's a vital component of our government, a guarantee of our democracy, and a sign of our maturity and independence as a nation.
"The King is a completely apolitical head of state (who) represents all New Zealanders regardless of their political views. This cannot happen in a republic."
However, there are also calls to abandon the holiday celebrating a monarch on the other side of the world.
Savage, the chair of the New Zealand Republic organisation, called King's Birthday an "empty public holiday that celebrates nothing in particular. It is no one's birthday and even the Brits don't celebrate it as a public holiday".
"It has already been surpassed by Matariki as a proper, meaningful public holiday. New Zealand Republic was one of the first groups to start campaigning for Matariki and we are campaigning to replace King's Birthday with a spring time public holiday in September."
NZ Republic suggests a replacement public holiday could be Citizenship Day, when New Zealand citizenship was officially established on 6 September 1948 by the passing of the New Zealand Citizenship Act, or Suffrage Day on September 19, marking the day in 1893 that NZ signed into law allowing women to vote.
But for now, your public holiday off is thanks to the King.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
5 hours ago
- Scoop
Is This The Lowest Rates Rise In The Country? Whanganui Council Holds Firm On 2.2 Percent
Whanganui District Council is sticking to an average rates increase of 2.2 percent following deliberations on its draft Annual Plan. Mayor Andrew Tripe believes it's the lowest rise in the country for the year ahead. The plan for 2025/26 will go before the council in June to be adopted. Tripe said the council has focused on doing the basics well, investing in core infrastructure, and involving the community in decision-making. The big topics thrashed out by the council in this week's deliberations were creating a standalone housing entity to grow housing stock, adopting a new strategy for Whanganui, changes to fees and charges, and increasing loan repayments. In each case, community feedback aligned with the council's preferred options. On Thursday, the council confirmed it would: Continue to consider a standalone housing entity Consider all submissions and feedback to inform any minor changes ahead of adopting the draft Strategy for Whanganui Proceed with proposed changes to fees and charges for the year ahead Pay off an additional $590,000 of debt. Operational budget changes have also been made since the council opened its draft Annual Plan 2025/26 for consultation. This includes water levies set by water services authority Taumata Arowai to recover the cost of regulatory functions. These levies will take effect from 1 July, 2025 and are expected to cost around $16 per household. Tripe said it was "incredibly frustrating" to receive news of the levies just as the council was about to adopt its budgets for the year ahead. "It is yet another example of central government shifting costs to local councils and communities - when it should be administered and funded at a national level." These levies, along with proposed Commerce Commission levies, would be incorporated into the Annual Plan budget for 2025/26 and would affect three waters rates for connected households. To ensure full transparency, the levies would be identified on rates notices. However, they would not increase overall rates due to additional income from other council revenue streams. The Annual Plan will be adopted on 26 June, with the plan taking effect from 1 July.
Scoop
6 hours ago
- Scoop
Couple Owes $20,000 Working For Families Debt ‘Through No Fault Of Our Own'
Article – RNZ , Money Correspondent Just a quarter of 'squared up' Working for Families recipients are getting the right amount. Phoenix Ruka says he and his wife owe about $18,000 to $20,000 in Working for Families debt, despite always doing their best to ensure that they supplied the correct details about their income and circumstances. 'We've always stayed up-to-date with my salary and what we received from them and updated my salary every time it went up and down,' Ruka said. 'What were receiving was what they assured us we were entitled to. But then we got a massive bill saying they had overpaid us.' He said his wife had been 'relentless' in trying to work out what had happened. It was discovered that a couple of years they had been underpaid, by many thousands of dollars, which they were reimbursed, but one year they were paid too much, which left them with the debt. 'I think the really frustrating part is that it's through no fault of our own. We owe a substantial amount of money. Now they're taking $350 a fortnight out of our bank account,' Ruka said. 