
Used electric cars lose half their value in two years - manufacturers blamed for discounting new prices
Electric cars are losing more than half their value within two years, according to a new report.
Analysis by Cox Automotive has suggested that a 24-month-old battery car sold to the trade in April on average retained just 47 per cent of its original new cost.
However, two years earlier, an EV of the same age profile was - on average - holding on to 83 per cent of its new price.
The dramatic acceleration in depreciation is being blamed on manufacturers who are caught in an unprecedented catch 22 scenario currently playing out in the automotive sector.
With car makers being forced to increase their sales of EVs to meet Government-mandated targets, they are offering huge discounts on new models to make them more attractive to new customers in order to meet their quotas.
But this is having a significant knock-on impact for residual prices, as drivers are seeing more value for money buying new rather than opting for a nearly-new second-hand EV, which has seen used prices tumble.
This graphs shows the average auction sale price for EVs under 24 months old as a percentage of their original cost new, with the typical electric car retaining just 47% of its showroom price
The Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) mandate introduced to law last January requires mainstream car manufacturers to sell an increasing share of EVs every year between now and 2035.
Failure to adhere to these quotas can result in significant fines of £12,000 for every car sold below the required threshold for that year.
In 2024, the minimum quota was for 22 per cent of all deliveries by manufacturers to be zero-emission electric cars.
However, the target jumps to 28 per cent this year, 33 per cent in 2026 and 80 per cent by 2030.
Officials reported that every mainstream brand achieved last year's 22 per cent EV sales mix - though at a huge cost to car companies.
The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) reported that makers lost a collective £4billion in discounted prices as they tried to make electric cars appear more attractive to petrol and diesel counterparts.
Mike Hawes, chief exec at the trade body, described the scale of these discounts as 'unsustainable'.
Labour's decision to force EV owners to pay car tax for the first time from April has also dampened demand for new models - and triggered further manufacturer discounts.
Both Vauxhall and Abarth - the performance division of Fiat - have recently reduced prices of their electric cars so that they sit below a £40,000 expensive car tax supplement being imposed on new EVs starting from next year.
But Cox Automotive Europe discounts are now having a huge knock-on effect on the second-hand market, because 'nearly new' used EVs are falling in value as a direct result.
Second-hand electric vehicle prices are also taking a hit from the huge acceleration in available models coming to market, with March seeing a record 69,313 new electric cars entering the road.
A rapid development of battery technology is also stinging the value of quickly outdated older EVs, while the emergence of new cheaper brands - predominantly from China - is also pushing second-hand values lower.
As such, a two-year-old electric car today is now holding just 53 per cent of its original price.
In contrast, the average diesel car selling to trade with the same age profile is retaining 30 per cent of its new value.
When second-hand EV values were at their peak in 2022 - as a result of supply constraints around the Covid-19 pandemic - a two-year-old electric car was losing only 17 per cent of its showroom price.
Philip Nothard, insight director at Cox Automotive Europe, said: 'The current performance of nearly-new EVs in the used market is still much lower than we would anticipate for vehicles in this age profile.
'The heavy discounts offered on new vehicles mean that consumers can pick up a brand-new model for the same price as a nearly-new model.
'This gives consumers very little incentive to consider them, which is a real blow to a market that needs all the incentives it can get its hands on.'
On the flipside, EVs between three to five years old are performing much better.
At auction, these vehicles have seen only a modest price drop of 15 per cent on average in the same time period as they aren't impacted as severely by heavy manufacturer discounts and tend to attract a different driver.
Last month, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer was forced to water down Britain's electric vehicle sales targets in response to Donald Trump's watershed tariff announcement.
The PM's new measures included additional leniencies in the ZEV mandate in a bid to 'support car makers'.
And only last week, a leaked letter from transport minister Lilian Greenwood revealed that the Government is considering dumping the expensive car supplement - widely being referred to as the 'Tesla Tax' - for new electric cars in an effort to stir up more demand for green vehicles.
Nothard added: 'The used market is a crucial source of profitability for the automotive sector.
'Within increasingly volatile market conditions, the strength and consistency of used operations are crucial.
