Marathon world record holder suspended for doping
The 30-year-old Kenyan, who shattered the previous world record by more than two minutes last October, was found to have the prohibited substance hydrochlorothiazide in her system following a test on March 14. The substance, which is a diuretic, may be abused to mask the presence in urine of other prohibited substances.
Chepngetich was not immediately charged but opted for a voluntary suspension on April 19 shortly after pulling out of the London Marathon because she was not 'in the right place mentally or physically'.
Brett Clothier, who heads up the Athletics Integrity Unit, said: 'In the intervening months, the AIU continued its investigation and today issued a notice of charge and imposed its own provisional suspension.'
The 2:10 barrier was long considered unbreakable for a woman – and her finishing time in Chicago of 2:09:56 was more than five minutes quicker than Paula Radcliffe's 2003 world record, which stood for 16 years, and eight minutes clear that day of the second-placed athlete. It sent shockwaves through the sport and, at the time, had only ever been bettered by 22 British men.
'It's a time we can't really comprehend – a time we would never have thought was possible,' said Britain's Jo Pavey, the former European 10,000m champion, who was commentating on the race for Eurosport.
There were also immediate questions, however, with the American journalist Robert Johnson asking at the press conference whether it was 'too good to be true'. Hundreds of Kenyan athletes have served doping suspensions over the past decade.
Athletics Kenya issued a statement in which they said that 'singling out' Chepngetich, who was also the 2019 world champion, was unfair. 'Such aspersions, made without due process, undermine not only her efforts but the integrity of the sport,' the statement said. 'It is important to note that Ruth, like all athletes in major competitions, underwent multiple anti-doping tests, both pre-race and post-race.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
11 minutes ago
- BBC News
Gossip: Fulham keen on Dewsbury-Hall
Fulham have registered an interest in Chelsea's 25-year-old English midfielder Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall. (GiveMeSport), externalWant more transfer stories? Read Monday's full gossip columnFollow the gossip column on BBC Sport
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
‘My 98-year-old partner fell from a window and died. Now his family blame me'
A 90-year-old widow has spoken of how her aristocratic partner's family blamed her when he died. Michael Brudenell-Bruce, the 8th Marquess of Ailesbury, was found dead on the patio of the couple's Shepherd's Bush home in London on May 12 last year after falling from a bedroom window. Teresa Marshall De Paoli, his widow, has now claimed that her partner of 37 years' grandchildren told mourners at his funeral that she had 'pushed him out of a window'. He was found with head and chest injuries and at least three belts wrapped around his arms. Ms De Paoli told the Daily Mail: 'Members of the family wanted a verdict of assisted suicide. That way they could challenge Michael's will because, as with all these things, it is about money.' A coroner's inquest ruled in March that Brudenell-Bruce took his own life, despite claims from barristers representing his family that there should be a narrative conclusion of assisted suicide. David Brudenell-Bruce, the late Marquess's estranged son, and Lady Louise Brudenell-Bruce were among those to accuse Ms De Paoli of helping him take his own life. The coroner found that Brudenell-Bruce took his own life because he was determined not to be a burden on his loved ones after being diagnosed with dementia four years before. Money has 'torn the family apart' David, the current Marquess of Ailesbury, and Lady Louise were both left out of their father's estate. Ms De Paoli said that money had 'torn the family apart', adding: 'The saddest thing of all is that these fights are all about money.' She went on to claim she had been left with PTSD over her partner's death. Brudenell-Bruce had five children with his first two partners: David, Lady Sylvia, Lady Carina, Lady Louise and Lady Kathryn. Lady Carina and Thomas Brudenell-Bruce, who is estranged from his father David, supported Ms De Paoli at the inquest, with Lady Carina, who lives on the Caribbean island of Tortola, writing a character reference in support of her stepmother. She wrote: 'I live thousands of miles away and always had total belief that he was safe and happy with Teresa.' Ms De Paoli also has close relationships with Lady Sylvia and Lady Kathryn. The late Marquess and his son became estranged because David believed that his father had improperly removed assets from the trust that owns Savernake Estate before he handed it to him in 1997. Ms De Paoli has refuted this suggestion. The Marquessate of Ailesbury was created in the 19th century, while the Brudenell ancestry dates back to medieval times. The family is custodian of the 4,500-acre Savernake Forest, in Wiltshire, and, until its £11.5m sale in 2014, were owners of the estate's Palladian mansion, Tottenham House.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Police use spit hoods on suspects once an hour
Police officers are using spit hoods to defend themselves in potentially violent situations once every hour, new figures have shown. The mesh fabric hoods are placed over a suspect's head to prevent them from spitting or biting when arrested or in custody. Figures show that they were used 26,4000 times over three years and that their use is increasing each year. Official data showing the use of spit hoods between 2021 and 2024 has been released by the Home Office, following a House of Lords written question by Lord Palter of Spalding. In 2021-22, they were used by police 8,281 times, in 2022/23 it was 8,275 and in 2023-24, it was 9,844. On average, that is 8,800 each year, which breaks down to 24 times a day. The Metropolitan Police had the highest number with 4,503 over the three years, Greater Manchester Police with 1,951 and West Midlands Police using 1,875. Critics of the tactic have voiced concerns that spit hoods can be dangerous, potentially leading to suffocation or distress, and that they can mirror a waterboarding effect. Two serving Metropolitan Police officers and a former officer are facing a gross misconduct hearing after a 90-year-old black woman with dementia was 'red-dotted' with a Taser, handcuffed and put in a spit hood. The woman was targeted with the Taser when she refused to drop kitchen utensils she had been holding after officers were called to an address in Peckham, south London, in May this year over reports of a disturbance. Officers approached the woman who spat in the direction of some officers. She was physically detained and placed in handcuffs and then a spit hood was applied, but she was not arrested. Ambulance staff attended and the woman was taken to hospital still in the handcuffs and spit hood. These were later removed at the hospital. The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) is now investigating the police officers' actions. Steve Noonan, the IOPC director, said: 'We are concerned by some of the actions and decision-making of police officers involved in the detention of this elderly and vulnerable lady, and we recognise this incident has also caused community concern. 'It's important that an independent investigation takes place to establish the full circumstances.' But officers have defended their use of spit hoods. Peter Bleksley, a retired Metropolitan Police detective, said: 'This is the shocking reality of policing in 2025. If there's a risk of an officer being spat on, I'd say put the hood on. ' Violence against police is out of control. It needs a proper crackdown. The use of these hoods is a clear sign it is not acceptable in any form.' 'Put yourselves in the shoes of the officers' He added: 'It's a horrific thing to have to go through. Anyone who does not believe me, I'd say put yourselves in the shoes of the officers it is happening to. 'They are there for a reason. Anyone making the human rights argument, what's humane about being spat on? It's a disgraceful act.' One officer from Kent, who did not want to be named, said: 'It's becoming an increasing problem. There is more reporting of it now. 'No police officer wants to have to use them. But if we're being spat on, we have to. It's also about controlling what could be an unfolding violent situation and not making it worse.'