'We've gone back and forth and shown them our expenses, that we actually can't afford the amount they're taking. We've shown them our bills, our mortgage – they told us that they can't keep taking money if we can't afford it but we can't.' He said there had been multiple times where the money that was being taken to repay the debt was all that was left in their bank account. It's an issue the government is attempting to tackle with proposed changes to the way that income is assessed for Working for Families. As part of the Budget, it was announced that the threshold at which entitlements start to abate was to be increased slightly, and the government would look at options to help avoid the issue of Working for Families debt. Inland Revenue's discussion document said 85 percent of Working for Families households received their payments weekly or fortnightly during the 2022 tax year, based on an income estimate. Only 15 percent were receiving their credits annual based on the family's actual income once income tax had been assessed. Those who were being paid weekly or fortnightly were subject to an end of year 'square up' process by Inland Revenue, the document noted, although they were expected to update IRD with any relevant changes during the year. In the 2022 year, only 24 percent of households receiving weekly or fortnightly payments and squared up by IRD had received the right amount of Working for Families credits. Those who were overpaid are left with a debt to repay. The document said debt was a particular problem for low- and middle-income families because it reduced their ability to meet their day to day costs in the future. 'Debt undermines the intent of the Working for Families scheme to support low to middle income families to meet basic needs and incentivise work.' The amount owed by Working for Families recipients has been steadily increasing over the years. The document noted that in June 2024, 56,800 accounted for $273.5 million of Working for Families debt. There were 21,418 instalment arrangements in place to clear $50 million of debt. 'Having to estimate annual income in advance is the most common reason why families do not receive the right amount during the year,' the document said. 'For many families, estimating yearly income is difficult to do with any accuracy. Under the current income estimation model, families can still be overpaid when their income increases unexpectedly. For example, something as simple as a promotion or starting a new job towards the end of the year could cancel out their Working for Families entitlement and leave them in debt.' But the document said assessing people's income very regularly could mean a lot of changes in what people received. If someone was paid fortnightly, some months could have two paydays and some three. Someone who was paid every four weeks would occasionally be paid twice in one month. 'Families would need to check in more often to report or confirm their income so that Inland Revenue can recalculate their payments. This would mean an increase in time spent interacting with Inland Revenue and its systems. This could also mean payments would vary every week or month, making it harder for families to budget and plan.' The discussion document said the government's current thinking was that a quarterly assessment could strike the right balance between responsiveness, certainty and recipient effort. It was seeking feedback on the idea. The government also suggests a shift from calculating a recipient's Working for Families on the recipient's estimate of future income over the coming year to basing the calculation on past income they actually received. This would help to prevent people going into debt. It is also proposing to simplify the residence criteria for Working for Families and require both caregivers and children to be physically present in New Zealand to qualify. Susan St John, associate professor at the University of Auckland and Child Poverty Action Group spokesperson, said she thought the review was limited. 'There are huge difficulties for self-employed in more regular assessment. For income that is not earned regularly it can cause volatility and add to the admin or compliance load. There are other ways – in Australia they hold a portion back until the end of the year.' She said the review did not address the problems of Working for Families in a meaningful way. 'They arise because the threshold is way too low and the rates of clawback way too high.' She said the scheme was confusing with the different types of credits available, and the poorest 200,000 were excluded from the full package, missing out on about $5000 a year. Revenue Minister Simon Watts said the government knew that it could be distressing to have debt to Inland Revenue. 'We are interested in what people think of the proposals.' Another woman, Amy says she's still paying off the $12,000 in Working for Families debt she was landed with three years ago, amid a messy divorce. She and her husband were shareholders in a business and, she says, he incorrectly reported some of the business profit as income in her name. That prompted the government to think she had been overpaid credit and she was landed with a bill. She now can only receive $172 a week in Working for Families credits for her three children because she is paying back the debt. She is a single parent also paying a mortgage.
