'Frightening and surreal': Palestine Action and a Saturday of mass arrests
Police were working their way through some 1,000 people gathered there, displaying the same sign. When her turn came, she didn't budge.
'Something just told me that I just wanted to lie there and be non-compliant,' she said.
When a young police officer crouched down and informed her she was under arrest under Section 13 of the Terrorism Act, she asked him simply, "Genocide is a crime isn't it?"
By that point, Cohen felt she had tried everything available to her to pressure the British government to do more to stop Israel's onslaught on Gaza, which has killed more than 61,000 Palestinians since October 2023.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
She dutifully took part in national pro-Palestine demonstrations, marching alongside fellow Jews as part of the Jewish bloc, wrote endless social media posts and repeatedly wrote to her MP, with no results.
She said Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's move to ban direct action group Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act was the 'utter last straw'.
'I struggle for words because I'm so exasperated and I'm so distressed about what's happening, you know, how can you not be?' she told MEE.
'It feels like there's nothing we can do, but we just have to use our body and our voice'
- Zoe Cohen, protester
'It feels like there's nothing we can do, but we just have to use our body and our voice,' she said. 'We have to stand up and be counted, or, in our case, sit down'.
'Another reason I did this is because of the government and media conflation of Zionism with Judaism, and of Israel and all Jews, and my horror and disgust at the implication that this genocide is being committed in my name,' Cohen said.
'Israel's actions make Jews less safe. There are many Jews who do not support Zionism or the actions of the Israeli state, but our voices are often silenced.'
Criminals over the age of 60
The UK government proscribed direct action group Palestine Action under anti-terror laws on 4 July, following an incident in which members broke into RAF Brize Norton and attacked with paint and crowbars two planes they said were 'used for military operations in Gaza and across the Middle East".
The designation puts Palestine Action on a par with al-Qaeda and the Islamic State under British law, making it a criminal offence to show support for or invite support for the group, punishable by up to 14 years in prison under the Terrorism Act 2000.
Cohen was arrested under Section 13 of the Terrorism Act, along with over 500 people, half of them aged 60 and above, at the largest protest yet denouncing the ban.
Defend Our Juries (DOJ), the campaign group that called the protest, said it was the largest mass arrest in the history of London's Metropolitan Police, outstripping the number of arrests during the Poll Tax riots of 1990.
Police detain a protester in central London on 9 August 2025 (Jaimi Joy/Reuters)
According to police figures, nearly 100 of those arrested at the Palestine Action sit-in were in their 70s, while 15 of them were over 80 years of age.
The majority were detained under Section 13 of the Terrorism Act, the less severe part of the legislation, which involves trial in a magistrates court rather than a crown court.
To deal with the volume of arrestees, the police implemented a 'street bail system', setting up 'prisoner processing points' housed in pop-up gazebos on the streets of central London.
All those arrested have been released under police bail, with the main condition being that they do not attend future protests challenging the ban.
'It felt dystopian'
When she refused to comply with the police, Cohen said she was carried by several officers from the protest in Parliament Square.
'As they picked me up, all the emotion of the day, and not just the day, but the collective grief and the distress of what's happening in Gaza, it just came out of me. I was sobbing,' she said.
Cohen was then put into a 'metal cage' at the back of a police van and driven round the corner to a processing site near Great Scotland Yard, where she found herself in a queue of some 150 people accompanied by their arresting officers.
'I've got a young child, and I do look at her and think if I were to be taken away from her because of this, that would rip me in two'
- Hayley Walsh, protester
'My arresting officer was very young, he was very new to the job,' Cohen said. 'Quite a lot of them were quite young and junior. I don't think they knew what was going on, not sure they really understood the law.'
She said they waited for a while and were then 'marched down the street on foot' back to another processing centre near Parliament Square.
'I've never seen anything like this processing centre, there were generators because they had rows of laptops for entering our details. So like a virtual custody desk on the street. It felt dystopian,' Cohen said.
'We were mainly middle-aged and older people, politely queuing.'
