logo
The glaciers on the verge of COLLAPSING: As Swiss villages face being wiped out by the Birch Glacier, terrifying interactive map reveals the huge bodies of ice that could be next

The glaciers on the verge of COLLAPSING: As Swiss villages face being wiped out by the Birch Glacier, terrifying interactive map reveals the huge bodies of ice that could be next

Daily Mail​30-05-2025
Switzerland's Birch Glacier hit the headlines this week, after a huge chunk broke off - partially destroying the village of Blatten.
Now, scientists have created an interactive map that reveals the glaciers around the world that could be next in the firing line.
The 'Global Glacier Casualty List' documents glaciers that are soon to disappear, or have already melted away.
Users can drag the globe to see glaciers from all around the world, including some in Africa, Indonesia and Venezuela – challenging the misconception that these cherished natural landforms are only found at the north and south poles.
The tool was created by anthropologists and glaciologists led by Rice University Professors Cymene Howe and Dominic Boyer, who warn that over three-quarters of global glacier mass is expected to disappear under present climate policies.
Glaciers are considered one of our planet's most precious natural features, as inspiring to behold as cliffs, canyons, valleys or reefs.
These slow moving rivers of ice - some hundreds of thousands of years old - reflect the sun's rays back into space and store valuable freshwater.
But scientists warn that many glaciers around the world have already disappeared – primarily due to rising global temperatures and climate change.
'Glaciers have literally shaped the ground we walk on, and they provide crucial water resources to about 2 billion people,' said Professor Howe.
'For people who have lived near glaciers, their cultural meanings are often profound, representing the fundamental relationship between social and natural worlds.'
The Global Glacier Casualty List features nearly 30 global glaciers that are given the classification 'Disappeared', 'Almost Disappeared' or 'Critically Endangered'.
Users can click on one of the existing or pre-existing glaciers to learn more about how they've been affected by global warming.
One of those listed as 'Disappeared' is the Baumann Glacier in New Zealand, which vanished in 2020 after decades of shrinkage.
The Baumann Glacier measured 0.34 sq mile (0.9 sq km) in 1978, 0.16 sq mile (0.44 sq km) in 2000 and just 0.02 sq mile (0.07 sq km) in 2016 before fading away forever.
Meanwhile, Anderson Glacier once flowed through the Olympic National Park of Washington State before disappearing in 2016.
When experts studied Anderson Glacier in 1992, they measured its area as 0.14 sq mile (0.38 sq km), which was just a third of the size it had been a century prior.
Why are glaciers important?
Glaciers are considered one of our planet's most precious natural features.
These slow moving rivers of ice, thousands of years old, reflect the sun's rays back into space - helping to keep the planet cooler.
Glacier loss also depletes freshwater resources that millions of people depend on for drinkable water.
They are also beautiful in their own right, forming some of our world's most inspiring landscapes just as much as canyons, valleys and reefs.
But by 2003 the glacier had diminished to 0.1 sq mile (0.28 sq km) and became a series of small disconnected relic glacier ice patches before vanishing entirely.
An even more recent one to have disappeared is the Sarenne Glacier, which was in the Grandes Rousses mountain area of southeast France.
As recently as the 1980s, Sarenne's ice was still as thick as 260 feet (80 metres) in some places, but its melting accelerated considerably in recent decades leading to its loss in 2023.
Among those still in existence – at least for now – are the Yala Glacier of Nepal, which is 'Critically Endangered' and expected to vanish in the 2040s.
The area of the Yala Glacier decreased from 0.9 sq mile (2.42 sq km) in 1981 to 0.5 sq mile (1.54 sq km) in 2015 – a decrease of 36 per cent.
'Because Yala Glacier is relatively accessible it's been an ideal research and training site for future glaciologists, but this is no longer the case as it has undergone significant changes in both area and volume,' said Sharad Joshi, a glacier researcher at International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD) in Nepal.
'With each visit, I'm left feeling profoundly sad when I see such massive loss on this glacier,' he said.
There's also the 'Almost Disappeared' Santa Isabel Glacier in Colombia which is projected to be gone even sooner – by 2030.
Since the 1970s, Santa Isabel has been a place for young Colombians to begin practicing ice mountaineering, because of its 'relative accessibility, multiple routes and variety of slopes'.
But scientists have observed its rapid diminishment in recent years as Colombia's 'endearing white giant' approaches an 'imminent extinction'.
As the tool explains, thousands of glaciers have already disappeared due to human-caused climate change, which is directly linked to fossil fuel use – but there is no comprehensive list of all of them.
In an accompanying piece published in the journal Science, Professors Howe and Boyer warn that 'melting glaciers are a signal of climate disruption'.
'Earth has now entered a new period in which glaciers are not simply retreating but are disappearing altogether,' they say.
'Consequences of glacial loss have a variety of effects on natural and social environments on a planetary level.'
Glacier melting contributes to rising sea levels, affects water resources downstream, damages ecosystems, increases the risk of natural disasters, and can compound other natural hazards such as increasing the formation of icebergs.
HOW IS GLOBAL WARMING AFFECTING GLACIAL RETREAT?
Global warming is causing the temperatures all around the world to increase.
This is particularly prominent at latitudes nearer the poles.
Rising temperatures, permafrost, glaciers and ice sheets are all struggling to stay in tact in the face of the warmer climate.
As temperatures have risen to more than a degree above pre-industrial levels, ice continues melt.
For example, melting ice on the Greenland ice sheet is producing 'meltwater lakes', which then contribute further to the melting.
This positive feedback loop is also found on glaciers atop mountains.
Many of these have been frozen since the last ice age and researchers are seeing considerable retreat.
Some animal and plant species rely heavily on the cold conditions that the glaciers provide and are migrating to higher altitudes to find suitable habitat.
This is putting severe strain on the ecosystems as more animals and more species are living in an ever-shrinking region.
On top of the environmental pressure, the lack of ice on mountains is vastly increasing the risks of landslides and volcanic eruptions.
The phenomena is found in several mountain ranges around the world.
It has also been seen in regions of Antarctica.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russia says excluding Moscow on Ukraine talks is a ‘road to nowhere'
Russia says excluding Moscow on Ukraine talks is a ‘road to nowhere'

