Let district courts hear civil cases involving disputes up to Rs 20 crore: Bar Association to Meghwal
The body has urged for an 'enhancement of pecuniary jurisdiction of district courts of Delhi from Rs 2 crore to Rs 20 crore' in relation to hearing civil suits. Currently, the jurisdiction of civil suits involving disputes of more than Rs 2 crore is vested with the Delhi High Court.
'…Delhi has got only 11 district courts located in six complexes having civil jurisdiction, and the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi has only very few courts (Presently 4) vested with original civil jurisdiction. It is further noteworthy that the Honourable High Court of Delhi has very limited capacity,' read the letter to Meghwal.
'With every passing day,' the letter further pointed out, 'the inflation and other contributory factors result in an increase in the valuation of every transaction, which finally gives rise to an increasing number of cases going to the High Court of Delhi, and the cases in district courts keep decreasing'. 'On the other hand, the capacity of district courts keep increasing from time to time whereas the capacity High Court of Delhi is almost stagnant for many decades,' it read.
'…We, the coordination committee of All District Courts Bar Associations of Delhi take the privilege to draw your kind attention about the urgency for enhancement of pecuniary limits of all District Courts in Delhi from existing Rs 2 crore, which is very minuscule considering the cost of living or volume of business in Delhi to Rs 20 crore at least,' the letter urged, adding the rate of disposal in Delhi's district courts was higher than the disposal in the High Court.
Earlier, this monetary limit for district courts was Rs 20 lakh and was enhanced to Rs 2 crore in October 2015 after the Delhi High Court Act, 1966, was amended by the Parliament.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Landmark Group to invest Rs 400 cr for construction of Gurugram housing project
Realty firm Landmark Group will invest Rs 400 crore in the construction of its new housing project in Gurugram. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Realty firm Landmark Group will invest Rs 400 crore in the construction of its new housing project in company is developing 240 apartments in its new residential project, spread over 4 acre of land parcel, at Sector 103 (Dwarka Expressway) in Gurugram."We will invest Rs 400 crore on construction of our new project ' Landmark SKYVUE '," Landmark Group Chairman Sandeep Chillar told reporters said the company has owned this land parcel since 2009, and all approval charges have been paid to the said the company would fund the construction cost with the help of internal accruals, bank loans and advances from customers against Group will sell apartments in a price range of Rs 5-7 crore per unit. The launch price is Rs 17,500 per sq chairman further said the demand continues to be strong in the Gurugram market, helped by infrastructure projects, including the opening up of Dwarka company has so far delivered 15 housing and five commercial projects, mostly in Delhi-NCR.
India Today
20 minutes ago
- India Today
Why Modi govt drew the line with online gaming bill
On August 19, when the Union cabinet cleared the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025, the sense of urgency was unmistakable. Within 24 hours, the draft was tabled in Parliament, underscoring how swiftly the Narendra Modi government wanted to push through one of the most ambitious regulatory overhauls in India's digital the language of consumer protection and youth welfare lies a story of political calculation, social pressure and economic disruption that could reverberate across industries far removed from consider this to be step down from Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Independence Day announcement last year, wherein he aspired for India to become the leader in the global gaming market. Modi had then said that India must leverage its rich ancient legacy and literature to come up with Made in India gaming products. He added that Indian professionals must lead the global gaming market, not just in playing but also in producing the red line has been drawn to keep real-money games out of the ambit, argue those in the government. For months, the government had been under pressure to respond to a surge of distress stories linked to real-money gaming. Parents complained of teenagers running up debts on borrowed digital wallets; young professionals saw their salaries wiped out in a few nights of high-stakes play; and across small towns, reports of suicides tied to online gambling losses began to appear with disturbing regularity. The public perception that gaming platforms were becoming a social menace—akin to alcohol or narcotics in their addictive pull—was gaining ground. State governments, particularly in the South, had tried to legislate bans, only to have them struck down by courts. The Centre's reluctance to intervene had begun to look like vacuum was filled by the Sangh Parivar's affiliates, who brought ideological pressure to bear on the government. The Swadeshi Jagran Manch (SJM), in particular, made online gaming a moral economy issue, portraying it as a threat to household savings and traditional argument resonated within the BJP ecosystem: speculative play was not creating productive capital but draining families, and worse, it was ensnaring India's youth. In closed-door consultations, Sangh functionaries invoked parallels with colonial-era opium and liquor trades, which they said had weakened communities from within. By the time the Cabinet note circulated, the push from the ideological right had become impossible to bill itself is sweeping. It bans real-money games outright and criminalises their endorsement by celebrities, athletes and social media influencers. It arms regulators with extraordinary powers, including warrantless search and seizure, allowing officials to enter premises, seize servers and freeze accounts without prior judicial oversight. Penalties run into crores, with provisions for jail time for repeat offenders. For a sector that had operated in regulatory grey zones for years, the shift is nothing short of impact on India's celebrity economy is immediate. Over the past three years, endorsements for gaming platforms had become a major source of income for cricketers, Bollywood stars and digital influencers. That revenue stream vanishes overnight, leaving talent agencies scrambling. For venture-backed firms, many with global capital riding on India as one of the largest growth markets, the bill is potentially built around fantasy sports, poker, rummy