Nigel Farage demands Keir Starmer gives him some Reform UK peers in the House of Lords as he blasts 'democratic disparity'
The Reform leader has hit out at a 'democratic disparity' that sees his party have no representation in Parliament's unelected upper chamber.
This is despite Reform having four MPs and controlling a slew of local councils.
In a letter to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, seen by The Times, Mr Farage pointed out how other parties with a small number of MPs had been able to nominate peers.
Mr Farage also noted how Reform won more than 4.1 million votes at last year's general election, and has led in national opinion polls for many months.
'The Greens, DUP, Plaid Cymru and UUP have 13 peers between them, but Reform UK has none,' he wrote.
'The time has come to address the democratic disparity that exists in the upper house.'
The Greens have four MPs in the House of Commons and two peers in the Lords, the DUP have five MPs and six peers, and the UUP have one MP and three peers.
Reform figures such as Ann Widdecombe, the ex-Tory MP, Nick Candy, a billionaire donor, and Zia Yusuf, Reform's ex-chairman, are potential candidates for the Lords.
Tory peer Lord Norton of Louth, a constitutional expert, said there was a 'case for minor parties like Reform to have representation in the Lords' but this was up to Sir Keir.
'The PM is the only person who writes the rules on this as it stands,' he said.
'Historically appointments to the House of Lords were in the gift of the Crown but that function has been passed to the prime minister.
'So any decision on whether to create Reform peers would rest with him alone.'
Lord O'Donnell, the former cabinet secretary, said: 'It is a feature of our system that the PM can appoint whoever they like to the House of Lords.
'It is an area where I think we need greater checks and balances.'
But Lord Hayward, the Tory peer and election expert, said: 'Just because Reform has a few MPs and is doing well in the opinion polls that does not mean that they are an established credible party that should be represented in the House of Lords.
'I think Starmer is entirely within his rights to wait and see how Reform actually does over the next few years before making a decision.'
In December last year, Sir Keir appointed 30 new Labour peers - including a string of ex-MPs and his sacked chief of staff Sue Gray - to the House of Lords.
At the same time, the Tories had six new peers appointed to the Lords - including former deputy PM Therese Coffey - while the Liberal Democrats got two new peers.
Defence Secretary John Healey this morning highlighted how Mr Farage had previously called for the Lords to be scrapped.
He told Times Radio: 'This is the same Nigel Farage that called for the abolition of the House of Lords and now wants to fill it with his cronies.
'But look, I'm not sure that Parliament is going to be benefiting from more Putin apologists like Nigel Farage, to be honest.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
17 minutes ago
- BBC News
Reform UK deputy Leicestershire County Council leader removed
The deputy leader of Leicestershire County Council has been removed from the role after three months in the UK's Joseph Boam has also been removed from position as cabinet member for adult social care, with a party source saying he would now be taking on an unspecified "new role".The 22-year-old was one of 25 Reform councillors elected to the authority in May's local on social media on Sunday, Boam said: "Despite the recent news, nothing's changed, I'll keep fighting for Whitwick at County Hall and doing everything I can to help get a Reform UK government and Nigel Farage as our next prime minister." County council leader Dan Harrison told the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) he would not comment on the matter until after the Reform group had met later this to the LDRS, Boam previously said: "I haven't stepped down from any role. I am no longer deputy leader or in cabinet. But have been offered a cabinet support role which I'm inclined to take." After winning 25 of the 55 seats on the council, Reform took control from the Conservatives to form a minority administration.A Reform UK source added: "Joseph deserves thanks for his role in helping to establish the Reform group at Leicestershire County Council and we wish him well, as he moves into a new role, where he will continue to support the group's efforts at County Hall."The Leicestershire Conservative group - the main opposition on the authority - has now branded Reform UK's local leadership a "shambles". Their leader Deborah Taylor said it was "no surprise" to her Boam "has been shown the door after just three months".She added: "He was wholly unqualified for such a critical role and lacked the experience or judgement to bring anything of value to the position. "Those of us who have led this council know that it takes at least six to 12 months for even the most capable new councillor to properly learn their portfolio, and that's with the benefit of mentoring from seasoned colleagues."A new deputy leader and cabinet member for adult social care is expected to appointed in due course.
