Opinion - 80 years after liberation, Italian anti-fascists deserve more than solemn remembrance
Italy today celebrates the 80th anniversary of its liberation.
After two-and-a-half years, Italian partisans got rid of both the Nazi German former ally that had occupied half the country and morally rid itself of the already-fallen Italian fascist regime. To put it jokingly: We Italians invented fascism, but luckily we also invented anti-fascism.
Fascism, before it was a regime, was (and remains) a political model based on the overpowering of the other and the utter refusal to resolve conflict peacefully. Both before and after Mussolini's fascists seized power in 1922, the squadristi exercised violence daily in the countryside and in the headquarters of political opponents — torturing, humiliating and killing. Mussolini declared in his famous 1925 speech claiming moral responsibility for the murder of Socialist politician Giacomo Matteotti, 'When two elements are in struggle and are irreducible, the solution is force.'
An anti-fascist movement developed against all this, but it was quickly stifled. Scattered, the rebels of the first hour continued to work against the regime, but their voices sounded faintly.
When King Victor Emmanuel III turned his back on Italy's German ally on Sept. 8, 1943, throwing the country into chaos, anti-fascists took to organizing to repel both the Nazis and the newly formed Italian Social Republic, the puppet state in which Mussolini sought to reassert his power in the northeast. But their anti-fascism was different from the previous one.
It was first of all a less intellectual and thought-out affair. A great many partisans were young renegades and stragglers. They went up into the mountains to join the Resistance driven by ideals as much as by personal confusion. The actual political training took place live, in the heat of battle and in the small community created among them, the microcosm of the 'banda,' the gang. ('Just a f—–g bandit,' the partisan of Luigi Meneghello's 'The Outlaws' memorably shouts to a British officer questioning him about who he was).
Living in gangs, and with the difficulty of communicating among the various groups (many 'relay girls' dealt with this heroically, a legacy too little remembered), the partisans were forced to give themselves autonomous rules. When they liberated larger territories, they gave birth to short-lived but full-fledged republics with advanced constitutions.
Above all, the Italian Resistance offered an entire generation the chance to make radical choices, to decide not only on their deeds but on the ultimate fate of a continent battered by violence. In the absence of governing powers to which they could delegate responsibility, they took it on in full — without abdicating their own youth. The partisans fought and danced, and laughed, and freely created their own lives after years of regimented education. It was very hard yet also, as many remember, very exciting.
Such narrative erases the martyr-like appearance so typical of public rhetoric, and restores them in their truth: young men and women who sacrificed everything to liberate their homeland, but also to build a new world. Not that there was agreement on its realization. Communists, Catholics and others had conflicting views, but all adhered to the core idea of denying fascism both as a totalitarian political structure and as the vindication of violence as a lifestyle.
If this were only an Italian national fight, the value of Apr. 25 would be limited, and this article not needed. Instead, the aims and gestures of partisans must take on a universal character. Before he was shot by the Nazis, a teenage Italian freedom fighter kissed one of them and smilingly told him, 'I die for you too. Long live free Germany!'
Today, the idea of historical fascism returning in full is untenable. But the presence of the drives that defined fascism persist: contempt for democracy, smug admiration of force, totalitarian aspiration and expansionist intent. So I would like to reiterate the goodness of anti-fascism as a method and ideal, even in the absence of 'true fascism,' however one wishes to understand it.
Europe, as has been said in recent days, is at a historic crossroads. But in fact it has been at this crossroads for years. In facing this challenge, the initiative cannot be left solely to the 'upper echelons' and international politics. Blindly delegating political action to them would mean giving into the indifference and fatigue that circulated long before the recent outbreak of Russian aggression.
So yes, the moment is crucial and very difficult — but also harbors great opportunities. In 1946, Albert Camus expressed it memorably: 'We can't pretend to escape from history for we are in history. We can only aspire to do battle in the arena of history to save from it that part of man which does not belong to it.' This is 'the obligation each person incurs with regard to others,' which must however be 'balanced by time for reflection, pleasure, and the happiness every person owes themselves.'
