
Widower continues tribunal claim against FOI Commissioner
One of her dying wishes was that her husband, Ian, push on with the case.
The Commissioner's office is defending the claim.
READ MORE
The tribunal claim also raises wider concerns about who watches the watchdogs.
The Commissioner is responsible for the "enforcement and promotion of Scotland's freedom of information laws", including "handling appeals about the way in which Scottish public authorities respond to information requests".
Given the need to avoid political interference, the job comes with a certain degree of independence. But that means the postholder can only be removed by a supermajority in the Scottish Parliament.
According to the claim, Helen enjoyed a good working relationship with the previous Commissioner, Daren Fitzhenry, but that changed after the appointment of David Hamilton, a former chair of the Scottish Police Federation, in October 2023.
The tribunal papers submitted by Helen state that the relationship deteriorated rapidly.
They go on to allege that at a January 2024 meeting, Mr Hamilton proposed an internal award called 'Margaret the Fox', named after a recently retired colleague, which Helen and two female colleagues found offensive due to 'the use of the word fox [having] negative connotations when referring to women".
The Commissioner, in his legal defence, says the award was a tribute to a colleague's fondness for foxes and had been welcomed by the person in question.
The claim also says she raised broader concerns about the 'introduction of a police culture', including staff feeling pressured to laugh at the Commissioner's jokes. The defence disputes that such concerns were raised in the way described.
During a return-to-work call after a period of absence, the claim alleges Helen was told she was "being precious", "obsessing", and that "people do not like her". The Commissioner denies saying that people disliked her.
In meetings, she was reportedly told she was "not agile", lacked a "can-do attitude", and had "failed in her job". One meeting allegedly ended with her being told to "be quiet" after raising financial concerns – an incident contested in the Commissioner's defence.
On March 14, she emailed Mr Hamilton, stating: "All members of staff, including myself, should be treated with consideration, dignity and respect while at work. Your comments about me are incorrect and are having a detrimental effect on me.
"You are not treating me fairly, with dignity or respect. I feel intimidated by you and discriminated against. The way you treat me, in person, in meetings and in writing, is unacceptable and also makes me feel belittled, anxious and not valued."
She lodged a formal grievance five days later, citing "unreasonable treatment" and alleging discrimination, harassment and intimidation.
She was then absent due to ill health.
Helen submitted the claim in December. She died in February. (Image: agency) According to her claim, Mr Hamilton initially responded by saying a "bespoke arrangement" would be created to ensure an independent process was in place, but only upon her return to work.
In March, he assigned another senior official, line-managed by him, to act as her main contact – despite Helen requesting someone else. The Commissioner disputes that the arrangements were inappropriate and later agreed to appoint an external independent investigator, contingent on confirmation of Helen's fitness to engage.
In June, he reiterated that he would proceed with the grievance only once she confirmed she was medically fit. He added he had sought legal advice.
Helen responded that her ill health had been caused by his conduct and she was willing and able to participate in the process.
The claim alleges that on July 19, Mr Hamilton phoned Helen's trade union representative to suggest she was ignoring emails – something her tribunal documents say was untrue. The Commissioner says he simply asked for emails to be acknowledged.
That same day, she was told her laptop and phone would be collected due to cyber-security protocols applying to staff absent for more than four months.
Her legal team say she was also blocked from using pre-approved annual leave to extend her period of full pay, with leave cancelled three times in April, May and August. The Commissioner says she was paid in lieu and suffered no loss.
In a letter dated August 13, Mr Hamilton wrote that "on conclusion of the internal grievance process, it is likely I will be investigating performance and disciplinary procedures". The letter provided no details of the alleged issues. Tribunal documents say Helen found this particularly upsetting and reiterated her request for the grievance to be investigated without delay.
By October 21, Helen had still not been contacted by the promised investigator. She emailed Mr Hamilton again to say the delay was harming her health and that she felt she was being punished for lodging a grievance.
He replied that same day, saying he had just returned to work and would respond after catching up.
Helen resigned three days later.
READ MORE
In her resignation letter, she wrote: "It is now more than seven months since I submitted a formal grievance against you and you have refused to allow any of my grievances to be dealt with."
She said his behaviour during her absence and while working had caused "enormous damage" to her health and left her with "no alternative but to resign".
There is no suggestion of a link between the treatment Helen received and her cancer diagnosis.
Before her resignation, she is understood to have been offered a financial settlement by the Commissioner, but it was rejected.
