logo
Letting your mind wander could help you learn

Letting your mind wander could help you learn

Daydreaming may often be seen as the ultimate time-wasting activity. However, researchers are now showing that letting your mind wander may have more benefits than previously thought.A recent study from Eötvös Loránd University in Hungary has found that allowing your mind to wander while engaged in a simple task may actually improve learning.More than that, participants who allowed themselves to daydream during a simple task were able to complete it just as effectively as those who had remained focused on the activity throughout.'Mind wandering poses an unresolved puzzle for cognitive neuroscience: It is associated with poor performance in various cognitive domains, yet humans spend 30–50% of their waking time mind wandering.'So claim the authors of a recent study published in The Journal of Neuroscience, citing previous literature on this topic.Lead author Péter Simor, PhD, and his colleagues from Eötvös Loránd University in Hungary, however, were keen on challenging assumptions that daydreaming negatively affects performance.Daydreaming is 'wakeful rest''The idea to study the potentially beneficial influence of mind wandering on information processing occurred to us during the COVID pandemic, when we had plenty of time to mind wander,' Simor told Medical News Today on a lighthearted note. Further, the researchers were 'inspired by the studies of local sleep indicating that sleep in a regionally and temporally localized manner can occur in the waking brain, and were also enthusiastic about the studies of Thomas Andrillon and colleagues, who showed that mind wandering […] [is] related to local sleep occurring in wakefulness.'Put simply, daydreaming, as its name aptly suggests, is a form of 'wakeful rest,' so Simor and his collaborators believed that, just like any form of rest, it may actually help give the brain a little 'boost.''We hypothesized that mind wandering linked to local sleep might not have only negative impacts, but may also facilitate information processing, especially in tasks that do not require effortful attention and which are learned without conscious awareness. If mind wandering facilitates learning in probabilistic learning — which is what we observed — perhaps there is no more room for post-learning sleep to improve performance. Maybe these kinds of learning do not require sleep at all, because information is processed during practice and episodes of mind wandering.'– Péter Simor, PhDStill, mind wandering is not just the same as sleep, Simor and his colleague, Dezső Németh, PhD, the study's senior author, cautioned.'By 'rest' during wake we refer to a state when the brain transiently decouples from the demands of the external environment to engage in internally dominated cognitive processes,' Simor and Németh explained for MNT. 'Nevertheless, this disconnection is just transient and limited in time and space (brain regions), therefore it just resembles some aspects of sleep, but it is markedly different from sleep,' they added.Daydreamers experience a learning 'boost'To find out how letting your mind wander actually impacts cognition, they designed a study where 27 participants — young adults in their 20s, an almost even split between male and female — had to complete a simple learning task.As they were doing this, the researchers recorded their brain activity using high-density electroencephalography, form of technology specially designed for behavioral experiments.The participants engaged in a probabilistic learning task — a simple task that involved extracting information but without requiring high levels of attention.Following task completion, they filled in a questionnaire assessing how focused they perceived themselves to have been while engaged in the exercise.The researchers found that participants who had allowed their minds to wander during the task had brain activity indicative of a 'sleep-like' state at the time of the experiment. This was also associated with 'enhanced probabilistic learning,' especially in the early stages of the task.All of this is to say that the daydreamers appeared to experience a boost in learning capacity. Moreover, the researchers also found that daydreamers and focused participants were both able to complete the task just as effectively.Speaking to MNT, Caroline Fenkel, DSW, LCSW, adolescent mental health expert, and Chief Clinical Officer at Charlie Health, who was not involved in this study, commented that 'the findings […] add to a growing body of research that challenges the idea that 'focus equals learning'.''As a clinician, I find it compelling that the brain might be quietly learning in the background while we daydream,' Fenkel added, noting that 'this study highlights that the brain is always working, even when it seems like we've checked out.''And for folks who've been told they're 'not paying attention enough,' especially those with ADHD or trauma histories, this can feel validating and hopeful,' she suggested.How does mind wandering contribute to learning?The mechanisms behind how mind wandering might help enhance learning capacity under certain circumstances, though, remain unclear.Simor and Németh were wary of providing a full hypothesis in the absence of hard evidence. 'We prefer to remain cautious about causality,' they told us.Still, they noted that:'What we observe is the periods of mind wandering are not negatively but, to some extent, positively associated with nonconscious, probabilistic learning, which is a very fundamental form of learning. […] Mind wandering may reflect a state when cognitive resources are allocated to process information at the expense of accurate responses and sustained attention. One possibility is that mind wandering is linked to sleep-like neural activity, which facilitates information processing and memory consolidation. The other possibility is that mind wandering reflects a state when controlled, so called model based processes are attenuated and associative, automatic, model-free learning is increased.'At the same time, they cautioned that daydreaming is, admittedly, not always helpful, and that we need to be careful about allowing our minds to wander in situations that require our full, dedicated awareness and engagement.'This [study] finding does not question the widely established observation that mind wandering exerts a negative influence on a variety of cognitive domains, especially those which require effortful attention,' said Simor and Németh.More work from Simor, Németh, and their collaborators is also on the horizon. 'We have a lot of plans for continuing this research — from the perspectives of sleep research, learning and memory, and intervention studies,' Simor and Németh told MNT.The list of upcoming trials the team is looking forward to is extensive: 'On the sleep research side, we're studying patients with narcolepsy, who are likely to experience more mind wandering during the day. We want to see how this affects their learning and predictive processes. […] We've also started an intervention study where we use noninvasive brain stimulation to enhance sleep-like slow-wave activity in the brain. and investigate whether this leads to increased mind wandering and improved implicit learning.'For now, daydreamers can rest easy in the knowledge that not every distraction is bad news for the brain.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democrat pushes for 'cognitive decline' tests for members of Congress
Democrat pushes for 'cognitive decline' tests for members of Congress

