Network Rail to launch army of drones to target trespassers
Trespassers on Britain's railways are to be pursued by a squadron of drones under plans being drawn up by Network Rail.
The track operator is planning to use the unmanned craft to cruise long stretches of track scanning for vandals, graffiti artists and thieves intent on stripping signalling cables and wires.
There were more than 18,500 reported instances of trespass on the UK railway last year, close to one for each of the network's 20,000 miles of track. The incidents caused 1.5m minutes of delays last year and cost more than £70m in compensation and internal charges.
Dominic Mottram, Network Rail's head of drone strategy, said the technology will be 'revolutionary' in tackling the problem.
While Network Rail already has around 200 drones, comprising one of Europe's biggest fleets, they must currently remain within visual range of the operator, limiting flights to about a third of a mile. That means they are of little use in locating and filming miscreants.
However, under the new plans, which are expected to win Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) approval in the coming months, drones will be able to travel beyond the view of operators, allowing them to travel far from base to scan for trouble.
Mr Mottram said: 'We're looking at being able to fly tens of miles from base, which is going to make a huge difference and send out a message that people must stay off the railway or they will be caught. It's the equivalent of having bobbies on the beat.'
The unmanned craft will be able to quickly locate and follow offenders while British Transport Police or Network Rail's own mobile crews head to the scene. They will also provide vital video evidence that will aid prosecutions.
The drones will be capable of arriving on the scene within two minutes of a reported incident in an urban area, compared with minimum response times of about 10 minutes for the police and 20 minutes for Network Rail's own staff.
Mr Mottram said drones will be just as important in confirming that offenders have left the scene following reports of people on the track, allowing lines to reopen more quickly.
Future plans could also see drones take over monitoring for collapsed trees, lineside fires and animals on the line.
Network Rail is working with two drone specialists to secure so-called beyond visual line of sight (BVLOS) capabilities.
Dronecloud is conducting a trial in Birmingham providing aerial coverage of the railway within 6 miles of the city centre, together with another in rural south Wales.
Meanwhile, Drone Major is testing its system in Wolverhampton and on the Severn Valley Railway.
Both companies are deploying a combination of ground-based sensors and satellite positioning to control and communicate with the craft. Dronecloud said flying distances would be increased incrementally at a pace dictated by the CAA.
Mr Mottram said the drones will be able transmit real-time video and body heat-detecting infrared feeds to operators that could potentially be used in prosecutions.
The craft also have the potential to undertake track-inspection tasks, reducing the risk of rail workers being struck by a passing train and trimming Network Rail's £2bn annual monitoring bill.
Alongside the drones, Network Rail plans keep using two helicopters to scan hundreds of miles of remote lines in the Scottish Highlands and locate trespassers in London, where the track operator has special permission to operate across the city.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
CAA Accuses Range Media Partners of Stealing Trade Secrets in Agency Battle
CAA added a barrage of new allegations to a lawsuit against a rival firm on Monday, alleging that former employees illegally accessed CAA databases and stole trade secrets when they left to form Range Media Partners in 2020. CAA first sued Range last fall, claiming the firm was built on deceit and betrayal. In an amended complaint filed Monday, the agency says it has since uncovered 'documents, photographs, and video footage' through discovery that 'reveal the depth of Range's dishonesty.' More from Variety Justine Lupe Signs With CAA (EXCLUSIVE) CAA Hires Former UTA Partner Brent Weinstein CAA Unveils 2025 Moebius Film Festival Lineup Mick Sullivan, who left CAA to help form Range, is accused in the suit of emailing himself client 'rundowns,' which detailed every meeting the clients had taken and projects they were tracking. At least one of those clients immediately left CAA when Range formed. Sullivan is also accused of emailing himself hundreds of pages of meeting notes, which detailed information on hundreds of projects and potential projects that had been gathered for CAA clients. Sullivan also allegedly pressured a CAA assistant to send him additional information about clients, including lists totaling nearly 200 scripts that had been sent to them. The suit alleges that other Range employees also stole confidential information, including by pressuring CAA employees who remained at the company. Paige Wandling, an assistant at CAA who left to become a manager at Range, is accused of using a CAA 'mole' to obtain hundreds of confidential documents. 'Over a course of weeks, Wandling requested, and Empoyee-1 provided, CAA's confidential information dozens of times,' the suit alleges. 