'To ensure this, more support for the used EV sector is needed to put the brakes on the rapid pace of depreciation.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Eradicating child poverty must become Labour's central mission
It is much more than a flip rhetorical cliche to say that if a nation thinks that fighting child poverty is costly, then it should try the alternative. It really should not be a matter of great controversy. The broadly warm welcome given to the government's expansion of the free school meals programme has been marred only by some noisy mumblings about how the policy will be funded. Of course, any item of public spending must be accounted for – but in the case of this and similar measures to alleviate child poverty, both sides of the ledger should be taken into account. Experience in Scotland, Wales and London – where free and nutritious meals are already available more widely – suggests that pupils perform better on a full stomach; something that surely accords with common sense. Academic studies go further, linking higher educational achievements with higher productivity and thus better living standards for those lifted out of poverty – with an obvious dividend for the nation as a whole. Official support for children, including the new breakfast clubs, a wider availability of free school meals, childcare, access to libraries, affordable housing and of course their education itself, should be treated less as 'current' spending and more like an investment. These are the kind of arguments The Independent has long put forward, as part of an award-winning campaign, and are compatible with fiscal sustainability. In essence, though it is not meant to be mercenary, money spent on rearing a healthier, more literate, more numerate and more intellectually able generation is, in the long run, as valid an investment as, say, building a new tramway or bolstering the national grid. 'Human capital' is, ironically, more precious than ever in a world where artificial intelligence will take over so many of the tasks currently undertaken by human beings. For people to enjoy socially useful and economically viable lives in the future, they will need to be smarter than the machines that will surround them. Soon enough, chancellor Rachel Reeves will be able to go further and faster, as the current ministerial catchphrase goes, in the Labour government's newfound mission to reduce child poverty. After years when the party seemed to be undeclared disciples of the austerity school of economics, Labour's conscience, albeit prompted by some shocking electoral setbacks, has been awoken. Eradicating child poverty by 2020 was the noble objective set by Tony Blair early in the last Labour government, enshrined in law during the last days of Gordon Brown's administration, revived in Jeremy Corbyn's time, but frankly neglected, beyond some necessary lip service, in more recent years. Now, it has rightly become a priority, and one that has lodged itself high on the long list of social challenges facing the chancellor. It now seems inevitable that the two-cap limit on child benefit, imposed by a Tory chancellor almost a decade ago, will be lifted, sooner or later, and perhaps 300,000 children in larger families lifted out of poverty immediately. That it will be partly under populist pressure from Nigel Farage does not make it a bad idea. Extending child benefit, like school meals, is not a total cure for child poverty. Where the Tories had a point as they downgraded the poverty targets in the past (which, to be clear, was a mistake) was when they stressed the importance of a healthy economy creating well-paid jobs. Child poverty is linked to general levels of poverty, obviously, and the creation of wealth still counts as the essential basis for a fairer society – and human capital is part of that. Even with these latest measures, continuing care will need to be taken to make sure the free school meals are nutritious and promote good physical and mental health. Other policy areas also need to be attended to. No level of child benefit or childcare will entirely compensate for being brought up in a cramped, overcrowded, mouldy, cold home. Other policies will thus have to contribute to giving every British child the best opportunities in life. In that context, the government's child poverty task force might consider how the SureStart centres could be restored. Arguably the most serious misjudgement of the coalition government of 2010 to 2014 was to scrap them. In any case, without much in the way of conscious effort, indeed almost by accident, Sir Keir Starmer's government has found itself endowed with a new, invigorating mission to pursue. For all the problems, disappointments, gaffes and missteps in their first year out of the wilderness, the Labour Party has rediscovered its raison d'etre.


BBC News
18 minutes ago
- BBC News
Glinton development of 24 homes refused a second time by council
A new proposal for a housing development in a village has been refused by planners at a plan for 24 new homes in Glinton, near Peterborough, was put forward by the Rutland-based developer, Hereward Homes Ltd. Peterborough City Council refused the new scheme on Wednesday, following an initial application that was declined in to the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS), the case officer report stated the latest proposal was "near identical" to the last and would have a "detrimental impact" on the village's rural setting. The fresh application was put forward in March, which Hereward Homes Ltd said addressed the previous developer argued the proposed development demonstrated a "high quality of design" and would use materials appropriate to the character of the application received objections from the council's conservation officer, urban design officer and five local residents. 'Unstainable development' The area has been the subject of three applications for new homes in the of them were refused for reasons including insufficient visitor parking and highway safety. In May, plans for 250 homes submitted by Gladman Developments were refused, which raised concerns with the parish council and application by Larkfleet Group for 95 homes was refused in February following opposition from Randall, the vice-chairman of Glinton Parish Council, previously told the LDRS of the village's concerns about the proposed allocation of 355 homes in the council's draft Local said: "Glinton is getting a big chunk of the development that's being proposed for rural villages and that is really unsustainable." Follow Peterborough news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.


The Herald Scotland
19 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
ScotRail is 'fixing' AI train announcer after voice controversy
But after prompting from Fiona Hyslop, he said: 'The Transport Secretary tells me they're fixing it, so they will be fixing it.' Ms Potter has welcomed this commitment as a 'meaningful step forward'. The issue was raised at First Minister's Questions at Holyrood, with Scottish Conservative MSP Dr Sandesh Gulhane asking if it is how the Scottish Government – which took ScotRail into public ownership in 2022 – 'supports actors'. The Tory pressed the case with Mr Swinney after Ms Potter, in a widely shared Facebook post, accused ScotRail of dismissing her concerns. She said Iona came from voice data held by Swedish-based company ReadSpeaker, who she did recordings for in 2021 – adding that by using her voice in an AI model the company had acted outside of the terms of her agreement with them. Ms Potter spoke of her 'distress' at discovering Scotland had 'installed the ReadSpeaker model 'Iona' that contains my biometric voice data as their new announcer on all their trains'. She insisted: 'I did not know. I was not asked. I did not consent.' Mr Swinney said he is 'sure' the rail operator will be 'engaging constructively with all concerned'. He added: 'I think sometimes these things do indeed need careful handling and I am sure ScotRail will be doing exactly that.' Following the First Minister's comments, a spokeswoman for Ms Potter told the PA news agency: 'We welcome the fact that the First Minister acknowledged the issue at hand and confirmed that ScotRail 'will be fixing it'. 'While the language may not be definitive at this stage, this public commitment is a meaningful step forward for Gayanne, and other artists in her position. 'That said, this case isn't just about hiring Scottish actors. It's about the use of a real actor's voice without her informed consent, and the broader need for ethical standards in the deployment of AI voice technology. 'We now hope that 'fixing it' will include direct engagement with Gayanne, proper accountability from those responsible, and a clear commitment to ensuring that consent, transparency, and fair treatment become non-negotiable in the use of AI by public bodies. 'The public sector needs to be rigorous in their procurement of AI solutions and the commercial partnerships they strike with AI companies.' Ms Potter's representative said the voice actress had been told by ScotRail earlier this week that the matter was between her and ReadSpeaker. She said they would request that ScotRail cease using 'Iona', adding: 'Any use of Gayanne's or anyone else's voice through AI must be based on her full, informed consent and agreed upon under fair conditions.' ReadSpeaker has said it has a contract to use her voice and its legal team has 'comprehensively' addressed Ms Potter's concerns.