logo
Lackawanna Democratic Committee: Home rule trumps court rule on vacancy

Lackawanna Democratic Committee: Home rule trumps court rule on vacancy

Yahoo08-04-2025

The Lackawanna County Democratic Committee's legal response in the battle to fill a commissioner vacancy contends the county's Home Rule Charter trumps a state court rule that would cut the committee out of the candidate selection process.
The committee met Monday's deadline to file an answer to the litigation started last month by Commissioner Bill Gaughan and the county over filling the vacancy of former Commissioner Matt McGloin for the nearly three years remaining on his unexpired term.
The Home Rule Charter process had the Democratic Committee picking three candidates to forward to county judges, who then would select one of the three to fill the McGloin vacancy.
Under the Home Rule Charter procedure, the county Democratic Committee named three candidates — former county Economic Development Director Brenda Sacco, Olyphant Borough Council President James Baldan and Scranton School Director Robert J. Casey — as candidates to potentially replace McGloin.
The Gaughan/county challenge claims the charter is trumped by Pennsylvania Rule of Judicial Administration 1908 of 2019, which says the county court — not a political party — shall receive applications from any interested candidates for the position.
The Democratic Committee's answer, prepared by attorney Adam Bonin of Philadelphia, claims the court rule was not established to guide Courts of Common Pleas when filling a county vacancy, but rather was created to give guidance when filling other elected office vacancies pursuant to statutory authority, including under the Pennsylvania Borough Code and the Pennsylvania Public School Code.
'It is specifically denied that the resignation of Commissioner Matt McGloin created such a scenario, as his vacancy must be filled pursuant to a Home Rule Charter provision and not pursuant to statutory authority,' the Democratic Committee reply states. 'The Supreme Court cannot simply promulgate internal rules that change the scheme of an enacted Pennsylvania Home Rule Charter.'
Meanwhile, Republican Commissioner Chris Chermak opposes the county's participation in the litigation and also has filed in court a legal action to remove the county as a party to the case.
On Thursday, Sacco — who is the Democratic Committee's top candidate — sought court approval to formally enter the litigation, claiming she is victim of a 'smear campaign' against her via reporting by The Times-Tribune. If allowed to intervene in the case directly, Sacco would back the Home Rule Charter/county Democratic Committee process that made her the top finalist; and she also would file a separate motion for a protective order against Gaughan/the county 'from orchestrating false news stories about (her) in the local press,' according to her legal petition prepared by attorney Paul James Walker of Clarks Summit.
In response to such claims in Sacco's petition, Lackawanna County Solicitor Donald Frederickson issued a statement Friday saying: 'To the extent that Lackawanna County is being accused of 'leaking' information to the press, this accusation is completely false and not based in reality. Any information which the county has provided to the press is public information which any citizen and taxpayer is entitled to receive. At no time was any confidential or privileged information relating to any employee or former employee disseminated by the county government.'
A judge has not yet ruled on whether to allow Sacco to enter the case. On Monday, she also filed a notice in the case that she would seek a 'Rule to Show Cause' for Gaughan and the county to demonstrate why she should not be allowed to enter the litigation and seek a protective order.
A panel of three senior Lackawanna County judges had previously scheduled oral arguments in the litigation to be heard April 22. Briefs from all parties in the case must be filed with the court no later than April 14.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Congress Is Subsidizing the Wrong Neighborhoods
Congress Is Subsidizing the Wrong Neighborhoods

New York Times

time4 days ago

  • New York Times

Congress Is Subsidizing the Wrong Neighborhoods

When President Trump signed Republicans' 2017 tax legislation into law, one section in it stood out for its ambitious goal: directing private investment dollars to left-behind communities. The law provides a tax incentive for long-term investment in economically disadvantaged communities that were designated by governors as so-called opportunity zones, subject to federal standards based on the communities' median income and official poverty rate. It was a worthy attempt at bolstering development in areas needing greater investment to stimulate the local economy. As The Times reported in 2018, Senator Tim Scott, a South Carolina Republican who championed the provision, explained that he was motivated by his belief that 'there's untapped potential in every state in the nation.' The problem? Opportunity zones were meant to be a game changer for persistently poor areas, but under the current law, far more money has gone to communities that qualified as poor but were already growing economically. Today, as Congress considers extending opportunity zones in Mr. Trump's 'big, beautiful' budget bill, many of its members appear to be overlooking this flaw and setting the program up to continue failing the very Americans it was meant to help. But there's still time to fix it. Before the 1980s, lower-income and economically depressed neighborhoods tended to improve over time as the benefits of economic innovation spread to workers and areas across the country. The past 40 years have been a different story: Poorer areas tend not to catch up to better-off areas. Opportunity zone tax incentives are meant to encourage the private sector to create the scale needed to turn around communities. The idea was that individuals would be spurred by generous tax breaks to reinvest capital gains into new businesses, which would generate economic development in struggling areas and in turn increase jobs there. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Trump budget plan would slash Great Lakes Authority
Trump budget plan would slash Great Lakes Authority

E&E News

time4 days ago

  • E&E News

Trump budget plan would slash Great Lakes Authority

A small commission focused on economic development in the Great Lakes region would be eliminated under the Trump administration's budget proposal for fiscal 2026. The White House budget would 'permanently' cancel $5 million in funding for the Great Lakes Authority. The money was appropriated by Congress last year, but the regional organization has no federal leader and has yet to formally launch. The authority was created to address regional issues throughout the Great Lakes watershed and was modeled on the Tennessee Valley Authority and the Appalachian Regional Commission, according to Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio), ranking member of the House Energy and Water Development Appropriations Subcommittee. Advertisement It would have representatives from state government and focus on boosting jobs in manufacturing and clean energy, among other issues.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store