Details emerge of Scottish arm of new Jeremy Corbyn party
The day after Corbyn's announcement, suspended Labour MP Zarah Sultana announced she had quit to join the new party, which she said she would co-lead with Corbyn.
Rumours quickly flew around whether or not there would be a Scottish branch of the new party when it is eventually set up.
A source told The National that a small group of left-leaning Scots have been working behind the scenes to prepare the Scottish arm ahead of the Holyrood election. However, with the party not yet fully-fledged, how many, if any, candidates it will stand is still up in the air.
Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana (Image: Stefan Rousseau/PA)On Saturday, a group called Collective Scotland published a statement confirming it had indeed been working towards a new party.
Collective is a movement which is working to build towards and begin a mass-membership party of the left. It is behind the new party referenced by Sultana, but is not a new party in its own right.
The statement by the Collective Scotland, the group's Scottish branch, was shared by several figures on social media, such as pro-independence outlet Bella Caledonia, Govanhill writer and poet Jim Monaghan, and the Scottish Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition.
In it, the group indicated it was looking to build "a full-fledged electoral alliance of the Scottish left" for next year's election.
READ MORE: Devolved relations reset with Labour has 'failed', says SNP official
While the statement did not mention Corbyn or Sultana directly, it said that "as the left across Britain comes together to form a new political party, the Scottish left now has a similar opportunity to unite".
It added: "With the SNP stagnant after 18 years of government, with the Labour party a hollow shell of itself, and the looming threat of Reform and the far-right, the time is ripe for a new progressive, left-wing consensus to form in Scotland.
"Collective Scotland is already engaged in discussions towards a conference of progressives and socialists to take place on October 4th in Glasgow. We invite all those groups and parties not already engaged in this project to join us.
"At that conference, we will look to build a full-fledged electoral alliance of the Scottish left to run in the 2026 Scottish Parliament elections, and build towards longer-term campaigns in our local communities for the 2027 Scottish local elections.
"In partnership with our left allies, we will seek to present a programme which takes away greed and personal enrichment from Scotland's political structures, and gives renewal to our local public services and democracy."
The statement continued: "A trend that must be broken in our political traditions is to assume that all politics happens at just Holyrood or one's local council chamber. We want to be more than just an electoral alliance for Scotland's left; we want to be the link to a wider progressive social movement.
"We look forward now, as an autonomous party of Scotland's progressives and socialists, to the coalition and partnerships we must build for all of Scotland's left to succeed, not just as a set of parties, but as a wider movement."
The focus of Collective has primarily been in the UK Parliament, as this is where the elected representatives that would form a party are based.
However, The National understands that the Collective Scotland branch and other left groups have been working since the end of 2024 towards some form of alliance or coalition for next year's Holyrood election.
READ MORE: Cabinet minister refuses to confirm if two-child cap will be scrapped
A source close to the organisation told The National: "In Scotland, we have been working as a small group of people in Collective since the end of last year, meeting with other left groups in Scotland who already have initiatives going about how to work together.
"There's only a very small group of people, all we're really doing is preparing the way for a new party to happen. In the end, it'll be up to the members to decide how to proceed from there."
The National understands that the group is not clear on whether it will be standing candidates under a new party at next year's Holyrood election.
While the group may stand candidates in a few constituencies, it may also decide to back another coalition or alliance.
On independence, the source stressed that the party's policy would be determined by its members, and could be changed or altered.
But they said: "We, at least in Collective Scotland, support the idea of self-determination and support the power to call and hold a referendum."
