logo
Will TikTok be banned on June 19?

Will TikTok be banned on June 19?

The National3 hours ago

For a third time in less than a year, a deadline is approaching that might cause TikTok to cease working in the US.
The US Congress passed a law with bipartisan support last year that ordered ByteDance, the owner of TikTok, to divest from the platform over concerns that American user data was being accessed by Beijing, or face a ban. Legislators set an original deadline of January 19.
President Donald Trump has pushed back the deadline twice, and he said in May that he might give the China-owned video-sharing social platform another extension, but it's not clear if that will happen.
TikTok's troubles are not new, but because the controversy surrounding the social platform has been around for so long, it's easy to forget how it ended up in this predicament.
For several years, as TikTok's popularity and influence grew, so did the concerns about its policies, which many technology analysts have found could leave user data vulnerable to being compromised by the Chinese government.
Though ByteDance and TikTok repeatedly denied accusations that data could be vulnerable, US legislators were sceptical, leading to the passage of the law ordering the app's distancing from Beijing.
After the US Supreme Court dismissed a legal challenge from ByteDance that claimed the law was unconstitutional, TikTok seemed to be at death's door.
On January 18, with ByteDance refusing to sell off TikTok, the company opted to let the platform go dark in the US for almost an entire day before newly sworn-in Mr Trump decided to give it an extension to try and work out a deal.
\Although brief, the blackout proved to be a major incident. Testimony in Meta's antitrust trial showed that TikTok's blackout caused a surge of internet traffic to Instagram.
On April 5, when time had almost run out on his initial extension, Mr Trump again decided to give ByteDance more time.
Entrepreneurs, corporations and tech tycoons have expressed interest in buying TikTok from ByteDance, but the company has refused to divest.
TikTok has also shown no sign of diminishing its presence in the US. The company's careers site lists more than 40 open positions in the public policy, privacy compliance and federal government affairs departments.
Chief executive Shou Zi Chew attended Mr Trump's inauguration and the platform has encouraged users to lobby the President directly. TikTok has also engaged in an intense campaign in the US capital.
The company's survival despite mounting odds is probably frustrating to other US-based technology companies, especially with Google and Meta currently involved in lengthy and costly antitrust battles that could mean the end of their technology dominance.
"It's a different issue," said Shweta Singh, a professor of information systems and management at the University of Warwick. "TikTok's debate centres on national security and foreign influence, not market monopoly."
Ms Singh also said that Mr Trump's affinity for rolling with the changing political tides instead of emphasising ideological purity gives TikTok reason for continued optimism.
"This time President Trump is balancing national security concerns with the reality that TikTok is hugely popular with his voter base," she said, noting that although Mr Trump first floated the idea of banning TikTok during his first term, he changed while trying to win back the White House in 2024.
'For all those who want to save TikTok in America, vote Trump,' he said in a post on his Truth Social platform while on the campaign trail.
Ms Singh added that throughout Mr Trump's campaign, he was able to reach millions more potential voters through TikTok.
"Its algorithm is hyper-addictive, drives unpredictable viral trends, and is accused of shaping public opinion in opaque ways," she said.
With the possibility of another extension and as controversies surrounding user data privacy get further away in the rear view mirror, the likelihood that TikTok survives is increasing.
According to Pew Research data released in March, support for the TikTok ban now hovers about 34 per cent, down significantly from 50 per cent when the poll was first taken in 2023.
Although it seems to be slowly but surely winning in the court of public opinion, TikTok's repeat brushes with a blackout are less than ideal for a social media platform that hosts high-earning influencers and businesses.
In a letter to Mr Trump in March, Democratic senators Ed Markey, Chris Van Hollen and Cory Booker pushed him to avoid short-term extensions in favour of a plan that would endorse legislation that would provide users and TikTok with a clear path forward.
"Without any further action from Congress, the 170 million Americans that rely on TikTok will continue to face uncertainty about TikTok's future," they wrote.
"Creators will continue to fear that the platform could disappear at any moment, and this situation is unfair and unworkable."
Yet for ByteDance, another short-term extension of the deadline beats the idea of no extension at all, which could mean another blackout of indeterminate length.
For now, however, the company is waiting for Mr Trump's decision. TikTok did not respond to The National's requests for comment on this story.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Donald Trump's stance on Iran conflict is dividing his Maga base
How Donald Trump's stance on Iran conflict is dividing his Maga base

