
Possible name change on the cards for one of SA's oldest towns
The African Transformation Movement (ATM) has called on Sport, Arts and Culture Minister Gayton McKenzie to begin processes to change the name of Harrismith in the Free State due to its cultural sensitivities.
According to BusinessTech , the ATM requested this of McKenzie in a recent parliamentary Q&A, revealing that towns named after historical figures who caused harm to the local indigenous population should be changed.
MP for the Movement, Vuyolwethu Zungula, revealed that the name 'Harrismith' was an unpleasant reminder to the AmaXhosa Kingdom in particular, as it was their King, Hintsa kaKhawuta, who was captured and killed in 1835 by Governor Harry Smith, whom the town was named after.
Harrismith itself has faced similar calls for name changes before, with proposals put forth as early as 2005, with Intabazwe being the preferred name choice.
Another proposal was put forward in 2014/15, but did not find support from local communities, who petitioned to keep the name the same.
Founded in 1849, Harrismith was named after British Governor Sir Harry Smith. The incredibly old South African town played a role during the Anglo-Boer War and still has some heritage buildings that reflect its colonial past.
Minister McKenzie, in response to Zungula's proposal, said that it was not the Department of Sport, Arts and Culture's responsibility to initiate name changes in the country.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
South Africa signs R26bn loan agreement from World Bank to boost economic reforms
South Africa faces a deepening jobs and growth crisis, with unemployment more than 31% and average GDP growth below 1% over the past decade. Structural barriers—including weak governance, limited competition, and skills shortages—have slowed progress. Image: Henk Kruger/Independent Newspapers The National Treasury on Monday said the government has signed a $1.5 billion (R26bn) Development Policy Loan (DPL) from the World Bank. DPLs are robust, flexible and quick-disbursing financing instruments that help countries achieve development results by supporting a program of policy and institutional reforms provided through general budget financing. This agreement reinforces the robust and constructive collaboration between the World Bank and the South African government, paving the way for transformative changes aimed at elevating the country's economic landscape. This strategic partnership aims to bolster structural reforms that enhance the efficiency, resilience, and sustainability of the nation's infrastructure services, particularly in the crucial sectors of energy and freight transport. This multi-faceted loan marks a significant intervention in the face of persistent economic concerns, including low growth and alarmingly high unemployment rates. South Africa faces a deepening jobs and growth crisis, with unemployment more than 31% and average GDP growth below 1% over the past decade. Structural barriers—including weak governance, limited competition, and skills shortages—have slowed progress. Infrastructure services have declined: in 2023, power outages cut GDP by 2% and cost 500,000 jobs, while rail and port inefficiencies reduced exports by around 20%. Analysts believe that this infusion of capital could act as a catalyst for dismantling existing infrastructure bottlenecks – a critical step towards enabling inclusive economic growth and fostering job creation across various sectors. The agreement is constructed around three primary pillars of reform: Improving energy security: Ensuring a reliable and stable energy supply is pivotal for economic development. Ensuring a reliable and stable energy supply is pivotal for economic development. Enhancing freight transport efficiency: Revamping transport services will streamline logistics and trade, promoting economic vibrancy. Revamping transport services will streamline logistics and trade, promoting economic vibrancy. Supporting a low carbon transition: Aligning with global sustainability goals, this focus is set to strengthen South Africa's commitment to an environmentally friendly economy. The financing terms of the loan are carefully aligned with the National Treasury's broader financing strategy, which is instrumental for maintaining the government's financial stability.