Daily Mail​

time5 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Democrat pushes for 'cognitive decline' tests for members of Congress

A push to set cognitive standards for the scores of aging lawmakers in Congress has hit a roadblock with their colleagues. After former President Joe Biden stunned the nation by cancelling his presidential bid weeks after his disastrous debate against Donald Trump, scrutiny over age-related decline has shifted from the White House to Capitol Hill. Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, D-Wash., proposed an amendment earlier this summer that would force an independent congressional body that reviews misconduct allegations to create standards to determine lawmakers' 'ability to perform the duties of office unimpeded by significant irreversible cognitive impairment.' Her proposal was unanimously and swiftly rejected by her colleagues, though her effort to set cognitive standards is far from over. 'I hear about it at town halls; I heard a lot about it after the presidential debate,' Perez told the New York Times of Biden's fateful showdown against Trump last summer. 'It is my job to reflect my community's sentiment that this is a problem. It's my job to reflect the accelerating loss of confidence in this body.' 'We have all of these rules about dumb stuff — hats — and not this more significant question of who is making decisions in the office,' she said. Perez, 37, is the co-chair of Democrats' moderate Blue Dog Coalition. She is one of the few Democratic members of Congress to be elected in a district that President Donald Trump carried. She is also one of the few Democrats to express concerns over the health of Rep. Eleanor Holmes Norton, 88-year-old non-voting delegate for Washington, D.C. who has been dogged by reports about her cognitive decline. Norton, the oldest member of the House of Representatives, has shown signs of decline during her official duties. Aides frequently help her navigate the sprawling Capitol complex and they have had to walk back quotes Norton gives to reporters. But she seems unconcerned with her own condition, announcing recently that she would seek re-election next year, when she will be 89. One of her staffers later told reporters that 'no decision has been made' yet about the D.C. delegate's re-election. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle appear opposed to cognitive tests because they're seen as a personal attack on older lawmakers and infringe on Congress' long tradition that rewards seniority. According to an analysis done by the Times , more than one in five members, or 22 percent, of this Congress is 70 or older - a level not seen in modern history. Age-related issues in the Capitol have become painfully clear this year after three sitting members of Congress, all 70-years-old or older, have died this year while in office. In March, Democratic Reps. Sylvester Turner of Texas and Raúl Grijalva of Arizona passed away due to complications with cancer. Virginia Rep. Gerry Connolly died in May from esophageal cancer while he held the top Democratic position on the powerful House Oversight Committee. In 2024, there were also three Democratic members of the House who passed away while in office. 'What I've heard from my neighbors, my community is this idea that this place is being run by a bunch of staffers,' Perez told Axios this year. 'And we're seeing a very real decline in confidence in Congress.' Despite her amendment getting shot down earlier this year, the 37-year-old has floated plans to renew her push for cognitive standards saying she may propose it as a stand alone bill. She has said she may court some Republican support to get her bill through the House. 'This is not an issue that's going away,' she told the Times. 'We're still talking to other members of Congress about a stand-alone bill, and trying to talk with leadership about a path forward here.' Her push comes amid a House Oversight Committee investigation into Biden's mental acuity and whether it was covered up by his top staffers. Many of the ex-Biden aides have pleaded their Fifth Amendment protections to not incriminate themselves during their interviews with the committee, raising questions about what they knew about the Democrat's health and when. 'It's a question of whether the elected member is making the decisions,' Perez said.

