logo
Portland considers adding Yom Kippur, Eid al-Fitr to school calendar

Portland considers adding Yom Kippur, Eid al-Fitr to school calendar

Yahoo02-04-2025

Apr. 2—Portland students and staff could have two new days off from school next year: the Jewish holiday Yom Kippur in October and the Muslim holiday Eid al-Fitr in March.
The Portland school board has been workshopping an updated 2025-26 school calendar over the past two weeks. Adding the two holidays would be an acknowledgement of the district's growing religious diversity, according to district leadership, but will also cost $65,000 per day. The board will take a final vote on the calendar Tuesday.
"The point of this is to recognize the rich diversity of our community, and to have our calendar reflect that there is significant religious diversity withing our school system and our larger community," said Sarah Warren, executive director of strategy, at last week's Curriculum and Policy Committee meeting. She said the push for the added holidays originally came from students.
The proposed calendar also includes tweaks to the winter break schedule and professional development days for teachers. Because Eid al-Fitr could take place on either March 19 or 20 next year, Portland will pair the holiday with a professional development day, and whichever date is determined not to be Eid will still be a day off from school, allowing families to plan in advance.
Maine law requires districts to have at least 175 instructional days for students and at least 180 school-functioning days for teachers. Each additional holiday would cost the district $65,000 because they would add a paid holiday for hourly staff like ed techs. Warren said the district would plan to find money in the operating budget for those costs, rather than proposing new expenses.
Warren said the district also considered adding other holidays — including Lunar New Year, a nonreligious holiday celebrated in China and other Asian countries, and Good Friday, part of the Christian Holy Week — but isn't suggesting those additions at this point.
"We just decided to start with these two and see where that takes us," Warren said. "This was an effort to try and at least build some diversity into the calendar in recognition of different religions' holidays, but doesn't clearly get all of it."
All of the holidays observed in Portland school calendar currently are either federal, state or related to the Christian faith.
Portland Public Schools doesn't know how many of its students are Muslim or Jewish, because it doesn't keep data on religious affiliations. But Census data shows the population of Muslims in the Portland area is growing.
About 3.67% of people in Cumberland County are Muslim, according to the 2020 U.S. Religion Census. The Portland-South Portland metropolitan area is the 23rd-largest metro area of Muslims in the country as of 2020, with a 2.02% Muslim population — a massive rise from 311th in 2010.
About 0.62% of people in Cumberland County, and around 0.37% of people in the greater Portland-South Portland metro area, are Jewish according to the 2020 religion census.
Lewiston Public Schools added two Muslim holidays, Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha, to its school calendar in 2021 and was the first district in the state to do so. Lewiston's superintendent said at the time that more than 40% of the district's students and staff recognize and observe the holidays.
Portland school board District 2 Board Member Ali Ali observed the growing number of Muslims on local government bodies and in the area.
"Having to miss school on those specific days and then having to re-make it was really ... it was a lot," Ali said, although he said he also understood the financial drawbacks.
The $130,000 price tag for the new calendar did receive concern from some committee members, although an amendment to convert the holidays to half-days did not receive support to move forward. Another amendment to add Good Friday also did not progress.
There was little discussion about the calendar when the school board workshopped it Tuesday night. Board Chair Sarah Lentz said she was excited to support the added holidays.
"I think that there's still a disconnect between the ways that we schedule things in schools and the major holidays that our students are celebrating. And so I think that this operationalizes us to think about Ramadan and to think about the High Holidays in the Jewish religion in a different way, that our previous calendar has done around major Christian holidays," she said.
A couple of public commenters, like Lara Rosen, spoke about their support for the changes, and described them as a step toward equity.
"As somebody who grew up Jewish in a very non-Jewish community, that was not something that I ever experienced," Rosen said. "And I would love for my kiddo, and his Muslim friends, and his Jewish friends, to also be able to have those holidays recognized and have that cultural history and religious experience recognized by the district."
Copy the Story Link
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jewish leaders condemn Queens pol John Liu for endorsing anti-Israel Zohran Mamdani for NYC mayor
Jewish leaders condemn Queens pol John Liu for endorsing anti-Israel Zohran Mamdani for NYC mayor

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Jewish leaders condemn Queens pol John Liu for endorsing anti-Israel Zohran Mamdani for NYC mayor

