
Jordan Peterson refuses to identify as a Christian in viral atheist debate
Canadian conservative philosopher Jordan Peterson repeatedly refused to identify as a Christian during a heated YouTube debate about theology that aired on Sunday, growing increasingly angry as a young atheist vlogger challenged him over his faith.
Peterson, 62, was participating in an episode of Jubilee Media's series Surrounded, 'Jordan Peterson vs Twenty Atheists,' when the spat occurred. The show required the professor to sit at a desk in the center of a circle of would-be challengers who took turns arguing with him on subjects related to religion.
Almost an hour into the session, Peterson was challenged by Danny, a philosophy graduate from the PhilTalk channel, who pushed him on his definition of Christian faith and whether or not the Virgin Mary can be considered a figure of worship.
'Why is that relevant?' Peterson asked him.
'Because you go to a Catholic church. I'm sure you've attended recently. You're interested in Catholicism, aren't you?' Danny responded. 'You're familiar with their doctrines?... How do they regard Mary?'
'Why are you asking me that?' Peterson asked.
'Because you're a Christian,' Danny responded.
'You say that. I haven't claimed that,' the public intellectual snapped back.
'What is this – Christians vs atheists?... You don't know where you are right now?' Danny scoffed.
After Peterson had admonished the younger man for being a 'smarta**' and warned him he would terminate the debate if he kept up his tone, the latter gave him an ultimatum: 'Either you're a Christian or you're not–which one is it?'
'I could be either of them, but I don't have to tell you… it's private,' Peterson responded defensively.
'Am I not talking to a Christian?... I think everyone should look at the title of the YouTube channel. You're probably in the wrong YouTube video,' Danny persisted, sensing victory.
'You're really quite something, you are,' Peterson seethed.
'Aren't I? But you're really quite nothing,' Danny hit back, drawing audible gasps from his fellow participants, some of whom covered their mouths in shock at the audacity of the insult.
'I'm done with him...' Peterson said, concluding the segment.
A former psychology professor at the University of Toronto, Peterson became an unlikely favorite of the right a decade ago after speaking out on identity politics issues and against political correctness, but has since become as well known for his erratic and emotional media appearances as for his academic work.
In a January 2025 interview with The Spectator, Peterson was asked if he called himself a 'Christian.'
'I would say in the deepest sense, yes. But I'm not a typical Christian because I'm striving for understanding above all. I suppose people might pillory me as agnostic, but that's not true because I don't believe that the proper relationship between this underlying unity and myself would be established as a consequence of intellectual conquest. I'm a new kind of Christian,' he answered.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Global LGBTQ+ advocates gather 'on Trump's doorstep' at World Pride despite travel anxiety
Days before she was to deliver opening remarks to World Pride's human rights conference in Washington, Phyll Opoku-Gyimah, the co-founder of UK Black Pride, said she was denied entry to the United States after her visa was revoked due to her travels to Cuba earlier this year. Opoku-Gyimah, widely known as Lady Phyll, said she applied immediately for a nonimmigrant visa. The earliest date she was given: September. 'I've called. I've written. I've pleaded,' she said over a video livestream. 'And the answer was a cold, bureaucratic 'No.'' Many LGBTQ+ travelers have expressed concerns or decided to skip World Pride due to anxieties about safety, border policies and a hostile political climate. Yet cross-national strategizing has still been central to the gathering as international attendees echoed that they wanted to send a clear message of opposition to U.S. officials with their presence. 'This is World Pride on Trump's doorstep," said Yasmin Benoit, a British model and asexual activist. "And that's all the more reason to be here. We want to show the U.S. that there's a lot of eyes on what's happening here.' New policies make visiting more complex World Pride gathers LGBTQ+ advocates from around the globe and has taken place most recently in Australia, Sweden and Denmark. This year, which marks the 50th anniversary of Washington's Pride festival, is the first time the city is hosting the gathering. Yet for many, the global celebration has been complicated by President Donald Trump 's policies targeting transgender people and diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives. Trump, a Republican, has said that whether a person is a man or woman is determined by that person's biological characteristics at birth, and about two-thirds of U.S. adults agree with him, according to an Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll. He has denounced DEI policies as a form of discrimination that threatens merit-based decision-making. Several countries, including Denmark, Finland and Germany, issued cautions for LGBTQ+ travelers visiting the U.S. for World Pride, culminates in a closing festival this weekend with a parade, a rally and concerts. Capital Pride Alliance, which organized World Pride D.C., included an advisory for transgender and nonbinary international travelers alongside security protocols. Egale Canada, one of the country's largest LGBTQ+ advocacy organizations, announced in February that its members would not attend any events in the U.S. through June, including World Pride. It cited concerns for transgender and nonbinary staff members. 'I didn't feel it was safe to have our staff crossing into the U.S. with the current hostilities, through legislation and rhetoric,' said Helen Kennedy, the organization's executive director. The African Human Rights Coalition, meanwhile, called for a boycott of World Pride in Washington 'because the event is being held in a venue ... governed now by an antagonistic fascist regime which presents distinct dangers to foreign LGBTQ I+ attendees,' the organization said in a statement. Jessica Stern, a former U.S. special envoy for the human rights of LGBTQI+ people, acknowledged that many potential attendees decided to skip World Pride as they 'wonder if they'll be safe in U.S. airports and on our streets.' 