
Bulgaria cyber ‘elves' fight Kremlin and cruelty
SOFIA, BULGARIA: A Bulgarian group of dozens of cyber activists at first clubbed together to battle Russian disinformation, but they have since found other foes -- like animal abusers.
They call themselves the BG Elves, which both refers to the kind-hearted characters of Scandinavian mythology and hints at a rivalry with the internet's malicious trolls.
The collective of about 70 anonymous cyber security experts have made a name for themselves by creating problems for their adversaries.
One of their latest efforts was helping an animal rights NGO uncover evidence that led to the March arrest of a woman and a man accused of selling videos online of hundreds of animals being tortured to death.
'Our work was crucial, because for the first time a crime was solved in Bulgaria based on OSINT data, proving that our efforts can produce concrete results,' software developer Petko Petkov, the Elves' only public face, told AFP.
OSINT refers to open-source intelligence, which is information gathered with digital investigation techniques like reverse image search and geolocation.
In the summer of 2024, the NGO alerted the cyber sleuths to videos posted on Telegram of a masked woman torturing animals. The Elves tracked her down within hours.
Using OSINT, they were also able to trace the locations where the videos of cats, rabbits and guinea pigs being tortured on camera were filmed by her accomplice.
The videos sparked widespread protests in Bulgaria, and prompted the government to propose emergency legislation.
- 'Counter-propaganda' -
Set up in 2023 in response to pro-Kremlin disinformation flooding Bulgaria, the group first zeroed in on the key players involved in the campaigns.
'There were about 10 of us in a chat group, we refined the concept, then put out a call for volunteers,' Petkov told AFP about the group's founding.
They have grown significantly since and include experts in cyber security, social engineering and databases.
'We are not hackers, we are researchers,' said Petkov, 37, who moved from central Bulgaria to Kyiv shortly after Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
Dedicated to activism, the Elves try to fight the deluge of disinformation by disseminating 'counter-propaganda that makes people think', he said.
'We noticed that a (disinfo) narrative... takes some time to reach people. Our idea was to flood the space with humour and irony before the propaganda takes hold,' said Petkov.
Recently, they launched a viral meme campaign targeting the main false claims about Bulgaria's accession to the eurozone, distributing the content through profiles embedded within major disinformation networks.
In March, BG Elves supported a Romanian journalist in an investigation that exposed a Russia-linked disinformation and propaganda network funded through online advertising.
- 'More serious' cases -
In the wake of the recent arrests, Bulgaria proposed a bill in parliament, which allows for higher prison terms of up to 10 years for torturing animals.
Nearly 300 people have been convicted of such offences in the last five years, but few end up in prison.
Petya Altimirska, president of the animal welfare association CAAI, who had reached out to the Elves for help in the abuse case, has since received numerous reports of 'even more serious' cases, adding that the cyber sleuths are already 'on it'.
While the group was praised for exposing the animal abuse, it has also faced criticism and numerous threats for its provocative approach and alleged political bias.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
6 hours ago
- New Straits Times
South Korea's Lee hails voters 'great decision' as poised to win presidency
SEOUL: South Korea's Lee Jae-myung hailed voters' "great decision" and vowed not to disappoint them as he was poised Tuesday to win a snap presidential election by a wide margin, capping months of political chaos. Six months to the day after ex-president Yoon Suk Yeol plunged the country into crisis with his disastrous declaration of martial law, all three major broadcasters projected Lee as the likely winner, with voter turnout the highest in nearly three decades. With almost 50 per cent of the votes counted, Lee of the left-leaning Democratic Party led with 49.01 per cent, followed by challenger Kim Moon-soo of the conservative People Power Party (PPP) with 42.62 per cent. Speaking outside his home, Lee thanked voters for placing their trust in him. "I will do my utmost to fulfil the great responsibility and mission entrusted to me, so as not to disappoint the expectations of our people," Lee told reporters. Lee will take office almost immediately – as soon as the National Election Commission finishes counting the votes and validates the result, likely early Wednesday. He will face a bulging in-tray, including global trade vicissitudes chafing the export-driven economy, some of the world's lowest birth rates and an emboldened North Korea rapidly expanding its arsenal. Voter turnout was 79.4 per cent – the highest since 1997. An exit poll by the three major broadcasters had earlier projected a victory for Lee, prompting his supporters to break into cheers outside the National Assembly, as party officials watching from inside the parliament started a chant of "Lee Jae-myung." For weeks, major polls had put Lee well ahead of Kim – Yoon's labour minister – who struggled with party infighting and failed to convince a third party candidate to unify and avoid splitting