Consumers in Karnataka may have to pay more for cab rides, food deliveries and other services. Here's why
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Popular in Bengaluru News
1.
Bengaluru rains: Get ready for another week of rains as IMD predicts showers till May 31
Karnataka is preparing to bring in a new welfare law for gig and platform workers. According to a TOI report, while the move has been widely appreciated, it may result in consumers paying more for cab rides, food deliveries, and other app-based services.The proposed Karnataka Platform-based Gig Workers' (Social Security and Welfare) Ordinance, 2025 includes a 1%–5% cess to create a welfare fund for nearly 30,000 gig workers in the state. Officials said the cost would be shared between customers, platforms, and the workers themselves, though the end user is expected to bear the most.The Karnataka cabinet's decision to introduce the ordinance has been seen as a positive step. But the real challenge lies in how the cess will be collected and the law enforced on the ground.Dr Manjunath, Additional Labour Commissioner, said, as quoted by TOI, 'The Act has been framed in such a manner that all three stakeholders can contribute to the welfare fund.' He added that gig workers could also voluntarily contribute more to improve their social security. He said the rules will likely be finalised within a week.However, concerns have been raised about the fine print. Balaji Parthasarathy, Principal Investigator at Fairwork India and professor at IIIT-Bengaluru, told TOI, 'The legislation outlines the terrain, but implementation will hinge on rules, particularly how wage protection, dispute resolution, and algorithmic accountability are addressed.'He warned that there's no wage-floor guarantee. 'Transparency in deductions is a start, but without clear limits on payout cuts, platforms can reduce per-task payments to make up for the cess,' he said. Parthasarathy also noted, as quoted by TOI, that while platforms don't talk to worker groups, they have made collective representations through bodies like Nasscom and IAMAI to oppose parts of the bill.From a legal perspective, the law is a formal recognition of gig work. However, Vikram Shroff, partner at AZB & Partners, said as quoted by TOI, that some of the termination-related clauses may face legal challenges, especially if they clash with current agreements between platforms and workers.Shroff also warned of possible confusion once the national social security code is implemented, saying, 'Two sets of laws may govern gig worker entitlements, potentially leading to regulatory overlap.'According to the draft rules, platforms will be placed in different cess slabs depending on whether they provide delivery, transport, or personal services. Officials expect to raise around ?150 crore a year through this cess.Despite the worries, some companies support the plan. Athira, Vice-President for Public Policy at Porter, called the ordinance a 'progressive and much-needed step' that recognises gig workers and their social security needs. 'We remain committed to working with both state and central governments,' she said, as quoted by TOI.Inputs from TOI
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
When misused, law becomes sword instead of shield: Karnataka high court
Bengaluru: The high court has quashed the proceedings in a five-year-old criminal case filed against a real estate developer by a business partner under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. "The courts must remain vigilant against the weaponisation of criminal law for settling civil disputes. The law, when misused, ceases to be a shield and becomes a sword. The complainant, to wreak vengeance or arm-twist the petitioner over a financial dispute, made use of the criminal justice system," Justice M Nagaprasanna stated while quashing the case against Vilas Bhormalji Oswal. Vilas, from Solapur, Maharashtra, established a partnership with Somashekara from Bengaluru and others for purchasing and developing agricultural land. Disputes arose in 2020 when Vilas refused to sign certain documents, hampering the development projects. Somashekara claimed that during a Dec 2020 meeting in a playground in Jayanagar, Vilas threatened him and made caste-based remarks. A complaint was filed with the Directorate of Civil Rights Enforcement in April 2021. Three years later, police registered an FIR, followed by a chargesheet. Vilas contested the chargesheet and summons in the high court, highlighting significant delays throughout the case. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Esta nueva alarma con cámara es casi regalada en Libertad (ver precio) Verisure Undo He maintained that he said "do not show your caste mindset" during their disagreement. While Somashekara argued that Vilas knew his scheduled caste status and made caste-specific insults, Justice Nagaprasanna found no evidence of casteist slurs in the initial complaint. The judge noted that witness statements on the Dec 2020 incident were recorded only in March 2024, with the case registered in April 2024. The court found significant discrepancies between the original complaint and the chargesheet, particularly regarding caste-related allegations. "The subject complaint is a blade of vengeance, cloaked in the garb of law. A criminal trial, if permitted to proceed on the glaring facts, would amount to an egregious abuse of legal machinery and would undoubtedly result in patent injustice," the judge observed while quashing the proceedings against Vilas.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
SC allows manufacturing unit's closure, orders ₹15 cr ex-gratia for workers