'The stolen information included, by way of example, internal CAA emails, extensive information about film and TV opportunities for talent, scripts, industry contacts, CAA memos, CAA grids, and information on CAA meetings and business initiatives.' According to the complaint, Wandling offered to pay the CAA mole for this information, and in fact did so. The complaint argues that CAA's trade secrets are essential to making the company — and the industry — run. Agents gather information from studios, producers, directors and writers, and put it into a database so it can be sorted and shared internally. Agents also collect sensitive information from clients, including their financial information, career goals and so on. 'This client confidential information is immeasurably valuable to competitors who could use it to understand the particular nuanced needs, motivations, and negotiating tactics of CAA's clients,' the complaint states. CAA's initial lawsuit, filed last fall, accused Range of 'unfair competition,' arguing that it had devised a scheme to get around California's talent agency law by claiming to be a management firm. Range has moved to throw out that suit, arguing it was legally defective. The amended lawsuit retains the initial claims while adding accusations of theft of trade secrets and unauthorized computer access. Best of Variety 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts? 25 Hollywood Legends Who Deserve an Honorary Oscar New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
CAA Says It's Got Range On Camera In Trade-Secrets Theft & Talent-Poaching Suit; Uberagency Claims Rival Was 'Fully Aware Of The Legal Risk'
Range Media Partners' founders got caught with their sticky fingers in the CAA trade-secrets cookie jar, the Bryan Lourd-run uberagency claims in an amended complaint to its October 2024 lawsuit. Or put another another way: In the truest of Hollywood litigation tradition, CAA has uncovered what it believes is the smoking gun of smoking guns in the multi-tiered battle with former staffers now at the self-described management company. More from Deadline CAA Finally Goes After 'Unlawful' Range Media Partners For Stealing Confidential Agency Material & Being A Talent Agency In All But Name CAA Vs. Range Takes New Twists With Court Wins & Tactical Shifts As Arbitration Trial Set For Next Month 'The Righteous Gemstones' Edi Patterson Signs With Range Media Partners 'Newly uncovered video footage, documents, photographs, and secret Telegram chats reveal an extensive plot by Range's founders to steal from Creative Artists Agency, LLC, set up an illegal talent agency, and cover up its wrongdoing,' reads a heavily redacted amended complaint filed Monday in Los Angeles Superior Court by CAA's outside counsel at Paul Hastings. 'This is what we now know,' adds the complaint, which has grown from four to six claims. 'Driven by greed, hubris, the lure of shortcuts, and a willingness to betray trusting colleagues, a small group of then-current and former CAA agents in 2019 began plotting to leave CAA. Over the next months, they began stealing CAA's trade secrets, poaching talent and employees from CAA, designing and operating an unlicensed talent agency, and deliberately and systematically destroying evidence of Range's scheme [redacted].' 'They adopted spy-novel tropes to hide their plan,' CAA alleges of Range's founders — former CAA and eOne exec Peter Micelli, and CAA talent agents Jack Whigham, Michael Cooper, Mick Sullivan and Dave Bugliari — and what ends they went to in order to get their hands on CAA's crown jewels of strategy, technique and of course clients – big clients. 'They used tools to avoid detection and eliminate digital fingerprints, fully aware of the legal risk. Encrypted ephemeral messaging was used to hide their illegal acts, including Signal, WhatsApp, and Telegram. They secured and used 'alternate' and 'burner' cell phones.' If this all sounds a bit like teenagers planning a banger of a weekend glamping in the mountains, you are picking up what the parental CAA is saying. Only here, capturing the interest and ambitions of the shifting agency world, the stakes might be a little higher than who brought the edibles and the WiFi hot spot. 'This conduct is illegal under multiple California laws, compelling CAA to take this action,' the suit reads. Today's filing comes almost a full five years after Micelli, Whigham, Cooper, Sullivan and Bugliari were among the well-connected core group that founded Range with big-bucks backing from hedge-fund kingpin and now New York Mets owner Steve Cohen. It also comes about nine months after the Artemis-owned CAA placed its initial complaint in the court docket to put what it calls Range's 'business model' of 'pursuit of unlawful profit through deception' under the legal and ethical microscope. What was allegedly stolen from CAA, according to CAA, was a lot. In a footnote in today's filing, there is a list: The trade secrets implicated here, at minimum, include the following materials: the confidential client and revenue lists that Whigham sent to his personal email address in March and June 2020; the hundreds of pages of confidential meeting notes that Sullivan sent to his personal email on his way out the door at CAA; the Open Directing Assignment and Open Casting Assignment 'grids' that Employee-1 obtained from CAA in August 2020; the client 'rundowns' that Sullivan sent to himself in August 2020; the highly confidential watermarked meeting information that Cooper's assistant emailed to her personal email account and then to her Range account and/or uploaded