logo
DA urges action on youth job crisis on Workers' Day

DA urges action on youth job crisis on Workers' Day

The Citizen02-05-2025
On Workers' Day, the Democratic Alliance (DA) Emfuleni Central Constituency expressed strong concern over South Africa's escalating youth unemployment crisis, calling for urgent reforms to address the issue.
According to Cllr Dady Mollo, Constituency Head of DA Emfuleni Central, the youth unemployment rate has soared to an alarming 43.2%. 'This is not just a number—it reflects a national crisis,' said Mollo. He described the impact on real lives: a graduate whose qualifications fail to secure employment, a breadwinner stripped of dignity, and a young woman made vulnerable by lack of opportunity.
Mollo attributed the crisis to 'decades of ANC mismanagement, corruption, and failed economic policies.' He criticised the ruling government for continuing to make 'empty promises' while young South Africans suffer the consequences.
In contrast, the DA called for bold economic reforms aimed at creating sustainable opportunities. These include encouraging investment, supporting small businesses, aligning youth skills with market needs, and cutting bureaucratic red tape to stimulate an inclusive economy.
'The DA believes opportunity should not be a privilege for the few, but a right for all,' said Mollo. 'We remain committed to building an economy that works—for every young South African, for every family, and for every dream deferred.'
The DA urged government and all sectors of society to act decisively before another generation is lost to unemployment.
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SACP defends SANDF chief Maphwanya over his Iran comments
SACP defends SANDF chief Maphwanya over his Iran comments

Eyewitness News

time6 minutes ago

  • Eyewitness News

SACP defends SANDF chief Maphwanya over his Iran comments

JOHANNESBURG - The South African Communist Party(SACP) has hit back at critics of defence force chief, Rudzani Maphwanya, for his remarks during a recent visit in Iran. Maphwanya was at the centre of a diplomatic storm last week, when Iranian media reported that he appeared to publicly co-sign South Africa to stronger political and military ties with Tehran. It's understood that he said that Iran's military had significant capabilities that could be used in cooperation with the South African armed forces to serve mutual national interests and enhance regional and international security. READ: Presidency says action will be taken against SANDF's Maphwanya over his Iran comments Despite mounting pressure to account for his comments, the SACP has come to out in defence of Maphwanya. A few months ahead of his retirement, South African National Defence Force chief, Maphwanya, is now facing calls to step down over his comments. The SACP has since come out batting for him in what the party labelled as anti-Iran hysteria and geopolitical hypocrisy. In a statement released at the weekend, the SACP said that South Africa's ties with Iran were not out of the ordinary. The Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) distanced itself from Maphwanya's comments, saying they did not reflect South Africa's foreign policy. President Cyril Ramaphosa called Maphwanya's comments ill-advised. The SACP said thats government's muddled response was concerning, accusing government of scapegoating the SANDF chief. It said that giving into the whims of Iran's foes to appease other countries sets a bad precedent.

Pull the plug and start dialogue over
Pull the plug and start dialogue over

The Citizen

time36 minutes ago

  • The Citizen

Pull the plug and start dialogue over

It's time to pull the plug on this whole thing… and start again. While the National Dialogue saga seems destined to generate little more than more hot air – as if we don't have enough already from our verbose politicians – it does provide some fascinating material for pondering our parlous political situation. First, the foundations associated with the elders of recent South African history – those who negotiated the way towards ending apartheid – have pulled out of the process. What the National Dialogue should've been One of the prominent critics of the dialogue process is former president Thabo Mbeki. He was the man who set in motion this idea of a national dialogue, and, in his own words, it should have been civil society in the driving seat, not President Cyril Ramaphosa and the ANC. That would seem, at first glance, to be noble and wise, as befitting Mbeki's status as an elder statesman. However, what if Mbeki realised that his own legacy – despite the collapse which followed after he left office – was going to be less than shining? Even ignoring the Aids debacle, where an estimated 250 000 people died while he dithered about antiretroviral medications, Mbeki is regarded by many critics as having moved the country onto a neocolonial, capitalist-friendly course, failing to deal with critical issues like land restitution. Perhaps he needs the dialogue to rebuild his legacy into one of 'the man who saved South Africa'. Yet, whatever his motive may be, Mbeki is correct – and so are the others who withdrew – that this dialogue should not be steered by Ramaphosa and the ANC. People, not political parties, should air their views on the future. That is why it is concerning that organisations like the DA and Freedom Front Plus, which represent many in the white community, have also chosen to stay away. It's time to pull the plug on this whole thing… and start again. READ NEXT: Mazibuko reaffirms that the National Dialogue will be in the hands of South Africans

Cape Town journalists march in solidarity with media workers targeted and killed in Gaza
Cape Town journalists march in solidarity with media workers targeted and killed in Gaza

Daily Maverick

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

Cape Town journalists march in solidarity with media workers targeted and killed in Gaza

