logo
Bihar electoral roll revision: EC tells SC 'Aadhaar card not a proof of citizenship'

Bihar electoral roll revision: EC tells SC 'Aadhaar card not a proof of citizenship'

Mint10-07-2025
Bihar electoral roll revision: The Election Commission told the Supreme Cpurt on Thursday that 'Aadhaar card not a proof of citizenship'. The ECI made the comments while responding to the court's question why Aadhaar was excluded from the Bihar Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls.
The Supreme Court was hearing on a batch of pleas challenging the Election Commission's decision to undertake a special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in the poll-bound Bihar.
The case was heard by a partial working day (PWD) bench comprising Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Joymalya Bagchi. Senior advocates Rakesh Dwivedi, KK VenuGopal and Maninder Singh representated the Election Commission. Senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan appeared for one of the petitioners.
The bone of contention in the July 10 hearing was the provision in the EC's June 24 directive that sought a large section of people in Bihar to prove their Indian citizenship to take part in the Bihar Asembly Elections 2025.
The last 'Intensive Revision' in Bihar took place in 2003. The Election Commission said the people whose names were in the voter list till 2003 do not need to submit any document, as there was a detailed revision at that time.
However, other (enrolled after 2003) must provide one or more documents from a list of 11 (along with a pre-filled enumeration form for existing electors) to establish their date and/or place of birth – which, in turn, is used to determine citizenship.
Those not listed in the 2003 roll will need to submit a document for their date of birth/place of birth as per their birthdate as follows: individuals born before 1st July 1987, to provide a document for themselves, those born between 1st July 1987 and 2nd December 2004, to include documents for themselves and one parent, Individuals born after 2nd December 2004, to submit documents for themselves and both parents.
Electors whose parents' names were on the Electoral Roll as of 01.01.2003, need not submit any additional documents relating to their parents, PTI reported.
The Supreme Court questioned the timing of the EC's electoral roll revision. The court told the poll body that it should have acted early if it wanted to check citizenship under SIR of electoral rolls in Bihar. 'Isn't it too late now for that?,' the court reportedly said.
The Bench was quoted by Live Law as saying, "There is nothing wrong in you [EC] purging electoral rolls through an intensive exercise in order to see that non-citizens don't remain on the role. But if you decide only a couple of months before a proposed election..."
The SUpreme Court also asked the Election Commission: 'Why are you getting into citizenship issue in special revision of electoral rolls in Bihar? It is domain of MHA [Ministry of Homes Affairs].'
The Election Commission said the citizenship is required to be checked for being voter in India under Article 326 of Constitution.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Govt banks on panel's watch as dog menace deepens
Govt banks on panel's watch as dog menace deepens

Time of India

time31 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Govt banks on panel's watch as dog menace deepens

Thiruvananthapuram: With over three lakh dog bite cases reported in a single year, the state govt has decided to retain the services of the committee headed by former high court judge Siri Jagan to process compensation claims from victims of stray dog attacks. Though the Supreme Court ruled in May 2024 that future compensation claims could be addressed by constitutional courts or other competent forums, it did not specify about the future of the existing mechanism in Kerala. As a result, when the committee paused its functioning citing a lack of clarity, public concerns mounted, especially with the state witnessing an alarming increase in dog bite cases. Data presented in the assembly paints a grim picture. In 2024 alone, 3,16,793 people sought treatment in govt hospitals after being bitten by dogs. It is suggested that the actual number could go over six lakh if those treated in private hospitals are also accounted for. Thiruvananthapuram district leads with 50,870 reported bite cases, followed by Kollam (37,618), Ernakulam (32,086) and Palakkad (31,303). Even hilly regions like Idukki (10,003) and Wayanad (5,719) have not been spared. The staggering stray dog population is at the heart of the issue. As per the latest available estimate presented in the assembly—based on the 2019 Livestock Census—Kerala is home to 2,89,986 stray dogs. That's nearly one stray dog for every 12 people in the state. The Siri Jagan committee was originally constituted to streamline compensation for victims and ensure humane responses to the stray dog crisis. Animal welfare groups have long warned that unchecked growth in the stray population, combined with inadequate sterilisation efforts and poor waste management, has created a situation in which both people and animals are at risk. The continuation of the committee offers some relief to victims, but pressure is mounting for lasting solutions and not just post-incident payouts. There have been calls for bold legislative interventions. In a detailed social media post, bureaucrat N Prasanth argued that Kerala can enact laws suited to its growing public safety crisis as animal welfare is a subject under the concurrent list of the Constitution. He suggested that the state could bring in targeted legislation such as a 'Kerala Public Safety and Aggressive Animals Regulation Act', which would allow for the classification and control of dangerous animals, including aggressive stray dogs. He also highlighted legal provisions available under Section 13 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and the 1967 Kerala Prevention and Control of Animal Diseases Act, which, if properly notified and clarified, can empower authorities to cull rabies-suspected or violent animals in hotspot zones.