to Dropbox; certain confidential or watermarked scripts, and the highly confidential information [Bugliari's assistant] Wandling received from Employee-1 via Telegram and email. A preliminary list of these trade secret materials is attached as Appendix A. All of these documents contain nonpublic confidential information, gathered at significant expense from countless agents, executives, and employees in various roles at CAA. These materials, often watermarked because of their sensitivity, are not distributed to those outside the company and CAA takes additional measures to keep that information within CAA for the benefit of CAA. Frustratingly, the last line of this juicy footnote is redacted. Monday's filing adds two new claims, with a Violation of California Uniform Trade Secrets Act and Violations of California Penal Code Section 502(c) now in the mix for the various unspecified damages over $25,000 that CAA is seeking along with injunctive relief that essentially is intended to bring death by defenestration to the currently expanding Range. Like when CAA's suit was first filed last year, representatives from Range did not respond to Deadline's request for comment on the latest filing. This legal action is separate from the closed-door arbitration over equity going on simultaneously between the players here. CAA's main outside attorney had even more to say than what was in its filing Monday. 'As CAA's new complaint details: for months when they knew they were leaving CAA, multiple Range founders stole valuable information from CAA,' Bo Pearl told Deadline today. 'They took the hard work of CAA colleagues to accelerate Range and lure clients, all while being paid by CAA,' the Paul Hastings partner added. 'Despite Range's many attempts to rewrite history and the hubris to believe that laws don't apply to it, the evidence of Range's wrongdoing is crystal clear. Recently recovered emails, messages, photos, and videos reveal the depths of the deception. The Range founders' public pronouncements of righteousness and innocence are undercut by their every action, which will be laid bare in court.' That sounds like some serious smokin' in the boys room. Best of Deadline Sean 'Diddy' Combs Sex-Trafficking Trial Updates: Cassie Ventura's Testimony, $10M Hotel Settlement, Drugs, Violence, & The Feds A Full Timeline Of Blake Lively & Justin Baldoni's 'It Ends With Us' Feud In Court, Online & In The Media Where To Watch All The 'John Wick' Movies: Streamers That Have All Four Films
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Professor prosecuted over tweets calling for Jews to be ‘de-Zionised'
An academic is facing a private prosecution over social media posts calling for Jews to be 'de-Zionised'. The Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) has brought three charges against Prof David Miller over posts on X. They allege that he used a public communications network to send messages of a menacing character, contrary to the Communications Act 2003. Prof Miller was previously found to have been unfairly and wrongfully dismissed by the University of Bristol in October 2021 after making comments criticising Israel. The CAA said the first message was posted on Nov 8 last year in relation to a discussion on violence in Amsterdam after a football match involving an Israeli team. It said: 'Last night's response by the brave Muslim communities of Amsterdam was necessary, but extremely measured and not at all proportional to the genocidal violence unleashed by Zionist terrorists on the Levant, on Muslims worldwide, or indeed in the provocations that preceded the measured response. Future incidents will likely involve a more proportional response. 'As well as being unwelcoming to Zionist colonists coming from Occupied Palestine, Europe must be unviable as a base for Zionist terror by Jewish supremacists who have infiltrated and are camouflaged among us. 'Zionist terrorist entryists must be expunged from European institutions, whether political parties, media, think tanks or elsewhere. Again, either institutions take the lead and conduct this work in orderly fashion with advice from experts on Zionist subversion, or the people will take care of it for them.' The first hearing is set to take place at Westminster magistrates' court on July 2, HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirmed. Prof Miller is alleged to have sent another message on March 20, saying: 'Every genuinely anti-Zionist Jew can count on being kept safe by the movement, when the time comes. Every Zionist Jew must be held accountable and de-Zionised. #DismantleZionism.' On March 24, he is said to have made another post saying: 'Protests are not enough. Listen to our brothers and sisters in Gaza. 'Those who are interested in ending this genocide must begin by targeting those responsible near them: the entire Zionist movement globally must live in fear of accountability until it is dismantled and its ideology eradicated. And let's be clear, there are Zionists everywhere. In every town and city. Find out where they are. #DismantleZionism.' He successfully claimed at an employment tribunal last year that he experienced discrimination based on his anti-Zionist belief. The CAA describes itself as an organisation of volunteers that works to 'expose and counter antisemitism through education and zero-tolerance enforcement of the law'. Prof Miller has been approached for comment. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