They added that they believed this power "should lie with the Scottish Parliament, not the UK Parliament."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
8 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour opens door to wealth tax
Downing Street has opened the door to introducing a new wealth tax following pressure from Labour's union paymasters. No 10 repeatedly refused to rule out a new levy on wealthy taxpayers after Lord Kinnock, the former Labour leader, said the party was 'willing to explore' it. In a briefing with journalists on Monday, the Prime Minister's spokesman initially appeared to suggest a wealth tax was off the table, pointing back to past comments from the Chancellor ruling it out. However, he failed to explicitly repeat that commitment, instead saying repeatedly that Sir Keir Starmer stood by his position that 'those with the broadest shoulders carry the greatest burden'. It will raise suspicions that Rachel Reeves is considering a new raid on the rich to plug the hole in Britain's finances left by the Government's dramatic reversal on welfare cuts. The Prime Minister is facing mounting pressure to consider the move. On Sunday, some of Labour's biggest union paymasters, including Angela Rayner's former employer Unison, backed calls for a wealth tax. One union source told The Telegraph they would raise the idea with the Prime Minister and lobby Labour MPs. Asked on Monday if Sir Keir would back a wealth tax, his spokesman said: 'We have repeatedly said that those with the broadest shoulders carry the greatest burden, and the choices we've made reflect that… But as you know, I'm not going to write the next Budget for you right now.' He went on to point out that 'the Chancellor has said in the past that we're not going to be bringing in a wealth tax', but repeatedly failed to repeat that commitment. Asked if those words reflected the Government's current position, the spokesman said: 'The existing position is what I've just said a couple of times, which is that we have repeatedly said, as the Prime Minister has said, that those with the broadest shoulders carry the greatest burden, and the choices we've made reflect that.' He added: 'The Government is committed to making sure the wealthiest in society pay their fair share of tax. And that's why the Chancellor announced a series of reforms in the last Budget to help fix the public finances in as fair a way as possible.' In an interview with The Telegraph earlier this year, Ms Reeves said there would be no increases to wealth taxes in her Autumn Budget. 'We're not interested in a wealth tax,' she said. 'Our priority is to grow the economy and that's the way that you make working people better off and secure better public finances. 'But there was lots of speculation ahead of the Spring Statement, including in your paper, about all the taxes I was going to raise. What taxes did I raise in the Spring Statement? None.' Asked on Monday if the position had now changed, the spokesman said: 'The position is as it's always been, and as I say, the Government is committed to making sure the wealthiest in our society pay their fair share of tax, but I'm just not going to write future Budgets here, as is our long-standing position.' Economists have warned that a new wealth tax would trigger a fresh exodus of the rich from Britain. However, the Prime Minister's spokesman insisted that finance leaders still see the UK as the 'best place in the world to invest in'. It comes after Cabinet ministers were warned taxes would have to rise following Sir Keir's capitulation on benefits. The gutting of the welfare cuts package last week has required the Treasury to find an extra £4.6 billion a year but has emboldened hard-Left Labour backbenchers to push for more policy changes. Speaking on Sky News on Sunday, Lord Kinnock, who led the Labour Party between 1983 and 1992, said of Sir Keir's Government: 'The appearance has been given that they are bogged down by their own imposed limitations. 'There are ways around that, ways out of it, pathways that I think people are willing to explore and actually would commend themselves to the great majority of the general public. 'They include, for instance, asset taxes in a period in which for the last 20-odd years in the United Kingdom, like quite a lot of other Western economies, earned incomes have stagnated in real terms while asset values have zoomed. They've just gone through the roof and they've been barely touched. 'Now, you wouldn't have to touch assets of under £6 million or £7 million, so people's houses would be secure. But even by going for an imposition of 2 per cent on asset values above £10 million, say, which is a very big fortune, the Government would be in a position to collect £10 billion or £11 billion a year.' Five trade unions have told The Telegraph that they will pressure the Prime Minister to pursue wealth taxes, while Labour rebels threw their weight behind the demands.
South Wales Guardian
33 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Reform councillors were ‘shocked' that they won their seats, says Farage
At the local elections on May 1, Reform won 57 of the 81 seats on offer at Kent County Council (KCC), which led to many 'shocked' new councillors. Since then, KCC opposition leader Antony Hook says 'most committees have not met once', adding that no 'key' decisions have been taken. On Monday, Mr Farage arrived at Kent County Council and was met by KCC leader Linden Kemkaran for an update on the authority's work. After the meeting, he told the PA news agency: 'I'm very proud of the election result, the stunning number of seats that we won – way more than we thought – and so there were an awful lot of shocked new councillors walking in here a few weeks ago. 'We've established a cabinet, we've got a full council meeting on Thursday at which our first big savings will be announced. 'This whole, 'oh, you're very slow at getting going' = we're not a continuum, we're not here to do exactly what was done before. We're a rethink on the way local government in Kent works, we're getting bedded in, we're making progress.' On Kent County Council's website, its meetings calendar shows that almost 50% of the meetings in June and July were cancelled. Ms Kemkaran pointed out that these were meetings set up by the previous administration and there was 'no way' the new Reform councillors could have stuck to the schedule. She said: 'Those meetings were set for May and June, clearly, 57 new councillors, to get appointed to cabinet, to deputy cabinet, to get to grips with their portfolio. 'Clearly there was no way on God's earth, with the greatest will in the world, we were going to be able to get all the cabinets and the committee places sorted out.' She added that it would 'take time' for councillors to 'work out how to do their jobs' in the new administration. The leader of KCC's opposition, Mr Hook, said: 'The election was on May 1 – we are two months in, and most committees have not met once. 'No key decisions have been taken. Real people are suffering while Reform councillors dither, delay and do anything except the job they were elected to do. 'The problems are urgent and Liberal Democrats demand action to improve services people depend on.' During his visit, Mr Farage also criticised the UK Government plan to restructure local government and told his party councillors to 'fight tooth and nail' against the plans. 'If people out there in the street knew what was being proposed they would be against it, so we will launch a campaign on this, an education campaign,' said Mr Farage. He added: 'If the county feel as strongly as I do, well, we may well take that to a referendum.' Kent and Medway were not selected to be to be a part of the Government's Devolution Priority Programme, which would include a mayor. However, there are moves towards turning their two-tier systems of district and county council into divided unitary authorities, which KCC's Reform council leader called 'a bit communistic'. Ms Kemkaran told PA: 'I worry that local government reorganisation, carving us up into unitary authorities, it's a bit… it just strikes me as a little bit communistic. 'You know, you're taking the power away from people to elect their district councillors, their county councillors, their town councillors, and you're basically passing it up the chain.' The Government has argued that unitary local government can enhance accountability by making it easier for residents to understand who is responsible for public services and local decisions.