A march in Sea Point, Cape Town, on Sunday was the latest in a series of protests aimed at spotlighting the targeted killing of media workers in Gaza. Local journalists led the demonstration, expressing solidarity with their colleagues on the other side of the world. Hundreds of people marched along the Sea Point promenade in Cape Town on Sunday, 17 August, to protest against the targeted killing of journalists in the Gaza Strip. The march was led by local journalists holding a sign bearing the names of more than 200 Palestinian media workers who have reportedly been killed since 7 October 2023. The march was organised by Journalists Against Apartheid, with support from other organisations including Gift of the Givers, South African Jews for a Free Palestine and the Palestine Solidarity Campaign. The demonstration comes exactly a week after an Israeli airstrike on a media tent near Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City killed six journalists. Among those killed were Al Jazeera correspondents Anas al-Sharif and Mohammed Qreiqeh; camera operators Ibrahim Zaher and Mohammed Noufal; local freelance reporter Mohammad Al-Khaldi; and Moaman Aliwa, a camera assistant. The Israeli military released a statement claiming it had targeted Al-Sharif because he allegedly headed a Hamas cell. However, the Israeli government has not provided evidence to back up these claims. The Al Jazeera Media Network and the South African National Editors' Forum (Sanef) have condemned the killing of Al-Sharif and his colleagues as an assassination and a 'blatant and premeditated attack on press freedom'. Sharif Mosa, a Palestinian photojournalist living in South Africa, spoke at Sunday's demonstration, describing the targeted killing of Gazan journalists as an attempt to 'steal' the Palestinian story by eliminating witnesses. 'Every colonial project survives on two weapons: physical extermination of the colonised people and control of the narrative. The power to erase, distort and rewrite reality,' said Mosa. '[These journalists] were killed not because they were in the wrong place, but because they were in the right place. Journalists are the antidote of colonial propaganda… Killing journalists is how Israel tries to maintain control over the narrative. But every journalist killed makes the truth louder, and today is a statement about that.' Crystal Orderson, a South African journalist, condemned the 'brutality' meted out against journalists in Gaza who were attempting to document the reality on the ground. 'The question today is, since when has journalism become a crime? Clearly, for the journalists like Anas [al-Sharif]… reporting the truth has become that crime,' she said. 'We're standing here today in solidarity… We grew up under apartheid, we knew the role of the media under apartheid… I want to remind the young journalists that it's important to tell the story of truth… [and] human suffering. We can't be silent. In newsrooms across South Africa, we need to stand up for the truth.' Al-Sharif and his colleagues were among many Palestinian journalists who have been documenting the devastation wrought by Israel's attacks on the Gaza Strip in the wake of the 7 October 2023 Hamas assault on Israel that killed 1,200 people and saw 251 taken hostage. Since then, Israeli forces have killed more than 60,000 Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health in Gaza. This includes a large number of media workers on the frontline. Waiting for death In the month before Al-Sharif was killed, both the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) and Irene Khan, the United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur on freedom of expression, released statements expressing concern about his safety. This followed 'online attacks and unfounded accusations by the Israeli army' about Al-Sharif's affiliation with Hamas, according to the UN. Khan said that fears surrounding Al-Sharif's safety were well founded as 'there is growing evidence that journalists in Gaza have been targeted and killed by the Israeli army on the basis of unsubstantiated claims that they were Hamas terrorists'. The CPJ said the Israel Defense Forces had previously made unfounded claims that journalists it killed in Gaza were terrorists, including four Al Jazeera staff. At Sunday's march, Journalists Against Apartheid demanded that: Media organisations call Israel's killing of media workers 'what it is – a war crime'; Israel must immediately release all arbitrarily detained Palestinian journalists in the West Bank and Gaza; and The Israeli media ban must end, allowing foreign correspondents entry to Gaza. 'We stand in solidarity with protesters around the world who have condemned Israel's reprehensible killings this week. Governments must act immediately to protect remaining Palestinian journalists before all of Gaza's media workers are killed. We stand with international human rights organisations who recognise that Israel's military actions and policies in Palestine amount to apartheid and genocide,' said Journalists Against Apartheid. In late 2023, South Africa filed a case asking the International Court of Justice to declare that Israel was in breach of its obligations under the 1948 Genocide Convention. Almost two years later, the case is still ongoing. International media ban Since 7 October 2023, no international journalists have been permitted entry to Gaza, other than a few controlled visits alongside Israeli soldiers that restricted independent reporting. Human rights investigators have also been barred. This has made Palestinian journalists working in the region the primary source of facts and reports about the effects of bombardments by Israeli forces and the growing threat of starvation among Gazans due to the blockade on aid. International media and human rights organisations, including the CPJ, have called for Israel to allow media workers and investigators into Gaza to document the situation on the ground. Restricted access to the region has made it challenging to establish the exact number of journalists killed. Sara Qudah, regional director for the Middle East and North Africa at the Committee to Protect Journalists, told Daily Maverick the organisation was often forced to rely on media reports when tracking the loss of life. 'The grave reality of documenting attacks on the press in the Israel-Gaza war is that we have known of instances where whole families have been killed in strikes, leaving no one to contact to verify details of a journalist or media worker's case. Other times, we face challenges getting hold of the outlet, or remaining family members don't even have information about the outlets the journalists worked at,' she said. The CPJ puts the number of journalists and media workers killed in the Israel-Gaza war between 2023 to 2025 at more than 190, which exceeds the number of press members that were killed worldwide in the previous three years (2020 to 2022). However, some organisations have estimated that the death toll is higher. DM

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store