Jewish leaders and activists have signed an open letter condemning Queens state Sen. John Liu for endorsing staunch Israel foe Zohran Mamdani for mayor, The Post has learned. The letter, signed by more than 60 mostly Jewish residents in the borough, called Liu's endorsement a betrayal. It is set to appear as an ad in local Queens Jewish publications, said the letter's organizer, Michael Nussbaum, a board member of the Jewish Community Relations Council of New York and former head of the Queens Jewish Community Council. 'Mamdani has made it clear that he is a virulently anti-semite in words and deeds… As a leader in our county, and a representative of a large Jewish population, we consider your endorsement a slap in our face,' states the missive, which shows the Israeli flag with the Star of David in the top right corner. 'Given the history of hateful acts against our community, this support will not go unnoticed,' it says. Liu's 16th District in northeast Queens has a significant Jewish population and his endorsement was a coup for Mamdani. Mamdani supports the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement against Israel and has opposed its right to exist as a Jewish state. Liu, a former city comptroller and councilman, is an Asian-American trailblazer who is widely respected. Nussbaum told The Post he has known the state senator for decades and respects him as a gifted politician and good public servant — and that's why he was shocked that Liu was backing the most anti-Jewish and Israeli candidate in the race. 'Why would he attach his name to someone who is an enemy of Israel and the Jewish people?' Nussbaum asked. During his June 2 endorsement of Mamdani, Liu noted that he had a 'big disagreement' with the Democratic socialist assemblyman on the 'the issue of Israel and how the Jewish community needs to be viewed in this social climate.' Nussbaum said he didn't 'buy Liu's explanation' for backing Mamdani. The wellbeing of the Jewish people is the defining issue in this race given the rise in antisemitism, he said. Other signatories of the letter include former CUNY trustee Jeffrey Wiesenfeld, Yaniv Meirov, CEO at Chazaq Organization; cantor Alan Brava of the Free Synagogue of Flushing, Zev Berman, executive vice president of the Queens Jewish Community, retired judges Jeremy Weinstein and Jeff Leibowitz, and David Aronov of the UJA Federation of New York. In closing, the letter quotes scripture: 'Even my close friend whom I trusted, he who shared my bread, has lifted up his heel against me.' Liu, in a statement on Tuesday, defended his endorsement of Mamdani but also said he would continue to stand with the Jewish community. 'This public rebuke – and the many private protestations – come from respected individuals and organizations with whom I've worked for many years, and I accept them and the consequences they will bear,' Liu said. 'Notwithstanding the deep disapproval of my endorsement, I will continue to stand with and up for the Jewish community.'

Letters to the Editor: Why pro-Palestinian protests can actually help protect Jewish students
Letters to the Editor: Why pro-Palestinian protests can actually help protect Jewish students

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Letters to the Editor: Why pro-Palestinian protests can actually help protect Jewish students

To the editor: Although I have no qualms calling out President Trump's exploitation of antisemitism charges to silence dissent and defund education, I object to this article's premise that the college protests make Jews unsafe and would argue the opposite is true ('Being Jewish on campus amid Trump's campaign against antisemitism: 'tremendous heartache,'' June 9). Pro-Palestinian protests on campus increase Jewish people's safety because they challenge the normalization of Israel's bombardment and blockage of food, water, medicine and fuel on a starving and caged population in Gaza. Once we normalize and arm the slaughter and imposition of starvation on Gaza, we normalize crimes against humanity everywhere, leaving us all unsafe. Moreover, Israel's proclamation that it is the state of the Jewish people unfairly associates Jews worldwide with its policies of apartheid and ethnic cleansing. I live in Santa Barbara, where I supported the UCSB encampment in the spring of last year and continue to applaud students of all denominations who say, "Never again means never again for anyone." Equating such protests and encampments with antisemitism does us all a disservice. I do not want to be associated with Israel's war crimes, as alleged by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the International Court of Justice and International Criminal Court, and appreciate the opportunity to participate in the anti-Zionist group Jewish Voice for Peace. Not in our name! Marcy Winograd, Santa BarbaraThis writer is a member of the California legislative team for Jewish Voice for Peace. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Gavin Newsom locks horns with Trump in a politically defining moment
Gavin Newsom locks horns with Trump in a politically defining moment