The Independent

time21 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Russia says excluding Moscow on Ukraine talks is a ‘road to nowhere'

Russia 's foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, issued a warning to Western nations regarding the exclusion of Moscow from security discussions concerning Ukraine. Speaking on Wednesday, Lavrov's comments followed a meeting hosted by Donald Trump at the White House with Volodymyr Zelensky and other Western leaders. Lavrov stated that alienating the Kremlin from collective security matters is a 'road to nowhere' and 'will not work'. He emphasised that Russia would continue to express its 'legitimate interests fairly and harshly', asserting that the US must understand the futility of excluding Moscow. Watch the video in full above.

Sending British troops to Ukraine is a dangerous folly
Sending British troops to Ukraine is a dangerous folly

Telegraph

time22 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Sending British troops to Ukraine is a dangerous folly

Sir Keir Starmer has pledged to send British troops to Ukraine as part of a European 'reassurance force' if and when the guns finally fall silent. According to the Defence Secretary, the military is 'ready to go, they're ready to act from day one'. Yet the hollowed-out state of Britain's armed forces paints a different picture. Britain is unlikely to be able to deploy troops in significant numbers, and it is far from clear that they would survive – let alone fight and win – should things get messy. The priority of this year's Strategic Defence Review was to get the armed forces ready to fight a war against Russia. But that will take time. Putting boots on the ground in Ukraine could jeopardise this ambition, as well as weaken our commitment to Nato. There are three principal reasons for this. First, numbers. Politicians will likely want to get away with deploying a single battle-group (1,500 troops) alongside a lion's share of the command and control, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance assets and logistics enablers. However, if Britain wants to lead the mission and provide a credible deterrent to Russia that other European nations can plug into, then the minimum contribution for the UK would be a brigade (5,000). This commitment would require 15,000 troops to sustain indefinitely (one in theatre, one recovering and one training), which amounts to 20 per cent of the total British Army on paper strength, or 27 per cent when considering that only 77 per cent of the army's soldiers (54,695 troops) are currently considered medically deployable. Committing this force to an open-ended operation would effectively be permanently removing these troops from the British Army order of battle. This would come after committing two divisions (likely over 25,000 troops) to be Nato's Strategic Reserve. Britain could just about do this, but it could not do anything else. Second, capabilities. The 'reassurance force' will not be a neutral peacekeeping one. It will need to have access to the full heavy suite of military capabilities – on the land, sea and in the air and space – to deter further Russian attacks. In extremis, this force would need to fight and fix Russian forces within Ukraine if a wider war between Nato and Russia broke out, whether it be in Ukraine, or somewhere else in the Euro-Atlantic. The British Army is modernising, but it simply lacks the drones, tanks, armoured infantry and heavy artillery to provide a credible fighting force that would concern Moscow. The army also needs time to bring in equipment, train and integrate new doctrine for a battlefield that has been revolutionised by drone warfare. This 'reassurance force' would essentially be a few thousand European troops with old and outdated gear. Should fighting break out, it is more likely that the Ukrainian armed forces – the largest in Europe, battle-hardened and up to date with the latest innovations – would be doing the reassuring. Third, track record. British soldiers trained the Afghan National Security Forces for two decades, who were swept aside by the Taliban in a single summer offensive. Similarly, US and British-trained Iraqi Security Forces crumbled under the 2014 summer Isis advance. Most concerning, the 2011 Nato-led Operation Unified Protector over Libya limited the violence but did not produce a strategic victory. In short, Europeans have a poor track record of post-Cold War military success, even when the US has been heavily involved. These recent operations were all discretionary, whereas a mission to Ukraine cannot fail, otherwise it would be fatal for European military credibility and therefore broader European security. With reports that British troops might be sent to Ukraine within weeks of a ceasefire, there is not much time for defence planners to design an operation maximised for success. Furthermore, Putin could test the reassurance force early, in the hope of unsettling the Europeans and preventing further Nato members contributing to it in the future. For this reason the operation is incredibly risky. Without concrete US guarantees – not just to Ukraine but also European allies – a European-led deployment would be incredibly vulnerable and provide Putin with an opportunity, rather than a deterrent, to continue his aggression.