Growing push for cognitive decline tests for members of Congress hits snag despite 'accelerating loss of confidence'
Growing push for cognitive decline tests for members of Congress hits snag despite 'accelerating loss of confidence'

Daily Mail​

time5 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Growing push for cognitive decline tests for members of Congress hits snag despite 'accelerating loss of confidence'

A push to set cognitive standards for the scores of aging lawmakers in Congress has hit a roadblock with their colleagues. After former President Joe Biden stunned the nation by cancelling his presidential bid weeks after his disastrous debate against Donald Trump, scrutiny over age-related decline has shifted from the White House to Capitol Hill. Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, D-Wash., proposed an amendment earlier this summer that would force an independent congressional body that reviews misconduct allegations to create standards to determine lawmakers' 'ability to perform the duties of office unimpeded by significant irreversible cognitive impairment.' Her proposal was unanimously and swiftly rejected by her colleagues, though her effort to set cognitive standards is far from over. 'I hear about it at town halls; I heard a lot about it after the presidential debate,' Perez told the New York Times of Biden's fateful showdown against Trump last summer. 'It is my job to reflect my community's sentiment that this is a problem. It's my job to reflect the accelerating loss of confidence in this body.' 'We have all of these rules about dumb stuff — hats — and not this more significant question of who is making decisions in the office,' she said. Perez, 37, is the co-chair of Democrats' moderate Blue Dog Coalition. She is one of the few Democratic members of Congress to be elected in a district that President Donald Trump carried. She is also one of the few Democrats to express concerns over the health of Rep. Eleanor Holmes Norton, 88-year-old non-voting delegate for Washington, D.C. who has been dogged by reports about her cognitive decline. Norton, the oldest member of the House of Representatives, has shown signs of decline during her official duties. Aides frequently help her navigate the sprawling Capitol complex and they have had to walk back quotes Norton gives to reporters. But she seems unconcerned with her own condition, announcing recently that she would seek re-election next year, when she will be 89. One of her staffers later told reporters that 'no decision has been made' yet about the D.C. delegate's re-election. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle appear opposed to cognitive tests because they're seen as a personal attack on older lawmakers and infringe on Congress' long tradition that rewards seniority. According to an analysis done by the Times, more than one in five members, or 22 percent, of this Congress is 70 or older - a level not seen in modern history. Age-related issues in the Capitol have become painfully clear this year after three sitting members of Congress, all 70-years-old or older, have died this year while in office. In March, Democratic Reps. Sylvester Turner of Texas and Raúl Grijalva of Arizona passed away due to complications with cancer. Virginia Rep. Gerry Connolly died in May from esophageal cancer while he held the top Democratic position on the powerful House Oversight Committee. In 2024, there were also three Democratic members of the House who passed away while in office. 'What I've heard from my neighbors, my community is this idea that this place is being run by a bunch of staffers,' Perez told Axios this year. 'And we're seeing a very real decline in confidence in Congress.' Despite her amendment getting shot down earlier this year, the 37-year-old has floated plans to renew her push for cognitive standards saying she may propose it as a stand alone bill. She has said she may court some Republican support to get her bill through the House. 'This is not an issue that's going away,' she told the Times. 'We're still talking to other members of Congress about a stand-alone bill, and trying to talk with leadership about a path forward here.' Her push comes amid a House Oversight Committee investigation into Biden's mental acuity and whether it was covered-up by his top staffers. Many of the ex-Biden aides have pleaded their Fifth Amendment protections to not incriminate themselves during their interviews with the committee, raising questions about what they knew about the Democrat's health and when. 'It's a question of whether the elected member is making the decisions,' Perez said.