The National

time13 minutes ago

  • The National

How Donald Trump's stance on Iran conflict is dividing his Maga base

US President Donald Trump 's support for Israel as it attacks Iran has divided his base, with many supporters angered over what they see as a betrayal of his 'America First' pledge. The Trump administration initially distanced itself from Friday's opening strikes conducted by Israel against Iran, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio stressing that the US was not involved. But within hours, Mr Trump praised Israel's 'excellent' military strikes and told Iran it must make a deal 'before there is nothing left' of the country. The US is also moving assets in the Middle East region to help Israel as it defends against Iranian missile strikes, and Mr Trump has said 'it's possible' the US could get involved. Prominent members of the often-hawkish Republican Party have long advocated for war with Iran, with either US or Israeli strikes, but Mr Trump has cast himself as a ' peacemaker and unifier ' and promised to keep the US out of new wars. Since taking office in January, he has pushed for a lasting ceasefire in Gaza, a Russia-Ukraine peace deal and a nuclear agreement with Tehran. None of these efforts have yielded concrete results. Now, the Make America Great Again movement that propelled Mr Trump to the White House is taking note of his support for Israel. For one of the first times since he took office in January, the isolationist coalition that wants to end all US military action overseas is showing signs of upset. Republican representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a passionate Trump supporter and a prominent member of the Maga movement, said anyone wishing for war with Iran was 'disgusting' and lamented America's previous military engagements in the Middle East. 'Anyone slobbering for the U.S. to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First/Maga,' she wrote on X. 'Wishing for murder of innocent people is disgusting. We are sick and tired of foreign wars. All of them.' Mr Trump told The Atlantic on Saturday that he gets to determine what 'America First' means. 'For those people who say they want peace – you can't have peace if Iran has a nuclear weapon. So for all of those wonderful people who don't want to do anything about Iran having a nuclear weapon – that's not peace,' he said. Representative Thomas Massie, a prominent Maga Republican who has voted against sending military aid to Israel, posted a poll he ran that showed most respondents agreed with his stance. As Israel began attacking Iran last week, Charlie Kirk, a pro-Israel Maga loyalist, held a live podcast to ask his pro-Trump audience what they thought of events. 'The emails are so largely overwhelmingly against Israel doing this, I'd say it's probably a 99 to one,' Mr Kirk said. 'No issue currently divides the right as much as foreign policy,' he later posted on X. 'I'm very concerned based on (everything) I've seen in the grassroots the last few months that this will cause a massive schism in Maga and potentially disrupt our momentum and our insanely successful presidency.' Further complicating matters for Mr Trump is his past handling of the conflict. In 2018 he unilaterally withdrew the US from the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran, negotiated under his predecessor Barack Obama, calling it the 'worst deal ever". But since returning to the White House, he has now spent nearly six months trying to get Iran to agree to a similar deal to constrain its nuclear programme. He had criticised former president Joe Biden last year for preventing Israel from carrying out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, only to find himself advocating for diplomacy. Saagar Enjeti, a presenter on the right-wing Breaking Points YouTube show, has said Mr Trump is letting down his isolationist supporters. 'Trump has now praised Israel's strike, affirmed US material support, and Israeli media is reporting his public opposition was a disinformation campaign to mislead Iran,' he said. 'So in other words Trump, not Israel, has made a mockery of all of us who wanted to avoid this war.'

Trump rejects US intelligence that Iran is not building nuclear weapon
Trump rejects US intelligence that Iran is not building nuclear weapon

Middle East Eye

timean hour ago

  • Middle East Eye

Trump rejects US intelligence that Iran is not building nuclear weapon

US President Donald Trump has dismissed a US intelligence assessment that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon. National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard told Congress in March that US intelligence 'continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon' and that the country's supreme leader 'has not authorised the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003'. However, Trump dismissed the findings, telling reporters aboard an overnight flight back to Washington from the G7 summit: 'I don't care what she said. I think they were very close to having one."

Trump urges Tehran's 'unconditional surrender' as US edges closer to war with Iran
Trump urges Tehran's 'unconditional surrender' as US edges closer to war with Iran

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

Trump urges Tehran's 'unconditional surrender' as US edges closer to war with Iran

President Donald Trump on Tuesday demanded the 'unconditional surrender' of Iran's supreme leader and said America's patience is wearing thin, apparently paving the way for the US to join Israel's war against Iran. Mr Trump had earlier said "we" have control of the skies above Iran, and hailed the use of US-made weapons. His remarks came after he urged Tehran's residents to evacuate the Iranian capital. Residents poured out of the city, and shops and the historic Grand Bazaar were closed on Tuesday. The President headed back to Washington late on Monday, cutting short his trip to the G7 summit in Canada to confer with his national security team as the Israel-Iran air war raged for a fifth day. His comments were a far cry from earlier messaging, in which he maintained that a US-Iranian nuclear deal remained within reach. In a pair of posts on Truth Social on Tuesday, Mr Trump warned Ayatollah Ali Khamenei that the US knows where he is "hiding" but doesn't plan to kill him, "at least for now". In a subsequent post, he wrote simply: "UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!" The US military is deploying more fighter aircraft to the Middle East and extending the deployment of others, US officials told Reuters. One said F-16, F-22 and F-35 warplanes would be involved. Vice President JD Vance, meanwhile, issued a lengthy statement on social media that appeared designed to convince Mr Trump's staunchly anti-war and isolationist Maga base that war in the Middle East might be inevitable. 'The President has shown remarkable restraint in keeping our military's focus on protecting our troops and protecting our citizens," Mr Vance wrote. 'He may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment. That decision ultimately belongs to the President.' But Khaled Elgindy, an adjunct professor at Georgetown University and an expert on US foreign relations in the Middle East, said Mr Trump may still believe he can reach a deal with Iran. "He thinks he can get a deal, but the kind where you put a gun to someone's head – I don't think that's feasible," he told The National."It looks like the Maga people, the America First people, have lost that debate." Analysts in Washington questioned whether US strikes on Iran's known nuclear sites – believed to be buried deep underground – would damage Tehran's programme, let alone its ambition. "US strikes on Iran would undermine non-proliferation goals and Congress has not approved any war on Iran – launching one would thwart the will of the American people, who oppose another costly Middle East war,' Rosemary Kelanic, director of the Middle East programme at Defence Priorities, wrote in a statement. "We need a political solution, not war."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store