According to Cohen, other protestors reported that some participants were mistakenly arrested under Section 12, and then re-arrested under Section 13.
"There was quite a bit of chaos, but they had clearly organised this", she said.
She recalled that arrestees were informed that if they did not give their details at the custody desk, they would be taken to a police station in Devon or South Wales.
Rachel Stubley, a 63-year-old who was also arrested, recalled seeing a 'massive pile of pre-printed forms' at the processing centre.
'The form I was given, it was quite extraordinary, it said 'you have been arrested under Section 13 of the Terrorism Act',' she told MEE.
'So they clearly planned to arrest everyone. There's no way they could take everyone to the station. So they tried to get everyone processed on the street.'
Zoe Cohen protesting in central London on 9 August 2025 (Supplied)
Hayley Walsh, 43, described the experience as 'unfathomably surreal'.
'It's terrifying, and hearing the words said to you, 'I'm arresting you under the Terrorism Act', is frightening, and the consequences are frightening', Walsh told MEE.
'I've got a young child, and I do look at her and think if I were to be taken away from her because of this, that would rip me in two".
"But I don't want this world for my children," she said. " I look at my five-year-old's face and I don't think I cannot take risks for myself if it means there's a potential for a better world for my children and for all children".
Stubley said she was moved to take part in Saturday's protest after a conversation with a younger activist.
'They said to me: you're white and middle class and older, maybe it's time for you to step up,' she told MEE.
'I went away and thought about what would be my reason for not doing this. I could pay a fine without it beggaring me. Worst-case scenario, I could go to jail because I haven't got any dependents, and my mum died last year".
During the call with MEE, Stubley broke down in tears when trying to explain her reasons for risking arrest.
"A line was crossed for me, when instead of trying to address our feelings of grief that many, many people in the UK feel, the government decided to proscribe Palestine Action", Stubley said.
'Having to do this is making my piss boil'
A DOJ spokesperson reported that a number of police officers told arrestees that 'the pressure to conduct arrests was coming from on high,' with one officer reportedly telling demonstrators waiting to be processed that 'having to do this is making my piss boil'.
In a press statement, the Metropolitan Police said that some protesters resumed the protest after arrest, adding that it was 'entirely unrealistic' to prevent them from doing so given the scale of arrests.
If convicted, those arrested under Section 13 could face a maximum sentence of six months' imprisonment or a fine of up to £5000.
An arrest under Section 12 could carry a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison.
In an interview with the BBC on Monday, Justice minister Alex Davies-Jones said participants in the protests would 'feel the full force of the law'.
But the Financial Times reported on Tuesday, citing a senior government official, that ministers anticipate that the 'vast majority' of Saturday's arrestees are likely to receive fines, community sentences or conditional discharges.
This is due to an already strained prison system currently hovering at 97.5 percent capacity, according to a recent review.
Meanwhile, DOJ says interest in the movement to lift the ban is burgeoning, reporting that 'hundreds' have already signed up to participate in the next action in early September, which they expect to be 'even bigger' than Saturday's.
Leading global academics denounce UK's Palestine Action ban Read More »
The group said the date will be announced on Wednesday.
'People are now seeing an arrest for terrorism as a badge of honour for resistance to genocide,' Tim Crosland, a former British government lawyer and the co-founder of DOJ, said in a statement.
The group reported on Tuesday that a Telegram channel used by the group for sharing information on peaceful protests and legal advice was taken down without prior warning. "No communication has been received from Telegram as to the reason for the disappearance of the group chat," it said.
Last Wednesday, DOJ's site was removed, and on Thursday an open Zoom call organised by DOJ for members of the public wanting to participate in Saturday's protest was shut down minutes before it was due to start, following a police order.
The government's banning of Palestine Action comes under increasing public scrutiny.
On Saturday, Sacha Deshmukh, chief executive of Amnesty International UK, described the mass arrests as "deeply concerning", and wrote to Mark Rowley, commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, ahead of the protest, warning that the arrests "fly in the face of international human rights law".
