logo
A legal cap, a political promise, and the tribal future of Andhra Pradesh

A legal cap, a political promise, and the tribal future of Andhra Pradesh

Indian Express15-05-2025
Written by Jagannath Ambagudia
The protest by tribal communities in Alluri Sitharama Raju district of Andhra Pradesh in the first week of May, demanding the restoration of the provision of 100 per cent reservation for tribal communities in schools located in scheduled areas, again evoked the debate on reservation policy in India.
The protest drew the immediate attention of the Andhra Pradesh government. The provision, also known as Government Order No. 3 (GO No. 3), was struck down by the Supreme Court in Chebrolu Leela Prasad Rao & Ors v. State of AP & Ors (2000), citing the 50 per cent capping of reservation set in the Indra Sawhney case. However, this was not the first time the judiciary invalidated such provisions. The Supreme Court also rejected the review petition filed by the state governments of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, as well as some tribal organisations.
Notably, the current demands by the tribal communities come against the backdrop of the Telugu Desam Party's poll promises of restoring or replacing GO No. 3 with a similar order. Andhra Pradesh CM N Chandrababu Naidu's latest announcement that his government is exploring various modalities of implementing 100 per cent reservation for local tribal communities in scheduled areas of the state must be read in this context. However, both the government's announcement and the erstwhile decision of the apex court to strike it down have broader implications for the tribal communities in the state.
Such provisions prevent demographic changes in the scheduled areas. The growing presence of non-tribals in such areas can potentially reduce the numerical strength of tribal communities, which could subsequently open the ground for 'descheduling' in the long run. Descheduling takes away the control of natural resources such as land, water, and forest — the critical means of livelihood — from the tribal communities. Demographic changes could also lead to the de-reservation of assembly and parliamentary constituencies in the long run. The attempt to restore the executive order or compensate for it through alternative means could be a mechanism against such transitions.
The 100 per cent reservation of tribal educators in the scheduled area also works as guardrails against 'stigmatisation'. It enhances sensitivity and helps tribal children to participate in the educational setups. Studies have revealed the dismal representation of tribal teachers in scheduled areas across the country. The indifferent attitude of teachers belonging to 'other' communities works against the interest of tribal children, who require much hand-holding at the initial stage. The presence of tribal teachers in the school system in scheduled areas can address language barriers and ease their learning process. These corrective measures can also potentially address the issue of enrolment ratio and drop-out rates in higher education among tribal communities.
The Andhra Pradesh government reportedly intends to consider a proportionate representation of tribal teachers in schools in scheduled areas to avoid possible legal scrutiny. However, proportionate representation may not be as helpful, as indicated by the present practice of proportionality around the country. The concentration of management and decision-making power in the hands of non-tribal teachers/communities always works against tribal communities' interests.
These efforts to restore 100 per cent reservation would also provide political dividends to the TDP in 19 assembly and three ST-reserved parliamentary constituencies. It may also impact other non-tribal constituencies where tribals are present in a considerable number.
Unfortunately, any proactive positive move to address the pressing challenges and concerns of tribal communities in India seems to be challenged by the 'non-beneficiaries' in the court. The judiciary must consider broader issues of tribal communities — socioeconomic indicators, educational status, presence in the public sphere — while making judicial pronouncements. The Indra Sawhney judgment should not be the sole reference point. In the case of reservation for economically weaker sections where the capping is not applicable, for instance, it was not the only metric considered. Otherwise, tribal communities may perceive that public institution(s) follow different legal metrics for tribal and non-tribal communities. The proposed move should be considered as a means to bring the marginalised on par with the rest of society.
The writer is professor and campus director at Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Guwahati Campus, Assam. Views are personal
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Who is Sudershan Reddy? INDIA bloc's pick against NDA's CP Radhakrishnan for Vice Presidential election
Who is Sudershan Reddy? INDIA bloc's pick against NDA's CP Radhakrishnan for Vice Presidential election

Mint

time2 minutes ago

  • Mint

Who is Sudershan Reddy? INDIA bloc's pick against NDA's CP Radhakrishnan for Vice Presidential election

The INDIA bloc on 19 August named former Supreme Court judge B Sudershan Reddy as its candidate for the Vice presidential election. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge announced the name of the opposition bloc's pick during a meeting with the other allies. Reddy will contest against the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance 's nominee, CP Radhakrishnan, in the elections to be held on 9 September. As things stand, the ruling NDA has sufficient votes to secure a victory for Radhakrishnan. The BJP-led alliance holds the edge in the 781-member electoral college with 424 members. The Opposition INDIA bloc, however, wanted to put up a fight by fielding a non-political leader to highlight its commitment for the Constitution and democracy. Reddy's name, it is learnt, was pushed by Mamata Banerjee-led TMC. Reddy is a former judge of the Supreme Court of India and the first Lokayukta of Goa. Born on 8 July, 1946, Sudershan Reddy was enrolled as Advocate at Hyderabad with the Bar Council of Andhra Pradesh on 27 December, 1971. He has practiced in Writ and Civil matters in the High Court of Andhra Pradesh. He worked as a government Pleader in the High Court during 1988-90. 'Shri B Sudershan Reddy garu is one of India's most distinguished and progressive jurists. He has had a long and eminent legal career including as Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court, Chief Justice of Guwahati High Court and Judge of the Supreme Court. He has been a consistent and courageous champion of social, economic and political justice,' Kharge said in a post on X Sudershan Reddy also worked as Additional Standing Counsel for the Central Government for six months during 1990. He also worked as a Legal Adviser and Standing Counsel for Osmania University. He was appointed a permanent Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court on 2 May 1995. Reddy was appointed as Chief Justice of the Gauhati High Court on in December 2005. Sudershan Reddy was appointed as a Judge of Supreme Court of India on 12 Janaury 2007. He retired as SC Judge in July 2011 The Opposition INDIA bloc wanted to put up a fight by fielding a non-political leader to highlight its commitment for the Constitution and democracy. According to Articles 63 to 71 of the Constitution and the Vice President (Election) Rules, 1974, a formal election had to be held within 60 days of Dhankhar's resignation on 21 July. The electorate or the electoral college comprises all members of both Houses of Parliament — elected and nominated — using a proportional representation system via a single transferable vote. The MPs will cast a single transferable vote with a secret ballot.