The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
‘We are not xenophobic': No justification to favour foreign academics over South Africans, says ANC MP
The Department of Higher Education's claim that it can't act against institutions has been criticised. Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training, Tebogo Letsie, at the Good Hope Chamber in Cape Town on 23 June 2025. Picture: X / @ParliamentofRSA ANC MP Tebogo Letsie, chairperson of parliament's portfolio committee on Higher Education, says there is no justification for universities to favour hiring foreign academics over equally qualified South Africans. His remarks followed a recent controversy involving the Central University of Technology (CUT) in the Free State. The university faced backlash after appointing a foreign internal employee as dean over a black South African woman who reportedly holds a doctorate. A video of Patriotic Alliance (PA) MP Ashley Sauls questioning CUT vice-chancellor Pamela Zibuyile Dube in parliament about the matter circulated widely on social media in April. Watch the video below: Parliament on recruitment of foreign academics Speaking during a media briefing on Monday, Letsie highlighted that the Employment Services Act required employers to ensure no suitable South African candidates are available before hiring foreign nationals. 'We place it on record that we are not xenophobic because there are others who are going to say we are xenophobic for saying our laws must be adhered to,' he said. He further emphasised that hiring foreign nationals should not undermine job opportunities for equally qualified South African citizens, as outlined in the Policy Framework for the Internationalisation of Higher Education in South Africa. 'So the excuse by the Department of Higher Education that there is nothing they can do when institutions hire beyond the 10% foreign, international talent [threshold] … is just a fallacy.' ALSO READ: Almost 90% of foreign government employees in health and education sectors, says DPSA Letsie also highlighted that the framework affirms it is in South Africa's best interest to appoint the most suitable candidates to academic positions at tertiary institutions, including qualified foreign nationals. 'We do need our international brothers and sisters, but it must not be a detriment to South Africans.' He further stated that, according to the policy, tertiary institutions in the country have no valid grounds to favour foreign nationals. 'There can be no justification for any South African institution prioritising and preferring foreign nationals to South Africans who qualify equally for the same post.' Referring to CUT, Letsie said: 'There was an equally—if not more—qualified South African lady… was not given the job, and the excuse that we got from the leadership of the institution was that they prioritised an internal person.' He argued that such reasoning should not be seen as a legitimate advantage. Watch the media briefing below: Higher Education department criticised Letsie further said the committee was concerned about the attitude of departmental officials and their failure to take accountability regarding the 'illegal' employment of foreign nationals. 'We can't have a department that is soft and fails to hold the universities accountable.' He added that if officials were unsure how to address the matter, perhaps it was time to 'gracefully resign'. READ MORE: Mashaba slams tertiary institutions for hiring foreign academics The Department of Higher Education, according to Letsie, informed the committee during a meeting on 18 June that it would be engaging with university councils on the issue. 'While the committee fully supports attracting and retaining international talent, it does not support those done outside of the national legislation and policies.' Seta board appointments Letsie also revealed that the committee plans to recall Higher Education Minister Nobuhle Nkabane to answer questions regarding the appointment of Sector Education and Training Authority (Seta) boards. Nkabane had faced criticism for refusing to disclose the identities of the independent panel members who recommended chairpersons for the Seta boards. The controversy emerged after it was revealed that several appointees had ties to the ANC, including Minerals Minister Gwede Mantashe's son Buyambo Mantashe, former KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) Premier Nomusa Dube-Ncube, and former ANC KZN deputy chairperson Mike Mabuyakhulu. Though the appointments were subsequently withdrawn, Nkabane came under fire in parliament for withholding the panel members' names. Under increasing pressure from MPs and President Cyril Ramaphosa, she finally released the list on 17 June, which included her advisors and departmental officials. READ MORE: 'Gum-chewing' minister goes viral, prompting conduct warning for South African MPs However, Advocate Terry Motau, cited as the panel's chairperson, denied involvement in the process. Letsie remarked that Motau's denial 'raised more questions' about the integrity of the appointment process. He said the committee has requested documentation from all panel members, including their correspondence with the minister, letters of acceptance, remuneration details, meeting minutes, and the final report that recommended the appointments. Letsie confirmed that Nkabane and the panel members have been invited to appear before the committee. 'We don't have a date yet because parliament is seized with a process of adopting the budget,' he said. 'We had identified a date which was this Friday, but because of the work of parliament, we could not get that particular date approved.'