This is nothing to be optimistic about, just as Camus was not. But his stark realism did not prevent him from cultivating a modest utopia — and from inviting every person to fight for it, building small, active groups that can influence the world from below.
In this regard, the Italian partisans give us an invaluable moral lesson. They refused both the easy indifference that afflicted the majority of the population, and the proxy of commitment to the Allied forces alone. They immediately acted because they couldn't stand the situation anymore, and did it with humanity, courage and responsibility. What a contrast to today's general refusal to be held accountable! Without taking refuge in some idea of moral sanctity, the partisans took up the fight when necessary, and paid its price.
So we should not remember the partisans standing still in a photograph, but in motion. In fact, Apr. 25, 1945 did not mark the end of the war — it launched the insurrection of the cities of northern Italy. That helped the forces of resistance to accredit and legitimize themselves, also through a display of force, to the Allies. Yet the symbolic meaning stands intact: It is not the victory that is celebrated, but the liberation process, the very conflict.
Historical perspective helps to avoid making erroneous comparisons and normalizing the partisan experience. Surely Italy has not been up to the Resistance over the last 80 years. Yet such critical distance can also create a trap: to consider these facts accomplished and buried, simply to be studied and known — available only as the objects in a moral museum.
They are not. The living experience of Apr. 25 gives us reasons to undertake the hard task of being better.
Giorgio Fontana is a writer and novelist who lives in Milan, Italy.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
German minister reticent on arms for Israel after Iran strikes
German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul has left open the question of whether the Israeli overnight attacks on Iran will have consequences for his country's arms exports to Israel. During a visit to Cairo at the start of his first Middle East trip – hours after scores of warplanes targeted Iran's nuclear sites and military leadership - the diplomat said the Federal Security Council would take its time to discuss the issue. "But I don't expect any far-reaching decisions to be made in the short term," Wadephul added. In recent weeks, there have been repeated calls from the Social Democrats – the junior partner in Germany's new ruling coalition - for a halt to arms deliveries due to Israel's military action in the Gaza Strip. However, the conservative alliance of Chancellor Friedrich Merz, to which Wadephul belongs, rejects a ban on exports. Following the October 7, 2023 attack on Israel until May 13, 2025, arms exports worth almost €500 million ($578 million) were approved for Israel, the Economics Ministry said recently in response to a question in parliament. It is not known whether and to what extent the new German government has authorized exports during its first weeks in office. Peace efforts Wadephul was set to meet with his Egyptian counterpart Badr Abdel-Atty in Cairo on Friday amid ongoing efforts to halt the fighting in the Gaza Strip. He and Abdel-Atty are due to discuss the dramatic humanitarian situation in Gaza, including ways to provide support to the Palestinian population as well as a potential path to peace. Egypt, which borders the embattled Gaza Strip, has been a vocal supporter of the Palestinians, strongly rejecting proposals by Israel and the United States to resettle Gazans to Arab states in the region. The northern African country has also been involved in mediating ceasefire negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian extremist group Hamas. Germany officially supports the two-state solution, which envisions an independent Palestinian state coexisting peacefully alongside Israel. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Hamas both adamantly reject this solution to the decades-old conflict. Egyptian officials might try to persuade Germany, one of Israel's strongest backers behind the US, to exert pressure on Netanyahu to end the war in Gaza. Wadephul has changed his travel plans in light of current events, cancelling planned stops in Jordan and Israel. Wadephul said on Friday he would travel on to Saudi Arabia for talks on Saturday. "Continuing the trip to Israel or Jordan at this point in time seems out of the question," he said in earlier remarks. The minister was originally scheduled to continue to Lebanon on Friday afternoon, with further planned stops in Syria as well as Jordan and Israel.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Letters to the Editor: No one brought in the Marines to quell sporting event chaos, so why protests?
