logo
CDS speaks out on Op Sindoor—from nuclear to losses & disinformation to Chinese role

CDS speaks out on Op Sindoor—from nuclear to losses & disinformation to Chinese role

The Print2 days ago

'At independence, Pakistan was ahead by many metrics; today, India leads in GDP, social harmony, and development. That progress reflects a long-term strategy. Diplomatic outreach has occurred—such as the PM's 2014 invitation to Nawaz Sharif—but reciprocation is lacking. In such cases, strategic disengagement is itself a considered response,' he said.
He also spoke on India-Pakistan relationship and rejected the idea of 'strategic aimlessness'.
New Delhi: Underlining that India retained full operational clarity and autonomy during Operation Sindoor regardless of broader geopolitical currents, Chief of Defence Staff Gen Anil Chauhan said what unfolded was a non-contact, multi-domain conflict involving both kinetic and non-kinetic elements which exemplifies the future of warfare.
Addressing military leaders from across the world at the IISS-organised Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore in a closed door session Friday, he said the military is seen as a rational actor when it comes to nuclear escalation and added that nuclear escalation in undeclared wars was illogical.
He said that prolonged mobilisation without combat imposes a significant cost. 'That's why India disengages swiftly post-operations. Prolonged wars hinder national development—something adversaries may aim to disrupt,' he said talking about the short and swift conflict.
Importantly, in his address, the CDS noted that while Pakistan may have leveraged Chinese commercial satellite imagery, there is no proof of real-time targeting support. This is significant because the CDS has said that what was available to Pakistan was commercial satellite pictures and not any active Chinese military inputs.
'India, by contrast, relied on indigenous systems like Akash, achieving success through effective system networking, integrating both domestic and foreign radars into a cohesive defence structure,' he said.
He also spoke about the disinformation warfare unleashed by the Pakistani military and noted that '15 percent of operational time was spent countering fake narratives, underlining the need for a dedicated information warfare vertical'.
'India's strategy emphasized fact-based communication even at the cost of slower responses. Initially, two women officers served as spokespeople while the senior leadership was engaged in operations. Only after the 10th May did the DGMOs brief the media,' he said.
The CDS also spoke on losses and said 'no war is without cost—but what matters is how one responds. India responded effectively within three days, without further escalation'
On the issue of automation and robotics, Gen Chauhan warned that reducing the human cost of war may increase the likelihood of conflict escalation. 'When fewer lives are at risk, decision-makers may act more aggressively. This shift presents serious ethical and strategic challenges,' he said.
The CDS noted that the modern warfare is undergoing a complex convergence—of tactics, domains (land, air, sea, cyber, space), time frames and strategies.
On the issue of cyber operations, he said it played a limited role. 'While there were some denial-of-service attacks, India's air-gapped military systems remained secure. Public platforms faced minor disruptions, but operational systems were unaffected,' he said.
Regarding space and satellite intelligence, he reiterated that commercial access is available to all. 'India relied on its own capabilities, while adversaries may have sought help from allies—but real-time coordination remains unconfirmed.'
Gen Chauhan pointed out that India's focus on indigenous platforms, like Akash, and self-reliant networking infrastructure has paid off. Integration of diverse radars into a unified air defence system was a key success, he underlined.
Turning to the Indian Ocean Region, particularly the northern Bay of Bengal, where geography and geopolitics constrain India's movement north (due to China) and east (due to Myanmar), he said the sea becomes India's strategic outlet.
'Though continental, India functions like an island nation, with its island territories providing depth. New concerns have emerged, but the view is expanding southward to secure broader maritime interests,' he said.
(Edited by Ajeet Tiwari)
Also Read: What's a National Security Strategy & why CDS Gen Chauhan feels India doesn't need one on paper

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Economists see global growth coming under strain amid uncertainty: WEF
Economists see global growth coming under strain amid uncertainty: WEF

Fibre2Fashion

time13 minutes ago

  • Fibre2Fashion

Economists see global growth coming under strain amid uncertainty: WEF

Uncertainty is the defining theme of the global economic environment, according to the World Economic Forum's (WEF) latest Chief Economists Outlook, which said 82 per cent consider it very high now, while 56 per cent anticipate easing over the next year. Ninety-seven per cent placed trade policy among the areas of highest uncertainty, followed by monetary policy (49 per cent) and fiscal policy (35 per cent). Uncertainty defines the global economic environment, the WEF's latest Chief Economists Outlook noted; 82 per cent see it as very high now. The growth outlook is divided, with weak prospects in North America, APAC resilience and cautious optimism in Europe. The most optimism about a strong economic expansion in South Asia, with India set to be the primary engine of growth this year and the next. Eighty-seven per cent anticipated that businesses will respond to uncertainty by delaying strategic decisions, increasing recession risks. The growth outlook is divided, with weak prospects in North America, resilience in the Asia-Pacific and cautious optimism in Europe. In Europe, while growth remains subdued, respondents pointed to emerging signs of improvement, driven by expansionary fiscal policy and continued monetary easing. The respondents were largely aligned in their assessment that higher tariffs and persistent trade tensions would fuel inflation and suppress trade volumes, and persistent uncertainty would inflict significant economic damage on the global economy, including through paralysed decision-making and heightened risks of policy mis-coordination, the report's executive summary said. Artificial intelligence (AI) is expected to drive growth, but 47 per cent anticipate related net job losses. The economists were the most optimistic about a strong economic expansion in South Asia, with India set to be the primary engine of growth this year and the next. They, however, warned of the overall global growth coming under strain from trade policy shocks and AI disruption. Respondents were clear that overall growth prospects were weakening, with the shift in trajectory being most pronounced in the United States, where the majority of respondents expected weak or very weak growth for the remainder of 2025, alongside rising inflation and a weakening dollar. China is also pursuing fiscal expansion in an effort to bolster growth, but the chief economists were divided on whether it would reach its target of 5-per cent gross domestic product (GDP) growth this year, given a range of both external and domestic economic challenges. A majority of surveyed economists saw the current US economic policy as having a lasting global impact, with 87 per cent expecting it to delay strategic business decisions and heighten recession risks. Although the rerouting of Chinese exports is casting a shadow over the South Asian region's economic prospects, a recently concluded trade deal between India and the United Kingdom was another source of optimism, the report said. Globally, public debt concerns were seen mounting as defence spending rises, with 86 per cent of chief economists expecting increased government borrowing. Seventy-nine per cent of respondents viewed the current geo-economic developments as signs of a significant structural shift for the global economy rather than a temporary disruption. Other key risks included rising concentration of market power (47 per cent) and disruption of existing business models (44 per cent). Fibre2Fashion News Desk (DS)