Helen's lawyer, Tony McGrade, argues that the Commissioner's handling of the grievance process was "significantly below accepted standards".
He told The Herald: "This case highlights the real dangers in there being no procedure in place to allow grievances against officials such as the Scottish Information Commissioner to be independently investigated.
"This means that the person against whom an allegation of discrimination or unfair treatment is made decides whether that is investigated. This is simply wrong."
Under the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002, the Scottish Information Commissioner is a statutory officeholder appointed by the Scottish Parliament and operates independently of government.
Unlike most public sector roles, the Commissioner is not accountable to ministers or civil service structures, and complaints about their conduct are not subject to routine oversight.
Removal from office requires a formal resolution passed by two-thirds of MSPs – a deliberately high threshold designed to protect the role from political interference.
That resolution can be triggered if the Parliament is satisfied the Commissioner has breached the terms and conditions of office, or if it determines that it has lost confidence in the Commissioner's willingness, suitability or ability to do the job.
Helen's husband believes this has created an accountability gap, making it extremely difficult for staff to challenge the Commissioner's actions through normal employment procedures or for Parliament to intervene when serious concerns arise.
It is understood the matter has been raised informally with Alison Johnstone, the Presiding Officer of the Scottish Parliament, who confirmed the limited powers available to intervene in what is treated as an internal employment matter.
Those close to the case say the aim of the legal action is not financial compensation, but accountability – though Mr Hamilton strongly contests the allegations.
The Commissioner said it "fully intends to defend its position in the Employment Tribunal" but that it "would be entirely wrong to make any comment on the substance of the claim until the Tribunal has considered the full evidence and issued a judgment."
"The Commissioner will accordingly respect that process, being of the view that this is covered by the law relating to contempt of court, and will be making no comment until the appropriate time."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
an hour ago
- The National
Edinburgh failing to honour childcare commitments
FAMILIES have been left paying thousands of pounds a year for childcare because Edinburgh City Council has reneged on a flagship Scottish Government policy that promises all children more than 1000 hours of free care at a nursery of their choice, it has been claimed. Under the policy, children aged three to five years old are entitled either to 30 free hours per week during term time or 22.8 hours per week for 50 weeks per year – a total of 1140 hours a year. These state-funded hours can be either a council-run nursery or a council-approved private one or with a registered childminder, according to the Government's Funding Follows The Child approach. Many working families say they choose privately run nurseries because they typically have longer opening hours and operate during school holidays, while some council nurseries are only open during school hours or term time, which don't fit with most work schedules. READ MORE: Fix visa problems to allow Gaza students to study in Scotland, Keir Starmer told However, in 2024, problems arose for families who were using private nurseries in Edinburgh but living in a bordering local authority area, when City of Edinburgh Council decided it would no longer fund free childcare in these circumstances. These cross-border families, who use Edinburgh nurseries either because they work in the city or because it is closest to their home, were told they could either find a new nursery in their own local authority or a council-run one in the city. But a group of impacted parents, many of whom were unable to find anything that met their childcare needs and working hours, are now claiming the move breaches both governmental policy and child rights, while discriminating against working parents. City of Edinburgh Council insists it is meeting statutory guidelines and claims its cross-border policy will lead to savings of £1 million. But the parents' group disputes this claim. It has shared freedom of information requests with The Ferret which the parents claim show savings are as little as £36,650 because almost as many children living in Edinburgh claim free places from nurseries in other local authorities. Several parents also shared emails from other councils willing to reimburse Edinburgh if cross-border private nursery places there could be granted. 'It had a real impact on his confidence' The Ferret spoke to families impacted – some living just metres outside the City of Edinburgh Council border – who were facing annual fees of more than £7000 if they did not remove their child from their private nursery. But some say they have been unable to find a nursery outside of Edinburgh that is open before they have to leave for work, or closes before they can return for pick-up. Others have been offered insufficient hours at council nurseries in Edinburgh, given work commitments, or have only been offered available hours at nurseries further away that would add hours on to already long commutes. Some had to cut working hours or ship in grandparents from other parts of the country. In one case, a mother was forced to give up her lunch break so she could pick her three-year-old up from a council nursery, where he had a free place for five mornings, and take him to a private nursery for the afternoon, as it was the only way she could find additional hours. Some parents have considered legal action and, backed by a leading professor in child law, they are calling for the Scottish Government to intervene. Private and third-sector nurseries – such as those run by charities and community groups – said they were also impacted. Claylands Nursery, in the western outskirts of Edinburgh, closed last July, after Edinburgh council decided that children attending from West Lothian, just a few miles away, would not receive funded places. It had asked the council for an exemption from the ruling, claiming the number of cross-border families that would be forced to leave would make their business unsustainable. Kirsten, a mother who has asked us not to use her surname, said her child was attending Claylands three days a week when she received an email giving five days' notice of its closure. She lives 'minutes' from the City of Edinburgh Council boundary. 