To the editor: I'm getting tired of explaining to people that a couple of dozen idiots turned a peaceful protest into a media event frenzy by turning violent ('Who's telling the truth? Searching for a shared reality amid L.A. protests,' June 10). But, after living in L.A. for nearly 30 years, I can honestly say I've seen more chaos at celebrations when the Dodgers or Lakers win. And no one suggests bringing in the National Guard and Marines. In the meantime, masked ICE thugs are throwing innocent citizens into vans and carting them off. President Trump promised to clear the U.S. of violent criminals. But this seems to have manifested as seamstresses, car wash attendants and farmworkers, who have been here for 10-plus years, and who have legal children here, being treated as violent offenders in order to meet his quotas. If you've ever seen photos of 1930s German soldiers throwing Jews into trains to be carted off and you don't see the similarities, then you're just lying to yourself. Robert Braunstein, Santa Monica .. To the editor: A dozen people arrested on charges such as failure to disperse, receiving stolen property and commercial burglary. Seven arrests were in connection with smash-and-grab incidents at two stores. A Metro bus in Echo Park was set on fire and a downtown store was looted. The Los Angeles Police Department declared four unlawful assemblies and used less-lethal munitions to control hostile crowds. Mayor Karen Bass said violence will not be tolerated. Was this a radical left-wing mob engaged in insurrection? No, what I just described was a 'celebration' by sports fans on Oct. 31, 2024, following the Dodgers' World Series victory. Ken Brock, Yucca Valley This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Europe must prepare for US scaling down support for Ukraine, Pistorius says
German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said Europe must begin preparing for a gradual reduction in U.S. military support for both the continent and Ukraine, Tagesschau reported on June 13. "Yes, that's right. That would be so, and we have to deal with that," Pistorius told journalists in response to a question about the U.S. potentially scaling down its support. He noted that the discussions focus on a reduction in U.S. backing rather than a full halt. The comments come after U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced that Washington would reduce the assistance allocated to Ukraine in the next year's federal budget. "We now have to look at how much support drops and whether Europeans can compensate for it," Pistorius added. While the U.S. has been Ukraine's leading military backer under former President Joe Biden, the Trump administration has yet to approve any aid packages and has become increasingly disengaged from peace talks. Pistorius's comments come amid increasing uncertainty in transatlantic relations. U.S. Ambassador to NATO Matthew Whitaker confirmed on May 16 that the United States plans to begin discussions with European allies later this year about reducing its military presence on the continent. Speaking at a security conference in Estonia, Whitaker said the talks would begin after the NATO summit in The Hague in June. "Nothing has been determined," Whitaker said, according to Reuters. "But as soon as we do, we are going to have these conversations in the structure of NATO." Whitaker emphasized that any drawdown would be closely coordinated to avoid creating security gaps. Still, he reiterated U.S. President Donald Trump's position that long-standing U.S. efforts to reduce its European military footprint must now be implemented. "This is going to be orderly, but we are not going to have any more patience for foot-dragging in this situation," he said. In February, Hegseth reportedly told NATO allies that "stark strategic realities" prevent the United States from being primarily focused on Europe's security. Leaks reported by the Atlantic in March revealed that both Hegseth and Vice President JD Vance privately criticized European defense spending, with Hegseth allegedly expressing his "loathing of European free-loading." Trump called on NATO member states to increase defense spending up to 5% of GDP. Ahead of the upcoming NATO summit in The Hague on June 24–25, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that member states will have agreed to a new goal of increasing defense spending. "We are headed for a summit in six weeks in which virtually every member of NATO will be at or above 2%, but more importantly, many of them will be over 4%, and all will have agreed on a goal of reaching 5% over the next decade," Rubio told Fox News on May 15. Such a move would mark a historic shift, with NATO partners collectively accounting for more than half of the alliance's military capacity, according to Rubio. Since the beginning of Russia's full-scale war against Ukraine in 2022, NATO members have significantly increased their defense spending, with countries like Poland and the Baltic nations aiming to reach the 5% target in the coming years. Read also: Ukraine bracing for 'painful' reduction in US military aid after Hegseth announces cuts We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.