Macron hits out at ‘abject' Netanyahu claim of rise in antisemitism in France
Macron hits out at ‘abject' Netanyahu claim of rise in antisemitism in France

The Guardian

time25 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Macron hits out at ‘abject' Netanyahu claim of rise in antisemitism in France

Emmanuel Macron has hit out at Benjamin Netanyahu for his 'abject' and 'erroneous' remarks after Israel's prime minister claimed that antisemitism had 'surged' in France after the country's decision to recognise a Palestinian state in September. In a statement released late on Tuesday, the office of the French president pushed back against Netanyahu's claim. 'The analysis suggesting that France's decision to recognise the state of Palestine in September is behind the rise in antisemitic violence in France is erroneous, abject, and will not go unanswered,' it said. 'The current period calls for seriousness and responsibility, not generalisation and manipulation.' Relations between the two leaders have been strained since July, when Macron announced that France would become the first major western power to recognise a Palestinian state at next month's UN general assembly, in the hope of bringing peace to the region. At the time, Netanyahu, who is wanted by the international criminal court over allegations of war crimes in Gaza, criticised the decision, saying that France 'rewards terror'. He added: 'A Palestinian state in these conditions would be a launch pad to annihilate Israel – not to live in peace beside it.' The move means France will join the group of UN members – at least 145 out of 193 – that now recognise or plan to recognise a Palestinian state, according to a tally by the news agency Agence France-Presse. In a letter sent to Macron earlier this week, Netanyahu accused the French president of not doing enough to confront the alarming rise of antisemitism in France. 'Your call for a Palestinian state pour fuels on this antisemitism fire,' Netanyahu wrote. A similar letter, with almost identical wording, was reportedly also sent to Australia's prime minister earlier this week. Responding to the allegations, Macron's office said that France 'protects and will always protect its Jewish citizens' and that, since 2017, the president had systematically required the government to 'take the strongest possible action against the perpetrators of antisemitic acts'. According to the latest figures from France's interior ministry, 504 antisemitic acts were reported across the country between January and May this year, suggesting a 24% decrease from the previous year. The numbers, however, remain high, double the number of reported incidents from the same time period in 2013. Members of France's Jewish community, one of the largest in the world, have repeatedly warned that antisemitic acts have increased since Israel launched its war in Gaza in response to the attack by Hamas on 7 October 2023. Most recently, the felling of an olive tree planted in memory of a young French Jewish man tortured to death in 2006 prompted outrage, with Macron vowing to punish an act of 'antisemitic hatred'. Tensions between Israel and its traditional allies have been mounting in recent weeks after Macron's promise to recognise a Palestinian state – a move that elicited similar signals from Britain, Canada and Australia. This week, after sending Australia's prime minister a letter accusing him of fuelling antisemitism with his decision to recognise a Palestinian state, Netanyahu doubled down on his criticism of Anthony Albanese on Tuesday, saying he was a 'weak politician who had betrayed Israel'. Albanese brushed off the claims. 'I don't take these things personally,' he told reporters on Wednesday. 'I treat leaders of other countries with respect. I engage with them in a diplomatic way.' Sign up to This is Europe The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment after newsletter promotion Hours after his office had sparred with Netanyahu, Macron highlighted plans to co-chair a conference on a two-state solution with Saudi Arabia in New York in September. Macron made the announcement as he criticised Israel's plans for a 'military offensive in Gaza', writing on social media that it 'can only lead to disaster for both peoples and risks plunging the entire region into a cycle of permanent war'. Global pressure has been mounting on Israel to address the situation in Gaza, where at least 62,000 people have been killed and a complete blockade on aid entering the Palestinian territory has led to widespread conditions of starvation. In July, two of Israel's most respected human rights organisations, B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights, said Israel was committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, and said the country's western allies had a legal and moral duty to stop it. The accusation echoes earlier positions taken by global human rights organisations such as Médecins Sans Frontières and Amnesty International. Israel denies is it carrying out a genocide, and says the war in Gaza is one of self-defence in response to the cross-border attacks by Hamas on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people, mostly civilians, were killed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store