'Thank you for coming to the U.S. amid a time of great uncertainty,' she said in her opening remarks before an emcee later instructed attendees to shout out where they had traveled from. Answers included New Zealand, Sweden, England, Zimbabwe, Australia, Nigeria and India. As an increasing number of international travelers have expressed anxiety, John Tanzella, president of the International LGBTQ+ Travel Association, said he has assured people that Washington is an inclusive city but advised them to stay informed of local policies, connect with LGBTQ+ organizations on the ground and book with trusted businesses with track records of inclusion. The organization is working on guidance for transgender and nonbinary travelers in the U.S. for the World Pride parade and march. 'Safety always comes up, especially in the current climate, but there's also a deep desire to bring our community together,' he said. 'For many, World Pride in Washington, D.C., feels extra meaningful given its location. There's caution, yes, but above all, people want to show up, be seen and be heard.' A bad experience while trying to enter Benoit's friends had warned her not to travel to the U.S., and her anxiety was mounting in the days leading up to her flight. She planned to avoid telling customs agents she was traveling for World Pride. But when that information surfaced, she said agents took her passport and asked her questions for an additional hour about where she was staying and for how long. Still, she said, it is more important now than ever to 'send a message to Trump in his own backyard" and to embrace the global nature of World Pride. 'The ability to bring people together to understand how interconnected everything is, how this harmful rhetoric may bleed over to other countries, is really important," she said. 'And it's an opportunity to access resources and people you may not have access to back home.' Essy Adhiambo, executive director of the Initiative for Equality and Non Discrimination, deleted all the social media apps on her phone before her 35-hour journey from Mombasa, Kenya, worrying that her phone might be searched. Still, Adhiambo said being visible as an international LGBTQ+ community is powerful amid threats to the community across the globe. 'We must continue to protest in the current context we are in," she said. "Those of us who are able to make this journey have to hold space for those who could not, especially our trans siblings. We want to amplify our message on the land of the people who are supporting homophobia.' Nikki Phinyapincha, co-founder of Trans Pride Thailand, set off on a 25-hour journey to World Pride from Thailand after issuing a travel advisory from her organization for Thai LGBTQ+ people. 'The political climate and instability is not new, but it makes it more important that we are here," she said. "We need to keep doing this work, strategizing together and being adaptive.' For people from marginalized communities, Opoku-Gyimah said, 'just traveling to speak truth can often feel like a mountain.' 'We have to prove our worth at every border, every checkpoint,' she said. Yet Opoku-Gyimah applauded the international nature of World Pride amid "connected, coordinated ... and increasingly violent" attacks against LGBTQ+ communities across the globe. She said the U.S. government's rolling back of DEI initiatives, protections for the transgender community and reproductive rights have had ripple effects abroad, including in the U.K. 'When the U.S. sneezes," she said, 'other parts of the world catch that cold.'


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Trump-Musks spectacular split minute-by-minute: How the president and the First Buddy's friendship unraveled online
Just last week, President Donald Trump was handing his friend and close aide Elon Musk a golden key to the White House, praising the work the tech billionaire had done for the administration. 'Elon gave an incredible service. There's nobody like him,' Trump said in a joint press conference with Musk last week. That press conference was to mark the end of Musk' s time as a special government advisor, leading the Department of Government Efficiency. Although there had been some disagreements during Musk's 130 days in the role - the Tesla owner made it clear he was not a fan of Trump's tariffs - it seemed to mark a conciliatory end to their working relationship. But there were rumblings: Musk, whose whole purpose at Doge had been cutting federal government spending, was deeply opposed to Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill.' And while White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt had been able to play that difference of opinion off as healthy debate for a while, everything came to a head on Thursday. Here's a timeline of how the very public fight between Trump and Musk unfolded. Trump vs Musk: Minute by minute 1:31 p.m. Washington time, Tuesday, June 3: Musk attacks the Big Beautiful Bill Writing on X, Musk says: 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' He continued: 'He added: 'It will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America (sic) citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.' Two days later, things escalated dramatically. In an Oval Office appearance, Trump said he was 'very disappointed' by Musk's comments. 'Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here,' Trump told reporters. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore.' Trump added he 'would have won Pennsylvania easily anyway,' without Musk's help. 1.44-1.57 p.m. June 5: Musk renames bill, asks his followers if it was time to create a new political party Musk posts a slew of tweets to X, including one asking, 'Where is this guy today??' in response to a tweet of screenshots from Trump's previous criticisms of increasing the debt ceiling. He then tweeted: 'The Big Ugly Bill will INCREASE the deficit to $2.5 trillion!' This is shortly followed by a new suggestion from Musk: 'Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?' This post is still pinned to the top of the X owner's timeline. 