US senators confirm call for formal probe of war plan Signal chat
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The leaders of the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee confirmed on Thursday that they have asked the Defense Department for an inquiry into Trump administration officials' discussion of sensitive attack plans on the Signal messaging app, including recommendations to address any issues.
In a letter to Steven Stebbins, the acting Inspector General at the department, Republican Senator Roger Wicker, the panel's chairman, and Senator Jack Reed, its ranking Democrat, asked for an inquiry and assessment of the facts surrounding the Signal chat and department policies "and adherence to policies" about sharing sensitive information.
Stebbins' office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Wicker had said on Wednesday he and Reed planned a letter, after critics said U.S. troops could have died if the information in the chat had fallen into the wrong hands.
Wicker and Reed also asked for an assessment of Defense Department classification and declassification policies, and how the policies of the White House, Pentagon and intelligence and other agencies differ, if at all, as well as "An assessment of whether any individuals transferred classified information, including operational details, from classified systems to unclassified systems, and if so, how."
After the review is finished, they said in the letter, dated Wednesday, that the Armed Services Committee would work with Stebbins to schedule a briefing.
Although no Republican member of Congress has called for any official to resign, a few members of Trump's party have joined Democrats in expressing concern about the chat on Signal, an encrypted commercial messaging app, about the planned killing of a Houthi militant in Yemen on March 15.
CABINET SECRETARIES, VP, INTELL CHIEFS ON CHAT
The chat included National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, Vice President JD Vance, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who did not know that Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of the Atlantic, was inadvertently included.
A wide range of Democrats have called for the resignations of Hegseth and others who participated in the chat.
As administration officials have discussed, and at times sought to downplay, the incident, they have focused on the question of whether any of the information was classified, and which agency might have classified it.
They also have insisted it did not include "war plans," although the messages listed the time of the planned attack and equipment - including aircraft - that would be involved.
"I am appalled by the egregious security breach from top administration officials," Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski said on X.com.
"Their disregard for stringent safeguards and secure channels could have compromised a high-stakes operation and put our servicemembers at risk. I hope this serves as a wake-up call that operational security must be a top priority for everyone—especially our leaders," she said.
The Defense Department's inspector general, a nonpartisan official charged with rooting out waste, fraud and abuse, was one of several officials Trump has fired since he began his second term in January. Trump has not named a permanent replacement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
22 minutes ago
- The Hill
Here's Trump's schedule with Zelensky on Monday
President Trump is set to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders on Monday following his controversial meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. 'I have already arrived in Washington, tomorrow I am meeting with President Trump. Tomorrow we are also speaking with European leaders. I am grateful to @POTUS for the invitation. We all share a strong desire to end this war quickly and reliably. And peace must be lasting,' Zelensky said in a post on the social platform X late Sunday night. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said in an X post of her own Sunday that she would 'join the meeting with President Trump and other European leaders in the White House tomorrow.' The White House released a schedule that shows Trump, Zelensky and their teams will first hold a meeting, before a larger meeting is held that will also include European leaders. Here's a rundown. 12:00 p.m. European leaders are expected to be at the White House by noon EDT at the South Portico, with television crew and photographers allowed to document the arrival. 1:00 p.m.-1:15 p.m. Zelensky and Trump are set to greet each other an hour after the European leaders arrive, and will shortly after go into a meeting with each other in the Oval Office. Vice President Vance is also expected to attend this meeting. The last time the three met in February, there were fireworks. 2:15 p.m.-2:30 p.m. Trump will greet other European leaders in the State Dining Room an hour after he begins his Oval Office meeting with Zelensky. Fifteen minutes after the greetings, Trump and European leaders will take a family photo together in the Cross Hall. 3:00 p.m.
The Hill
22 minutes ago
- The Hill
Zelensky arrives in DC, says war must be ended ‘reliably'
Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky arrived in Washington, D.C., on Sunday night, saying he was grateful for President Trump's invitation and wanted to end the war with Russia 'quickly and reliably.' He also said that if there is a peace deal, it must be set up to be lasting to avoid a situation where Russia might invade Ukraine again. He specifically noted Russia's taking of Crimea and parts of the Donbas region, saying in a post on X that a new deal couldn't be set up to give Russian President Vladimir Putin things that he could then use as a springboard for a new attack. Zelensky also criticized 'security guarantees' he said were given to Ukraine in 1994 that didn't work. 'And peace must be lasting. Not like it was years ago, when Ukraine was forced to give up Crimea and part of our East—part of Donbas—and Putin simply used it as a springboard for a new attack. Or when Ukraine was given so called 'security guarantees' in 1994, but they didn't work. 'Of course, Crimea should not have been given up then, just as Ukrainians did not give up Kyiv, Odesa, or Kharkiv after 2022. Ukrainians are fighting for their land, for their independence,' he wrote. 'I am confident that we will defend Ukraine, effectively guarantee security, and that our people will always be grateful to President Trump, everyone in America, and every partner and ally for their support and invaluable assistance,' Zelensky said. 'Russia must end this war, which it itself started. And I hope that our joint strength with America, with our European friends, will force Russia into a real peace. Thank you!' U.S. officials on Sunday said Ukraine may get security guarantees similar to NATO Article 5 guarantees in which European countries and the U.S. would commit to defending Ukraine, though not NATO itself.