and other real-money formats face outright extinction. Investors had poured billions into the sector, confident that India's courts would protect skill-based gaming from outright bans. That bet has now in one of those paradoxes that define India's markets, several listed tech and gaming-related stocks rallied after the Cabinet decision. Investors seemed to calculate that the elimination of grey-zone competition would consolidate opportunity in segments the government deems permissible—casual, skill-based or educational gaming. Some even speculated that global studios, wary of the unpredictability, would step back, leaving domestic firms to dominate what remains of the field. In that sense, capital was already reorienting to profit from the regulation even as hundreds of start-ups faced an existential the Modi government, the calculus is clear: the political dividend outweighs the economic cost. Positioning itself as a guardian of family welfare against predatory industries has appeal across caste, class and geography. In semi-urban and rural constituencies, stories of young men pawning jewellery or defaulting on loans after online gaming binges have spread the southern states, where courts had overturned state-level bans, the Centre's decisive intervention allows the BJP to claim ownership of a cause that regional parties had fumbled. By centralising regulation, the government not only resolves a messy federal dispute but also asserts Delhi's primacy over a digital sector once seen as beyond traditional symbolism goes further. Around the world, governments are moving against online gaming excesses. China has imposed strict limits on youth play, Europe is tightening gambling-related regulations, and the US has seen state-level crackdowns. India's permissive stance had begun to look tabling the bill, the government aligned itself with this global wave, signalling that its digital economy is not a laissez-faire frontier but one subject to moral and political oversight. As one economist who has tracked the sector for years put it, 'This is a blunt instrument, but perhaps a necessary one. When markets fail to self-regulate and the social costs pile up, the state asserts itself.'advertisementStill, the long-term consequences remain uncertain. India's digital economy has thrived on global investor confidence, and sudden, sweeping prohibitions risk undermining that perception of predictability. Venture capital funds have already begun reassessing their appetite for Indian start-ups, worried that other high-growth sectors could face similar crackdowns. Even firms in permissible categories will find themselves grappling with compliance costs and the chilling effect of regulators armed with warrantless powers. For entrepreneurs, the bill is a reminder that in India's political economy, social stability can trump for the ruling BJP, the political upside is too attractive to ignore. The legislation dovetails neatly with the party's broader narrative of moral guardianship: protecting the young, safeguarding families and curbing what it portrays as corrosive modern temptations. In campaign rallies, expect to hear references to the bill as proof that the Modi government will not allow 'digital addiction' to destroy households. The fact that it was tabled in Parliament so swiftly after Cabinet approval underscores its role as a political project, not just a regulatory the clash between capital and culture, the government has chosen culture. In the tug of war between states and courts, it has reasserted central authority. In the balance between innovation and morality, it has sided firmly with morality. Whether the online gaming bill becomes a model for future digital regulation or a cautionary tale of overreach will depend on its implementation. For now, what it represents is unmistakable: the assertion of the state's right to police not just the economy but the moral fabric of Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill is, therefore, more than a piece of legislation. It is a statement of intent from a government that thrives on decisive gestures. The message to investors is blunt: profits cannot come at the cost of social order. The message to voters is sharper still: the state will intervene, aggressively if necessary, to protect families from what it sees as corrosive forces. In a season of high political stakes, the bill has become both policy and politics, an emblem of how the Modi government views the trade-offs between growth, morality and to India Today Magazine- Ends
New Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Uttarakhand Monsoon Session adjourned after overnight opposition sit-in as government rushes through nine bills
DEHRADUN: The Uttarakhand Assembly's Monsoon Session, which began on Tuesday in Bhararisain, the state's summer capital, was abruptly adjourned indefinitely on Wednesday, just two days into its scheduled five-day run. Lasting only two hours and forty minutes over both days, the brief session was marked by vociferous protests from the opposition Congress, while the ruling party swiftly pushed through nine key bills and a supplementary budget. From the outset, the opposition demanded a discussion on the state's disaster management and law and order under Rule 310. Their protests escalated within the Assembly hall, with members tearing papers, shaking microphones, and raising slogans against what they described as a 'dictatorial government' and 'vote theft.' Failing to secure a debate, Congress MLAs, led by Leader of Opposition Yashpal Arya and Pritam Singh, staged an unprecedented overnight sit-in inside the Assembly building. Chief Minister Pushkar Singh Dhami's efforts to pacify them reportedly proved futile. The second day mirrored the first in its tumultuous nature. Despite the uproar, the government managed to pass nine bills and a supplementary budget of Rs 5,315.89 crore. Among the significant legislations approved were the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) Amendment Bill, the amended Conversion Law, and the Uttarakhand Minority Bill, paving the way for major state-level changes. The UCC (Amendment) Bill, passed by voice vote, introduces stricter provisions for live-in relationships, including increased penalties for misuse or violations. The amended Conversion Law has been made more stringent, now providing for a life sentence for those found guilty of forced or fraudulent conversions. Furthermore, the Uttarakhand Minority Bill seeks to establish an authority for all minority communities in the state, while also facilitating formal recognition for madrasas, with the aim of strengthening their operations and educational framework.