2.16 p.m. June 5: Musk says he will be around for longer than Trump Responding to Maga blogger Laura Loomer on X, who was commenting about the divide amongst Republicans over the fight between Musk and Trump, the billionaire said: 'Oh and some food for thought as they ponder this question: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years...' 2.37 p.m. June 5: Trump attacks from Truth Social The president says that Musk was 'wearing thin' in a series of posts on his social media platform: 'I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Trump said. He then added: 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' 2.48 p.m. June 5: Musk hits back Retweeting a screenshot of Trump's EV madate comment, Musk said: 'Such an obvious lie. So sad.' 3.10 p.m. June 5: Musk alleges Trump appears in the Epstein files Musk tweeted: 'Files linked to the investigation of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein have emerged as a point of fixation for Trump and his allies and right-wing media figures. Time to drop the really big bomb:@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.' Shortly after, he wrote: 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' 4.09 p.m. June 5: Musk says he will decommission spacecraft 'In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately,' he tweeted. Another X user replied, urging Musk to 'cool off and take a step back for a couple of days.' Musk replied: 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' 4.06 p.m. June 5: Trump defends the bill Trump wrote on Truth Social: 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. It's a Record Cut in Expenses, $1.6 Trillion Dollars, and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given. If this Bill doesn't pass, there will be a 68% Tax Increase, and things far worse than that. I didn't create this mess, I'm just here to FIX IT. This puts our Country on a Path of Greatness. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!' 4.11 p.m. June 5: Musk seems to agree Trump should be replaced by vice president J.D. Vance Musk retweets an X user, who said: 'President vs Elon. Who wins? My money's on Elon. Trump should be impeached and JD Vance should replace him.' 4.26 p.m. June 5: Musk brings tariffs into the fight Musk tweets: 'The Trump tariffs will cause a recession in the second half of this year'. 7.50 p.m. June 5: Musk says 'Kill the bill' Musk tweets: 'Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL' Last post for June 5: Impeachment for Trump? Musk's last repost for the day is from an X user, who said: 'This is why Republicans will likely lose the House in 2026 and then Democrats will spend two years investigating and impeaching President Trump. :Trump and the Republicans in Congress need to deliver. We want budget cuts. We want agencies shut down. We don't want big govt.'


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
CBS owner Shari Redstone reveals cancer diagnosis amid Trump lawsuit
Paramount Global chair Shari Redstone (pictured) revealed she has been diagnosed with thyroid cancer amid her company's legal battle with Donald Trump. Redstone, 71, is a key decision maker at the media giant and is looking to settle with the president while she works to secure a corporate merger. While surgeons removed her thyroid gland, some cancer cells remained as they had spread to her vocal cords. 'She is maintaining all professional and philanthropic activities throughout her treatment, which is ongoing. She and her family are grateful that her prognosis is excellent,' Redstone's spokesperson Molly Morse said. Redstone kept her diagnosis private, sharing it only with a tight circle of relatives, close friends, and advisers including David Ellison, the Skydance head and tech heir, whose company is set to purchase Paramount and her family's stake in the company. Her diagnosis comes as Paramount is preparing for the $8.4 billion merger with Skydance while the company is also looking to settle a lawsuit with Trump. The 79-year-old president filed a lawsuit against CBS News in October 2024, accusing the network of manipulating the American public by deceptively editing the interview in a way that favored Kamala Harris and damaged his own image. Redstone wants to settle to stay on good terms with the President while waiting for FCC approval of a major deal and offer him $15 million, according to reports. Insiders fear a payout, estimated to be up to $50 million, could be seen as a 'bribe' amid her plan to sell Paramount and CBS News, which is currently being reviewed by Trump's Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Meanwhile, the FCC has delayed approval of Redstone's plan to sell Paramount and CBS News to Skydance, an independent film company. Redstone's high-stakes decision comes amid warnings from both media insiders and high ranking Democrats like Bernie Sanders, who has also warned there could be further legal risks around settling the case against the backdrop of the Skydance deal. Network insiders fear the settlement could backfire if the deal is seen as a payoff or bribe. Paramount's insurance doesn't cover bribery claims, despite typically protecting board members and executives from being held personally liable. Both the board and Redstone could face shareholder lawsuits, a criminal probe from a Trump-opposing prosecutor, and if Democrats win Congress - endless hearings that could drag this out even further. Paramount maintains that the lawsuit has nothing to do with the $8 billion Skydance merger. 'This lawsuit is completely separate from, and unrelated to, the Skydance transaction and the FCC approval process,' the spokesperson said in a statement to the New York Post. 'We will abide by the legal process to defend our case.' Despite the warnings, 71-year-old Redstone seems ready to make her official move. With her wealth dwindling as Paramount's stock continues to slide, she's reportedly eager to 'move on with her life', The Post reported. If the deal goes through, Redstone could walk away with $2 billion - ultimately salvaging part of the fortune inherited from her father, late media mogul Sumner Redstone.