'It was a really stressful time as more than 50 people were looking for last-minute places all at once,' she said. 'We looked at one nursery in West Lothian, but because of our working patterns, it would have added about an hour to our commute, and we would have to pay for a second car to make pick-ups and drop-offs possible due to our hours, so we went with an Edinburgh nursery which was much closer.' Though Kirstin felt 'lucky' to find a nursery she is happy with, the sudden move had a big impact on her then almost two-year-old, who went from being content at drop-offs to 'screaming and crying and clinging to us'. 'It was horrible,' she said. 'It had a real impact on his confidence.' The family got through a difficult transition with the help of additional leave from work. Now almost three, her son has settled and 'loves the nursery and the staff', but his place will not be funded by Edinburgh Council. Kirstin has decided not to move him again this year. Instead, the family will make 'sacrifices' to afford £10,000 worth of fees over the next two years, though they will reassess in her son's preschool year. 'It's hugely frustrating,' she added. 'The council took this decision [about cross-boundary funding] without assessing the impact on children, and it's been left to parents to sort it out. I feel it should be up to the council and the Scottish Government should recognise that its policy is not being upheld.' Father Sam Illingworth lives in West Lothian, just metres from the City of Edinburgh Council boundary. His youngest daughter was settled in a private nursery just over the Edinburgh boundary. But since she has turned three, they have been unable to secure funding for her place there. They found a council nursery nearby, but as it doesn't have enough hours available, they had to 'top-up' their hours by continuing to use the private one. He has gathered testimonies from other parents whose work patterns rule out available council nurseries and others unable to find funded places that work with their commute. Earlier this month, he set up a petition calling on Edinburgh City Council to reversve its decision on funding. 'The frustration is that West Lothian was willing to reimburse Edinburgh in terms of the funding,' he said. 'We understand that council budgets are stretched – of course we do – but we dispute that they can make the savings they claim. It feels like this decision is ideological.' Sharon Fairley, chief executive of the Scottish Private Nurseries Association and owner of the Little Flyers chain, claimed the problems stemmed from the decision to move away from the centralisation of funding in 2020. 'It means that councils are nursery providers but are also making decisions on who gets funding,' she said. 'This is a conflict of interest. This can be solved by moving back to a centralised payment system.' She claimed there had also been widespread issues in other council areas, with 'unfair' payment funding distribution. In recent years, hundreds of third sector and private nurseries have closed, with many blaming problems on a lack of 'fair funding'. Bruce Adamson, a professor in child law at the University of Glasgow, said the issue was about 'children's rights and fairness'. 'The high cost of living in Edinburgh means that many parents and carers who work in Edinburgh live in neighbouring local authorities, but need childcare close to their work,' he added. 'The City of Edinburgh Council's decision to block funded nursery places for children living outside the city risks breaching children's rights. 'We should be making it easier – not harder – for children to get high-quality early learning and childcare. The Scottish Government needs to step in to protect families and uphold children's rights.' Women, he claimed, were more likely to 'bear the brunt of childcare gaps'. A study by the Fawcett Society from November 2023 found that almost a quarter of a million women had left their jobs due to the difficulty of balancing work and childcare. Anna Ritchie Allan, executive director of charity Close the Gap, which campaigns on gender-based inequality in work, said: 'It's clear the childcare system isn't working for women and their families, especially those on low incomes. Local variation in how funded hours are delivered further penalises many women.' READ MORE: Protesters go on strike in Israel demanding ceasefire and hostage releases However, councillor James Dalgleish, the education, children and families convener at Edinburgh City Council, insisted it 'follows national guidance in offering funded early learning and childcare (ELC) for children in Edinburgh and work in partnership with a range of providers to ensure that all parents and carers in Edinburgh are able to access quality funded early learning and childcare'. City of Edinburgh Council does offer its own local authority nursery provision to families living in neighbouring local authorities, he added, though it is currently not accepting new private or third sector providers as partner nurseries. A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Local Authorities have a statutory duty to make available funded early learning and childcare to the children residing within their own area and are also responsible for meeting the statutory guidance requirements in relation to cross-boundary placements. 'We encourage local authorities to work with neighbouring areas to ensure publicly funded services meet the needs of families and prioritise children's wellbeing, including those who need cross-boundary placements.'