On Wednesday, former cabinet minister Peter Hain warned that the ban would "end in tears for the government", adding that his fellow Labour peers and MPs were regretting voting for the group's proscription.
On 30 July, a High Court judge ruled in favour of Palestine Action and granted the direct action group a judicial review to oppose the ban on the group.
Hain said that if the legal challenge were successful, 'would be a mercy to all concerned, including the government'.
Last month, UN human rights chief Volker Turk said that the ban was 'disproportionate and unnecessary' and called for the designation to be rescinded.
He said: "UK domestic counter-terrorism legislation defines terrorist acts broadly to include 'serious damage to property'.
"But, according to international standards, terrorist acts should be confined to criminal acts intended to cause death or serious injury or to the taking of hostages, for purpose of intimidating a population or to compel a government to take a certain action or not".
In a statement on Monday, Prime Minister Keir Starmer's official spokesperson said that Palestine Action is a "violent organisation" that has committed "significant injury".
"We've said that many people may not yet know the reality of this organisation, but the assessments are very clear: this is a violent organisation that has committed violence, significant injury, extensive criminal damage and, as I say, it has met the tests as set out under the Terrorism Act to be proscribed".
Responding to the statement, the group's co-founder Huda Ammori hit back saying that these claims were "false and defamatory".
The protestors who spoke to MEE do not regret their actions. Stubley described the swell of support from the crowd as she was led to the police van where she was sat next to two younger women.
"They were very brave but seemed quite anxious," she said. "We held hands. I didn't know who they were, but it felt really good".
"It was quite moving, because as the van drove off, and we were looking out the window, and everybody was waving flags and saying, 'We love you'. It was a real moment of solidarity," Stubley added.
"And that gives you strength. It makes you think, 'No - we do have to do this,' and people are strong. And actually, you don't always have to follow the law. Sometimes its the right thing to do to cross a line".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
US terror designation of Muslim Brotherhood and Cair 'in the works'
In comments on a right-wing radio show earlier this week, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the Trump administration is working on designating the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organisation, as well as cracking down on a Muslim-American non-profit for its perceived ties to the Brotherhood. While calls to do so have come from several US lawmakers in the past, they have not borne fruit. But now, a cabinet-level official is making the assertion. "Why wouldn't you guys designate the Muslim Brotherhood and Cair?" asked the radio host, Sid Rosenberg, referencing the Council on American-Islamic Relations, the largest Muslim civil liberties organisation in the country. "I just - I look at these organisations. I have a mayor's race here in New York City with this psycho, this lunatic Mamdani," he added, referencing the current Democratic candidate for mayor, Zohran Mamdani, who also happens to be Muslim. "Both of these groups, you know, are behind him, especially the Muslim Brotherhood," Rosenberg said of Cair's indirect financial support for the progressive candidate. "Is that something you think we can count on maybe in the near future? Maybe not Cair just yet, but certainly the Muslim Brotherhood?" New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters " Yeah, all of that is in the works," Rubio responded. "Obviously, there are different branches of the Muslim Brotherhood, so you'd have to designate each one of them... these things are going to be challenged in court, right?" " We are constantly reviewing for groups to designate for what they are: supporters of terrorists, maybe terrorists themselves, whatever it may be. We haven't done this in a long time, so it's - we've got a lot of catch-up to do. And you've mentioned a couple names, particularly the Muslim Brotherhood, that are of grave concern," he said. Last month, a bill was introduced in the House of Representatives called the "Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act of 2025", which called on the Trump administration to do just that. And a letter was sent just last week by Republican Senator Tom Cotton, calling on the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to revoke Cair's nonprofit status for its alleged "ties to terrorist activities" linked to "Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood". US senator asks tax authority to strip Muslim civil rights organisation of nonprofit status Read More » Middle East Eye reached out to Cair for a response on Rubio's comments, and was referred to a statement released by the Muslim Public Affairs Committee (Mpac) instead, which condemned the move to "smear" a domestic group "or treat political disagreement as grounds for terrorism designation". Mpac's vice president of policy and programming, Haris Tarin, is a former senior policy advisor to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and was at the agency under three different presidents since the Obama administration. "For the Secretary of State to comment on Cair... that's extremely problematic and concerning to us. He does not have the right to say that. He does not have the authority. He does not have the mandate," Tarin told MEE. "The conversation around Cair [now]... that was never in previous administrations, including Biden, Trump 1.0, Obama, and Bush," he added. "There was never conversations about banning Cair. There was conversations about engaging Cair and whether the federal government thought it was a politically right or politically savvy thing for them to engage Cair". The public, Tarin said, should be "extremely alarmed when it comes to designating a domestic institution" precisely because Americans fund it and it is not a foreign institution. What could happen - should the Trump administration compile clear evidence for such a case - is that it would have to file charges through the Department of Justice, he explained. What is The Muslim Brotherhood? The Muslim Brotherhood is most commonly known in the Arab world as a political party founded on Islamic principles and laws, whose support skyrocketed in the wake of the 2011 Arab protests aimed at overthrowing autocratic rulers. It was established in the late 1920s in Egypt and gained popularity as the mid-century ushered in secular governments that saw modernisation and westernisation interchangeably. In 2012, after the toppling of Egypt's ruler of three decades, Hosni Mubarak, an internationally-monitored election in Egypt saw the victory of its first Muslim Brotherhood president, Mohammed Morsi. Within a year, he was toppled by the military, imprisoned, and died in prison in 2019. The Muslim Brotherhood is now banned in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and the United Arab Emirates, and most recently in Jordan. 'Islamophobia and anti-Muslim sentiments have created a narrative in the US where democracy is good, except when religious Muslims win to govern their own countries' - Raed Jarrar, Dawn "Islamophobia and anti-Muslim sentiments have created a narrative in the US where democracy is good, except when religious Muslims win to govern their own countries," Raed Jarrar, the advocacy director for Democracy for the Arab World Now (Dawn), told MEE. "We saw that narrative come out of Gaza when Hamas won the elections. We saw that narrative come out of Egypt when the Muslim Brotherhood won the elections. We saw that narrative in Tunisia, in Libya, in Jordan, and many other countries where religious Muslims won democratic elections," he said. Jarrar added that there is no singular Brotherhood entity or "headquarters" because it's an ideology and a movement that springs up independently across each of the countries in the Middle East and North Africa - so a US designation would have to be detailed and country-specific to hold up in court, just as Rubio indicated. For lawmakers pushing for a terror designation, the Muslim Brotherhood "poses a direct threat to US national security through radical jihadist attempts to eliminate and destroy America and its allies", Florida Congressman Mario Diaz-Balart, who sponsored the House bill, said in a press release. MEE put the question to George Washington University professor Nathan Brown, who is an expert on Middle East politics and sits on the board of trustees at the American University in Cairo. In what ways is the Muslim Brotherhood a threat to US national security? " None at all," he said. Anti-Muslim, anti-Palestinian sentiment When Senator Cotton wrote to the IRS, he alleged that Cair was listed as a member of the Muslim Brotherhood's Palestine Committee and that the group participated in a meeting of Hamas supporters in Philadelphia. Cair firmly rejected the claims and said they're tied to anti-Muslim bigotry. "You have some very heated anti-Muslim forces [in the State Department] that are a little bit more eager to try to find and make those connections, but they're going to run into the same problem: you can't. There's no smoking gun anywhere, because there's no real, tangible connection," Shahed Amanullah, a former State Department senior staffer under Hillary Clinton and John Kerry, told MEE. What's so scary about the Muslim Brotherhood? Read More » The State Department is the agency that is responsible for any terrorist designations, as well as visa revocations. "In the past, I would say that people at the State Department were sophisticated and smart enough to understand the nuances of those affiliated movements overseas, and that it wasn't some kind of command and control structure," Amanullah said of the Muslim Brotherhood. "Those people have been hollowed out from the State Department," he said. Unlike past attempts at designating the Brotherhood and going after Cair, this time in particular, it's also taking place with the backdrop of the genocide in Gaza, Tarin told MEE. "Anything that has to do with American-Muslim institutions... it has to do with their support for pro-Palestinian organisations," he said. The Trump administration has made it a priority to go after international students and some of the most prestigious universities in the country for pro-Palestine protests and activism. Students have been jailed in immigration detention centres, deported, and the institutions they attended were effectively sued for hundreds of millions of dollars by the government. Jewish Voice for Peace, which has joined pro-Palestine demonstrations, has previously noted that the administration's playbook is taken from the Heritage Foundation's 'Project Esther' report, "which is a blueprint for using the federal government and private institutions to dismantle the Palestine solidarity movement and broader US civil society, under the guise of 'fighting antisemitism'". "I think pro-Israel groups feel that American Muslim institutions that support the pro-Palestinian movement are a threat to their existence here in the US, and their dominance of US foreign policy," Tarin told MEE.