Newsweek
22 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump Defends Putin Summit Against Media 'Major Defeat' Claims
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump dismissed criticism of his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska as "fake news" Sunday night on Truth Social, saying the war in Ukraine could be ended "almost immediately" but critics were making it harder to do so. Trump also appeared to rule out any return of the Russian-occupied Crimea region or NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) membership for Ukraine. Why It Matters Critics have slammed Trump for providing Putin with red-carpet treatment in Alaska on Friday in exchange for seemingly little in the way of concessions. The meeting ended without any agreement on a ceasefire or peace deal, but Trump officials have talked up possible concessions made by the Russians, although details have yet to surface. Trump's comments come as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is due to travel to Washington, D.C. on Monday to discuss with Trump a possible settlement of the war, which Putin launched in February 2022. Several European leaders are due to participate in the meeting. U.S. President Donald Trump (R) walks with Russian President Vladimir Putin as they arrives at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson on August 15, 2025 in Anchorage, Alaska. U.S. President Donald Trump (R) walks with Russian President Vladimir Putin as they arrives at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson on August 15, 2025 in Anchorage, Alaska. Andrew Harnik What To Know Trump rejected any suggestion that holding the summit on U.S. soil represented a defeat. "The Fake News has been saying for 3 days that I suffered a "major defeat" by allowing President Vladimir Putin of Russia to have a major Summit in the United States. Actually, he would have loved doing the meeting anywhere else but the U.S., and the Fake News knows this. It was a major point of contention!" the president said in a post on his Truth Social platform. "If we had the Summit elsewhere, the Democrat run and controlled media would have said what a terrible thing THAT was. These people are sick!" he said. The decision to hold the summit at Anchorage's Joint Base Elmendorf–Richardson surprised many observers as previous suggestions indicated a third country, such as the United Arab Emirates, would host the two leaders' first meeting in six years. Senator Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat, did not hold back on his assessment of the Trump-Putin summit, saying in a Sunday appearance on NBC News' Meet the Press that the meeting was a "disaster" that gave Russian Putin "everything he wanted." "The very unattractive (both inside and out!) Senator from Connecticut, Chris Murphy, said "Putin got everything that he wanted." Actually, "nobody got anything," too soon, but getting close," Trump fired back in another Sunday Truth Social post. "Murphy is a lightweight who thinks it made the Russian President look good in coming to America. Actually, it was very hard for President Putin to do so. This war can be ended, NOW, but stupid people like Chris Murphy, John Bolton, and others, make it much harder to do so." In advance of his talks with Zelensky and his European allies, Trump appeared to rule out any chance that the Ukrainian leader would succeed in his long-held aims of getting back Crimea, which Russian forces occupied in 2014, or of membership of NATO. "No getting back Obama given Crimea (12 years ago, without a shot being fired!), and NO GOING INTO NATO BY UKRAINE. Some things never change!!!" Trump said. Kyiv has repeatedly said it is against the country's constitution to give land away to Moscow. One of Putin's fears is that Ukraine would become a member of NATO, expanding the U.S. and European footprint even more along the border of Russia. U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff on Sunday said the Russians had agreed to a "game-changing" concession, which would allow the U.S. to establish security guarantees modeled after NATO's Article 5 protections, which states that an attack against any member of NATO is an attack against all members of NATO—also known as the collective defense clause. Looking ahead to Monday's talks, Trump said: "Big day at the White House tomorrow. Never had so many European Leaders at one time. My great honor to host them!!!" What People Are Saying In a post on Truth Social, President Donald Trump said: "President Zelenskyy of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight." Senator Chris Murphy told NBC News: "It was a failure. Putin got everything he wanted…He was invited to the United States: War criminals are not normally invited to the United States of America." What Happens Next? Zelensky and several European leaders are due to meet Trump in Washington on Monday.