The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed the closure of a unit manufacturing biscuits for Britannia Industries Limited (BIL) for over three decades by overruling a Bombay High Court verdict. Justices Sanjay Karol and Prashant Kumar Mishra passed the verdict on an appeal of Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd (HSML) against the high court's February 17, 2023 order. While HSML initially offered Rs 10 crore as a goodwill gesture to its employees, the court enhanced this amount to Rs 15 crore and ordered its payment within eight weeks. Considering that some of the employees may be, with the closure of this concern, losing the only job they have known and still others would be, for no fault of their own, rendered unemployed, we appreciate the gesture made by HSML. Such a statement is taken on record," the court said. Senior advocate Mukul Rohtagi, appearing for HSML, had left it to the court to decide on the enhancement. We deem it just and proper to further enhance the appellants' offer by a sum of Rs 5 crore, thus, making it Rs 15 crore instead of Rs 10 crore, as mentioned in our order... Let the amount be released forthwith, as per their entitlement, in favour of the employees and, in any case, not later than eight weeks from the date of the judgment, it said. HSML was engaged in biscuit manufacturing exclusively for BIL for over three decades under successive job work agreements and the latest agreement of May 22, 2007 was terminated by BIL with effect from November 20, 2019, following a six-month notice period. In response, HSML applied for closure of its operations under Section 25-O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, submitting the application on August 28, 2019, and notifying its workers shortly thereafter. The case reached the Bombay High Court through petitions after the Maharashtra State Government allegedly failed to respond to the closure application within the statutory period. The state government said that a letter of September 25, 2019, amounted to a refusal of permission. HSML contended that the delay triggered the deemed approval clause under the relevant provision of the Industrial Disputes Act. Justice Karol, who authored the verdict, considered whether the state government's communication of September 25, 2019, qualified as a valid refusal order under the Industrial Disputes Act. The bench also dealt with the question whether the deputy secretary, who issued the communication, was legally empowered to do so. The verdict ruled in favour of HSML and held that the letter of September 25, 2019 did not constitute a valid or reasoned order of refusal as mandated by law. The deputy secretary, it held, was not the 'appropriate government' under the Act, and had no authority to seek resubmission or revision of the closure application. The bench then held since no valid order was passed within 60 days of the application, permission to close must be deemed granted, effective from October 27, 2019. We hold that the application dated August 28, 2019 was complete in all respects, and the 60-day period for the deemed closure to take effect would be calculable from said date," it said. Secondly, the deputy secretary was not the appropriate government who could have asked HSML to revise and resubmit the application for closure as the authority was only vested with the minister concerned, it said. "The minister did not, even in the slightest, consider the merits of the matter independently, much less with or without any application of mind. Subdelegation to the officer was not permitted by law, and, therefore, any communication made by him would be without any legal sanction, the verdict said. The bench reiterated the constitutional right to trade and business under Article 19(1)(g) and closures must still adhere to statutory procedures that safeguard public interest and employee rights. The bench acknowledged the humanitarian aspect of the case and appreciated HSML's willingness to provide additional compensation. The amount was ordered to be disbursed among the affected employees within eight weeks from the date of the judgment.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
From MAGA to Abomination: Elon Musk goes rogue on Donald Trump
TOI correspondent from US: Mutiny has erupted in MAGA after Elon Musk exploded at Trump Republicans on Tuesday, accusing them of bankrupting America with reckless spending, leading to a mountainous, unsustainable deficit. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Musk did not directly attack President Trump, but signs of a deep rupture were evident considering the MAGA supremo owns his so-called Big Beautiful Bill and urged lawmakers to support it, which every Republican member -- save two -- did to pass it 216-215 in the House of Representatives last week. All but two Democrats opposed it. The Republican action, spurred by President Trump, did not go down well with Musk, who suddenly has buyer's remorse after plowing almost $ 300 million of his fortune into the 2024 election campaign for what many critics have characterized as buying the White House/Presidency. "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it," he exploded on X. He followed it up with a series of posts, accusing Congress of "making America bankrupt" by voting for a bill that will "massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt." "ENOUGH. Interest payments already consume 25% of all government revenue. If the massive deficit spending continues, there will only be money for interest payments and nothing else! No social security, no medical, no defense … nothing," Musk said in another post, adding "This immense level of overspending will drive America into debt slavery!" He also reposted several posts from critics, many of them Republicans, who pointed out that the US national debt is now rising by $1 trillion every 180 days, and the government is paying over $100 billion per month in interest on the national debt, with about 25% of all government revenue going to pay interest. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now While Musk blamed the entire Congress for putting America on the road to bankruptcy, the onus for this rests for the moment with the Republican majority, which passed the BBB legislation in the teeth of opposition from Democrats. The bill now goes to US Senate, where Republicans have a 53-47 majority, but at least half-dozen GOP senators are opposed to the legislation in its present form unless it includes major spending cuts. Senator Rand Paul, the most vocal among them, and aligned with Elon Musk, was subjected to a withering attack on Tuesday from Trump, who tweeted: "Rand votes NO on everything, but never has any practical or constructive ideas. His ideas are actually crazy (losers!). The people of Kentucky can't stand him. This is a BIG GROWTH BILL!" But till at the time of writing, Trump had held fire against Musk.