The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
Larger families could gain more than £20,000 if Labour scraps two-child benefit cap
Tens of thousands of families with multiple children could receive thousands of pounds more in annual payments if ministers scrap the two child benefit cap, according to official figures. More than 70,000 households would be entitled to over £18,000 a year in child benefits if the policy is lifted, with the largest families gaining more than £20,000 compared with the current system. The cap, introduced under Conservative welfare reforms, blocks parents from claiming the child element of Universal Credit worth £292.81 a month for a third or subsequent child born after April 2017. Figures released in response to a parliamentary question show 71,580 families with five or more children would benefit from its removal. That includes nearly 15,000 families with six children, almost 5,000 with seven, and more than 400 with ten or more, who could be eligible for the child payments. Labour MPs are pressing Sir Keir Starmer to deliver on his pledge of fairness by abolishing the cap, which they argue is punishing children growing up in poverty. The Institute for Fiscal Studies has previously estimated that ending the policy would lift around half a million children out of hardship. But Conservatives insist the cap is a matter of fairness for taxpayers, arguing that it prevents families on benefits from receiving packages worth more than the minimum wage. Nigel Farage has also called for it to be scrapped, leaving the Conservatives increasingly isolated in defending the measure. The prime minister must find around £3.5 billion to fund the move. Chancellor Rachel Reeves is weighing proposals, including a push from Gordon Brown to raise gambling levies. Helen Whately, the shadow work and pensions secretary, said: 'Without a cap, Labour will end up giving households thousands of pounds in extra benefits — a top-up worth more than a year's full-time pay on the minimum wage. Not only is this unaffordable, it's also unfair. If you're in work you don't get extra pay for another child, so it doesn't make sense for parents on benefits to get more.' She added: 'Working people shouldn't see their taxes go up to fund uncapped payouts to others who've opted out of work but opted in to multiple children.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
UK's first trans judge to challenge Supreme Court's landmark gender ruling using European human rights laws
Britain's first transgender judge has lodged an appeal with the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) against the landmark Supreme Court ruling on the definition of a woman. Victoria McCloud is seeking a rehearing of the case as she claims the UK's highest court undermined her Article 6 rights to a fair trial when it declined to hear evidence from her. In April the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that 'woman' and 'man' refer to biological women and men in the context of the Equality act and that 'the concept of sex is binary'. Ms McCloud - who left her role as a judge last year - is seeking a review as she claims the Supreme Court refused permission for her to provide evidence on how its clarification of the law would affect trans people. But women's rights campaigners have dismissed the case as a 'fantasy' and say Ms McCloud should exhaust 'all domestic legal remedies' before appealing to the court in Strasbourg. The former judge will be represented by Oscar Davies, the UK's first openly non-binary barrister, and Olivia Campbell-Cavendish, the founder of the Trans Legal Clinic and the UK's first black trans lawyer. 'There is no space for decision-making about us, without us,' Ms McCloud said in a statement yesterday. 'I intend to ensure that there will be no peace for the gender-critical ideological movement, the Labour Government appeasing it, or space in our schools, homes and workplaces for an ideology which causes harm, misery and oppression of a small and law-abiding minority in our formerly tolerant country.' A spokesman for the Trans Legal Clinic said: 'For the trans community, it embodies a simple truth: there must be no more conversations about us, without us. 'At its heart lies the principle in Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights; the right to a fair and impartial hearing by an independent tribunal. 'This cornerstone of democratic societies exists to guarantee that those whose rights are affected can take part in proceedings that determine their future.' However Maya Forstater, chief executive of human rights charity Sex Matters, said Ms McCloud's appeal is legally 'incomprehensible' and a 'fantasy'. She said: 'What we are being told about this proposed case is incomprehensible. The ECHR only hears cases that have exhausted all domestic legal remedies, and since McCloud wasn't a party to For Women Scotland in the Supreme Court, that's not the case here. 'It's a fantasy that someone can go straight to Strasbourg to complain that the Supreme Court in their own country didn't listen to them.' Ms Forstater added: 'This looks more like a deceptive and expensive PR campaign than a serious legal strategy.' The Supreme Court can consider outside arguments from 'interveners' at its discretion but rarely allows individuals to intervene and often rejects them if it will hear the same arguments from others. In the biological sex case, the UK's highest court did consider arguments on trans issues from the human rights campaign group Amnesty International. Susan Smith - from For Women Scotland, which brought the Supreme Court case - said that it is the Supreme Court's 'prerogative whether to accept interventions or not' and that it 'rarely takes interventions from individuals' 'We will watch with interest whether McCloud's application is accepted by the ECHR or even if it comes within the deadline to proceed,' she added. Ms McCloud transitioned in the 1990s and became the first transgender barrister and judge in the UK. She stood down last year, saying she could not continue her work amid the increasingly fraught public debate. In her resignation letter, Ms McCloud likened herself to civil rights activist Rosa Parks. It comes as Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy was criticised for wearing a trans rights T-shirt with the slogan 'protect the dolls' while attending a Pride march in her Wigan constituency. Critics have said a government minister should not be promoting the slogan and described it as a 'middle finger from the Labour Government'. The term 'doll' is a slang term from the 1980s for biological men who 'pass' as women but has seen a revival after celebrities including Pedro Pascal, Madonna and Tilda Swinton were photographed in a £75 T-shirt emblazoned with the slogan. James Esses, a gender critical campaigner and therapist, said it was a 'middle finger from the Labour Government to everyone who believes in biological reality'. Fiona McAnena, from Sex Matters, said: 'No elected representative of the public - let alone a government minister - should be promoting the slogan of campaigners who are calling for men to be able to identify into any space for women'. The Culture Secretary was contacted for comment.