RNZ News
7 hours ago
- RNZ News
Police launch review after controversial retail crime directive
Police Commissioner Richard Chambers. Photo: RNZ / Nick Monro Police have launched a review to establish how many cases of retail crime were filed while a controversial and now scrapped directive was in place. RNZ revealed last week a directive was recently sent to staff relating to police's File Management Centre (FMC) titled 'Assignment Changes - Theft and Fraud'. The directive said that from 26 March, the FMC was applying "nationally standardised value thresholds" when assessing theft and fraud files. The value thresholds were: General theft $200, petrol drive off $150, shoplifting $500, fraud (paywave, online, scam etc) $1000, and all other fraud $500. "When assessing files with these offences, you will apply the relevant value threshold and file any file under that threshold regardless of any lines of enquiry or IFA score," it said. The police instructions relating to Case Management define an IFA score as "a numeric value derived from a series of weighted factors which gives an indication of the solvability of the case, based on the presence or absence of certain key lines of enquiry". Police Commissioner Richard Chambers canned the directive , which he called "confusing and unhelpful" on Tuesday following significant backlash. On Friday, a police spokesperson confirmed to RNZ the national value threshold applied to the prioritisation of lower-level theft and fraud offences was being removed. "A review is being completed on any cases that may have been impacted by those thresholds to assess whether they should be assigned to districts for follow-up," the spokesperson said. The review will be done by police's data quality team. "Police want to reassure that cases will continue to be managed locally balancing demand, resources and priorities to ensure the best possible service to victims in those communities." The national value threshold applied to the prioritisation of lower-level theft and fraud offences was being removed. Photo: Andrey Popov Retail NZ advocacy manager Ann-Marie Johnson told RNZ earlier this week the organisation would "like assurance that no cases have slipped through the cracks due to any misunderstandings around the directive". Motor Trade Association (MTA) head of advocacy James McDowall told RNZ he welcomed the Commissioner's comments on Tuesday. "We are pleased to hear that police will be taking fuel theft seriously. If police want to conduct a review of the directive and any impact from it, we would be willing to take part and interested in the results," he said. "But why stop there? Why not go back over the last six or 12 months and see how many fuel thefts under $150 were investigated, not simply recorded." McDowall said members reporting that police did not take fuel theft seriously "goes back much further than March". "But we are heartened by the Commissioner's comments yesterday that police will do their 'absolute best for the retail community to hold offenders to account'. We are keen to meet and work with police to this end." Motor Trade Association (MTA) head of advocacy James McDowall. Photo: RNZ / Anneke Smith On Tuesday, Chambers told media at a press conference he was "very disappointed" when he learned of the memo talking about thresholds. "The content of that memo is inconsistent with my expectations as the Commissioner of Police," he said. On Tuesday afternoon, Chambers spoke with a number of leaders in the retail sector at a pre-planned meeting. "We sat down and we talked about what the opportunities are to work together in terms of addressing the problem of retail crime," he said. "My staff across the country work incredibly hard to address the problem of retail crime. We know that retail crime has been increasing over recent years, but so too have the number of prosecutions that police have laid addressing offenders." Chambers said police relied on the support of the retail community and members of the public to gather information and evidence that allowed police to hold offenders to account. "We won't always be able to be there, but we will do our absolute best for the retail community to hold offenders to account," he said. Chambers said he first became aware of the memo on the weekend, after RNZ revealed its existence. He read it for the first time on Monday night. "Having read the memo myself, some might think that we were giving license to those who choose to break the law. That's not the case," he said. "In fact, my appeal is for the retail community and the public to continue to help us to ensure that we gather information to hold people account that hasn't changed." Chambers said the staffer behind the directive "thought they were being helpful". "But actually, when we think about the processes that we have internally to address demand, we must also be thinking about the impact of those decisions externally. "Our role as law enforcement, we are working incredibly hard with the retail community, and the memo was inconsistent with my expectations. I have not spoken to the individual myself, but I think the Commissioner coming out and being very clear about my expectations is probably sufficient." Chambers described himself as an "understanding leader," but said he was "disappointed" the memo spoke to things "that are very inconsistent with my expectations when it comes to retail crime". He said he was "concerned" when he read the memo that it may "impact on trust and confidence in police". "So I'm here today making very clear, and I'm hoping reassuring, that my expectations have not changed." Victims and Resolutions executive director service Rachael Bambery sent an email to District Commanders on Tuesday. The email, supplied to RNZ by police, spoke about "public commentary about national consistent thresholds" for certain offences. "I want to reaffirm that our collective focus remains on the victims and retail crime… The Service, Victims, and Resolutions teams remain committed to supporting you and your districts-both in progressing files and in ensuring our victims are kept informed. "As outlined in the recent memo regarding the development of a consistent IFA approach, please remember this is not a hard and fast directive. To be clear, districts continue to retain the discretion to investigate based on local context, and local resources. Early case closure is not final-many files are reactivated as new information or patterns emerge." Bambery said victim feedback continued to highlight a common theme. "They want to know what's happening next. A consistent national approach will help us provide timely, meaningful updates to victims-something that builds trust and reinforces our commitment to service. "Encouragingly, recent prosecution data shows an increase in shoplifting charges being laid." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