the right-wing vote. After months of turmoil and a revolving door of lame-duck acting leaders, many South Koreans said they were eager for the country to move forward. "I hope the next president will create an atmosphere of peace and unity rather than ideological warfare," cab driver Choi Sung-wook, 68, told AFP as he cast his ballot. Noh Min-young, 20, who has been protesting in the streets since Yoon declared martial law, told AFP she was "relieved" at the exit poll projection. "It's been a tough road. I'm happy because it feels like we've seized the opportunity that so many people fought for over the past six months." The fallout from Yoon's martial law declaration, which has left South Korea effectively leaderless for the first months of US President Donald Trump's tumultuous second term, was the decisive factor in the election, experts said. The vote was "largely viewed as a referendum on the previous administration," Kang Joo-hyun, a political science professor at Sookmyung Women's University, told AFP. Yoon's impeachment over his martial law bid, which saw armed soldiers deployed to parliament, made him the second straight conservative president to be stripped of office after Park Geun-hye in 2017. "Lee's victory signals that the Korean public rejects illiberal and undemocratic measures such as martial law," Gi-Wook Shin, a sociology professor at Stanford University, told AFP. "This moment will likely be remembered as a peculiar and consequential turning point in South Korea's political history." But Lee's success is due as much to his rivals' failings as his own strengths, said Minseon Ku, a postdoctoral researcher at the William & Mary Global Research Institute. "Lee has a criminal record and was involved in several political and personal scandals, which made him deeply unpopular among many voters in the 2022 presidential election," Ku said, referring to Lee's unsuccessful run for top office, when he lost to Yoon by a narrow margin. His rise to the presidency is "a reflection of the deep political turmoil South Korea has been experiencing." South Korean presidents serve a single five-year term. Ballot counting stations swung into action after polls closed at 8pm, AFP reporters saw, with boxes of ballots arriving at the Seoul National University Gymnasium in Gwanak-gu district. On election day, Seoul streets were peaceful as people made the most of good weather and a public holiday, but police issued the highest level of alert and deployed thousands of officers to ensure the election and inauguration Wednesday proceed smoothly. Lee – who survived an assassination attempt last year – has been campaigning in a bullet-proof vest and delivering speeches behind a glass protective shield. — AFP


The Star
6 hours ago
- The Star
Factbox-Russia and Ukraine miles apart on peace terms
A view shows the site of Russian military strike, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine in Sumy, June 3, 2025. REUTERS/Stringer MOSCOW/KYIV (Reuters) -Russia and Ukraine have shared blueprints for a peace deal that demonstrate how far apart the warring parties are. Russia listed its demands in a memorandum handed to Ukrainian negotiators in Istanbul on Monday and published by Russian news agencies. The text of the peace proposals that Ukrainian negotiators put forward has been shown to Reuters. SEQUENCING Moscow proposes a limited 2-3 day truce for the exchange of bodies, and says truce terms must then be negotiated. These would include a list of Russian demands. Kyiv says there can be no talks without a full and unconditional ceasefire, initially for at least 30 days, with the possibility of rolling extensions. It then wants "confidence-building measures", notably the return of all children illegitimately taken from Ukraine and the release of Ukrainian civilian detainees and all prisoners of war on both sides. Meanwhile, full peace negotiations would be prepared. Kyiv says sanctions on Russia could be progressively lifted, with a "snapback" mechanism for restoring them if necessary. Final terms would be settled in a meeting of the two countries' leaders. They would include monitoring of the ceasefire and penalties for breaking it; security guarantees; territorial issues; economic issues including compensation and reconstruction; penalties for breaking the agreements. CEASEFIRE Kyiv says a ceasefire must be unconditional and monitored by the U.S., supported by third countries. Moscow offered two options for a truce. In the first, it would stop firing once Ukraine begins a complete withdrawal from the parts that it still controls of four regions that Russia claims: Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson. This would have to be completed within 30 days. In the second, Ukraine would cease all troop movements, along with enlistment and all foreign military assistance. It would also undertake to halt "sabotage and subversive activities" against Russia. Political prisoners and other detainees would be amnestied and released by both sides. An agreement would be signed on implementing the "parameters" of a settlement, and a date would be set for the signing of a final treaty. Ukraine would lift martial law to remove an obstacle to parliamentary and presidential elections, which it would commit to holding within 100 days. The treaty would be signed, approved by the U.N. Security Council, ratified by both sides and enter into force. FINAL SETTLEMENT Territory Moscow wants international legal recognition of Crimea, seized in 2014, as part of Russia, along with the entirety of Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions. Kyiv notes that the territorial gains made by Russia since 2014 are not recognised by the international community. It says that "the contact line is the starting point for negotiations". Alliances Moscow says Ukraine must become neutral, outside any military alliance, with no foreign forces on its soil, and pledge not to acquire nuclear weapons Ukraine demands the right to join NATO if the U.S.