CNBC

time4 hours ago

  • CNBC

Gavin Newsom locks horns with Trump in a politically defining moment

Amid immigration raids, peaceful protests, attacks on law enforcement officers and the threat of his own arrest by federal agents, California Gov. Gavin Newsomis immersed in what could be the most consequential political fight of his career. The battle between the president and the governor of the country's largest state instantly turned Newsom into the face of resistance to President Donald Trump's expansive interpretation of the authorities of his office and mass-deportation campaign. Newsom, who is a potential 2028 Democratic presidential candidate, has been taking heavy criticism from within his own party over his efforts — in part through his new podcast — to cast himself in the role of conciliator. Newsom delivered an address Tuesday night that aimed squarely at Trump and was clearly intended for a national audience. "This isn't just about protests here in Los Angeles," he said. "When Donald Trump sought blanket authority to commander the National Guard, he made that order apply to every state in this nation. This is about all of us. This is about you. California may be first, but it clearly will not end here. Other states are next. Democracy is next. Democracy is under assault before our eyes. This moment we have feared has arrived." "For someone like Newsom, the balance is: Is he able to be tough enough? Will he stand up to Trump? How does he lead at this moment?" said Democratic strategist Karen Finney. "This is unprecedented. There's not a right answer. So far, he's doing the right things, being clear, consistent, clear communication." Newsom could try to turn the situation on Trump by pointing to government overreach, but at the same time, there is real risk of an eruption violence from rogue actors, said Matt Bennett, co-founder of Third Way, a center-left think tank. "The images of the militarization of this for no reason should be enough for Newsom to win this debate as long as they can keep control of the worst of the violence," he said. "Trump always goes too far," Bennett added. "Last time, he went too far with the Muslim ban. Then he really went too far with child separation — those images really hurt Trump. Here, it's a real question. It's a much closer call this time. We just don't know yet." As it is, Newsom must balance forces that are both inside and outside of his control. That includes competing with messaging from Trump (who frequently refers to the governor as "Newscum") and the president's top lieutenants, who are ever-present on cable news, social media and political podcasts. And it involves attempting to quell violent actors while pointing to Trump's actions — which have included deploying the U.S. Marines — as an overreach. The White House maintains it is winning the public relations battle, with officials tapping a refrain this week that it was the fight they wanted replete with made-for-TV images. They included images of billowing black smoke and Waymo vehicles that protesters had set on fire. On Monday, California sued Trump for using emergency powers to deploy National Guard troops to the Los Angeles area over the weekend. Trump, citing a statute that allows the president to activate the guard to repel a foreign invasion or quell a rebellion, accused Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass of failing to protect federal agents and property from demonstrators. Newsom has slammed the step as escalatory and said existing law enforcement could have handled any violence or destruction. He argued that the move was "purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions" and that there was "currently no unmet need." Newsom has also been mounting his own messaging offensive, including on X, where he posted what appeared to be photos of troops crowded on a floor, apparently attempting to rest. "You sent your troops here without fuel, food, water or a place to sleep. Here they are — being forced to sleep on the floor, piled on top of one another. If anyone is treating our troops disrespectfully, it is you @realDonaldTrump," Newsom said on X. On Sunday, Newsom chided Trump "border czar" Tom Homan, saying in an MSNBC interview: "Tom, arrest me. Let's go." Late Monday, Newsom sat for a "Pod Save America" podcast recording in which he cast Trump's actions as unconstitutional and said some of those assigned to Los Angeles — in his view, unnecessarily — were pried away from fentanyl investigations, and potentially from border operations, for "this theatrical display of toughness by a president of the United States who is unhinged." By Tuesday morning, Newsom accused Trump and his top White House deportation architect Stephen Miller of sheltering insurrectionists. "The only people defending insurrectionists are you and @realDonaldTrump. Or, are we pretending like you didn't pardon 1500 of them?" On Tuesday afternoon, the two were locked in another public squabble after Trump told reporters he delivered some tough words to Newsom in a phone call Monday. Newsom said the two hadn't spoken since Friday, then posted an interview with NBC News from over the weekend in which Newsom contended he and Trump had a pleasant conversation and that the president barely talked about the issue at hand. The White House had a different take. "The President called Gavin Newsom to tell him to get his ass in gear," White House spokesman Steven Cheung said in a statement. "The only liar here is Newsom who continues to fail his state as he prioritizes doing interviews with leftist media to gaslight the public instead of helping his state." At that, Newsom responded on X: "Donald Trump is a stone cold liar."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store