PM Modi appeals for unanimous election of NDA's vice presidential candidate CP Radhakrishnan
PM Modi appeals for unanimous election of NDA's vice presidential candidate CP Radhakrishnan

Mint

time2 minutes ago

  • Mint

PM Modi appeals for unanimous election of NDA's vice presidential candidate CP Radhakrishnan

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday, August 19, appealed to all parties for the unanimous election of NDA's vice presidential candidate CP Radhakrishnan. Praising his life of public service, PM Narendra Modi made the appeal to even the Opposition MPs. Radhakrishnan was felicitated at a meeting of the MPs of the ruling party. He is expected to file his nomination on Wednesday, August 20. Meanwhile, the Opposition bloc, too, has picked its Vice Presidential candidate. Former Supreme Court judge B Sudershan Reddy as its candidate for the Vice President's election. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju told reporters that Modi, in his address, appealed to various parties, especially the Opposition, to back Radhakrishnan to ensure that he is elected unanimously. PM Modi introduced the Maharashtra governor, who is a seasoned BJP leader from Tamil Nadu, to the NDA MPs, citing his long public life in which he served ably in different capacities. In his speech, Modi also raised the Indus Waters Treaty, criticizing then Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru for signing it with Pakistan without consulting Parliament or his Cabinet. Nehru did to burnish his own image at the cost of the interest of the country, he said, according to sources. Over 80 per cent of the waters was allowed to be used by Pakistan, he noted. The Modi government put the treaty in abeyance following the Pahalgam terror attack. The prime minister said his government has been undoing the sins of that era, the sources added. PM Modi also said that Nehru later told a colleague that he had believed that the agreement will help resolve other issues with Pakistan but it did not happen, PTI mentioned. Kiren Rijiju said that CP Radhakrishnan has lived a simple life, free from controversy or blemish, and added that his election as Vice President would be a matter of pride and joy for the entire nation. With the BJP-led NDA enjoying a comfortable majority in the electoral college comprising MPs from the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, Radhakrishnan's win is a certainty amid indications from the opposition INDIA bloc that it will field its own candidate and force a contest.

Viral video: Animal lovers dance with street dog during protest; social media reacts with memes
Viral video: Animal lovers dance with street dog during protest; social media reacts with memes

Mint

time2 minutes ago

  • Mint

Viral video: Animal lovers dance with street dog during protest; social media reacts with memes

A Twitter (now X) post has captured a unique protest in Delhi against the relocation of sterilised and vaccinated street dogs. The viral video shows demonstrators affectionately carrying a street dog in their arms. Others around clap and cheer. The video captures the protest, with animal lovers holding signs and chanting together. One placard clearly reads, 'Sterilise and vaccinate not relocate' in bold letters. The text on the viral video reads 'We will not back down.' Many social media users expressed their dissatisfaction with such protests. While some slammed the protesters, many shared memes as reactions. 'Crazy are millions of humans who are living worst life than dogs…' wrote one user. 'Why are you harassing a poor dog?' asked another. Another commented on the calm stray animal while everyone around dances and cheers, 'The dog is better behaved than these dehatis.' 'Saare iPhone wale protesters, what a time we live in... Same crowd doesn't give two hoots to provide water to a delivery boy who races against time and runs often from these dogs too. Hypocrisy is the mantra of this age,' stated another. Another user wrote, 'These dog lovers are absolute low IQ dumb f**ks.' 'The dog had the opportunity to do the most funny thing ever,' quipped another. 'This is the same crowd that would shame a delivery boy to death if out of desperation and lack of facilities, pees at a street corner. But they happily let their pet dogs poop all over the common areas and public places n never pick it up, but expect everyone to walk over it,' came from another. Another user commented, 'I hope they will continue to show the same love to these street dogs when it will bite someone near them without any provocation.' On August 11, the Supreme Court ordered all stray dogs in Delhi to be removed from the streets. The apex court asked the Delhi government to shift them to shelters within eight weeks. The SC order triggered strong protests from animal rights groups, citizens and politicians. They argue that the move goes against the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules of 2001, updated in 2023. After widespread protests, the matter went to the top court again on August 14. The Delhi government told the SC bench that children were dying due to dog bites. The Supreme Court finished hearing arguments from all parties, but it has not yet delivered its final judgment. Meanwhile, Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta has asked officials to pause aggressive actions. The government is planning a large-scale sterilisation drive while awaiting the next SC directive.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store