Western Telegraph
an hour ago
- Western Telegraph
Reform councillors were ‘shocked' that they won their seats, says Farage
At the local elections on May 1, Reform won 57 of the 81 seats on offer at Kent County Council (KCC), which led to many 'shocked' new councillors. Since then, KCC opposition leader Antony Hook says 'most committees have not met once', adding that no 'key' decisions have been taken. Reform enjoyed great success in the council elections (Gareth Fuller/PA) On Monday, Mr Farage arrived at Kent County Council and was met by KCC leader Linden Kemkaran for an update on the authority's work. After the meeting, he told the PA news agency: 'I'm very proud of the election result, the stunning number of seats that we won – way more than we thought – and so there were an awful lot of shocked new councillors walking in here a few weeks ago. 'We've established a cabinet, we've got a full council meeting on Thursday at which our first big savings will be announced. Mr Farage acknowledged a 'slow start' (Gareth Fuller/PA) 'This whole, 'oh, you're very slow at getting going' = we're not a continuum, we're not here to do exactly what was done before. We're a rethink on the way local government in Kent works, we're getting bedded in, we're making progress.' On Kent County Council's website, its meetings calendar shows that almost 50% of the meetings in June and July were cancelled. Ms Kemkaran pointed out that these were meetings set up by the previous administration and there was 'no way' the new Reform councillors could have stuck to the schedule. She said: 'Those meetings were set for May and June, clearly, 57 new councillors, to get appointed to cabinet, to deputy cabinet, to get to grips with their portfolio. 'Clearly there was no way on God's earth, with the greatest will in the world, we were going to be able to get all the cabinets and the committee places sorted out.' Make Britain Great Again hats were on show at the authority HQ (Gareth Fuller/PA) She added that it would 'take time' for councillors to 'work out how to do their jobs' in the new administration. The leader of KCC's opposition, Mr Hook, said: 'The election was on May 1 – we are two months in, and most committees have not met once. 'No key decisions have been taken. Real people are suffering while Reform councillors dither, delay and do anything except the job they were elected to do. 'The problems are urgent and Liberal Democrats demand action to improve services people depend on.' During his visit, Mr Farage also criticised the UK Government plan to restructure local government and told his party councillors to 'fight tooth and nail' against the plans. 'If people out there in the street knew what was being proposed they would be against it, so we will launch a campaign on this, an education campaign,' said Mr Farage. Mr Farage said councillors had been getting to grips with their new portfolios (Gareth Fuller/PA) He added: 'If the county feel as strongly as I do, well, we may well take that to a referendum.' Kent and Medway were not selected to be to be a part of the Government's Devolution Priority Programme, which would include a mayor. However, there are moves towards turning their two-tier systems of district and county council into divided unitary authorities, which KCC's Reform council leader called 'a bit communistic'. Ms Kemkaran told PA: 'I worry that local government reorganisation, carving us up into unitary authorities, it's a bit… it just strikes me as a little bit communistic. 'You know, you're taking the power away from people to elect their district councillors, their county councillors, their town councillors, and you're basically passing it up the chain.' The Government has argued that unitary local government can enhance accountability by making it easier for residents to understand who is responsible for public services and local decisions.