Op Sindoor should not be used to derive political mileage
Op Sindoor should not be used to derive political mileage

Hans India

time18 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Op Sindoor should not be used to derive political mileage

The political class will do better if it stops desisting from trying to derive electoral mileage from the highly successful Operation Sindoor that was executed recently. The military aspects of the operation have been largely praised (even by objective western experts), but the political aftermath has proven far more complex. The ruling party has come under scrutiny for allegedly using the operation's success to enhance its nationalistic image ostensibly for electoral gains. On its part, the Opposition has done little better. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge called for a special parliamentary session to discuss the operation in detail. He raised concerns about inconsistencies in official narratives, particularly surrounding reports regarding the number of Indian aircraft lost during the strikes. He also accused the government of 'misleading the nation.' His statement came after the Chief of Defence Staff Gen Anil Chauhan acknowledged the loss of some Indian aircraft but emphasised that the armed forces had adapted quickly to changing tactical scenarios, ultimately achieving the mission objectives. Chauhan categorically refuted Pakistan's assertions of shooting down multiple Indian jets, labelling them as propaganda meant to distort facts. His remarks highlighted the critical role of clear and truthful communication in sustaining public trust and countering misinformation. The political discourse triggered by Operation Sindoor reflects a broader tension between safeguarding national security and navigating partisan interests. While it is natural for political parties to discuss significant national developments, it is imperative that such dialogues remain constructive and rooted in the national interest. Exploiting military operations for electoral advantage not only undermines the integrity of the armed forces but also erodes public confidence in the nation's democratic institutions. As India continues to assess the long-term implications of Operation Sindoor, there is a pressing need for political maturity and a unified stance on issues of national security. Recognising and honouring the courage and competence of the armed forces should transcend political divides. National security must remain above the realm of party politics, treated with the seriousness and dignity it deserves. Also, our political leaders must come to terms with a sobering reality: Operation Sindoor, while tactically successful and symbolically significant, was not a war that we won—nor even a full-scale battle. At best, it was a well-executed skirmish, a calibrated military response to the horrifying Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 innocent lives. Its importance lies not in territorial gains or dramatic military victories, but in the message it has sent loud and clear-Pakistan will have to pay a heavy price for supporting and harbouring terrorist outfits. Precision strikes on terrorist camps disrupted their operations and showcased India's strategic capabilities. However, this operation must not be mistaken for closure. The war on terror is a long and evolving struggle, requiring constant vigilance, strategic foresight, and, above all, national unity. True victory will come not with a single strike, but through sustained efforts to dismantle the networks of extremism to be assured of lasting peace and security. Operation Sindoor stands as a testament to India's strategic capability and resolve in the face of terrorism. However, its legacy will be defined not just by military precision but by the manner the nation's political leadership chooses to engage with it. By fostering transparency, encouraging responsible dialogue, and prioritising unity, India can ensure that such operations serve their true purpose—protection and security of all its citizens.

'Kept pleading for help': BJP's Nishikant Dubey cites declassified files to slam Nehru's foreign policy
'Kept pleading for help': BJP's Nishikant Dubey cites declassified files to slam Nehru's foreign policy

Time of India

time26 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'Kept pleading for help': BJP's Nishikant Dubey cites declassified files to slam Nehru's foreign policy

BJP MP Nishikant Dubey NEW DELHI: BJP MP Nishikant Dubey on Monday launched a sharp attack on the Congress, targeting former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru over his handling of the 1962 Indo-China war. Referring to Nehru's appeals during the conflict, Dubey said, 'Nehru kept pleading for help.' The remark came in response to the Congress party 's criticism of external affairs minister S Jaishankar for 'informing' Pakistan about Operation Sindoor . In retaliation, Dubey took to X to highlight what he called the flawed foreign policy of previous Congress governments, especially under Nehru. Dubey posted a letter written by Nehru to then US President John F Kennedy, calling it 'the second letter written by Iron Lady's father Nehru ji to the American President during the China war. He kept pleading for help.' Sarcastically attacking Nehru's diplomatic approach, Dubey added, 'Pakistan is a brother, a friend, a good neighbour, we will reach an agreement with them, everything was written. But carefully read the excellent foreign policy of the great Nehru ji.' According to Dubey, the US passed Nehru's letter to then Pakistani military ruler Ayub Khan . 'America sent this letter to Pakistan's military ruler Ayub Khan. After seeing this letter, did we give Pakistan a chance to attack India in 1965 or not? What can be said about the person who tells the country's weaknesses to foreigners, especially Pakistan?' Earlier in the day, Dubey also responded to Congress leader Pawan Khera's post on X by digging further into history. He referenced another letter, Nehru's 1945 communication to British Prime Minister Clement Attlee regarding Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store