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Israel threatens to ban major aid organisations, as starvation in Gaza deepens
Most major international non-profit organisations have been unable to deliver a single truck of lifesaving supplies since 2 March, despite claims by Israeli authorities that there is no limit on humanitarian aid entering Gaza, a joint press release from more than 100 NGOs said on Thursday. Israeli authorities are said to have rejected requests from dozens of NGOs to bring in lifesaving goods, citing that these organisations are 'not authorized to deliver aid", instead of clearing the increasing backlog of goods. The statement said that more than 60 requests were denied under this justification in July alone, and the obstruction has left millions of dollars' worth of food, medicine, water, and shelter items stranded in warehouses across Jordan and Egypt, while Palestinians are being starved. 'Anera has over $7 million worth of lifesaving supplies ready to enter Gaza - including 744 tons of rice, enough for six million meals, blocked in Ashdod just kilometers away,' said Sean Carroll, president and CEO of Anera. Many of the NGOs that are now told they are not 'authorized' to deliver aid have worked in Gaza for decades, are trusted by communities, and are experienced in delivering aid safely. Their exclusion has left hospitals without basic supplies, children, people with disabilities, and older people dying from hunger and preventable illnesses, and aid workers themselves going to work hungry.
Dubai Eye
5 hours ago
- Dubai Eye
Zelenskyy says he discussed security guarantees with Starmer
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Thursday that he had a detailed discussion of possible security guarantees for Ukraine during a "productive meeting" with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. "We also discussed in considerable detail the security guarantees that can make peace truly durable if the United States succeeds in pressing Russia to stop the killings and engage in genuine, substantive diplomacy," he said on X. Zelenskyy added that the leaders also touched on investment in Ukrainian drone production. Zelenskyy, who was in Germany on Wednesday, has been working with European leaders to press Trump not to allow Putin to carve up Ukraine's territory at the Alaska summit. On Wednesday, Trump joined a Germany-hosted virtual meeting with European leaders, including Zelenskyy, who sought to set red lines ahead of the summit on ending the war in Ukraine. Zelenskyy said he warned Trump that the Russian leader was "bluffing" about his desire to end the war. Trump later threatened "severe consequences" if Putin does not agree to peace in Ukraine and while he did not specify what the consequences could be, he has warned of economic sanctions if his meeting on Friday proves fruitless. The comments and the outcome of the virtual conference on Wednesday could provide encouragement for Kyiv ahead of the summit. Trump described the aim of his talks with Putin in Alaska as "setting the table" for a quick follow-up that would include Zelenskyy. "If the first one goes okay, we'll have a quick second one," Trump said. "I would like to do it almost immediately, and we'll have a quick second meeting between President Putin and President Zelenskyy and myself, if they'd like to have me there." Britain, France and Germany, the co-chairs of the so-called "Coalition of the Willing", set out their position on the pathway to a ceasefire in Ukraine in a statement released after Wednesday's virtual meeting.