To stay sharper while aging, get active, challenge your brain, and eat healthy
To stay sharper while aging, get active, challenge your brain, and eat healthy

The Independent

time7 hours ago

  • The Independent

To stay sharper while aging, get active, challenge your brain, and eat healthy

It's official: Older Americans worried about cognitive decline can stay sharper for longer by exercising both their bodies and their brains and eating healthier. That's according to initial results released Monday from a rigorous U.S. study of lifestyle changes in seniors at risk of developing dementia. People following a combination of healthier habits slowed typical age-related cognitive decline — achieving scores on brain tests as if they were a year or two younger, researchers reported in JAMA and at the Alzheimer's Association International Conference. It's not too late to get started -- study participants were in their 60s and 70s -- and it doesn't require becoming a pickleball champ or swearing off ice cream. 'It was the first time I felt like I was doing something proactive to protect my brain,' said Phyllis Jones, 66, of Aurora, Illinois, who joined the study after caring for her mother with dementia and struggling with her own health problems. It's too soon to know if stalling age-related decline also could reduce the risk of later Alzheimer's or other forms of dementia. But Jones and other study participants underwent brain scans and blood tests that researchers now are analyzing for clues – such as whether people also saw a reduction in Alzheimer's-related protein buildup. 'We're all on a cognitive aging clock and anything we can do to slow that clock down, to me, that is a significant benefit,' said Laura Baker of Wake Forest University School of Medicine, who led the study. What's good for the heart is good for the brain Doctors have long encouraged physical activity and a healthy diet for brain fitness. Those steps fight high blood pressure and cholesterol, heart disease and diabetes, factors that increase the risk of dementia. But until now the strongest evidence that specific lifestyle changes later in life could improve how people perform on brain tests came from a study in Finland. Would it work for a more sedentary and culturally diverse U.S. population? With funding from the Alzheimer's Association and the National Institute on Aging, Baker's team tested the strategy for two years in 2,100 adults ages 60 to 79. Here's what study participants had to do Half of participants were randomly assigned to group classes for exercise and dietary changes plus brain-challenging homework – with peer support and coaches tracking their progress. They did a half-hour of moderately intense exercise four times a week -- plus twice a week, they added 10 to 15 minutes of stretching and 15 to 20 minutes of resistance training. They followed the 'MIND diet' that stresses lots of leafy greens and berries plus whole grains, poultry and fish. Nothing is banned but it urges limiting red meat, fried or 'fast food' and sweets, and substituting olive oil for butter and margarine. They also had to meet someone or try something new weekly and do brain 'exercises' using an online program called Brain HQ. Other study participants, the control group, received brain-healthy advice and minimal coaching — they chose what steps to follow. Both improved but the groups fared significantly better. Combining social engagement with exercise and dietary steps may be key, said Jessica Langbaum of the Banner Alzheimer's Institute, who wasn't involved with the study. 'Americans want to have that one easy thing – 'If I just eat my blueberries,'' Langbaum said. 'There is no one magic bullet. It is a whole lifestyle.' How to exercise your body and mind on your own Moderately intense physical activity means raising your heart rate and panting a bit yet still able to talk, said Wake Forest's Baker. Pick something safe for your physical capability and start slowly, just 10 minutes at a time until you can handle more, she cautioned. Make it something you enjoy so you stick with it. Likewise there are many options for brain exercise, Baker said – puzzles, joining a book club, learning an instrument or a new language. Jones, a software engineer-turned-tester, learned she loves blueberry-spinach smoothies. Her favorite exercise uses an at-home virtual reality program that lets her work up a sweat while appearing to be in another country and communicating with other online users. One challenge: How to keep up the good work Researchers will track study participants' health for four more years and the Alzheimer's Association is preparing to translate the findings into local community programs. Will people with stick with their new habits? Jones lost 30 pounds, saw her heart health improve and feels sharper especially when multitasking. But she hadn't realized her diet slipped when study coaching ended until a checkup spotted rising blood sugar. Now she and an 81-year-old friend from the study are helping keep each other on track. The lifestyle change 'did not just affect me physically, it also affected me mentally and emotionally. It brought me to a much better place,' Jones said. —- The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store