-led transatlantic defence alliance accepts it. Military Moscow wants limits on Ukraine's armed forces and weaponry, and a ban on foreign forces deploying there or providing support. Kyiv rejects all such restrictions. Meanwhile it insists there must be robust international guarantees of the settlement's implementation and of Ukraine's own security. Financial Moscow wants bilateral sanctions scrapped; mutual war damage claims waived; and diplomatic and economic ties, including gas transit flows, restored. Kyiv says Russian sovereign assets including those held abroad must be used for the reconstruction of Ukraine or remain frozen until reparations are paid. National identity Moscow says Ukraine has discriminated against its Russian-speakers - which Kyiv denies - and must guarantee them "full rights", recognising Russian as an official language. Russia has repeatedly accused Ukraine, without evidence, of "glorifying Nazism" and spreading "Nazi propaganda", and demands that these be explicitly outlawed along with "nationalist organisations". (Reporting by Mark Trevelyan; Editing by Kevin Liffey)


New Straits Times
6 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Young Ukrainian women see reporting from frontline as a duty
WHEN Russia invaded Ukraine in early 2022, Olha Kyrylenko was at home watching images from her colleagues risking their lives to cover the siege of the port city of Mariupol. "I asked myself whether I could work in such conditions at all," said Kyrylenko, now a 26-year-old reporter for the leading media outlet Ukrainska Pravda. "And I was like, well, I have to at least try," she said during a rare break in war-torn eastern Ukraine. She went to cover the front lines for the first time shortly after Russia invaded, and noticed that she was far from the only woman. "All my friends, journalists working in the war, are women," Kyrylenko said. While women journalists had already been covering fighting between Ukraine and Kremlin-backed separatists since 2014, a new generation emerged in 2022. Mobilisation in Ukraine's army is obligatory only for men, but the country has seen more and more women joining its ranks. Two Ukrainska Pravda journalists have been drafted into the army, including the photographer Kyrylenko worked with on her first reporting trip to the front in 2022. Since then, she has been working on her own. That was also the case for Viktoria Roshchyna, whose death in Russian detention last year highlighted the risks taken by Ukrainian journalists covering the war. The 27-year-old went missing in 2023 during a high-risk trip to territory occupied by Russian forces. Her body was sent back only in February and bearing signs of torture, according to a media investigation. Kyrylenko worked with Roshchyna and remembers her as "tenacious" and ready to work where no one else would. But Kyrylenko said her death had forced her to think hard about whether journalism "is worth risking your life". In April, Kyrylenko was reporting in Pokrovsk, a vital frontline logistics hub where fighting is fierce, on her mother's birthday. She promised her mother that nothing would happen to her. But, she said, "my life right now is not the highest value in my life". The main thing is "that my country as a country should survive and that the truth about this war, whatever it is, should be present in the information space". Keeping a professional distance as a Ukrainian journalist covering the war can be difficult. Alina Yevych, a 25-year-old reporter, said she had managed — for a while. Then she met a woman who said she had been kidnapped and raped for a week by Russian soldiers in Mariupol. After hearing her words, "I don't know how to be objective", said Yevych, who works along with her boss Maria Davydenko for Vchasno, an independent news outlet. Yevych said soldiers they interview sometimes found it hard to believe that women could understand how tanks work or listen to their stories without flinching. Mentalities are changing, Yevych said, but "for some people, you really remain a girl in this war". Vyacheslav Maryshev, editor in chief of the visuals department at Suspilne, a state-funded news organisation, in Kharkiv in northeast Ukraine, said his female employees tended to take fewer unnecessary risks. The men sometimes want to act like "Rambo" to prove their bravery, he said, but in his team of war reporters there are more women than men. One of them, Oleksandra Novosel, said she had just convinced her bosses to invest in bulletproof jackets more suited to women's body shapes. At the start of the invasion, one of the vests available at Suspilne weighed 12kg — around a quarter of her weight. "I walked around in it and wobbled," Novosel recalled. The 30-year-old said she would prefer not to need a bulletproof vest, and had not imagined working in a warzone until her country became one. She would rather be covering courts or investigating corruption, she said, but for the moment, reporting on the war is "my duty".