Why creating a big fuss now: Election Commission says draft voter list not final
Why creating a big fuss now: Election Commission says draft voter list not final

India Today

time36 minutes ago

  • India Today

Why creating a big fuss now: Election Commission says draft voter list not final

The Election Commission (EC) on Sunday raised sharp questions over the ongoing controversy surrounding the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral roll in Bihar, clarifying that the draft voters' list to be published on August 1 is not the final a strongly-worded statement, the EC said that a full month from August 1 to September 1 will be available for eligible citizens to file claims and objections, and ensure any wrongful inclusions or exclusions are corrected. The final list will be published on September poll panel questioned the motive behind the uproar, saying, "Why are they creating such a big fuss now?" when the process is still ongoing. As part of the first phase of SIR, which ended on July 25, enumeration forms were received from 7.24 crore voters — representing 91.69% of Bihar's electorate. During this period, booth-level officers found that around 36 lakh electors had either permanently shifted or were untraceable. Additionally, seven lakh voters were discovered to be registered at multiple EC clarified that the status of these voters will be scrutinised and finalised by August 1, but stressed that "genuine electors can still be added back to electoral rolls during the Claims and Objection period from August 1 to September 1." Names appearing at multiple places will be retained at only one to political allegations, the EC asked, "Why not ask their 1.6 lakh booth-level agents to submit claims and objections from August 1 till September 1?" It emphasised that all parties are free to check the process on the ground through their own poll body further asked, "Why are some people trying to give the impression that the draft list is the final list, which it is not, as per Special Intensive Revision orders?"Opposition parties in Bihar have alleged that the revision process could disenfranchise crores of voters due to documentation issues, and claimed it may benefit the ruling BJP through targeted exclusion of opposition such concerns, the EC maintained that the goal of the SIR is to ensure full participation of all electors and political parties. It noted that the number of booth-level agents (BLAs) increased by 16 per cent during the SIR phase, and added that "special efforts" are being made to ensure that no eligible voter in Bihar is left behind.- EndsWith inputs from InMust Watch

Bharat must remain Bharat, shouldn't be altered: RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat
Bharat must remain Bharat, shouldn't be altered: RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat

India Today

time36 minutes ago

  • India Today

Bharat must remain Bharat, shouldn't be altered: RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat

Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) Chief Mohan Bhagwat on Sunday emphasised that 'Bharat must remain Bharat' and should not be translated or altered in any context, as reported by news agency at the 'Gyan Sabha', a national education conclave organised by the RSS-linked Shiksha Sanskriti Utthan Nyas, Bhagwat said that Bharat is not just a name but the nation's very 'identity'.advertisement'Bharat is a proper noun. It should not be translated. 'India that is Bharat,' is true. But Bharat is Bharat, and that is why, while writing and speaking, we should keep Bharat as Bharat... Bharat must remain Bharat,' Bhagwat said, stressing that the global respect India commands is rooted in its original identity, or 'Bharatiyata'. He cautioned that losing one's identity, regardless of achievements, could result in a loss of respect and security on the global stage. 'The identity of Bharat is respected because it is Bharat. If you lose your identity, whatever other meritorious qualities you may have, you will never be respected or secure in this world. That is the rule of thumb,' he highlighted India's historical commitment to peace and non-violence, saying the country has never followed expansionist or exploitative policies.'Viksit Bharat, Vishwa Guru Bharat, will not be the cause of war ... and will never exploit. We have gone from Mexico to Siberia; we walked on foot, and we went in small boats. We did not invade anyone's territory or ruin it. We did not usurp anyone's kingdom. We taught everyone civilisation,' he to India's civilisational philosophy, he added, 'You see the tradition of Indian knowledge. The root of the tradition is in that truth... the truth of the unity of the whole world.'On education, Bhagwat called for a values-based system rooted in India's cultural ethos. He stressed the need for education to foster self-reliance and social responsibility. 'One small intention behind getting education is to be able to stand on your own in your life and to be able to keep your family intact...' he to nationalist thinker Maharishi Arvind, the RSS Chief linked the revival of Sanatana Dharma to the idea of a Hindu nation. 'Yogi Arvind said that it is God's will for the Sanatana Dharma to rise and for the rise of Sanatana Dharma, the rise of the Hindu nation is inevitable. These are his words, and we see that today's world needs this vision. Therefore, we will have to first understand what Bharat is...' he concluded by reiterating the importance of anchoring India's education system in its civilisational values and national identity.- EndsWith inputs from InMust Watch

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store