STV News
2 hours ago
- STV News
Swinney calls on UK Government to enable Gaza students to travel to Scotland
Scotland's First Minister has called for 'urgent action' from the UK Government to ensure students from Gaza can take up their places at Scottish universities. John Swinney said that other countries have successfully evacuated Gazan students to enable them to continue their studies. And he called on the UK Government to do 'everything in its power' to enable students to travel from Gaza to Scotland. The UK Government has said it is doing everything it can to find a solution. Mr Swinney spoke out after the Sunday Mail reported on a Palestinian student who has a place at Edinburgh University, but has not been able to leave Gaza to start her course next month due to visa processing issues. Mr Swinney said: 'I am appalled at the situation the students from Gaza are facing. We must see urgent action from the UK Government to support them in taking up their university places in Scotland. 'The people of Gaza are already suffering unimaginably at the hands of the Israeli government – the idea that these students could also be denied the chance to take up the university places in Scotland they have worked so hard to attain is not acceptable to me. 'I am aware that other countries including France, Ireland and Italy have managed to successfully evacuate students, so the UK Government cannot simply duck its responsibilities here. 'Where there is a political will, a resolution can be found – and failure to act is quite literally putting these people's lives at risk.' Scotland's Education Secretary Jenny Gilruth has written to the UK Home Secretary and UK Secretary of State for Education calling for action to support the students impacted and for urgent discussions. Mr Swinney said: 'I am clear that the international community must put a stop to Israel's killing in Gaza and that we must see the immediate recognition of a sovereign, independent Palestine. 'But until that point, the UK Government must do everything it can to ensure ordinary Gazans are not punished further. 'Scotland looks forward to welcoming students from Gaza seeking to take their places at our universities – the UK Government must do the right thing and do everything in its power to allow them to get here.' A UK Government spokesperson said: 'We are aware of these students and are actively considering how we can best support. 'Of course, the situation on the ground in Gaza makes this extremely challenging but we are doing everything we can to find a solution.' The normal arrangements for non-British nationals requiring a visa are to make an online visa application and submit their biometrics at a Visa Application Centre, prior to travel to the UK. The UK Government said biometrics are an essential part of the immigration process as they enable it to confirm the identity of the person and assess whether they pose a risk to public safety. Where an applicant cannot travel to a Visa Application Centre (VAC) to enrol their biometrics, they can contact the UK Government to explain their circumstances, so it can consider all the options. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

The National
4 hours ago
- The National
SNP councillor hits back at 'lie' he defected to Reform UK
Alexander McLellan was listed as a member of Nigel Farage's party on the local authority's website. It has now been changed back to list the Tillydrone, Seaton and Old Aberdeen representative as a member of the SNP. The glitch emerged after Luis Cook, a right-wing influencer, posted on Twitter/X that McLellan was the 'first (direct) defection from the SNP to Reform'. Cook's post has since been deleted. READ MORE: Police Scotland 'breaching human rights to subdue Palestine protests' McLellan was quick to hit back at the claims as a 'lie' and told the Herald the issue had been 'reported to senior officials and is being investigated'. On Twitter/X, McLellan wrote: 'These people are so desperate for attention that they will fabricate nonsense about whatever, and whomever, they can. 'The problem they have is that defamation laws exist in the UK for a reason, and if this post isn't taken down then they will likely find that out.' Reform UK Scotland also responded to the post, writing: 'Absolute nonsense. We have never spoken with this councillor and have zero knowledge of his wish to defect.' So far, 13 councillors in Scotland have defected to Reform – the overwhelming majority from the Scottish Conservatives. Jamie McGuire became the first councillor to defect from Scottish Labour to Farage's party in June. He serves the Renfrew North and Braehead ward on Renfrewshire council. McGuire announced the move during Farage's visit to Scotland ahead of the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election, where the Reform UK leader hid from the Scottish press and faced protests outside of the party's local campaign offices. In April, Reform claimed that their membership numbers in Scotland had passed 10,000 people, making them the country's third largest party. Polling published in May suggested Farage's party could overtake Scottish Labour at the Holyrood 2026 election, suggesting they could return 19% of the vote on the constituency ballot and 20% on the regional list.