The Citizen
4 hours ago
- The Citizen
Navigating economic headwinds of grey list and US tariffs
While South Africa might finally see the end of being on the grey list, the country still faces the US tariffs that could be 30% again. While the world watches various wars and conflicts play out that can affect economies worldwide, including our own, South Africa must also complete its work to get off the grey list and plan and negotiate to manage the US tariffs scheduled to kick in on 9 July. Busisiwe Mavuso, CEO of Business Leadership South Africa (BLSA), says in her weekly newsletter that South Africa's completion of all the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) requirements is a significant achievement for the country's economy. 'I congratulate National Treasury for orchestrating a complex, multi-agency effort that fundamentally strengthened our anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing frameworks. 'The final hurdle, to demonstrate sustained improvements in investigation and prosecution capabilities, required rebuilding capacity across our entire criminal justice system, from police units to the National Prosecuting Authority. 'We now have a clear trajectory toward exiting the FATF grey list in October, pending the required on-the-ground peer review.' ALSO READ: South Africa well on its way to get off FATF grey list Grey list costs the economy but can soon be over Mavuso says this progress cannot come soon enough, as grey listing imposed crushing costs on South Africa's economy due to the fact that international financial institutions must apply enhanced due diligence to every South African transaction, a burden many simply avoid by severing relationships with our companies entirely. 'BLSA sounded the alarm about impending grey listing six months before it happened, commissioning a report that analysed the potential economic costs. Throughout this process, business stood ready to support government in meeting FATF requirements, and there have been various joint projects to do so. 'The improvements achieved since February 2023 extend far beyond FATF compliance. We now have comprehensive beneficial ownership registers for companies and trusts, while investigators can finally use the Financial Intelligence Centre's vast data reserves to build prosecutable cases. 'Our law enforcement agencies have also been integrated into global networks combating transnational crime. Let's be clear: Grey listing was state capture's direct legacy. The systematic gutting of our criminal justice system, from crime intelligence to the NPA, created a paradise for white-collar criminals. 'Skilled investigators were purged, replaced by political appointees whose job was protection, not prosecution. The probability of facing consequences for economic crimes became negligible.' ALSO READ: Financial Intelligence Centre: Lawyers and estate agents keeping SA on grey list Treasury reversed institutional decay to get SA off grey list Mavuso points out that the National Treasury's remediation process started to reverse this institutional decay, with important economic implications. 'As I consistently argued, the collapse of the rule of law devastates economic growth. Contracts become unenforceable. Businesses shoulder massive fraud and corruption costs. Criminal syndicates flourish, spawning extortion networks that strangle legitimate enterprise.' Although critical steps remain before October's official exit, Mauvo says prospects are now excellent. 'Removing this economic headwind will provide crucial momentum for growth. Given the challenges we face, we need every advantage we can get.' ALSO READ: Tariffs and Agoa: How Parks Tau summarised US-SA trade talks US tariffs of 30% looming on 9 July However, she says, with this good news, there are also other challenges waiting for the South African economy, and in particular, the significant headwind from Washington that demands urgent attention. 'The current 10% US tariff on South African goods expires on 9 July, reverting to a punitive 30% unless we can secure an extension.' Trade, industry, and competition minister Parks Tau will meet with US officials this week at the US-Africa Summit in Angola, a meeting that could determine our economic trajectory. However, Mavuso says progress has been disappointing since President Trump and President Ramaphosa's Washington discussions, during which South Africa tabled proposals, including mineral access and potential US liquified natural gas acquisitions. 'The US did not give formal feedback, and the clock is ticking. The minister and his team must break the logjam. The broader geopolitical context makes this moment even more critical. China's recent announcement of duty-free access for all African nations with diplomatic ties will not have gone unnoticed in Washington. 'We may be witnessing a fundamental shift in Africa's global orientation, one that could permanently damage American interests on the continent.' ALSO READ: Trump tariffs' seesaw impact on Southern Africa SA cannot afford to lose employment-intensive industries due to US tariffs She says this matters profoundly for two reasons. 'Africa remains a crucial source of critical minerals essential to the American economy, while our continent's young, growing population positions Africa as a key long-term consumer market and manufacturing hub. America risks ceding this strategic advantage to China.' Mavuso believes that South Africa must present a materially different proposition that clearly serves American interests as well as our own. 'In this transactional environment, incremental gestures will not suffice. Business has a vital role here. 'Our daily interactions with American customers and suppliers provide direct insight into genuine opportunities and risks. This intelligence must inform our negotiating strategy. The consequences of failure fall hardest on manufacturing and agriculture, sectors that drive employment. 'Raw material exports remain exempt, but value-added activities that create jobs face significant disruption under 30% tariffs. We cannot afford to lose these employment-intensive industries.' She emphasises that this week's meetings will be defining. 'We need a deal that recognises economic realities while serving mutual interests. The stakes are high.'